Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geotechnical Investigation for Estimation of Liquefaction Hazard for the Capital City of Gujarat State, Western India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gandhinagar, the capital city of Gujarat state (Western India), is situated in the middle of the moderately active Cambay rift. The region lies under the seismic zone III of the seismic zoning map of India. The city rests on 250–300 m thick flood plain deposits consisting of coarse sand, silt and clay. In this work, liquefaction hazard is assessed using geotechnical investigations. A total of 14 boreholes of 35 to 50 m depth were drilled with sampling at every 1.5 m depth interval (till termination depth) covering entire Gandhinagar city. A standard penetration test (SPT N-value) was conducted at an interval of 3 m depth in every borehole. We used 400 samples for the estimation of index properties of the soil in the study area. The lithological distribution in the city is also mapped based on the soil classification. The liquefaction hazard is estimated by standard methodologies using density, plasticity index, groundwater level, Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), fine content and Standard penetration test (SPT) N value. The site-specific PGA values at the surface are estimated by carrying out ground response analysis. The study shows that the area comprises of alternate layers of argillaceous and arenaceous soil. We found that in general the area has low liquefaction potential but in case of heavy rainfall the chances of liquefaction may increase as the soils are conducive of liquefaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159:165–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02323.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Seismic microzonation of Bangalore, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117:833–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0071-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9253-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus R, Stokoe K (1997) Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity. In: Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity.’’ Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Nat. Ctr. for Earthquake Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York at Buffalo. pp 89–128

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayothiraman R, Raghu Kanth STG, Sreelatha S (2012) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of Guwahati: gateway city to Northeastern India. Nat Hazards 63:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0158-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt N, Pancholi V, Chopra S et al (2018) Rapid seismic hazard assessment of the Sabarmati River basin in Gujarat State, Western India using GIS techniques. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1373-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK (1987) Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics 135:307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90115-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boncio P, Amoroso S, Vessia G et al (2018) Evaluation of liquefaction potential in an intermountain Quaternary lacustrine basin (Fucino basin, central Italy). Bull Earthq Eng 16:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0201-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger R, Idriss I (2004) Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays. Report No UCD/CGM-04/01, Center for Geotechnical Modelling, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of California, Davis

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2014) Center for geotechnical modeling Cpt and Spt based liquefaction triggering procedures Cpt and Spt based liquefaction triggering procedures. Cent Geotech Model 134

  • Cascone E, Castelli F, Grasso S, Maugeri M (1999) Zoning for soil liquefaction at Catania city. In: International conference on earthquake resistant engineering structures. pp 311–320

  • Castelli F, Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Ferraro A (2016) In situ and laboratory tests for site response analysis in the ancient City of Noto (Italy); In: 1st IMEKO TC4 international workshop on metrology for geotechnics, Benevento. pp 85–90

  • Cavallaro A, Capilleri PP, Grasso S (2018) Site characterization by dynamic in situ and laboratory tests for liquefaction potential evaluation during emilia romagna earthquake. Geoscience 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury P, Gahalaut K, Dumka R et al (2018) GPS measurement of land subsidence in Gandhinagar, Gujarat (Western India), due to groundwater depletion. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7966-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung WY, Gao H (1995) Source parameters of the Anjar earthquake of July 21, 1956, India, and its seismotectonic implications for the Kutch rift basin. Tectonophysics 242:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00203-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COI (2011) Census of India. Dist census handbook, Gandhinagar, Gujarat Series-25:196

  • Das S, Ghosh S, Kayal JR (2019) Liquefaction potential of Agartala City in Northeast India using a GIS platform. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:2919–2931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1287-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey AK, Gandhi SR (2008) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of pond ASH. In: Geotechnical Engineering for disaster mitigation and rehabilitation—proceedings of the 2nd international conference GEDMAR08. pp 315–320

  • Dixit J, Dewaikar DM, Jangid RS (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759–2768. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2759-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro A, Grasso S, Massimino MR (2015) Site Response Analysis and Liquefaction Hazard Evaluation in the Catania Harbour (Italy). In: Marchetti S, Monaco P, Da Fonseca AV (Eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on the flat dilatometer, Rome, Italy

  • Fioravante V, Giretti D, Abate G, et al (2013) Earthquake geotechnical engineering aspects of the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake (Italy). In: 7th international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering

  • Grasso S, Maugeri M (2008) The seismic dilatometer marchetti test (SDMT) for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. In: Geotechnical Special Publication

  • Holzer TL, Toprak S, Bennett M (2003) Application of the liquefaction potential index to liquefaction hazard mapping. Eighth US—Japan Work Earthq Resist Des Lifeline Facil Countermeas against Liq Tokyo 161–171

  • Huang F, Wang GS (2006) Comparison of PGA determination methods for liquefaction analysis. In: Joint international conference on computing and decision making in civil and building engineering. pp 2517–2526

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2132 1986: Reaffirmed 1997 (1986) IS: 2132 1986: Reaffirmed 1997 Indian standard methods of test for soils, code of practice for thin walled tube sampling of soils. Indian Stand

  • IS: 2720 (part 5) (1985) Methods of test for soils: Determination of liquid limit and plastic limit. Indian Stand 1–16

  • IS:2720-Part 2 (1973) Indian standard methods of test for soils: Determination of water content. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi, India

  • IS 2131 (1981) IS 2131: 1981 Indian Standard, Method for Standard Penetration Test for Soils. Indian Stand

  • IS 2720–29 (1975) Method of test for soils, determination of dry density of soil In-place by the core cutter method”. Bur Indian Stand

  • IS 2720 (Part 4) (1985) Methods of test for soils: grain size analysis. Bur. Indian Stand.

  • IS 2720 Part 3 (1980) Methods of Test for Soils–Determination of Specific Gravity. Bur Indian Stand

  • Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loadING. Soils Found 18:39–56. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, et al (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Third international earthquake microzonation conference proceedings. pp 1319–1330

  • Iwasaki T, Arakawa T, Tokida K-I (1984) Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Int J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 3:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakka RS, Datta M, Ramana GV (2010) Liquefaction behaviour of loose and compacted pond ash. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayen RE, Mitchell JK, Seed RB, et al (1992) Evaluation of SPT-, CPT-, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data. US Natl Cent Earthq Eng Res (NCEER) Proc from fourth Japan-US Work Earthq Resist Des lifeline Facil Countermeas soil Liq 1 N° 92–00:177–204

  • Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand. J Geotech Eng 112:373–377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna R, Frost JD (1998) Spatial liquefaction analysis system. J Comput Civ Eng 12:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:1(48)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Rastogi BK, Satyanaraya HVS et al (2004) Characterization of the causative fault system for the 2001 Bhuj earthquake of Mw 7.7. Tectonophysics 378:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2003.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maugeri M, Grasso S (2013) Liquefaction potential evaluation at Catania Harbour (Italy). In: WIT transactions on the built environment. pp 69–81

  • Merh SS, Chamyal LS (1997) The quaternary geology of the Gujarat Alluvial Plains. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 63:1–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhaske SY, Choudhury D (2010) GIS-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. J Appl Geophys 70:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan K, Rastogi BK, Pancholi V, Gandhi D (2018) Seismic hazard assessment at micro level in Gandhinagar (the capital of Gujarat, India) considering soil effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 109:354–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty B, Kumar PEA, Patra NR, Chandra S (2010) Evaluation of residual strength and liquefaction potential of pond ash. Int J Geotech Eng 4:483–493. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2010.04.04.483-493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Patra NR (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential of pond ash at Panipat in India using SHAKE2000. In: Geotechnical Special Publication. pp 1829–1838

  • Motazedian D, Atkinson G (2005) Ground-motion relations for Puerto Rico. Spec Pap Geol Soc Am 385:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2385-X.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Srivastava N, Ghatak C et al (2018) Earthquake induced liquefaction hazard, probability and risk assessment in the city of Kolkata, India: its historical perspective and deterministic scenario. J Seismol 22:35–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9691-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1926) The Cutch (Kachh) earthquake of 16th June, 1819 with a revision of the great earthquake of 12th June, 1897. India Geol Surv Mem 46:71–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran CP, Rajendran K (2001) Characteristics of deformation and past seismicity associated with 1819 Kutch earthquake, northwestern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:407–426. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KS, Satyam DN (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 92:646–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Reshma PR, Deepankar C (2015) Seismic liquefaction hazard zonation and contour maps for Mumbai city using open source GIS. Disaster Adv 8:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1997) Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on the SPT and CPT. In: Youd TL, Idriss IM (Eds) Proc. of Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. ational Cent Earthq Eng Res Tech Rept. NCEE:41–87

  • Sareen BK, Reddy NRS (1984) Quaternary geological mapping of parts of Mehsana and Gandhinagar districts, Gujarat. Geol Surv India Unpubl Rep

  • Schweig E, Gomberg J, Petersen M et al (2003) The Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake: global lessons for earthquake hazard in intra-plate regions. J Geol Soc India 61:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1249–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes Monogr. 5. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley

  • Shanker R, Pande P (2001) Geoseismological studies of Kutch (Bhuj) earthquake of 26 January 2001. J Geol Soc India 58:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Hazarika PJ (2013) Assessment of liquefaction potential of Guwahati City: a case study. Geotech Geol Eng 31:1437–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9667-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2007) Seismic hazard analysis for the Bangalore Region. Nat Hazards 40:261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0012-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Samui P, Anbazhagan P (2008) Spatial variability of rock depth in Bangalore using geostatistical, neural network and support vector machine models. Geotech Geol Eng 26:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9185-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H (2003) Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey). Environ Geol 44:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0831-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon AN (1956) The Rann of Cutch earthquake of 21 July 1956. Indian J Meteorol Geophys 10:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoithoi L, Dubey CS, Ningthoujam PS et al (2016) Liquefaction potential evaluation for subsurface soil layers of Delhi region. J Geol Soc India 88:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0473-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipin KS, Sitharam TG (2009) Evaluation of liquefaction return period for Bangalore based on standard penetration test data: performance based approach. Am J Eng Appl Sci 2:537–543. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2009.537.543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Perkins DM (1978) Mapping liquefaction-induced ground failure potential. ASCE J Geotech Eng Div 104:433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Director-General, Institute of Seismological Research, for his kind permission to publish this work. This study is supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of Gujarat.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seismic Hazard and Microzonation Group, Institute of Seismological Research, Raisan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Vasu Pancholi, Vinay Dwivedi, Pallabee Choudhury & Sumer Chopra

  2. M.G. Science Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

    N. Y. Bhatt

Authors
  1. Vasu Pancholi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vinay Dwivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Y. Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pallabee Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sumer Chopra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasu Pancholi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pancholi, V., Dwivedi, V., Bhatt, N.Y. et al. Geotechnical Investigation for Estimation of Liquefaction Hazard for the Capital City of Gujarat State, Western India. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6551–6570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01454-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01454-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation