Skip to main content
Log in

Geotechnical Investigation for Resort Construction Using Resistivity and Granulometric Studies in Pattinamaruthur Coast, Southern India

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to find out the soil strength, depth of hard rock, boundary of Archean and Quaternary stages, and aquifer conditions for resort construction in Pattinamaruthur coast, Southern India. Thus geotechnical studies using the electrical resistivity method and grain size analysis were carried out in marine environs using the CRM-500 equipment and microscope. In the field 20 profiles were covered using the square array configuration and the data were interpreted using the curve matching technique. The contour maps of soil thickness and depth to the basement were prepared using the GIS software package (ArcGIS 9.3). The results indicate that the top layer has a resistivity value ranging from 20 to 100 Ω-m showing clayey, sand and sandy clay with maximum a layer thickness of 1.5 m. It is also able to distinguish the soil and rock boundaries. The electrical resistivity values are obtained that range from 1 to 5 Ω-m for saltwater, 5–50 Ω-m for sandstone and >400 Ω-m for weathered genesis rock in the study area. The grain size analysis has identified the depositional environment such as coastal and inland dunes, and freshwater deposits; and also recommended for wood house foundation in the coastal area for disaster management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Hassanein ZS, Benson CH, Blotz LR (1996) Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. J Geotech Eng 122(5):397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akintorinwa OJ, Adeusi FA (2009) Integration of geophysical and geotechnical investigations for a proposed lecture room complex at the Federal University of Technology, Akure, SW, Nigeria. Ozean J Appl Sci 2(3):241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Arulrajah A, Nikraz HR (2004) Ground improvement techniques for the treatment of high-speed railway embankments. Aust Geomech J 39:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Batayneh AT, Eslam AE, Nasser SA (2010) Use of geoelectrical technique for detecting subsurface fresh and saline water: a case study of the eastern Gulf of Aqaba coastal aquifer Jordan. J Coast Res 266:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai JC, Carter JP (2011) Deformation analysis in soft ground improvement. Geotech Geol Earthq Eng 18:247

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai JC, Miura N, Kirekawa T, Hino T (2010) Settlement prediction for soft ground improved by columns Ground Improvement. Proceedings of Institute of Civil Engineers UK 163(2):109–119

  • Chik Z, Islam SMT (2012) Finding soil particle size through electrical resistivity in soil site investigations. Electron J Geotech Eng 17:1867–1876

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphili, Austin, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  • Fookes PG (1997) Geology for engineers: the geological model prediction and performance. Q J Eng Geol 30(4):293–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster A (2001) Engineering properties of soils and rocks. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 344(2001):416–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman GM (1961) Distinction between dune beach and river sands from textural characteristics. J Sediment Res 1(31):514–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman GM, Sanders JE (1978) Principles of sedimentology. Wiley, New York, p 792

    Google Scholar 

  • Giao PH, Chung SG, Kim DY, Tanaka H (2003) Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits. J Appl Geophys 52(4):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi BH, Nikraz R, Varaksin S (2009) A review on impact oriented ground improvement techniques. Aust Geomech J 44(2):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Heigold P, Gilkeson RH, Cartwright K, Reed PC (1979) Aquifer transmissivity from surficial electrical methods. Groundwater 17(4):338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Imrie AS (1995) Guidelines to establish project consulting boards. International Water Power and Dam Construction, August 1995

  • Hoek E, Marios P (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60(2):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PD, Taylor Smith D, Stanford PN (1978) Resistivity-porosity-particle shape relationships for marine sands. Geophysics 43(6):1250–1268

  • Joshua EO, Oyebanjo OA (2010) Grain-size and heavy mineral analysis of river Osun sediments sandstones. J Geol 70:737–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike K, Matsuda S (2005) Spatial modeling of discontinuous geologic attributes with geotechnical applications. Eng Geol 78:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzana L, Abdallah BM, Mennoubi SF (2009) Seawater intrusion and associated processes: case of the Korba aquifer (Cap-Bon Tunisia). CR Geosci 3411:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles SB, Carlton HL (1999) Applications and issues of GIS as tool for civil engineering modeling. J Comput Civ Eng 133(1999):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwoala HO, Amadi AN (2013) Geotechnical Investigation of Sub-soil and Rock Characteristics in parts of Shiroro- Muya-Chanchaga Area of Niger State Nigeria. Int J Earth Sci Eng 61(8):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwoala HO, Warmate T (2014) Geotechnical evaluation of subsoil for foundation design considerations in Okochiri, Okrika Island, Rivers State, Nigeria. Int J Curr Res Acad Rev 2(4):16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Oghenero AE, Akpokodje EG, Tse AC (2014) Geotechnical properties of subsurface soils in Warri Western Niger Delta Nigeria. J Earth Sci Geotech Eng 4(1):89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke SA, Amadi AN (2008) An assessment of the geotechnical properties of the subsoil of parts of Federal University of Technology, Minna, Gidan Kwano Campus, for foundation design and construction. J Sci Educ Technol 1(2):87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke SA, Okeke OE, Amadi AN, Onoduku US (2009) Geotechnical properties of the sub-soil for designing shallow foundation in some selected parts of Chanchaga area Minnaigeria. J Environ Sci 11:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozdnyakova L, Pozdnyakov A, Zhang R (2001) Application of geophysical methods to evaluate hydrology and soil properties in urban areas. Urban Water 3:205–216

  • Quarto R, Schiavone D (1994) Hydrogeological implications of the resistivity distribution inferred from electrical prospecting data from the Apulian carbonate platform. J Hydrol 1541:219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindran A, Ramanujam N, Sudarsan R (2012) Delineation of saltwater and freshwater interphase in beach groundwater study using 2-D ERI technique in the northern sector of the Gulf of Mannar Coast Tamilnadu. Water J 5:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samouëlian A, Cousin I, Tabbagh A, Bruand A, Richard G (2005) Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res 83(2):173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz BF, Schreiber ME, Yan T (2008) Quantifying field-scale soil moisture using electrical resistivity imaging. J Hydrol 362(3):234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvam S, Manimaran G, Sivasubramanian P, Balasubramanian N, Seshunarayana T (2014) GIS-based evaluation of water quality index of groundwater resources around Tuticorin coastal city South India. Environ Earth Sci 71:2847–2867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard FP (1954) Nomenclature based on sand–silt–clay ratios. J Sed Pet 24:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Stummer P, Hansruedi M, Alan GG (2004) Experimental design: electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics 691:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudha K, Israil M, Mittal S, Rai J (2009) Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. J Appl Geophys 67:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabbagh A, Dabas M, Hesse A, Panissod C (2000) Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation. Geoderma 97(3):393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topolnicki M (2004) In situ soil mixing. In: Moseley MP, Kirsch K (eds) Ground improvement, 2nd edn, chap 9. Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 331–428

  • Urish DW, Reinhard F (1990) Surface electrical resistivity in coastal groundwater exploration. Geoexploration 264:267–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeikov VL, Del Giudice E (2009) Water respiration—the basis of the living state. Water 1:52–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav GS, Abolfazli H (1998) Geoelectrical soundings and their relationship to hydraulic parameters in semiarid regions of Jalore northwestern India. J Appl Geophys 391:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohdy AR (1989) A new method for the automatic interpretation of Schlumberger and Wenner sounding curves. Geophysics 542:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

First author expresses his sincere thanks to Mr. A.P.C.V. Chockalingam, Secretary and Principal, V.O.C. College, Tuticorin. The helps extended by Dr. N. Ramanuajam, Professor and Head, Department of Disaster Management, Pondicherry University, Andaman. The authors are thankful to them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Antony Ravindran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antony Ravindran, A., Mondal, N.C. Geotechnical Investigation for Resort Construction Using Resistivity and Granulometric Studies in Pattinamaruthur Coast, Southern India. Geotech Geol Eng 33, 1335–1350 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9905-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9905-5

Keywords

Navigation