Skip to main content
Log in

Limit Equilibrium Analyses for Internal Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes: Influence of Potential Failure Surface and Strength Distribution

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents results from a computer code, based on limit equilibrium analyses, able to quantify earth pressure coefficients for the internal design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures and identify the potential failure surfaces. Failure mechanisms assuming bilinear or logarithmic spiral failure surfaces are considered. The influence of the potential failure surface and geosynthetic strength distribution on the earth pressure coefficient is analysed. Required reinforcement tensile strengths calculated by the developed program are compared with values published in the literature. To further evaluate the capabilities of limit equilibrium analyses, the numerical modelling of a geosynthetic reinforced steep slope, designed at ultimate limit state conditions (FS = 1), is also presented. Good agreement was achieved between the potential failure surfaces predicted by limit equilibrium analyses and those obtained with numerical modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FS:

Factor of safety (dimensionless)

H:

Height of structure (m)

H:

Horizontal component of inter-wedge force (Fig. 1 and Eq. (1)) (kN)

Fig. 1
figure 1

Two-Part wedge failure mechanism

Kreq :

Equivalent earth pressure coefficient (dimensionless)

\( {\text{K}}_{\rm req}^{\rm uniform} \) :

Equivalent earth pressure coefficient for uniform distribution of reinforcement (dimensionless)

N:

Resultant force of normal stresses over the failure surface (kN)

Pa :

Required force for equilibrium (kPa)

r:

Radius of log spiral surface (m)

S:

Resultant force of shear stresses over the failure surface (kN)

Sv,i :

Contributory height for the ith layer (m)

Ti :

Required strength for reinforcement layer, i (kN/m)

Tmax :

Maximum reinforcement tensile force (kN/m)

V:

Vertical component of inter-wedge force (kN)

W:

Weight of failure mass (kN)

XC :

Horizontal coordinate of the centre of gravity (failure mass) (m)

XP :

Horizontal coordinate of the pole (m)

Ya :

Elevation of Pa application point (above the base) (m)

YC :

Vertical coordinate of the centre of gravity (failure mass) (m)

YP :

Vertical coordinate of the pole (m)

β:

Slope angle (°)

δ:

Friction angle between the soil and the wall facing (º)

εsmax :

Maximum soil shear strain (dimensionless)

ϕ:

Soil internal friction angle (°)

ϕd :

Design value of internal friction angle of backfill (°)

γ:

Backfill unit weight (kN/m3)

λ:

Inter-wedge mobilized shear stress ratio (dimensionless)

θ:

Angle between the radius, r, and a vertical line (Fig. 2 and Eq. (4)) (°)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Log spiral failure mechanism

σav :

Available stress (kPa)

σv,i :

Vertical stress at the depth of reinforcement layer, i (kPa)

σreq :

Required stress (kPa)

References

  • Ausilio E, Conte E, Dente G (2000) Seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Hatami K (2006) Parametric analysis of reinforced soil walls with different height and reinforcement stiffness. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics. Yokohama, Japan, pp. 953–956

  • Bathurst RJ, Miyata Y, Nernheim A, Allen AM (2008) Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics Int 15(4):269–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2010) Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes. In: Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg RR, Samtani NC (eds) Geotechnical engineering circular No. 11 FHWA-NHI-10-024. Washington DC

  • Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2001) Modeling static response of a geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental retaining wall using FLAC. In: Proc. 2nd international FLAC and numerical modeling in geomechanics. Lyon, France, pp. 223–231

  • Itasca (2005) FLAC—fast lagrangian analysis of continua. Version 5.00. Itasca Consulting Group, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell RA (1989) Revised design charts for steep reinforced slopes. In: Proc.symp. Reinforced embankments: theory and practice. Thomas Telford

  • Jewell RA, Paine N, Woods RI (1984) Design methods for steep reinforced embankments. Polym grid reinf, Thomas Telford, pp 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshchinsky D, Boedeker RH (1989) Geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(10):1459–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshchinsky D, Ling HI, Hanks G (1995) Unified design approach to geosynthetic reinforced slopes and segmental walls. Geosynthetics Int 2(5):845–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Perry EB (1997) Seismic design and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Géotechnique 47(5):933–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski RL (1997) Stability of uniformly reinforced slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(6):546–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski RL (1998) Soil reinforcement for seismic design of geotechnical structures. Comput Geotech 23:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki A, Lesniewska D (1989) Limit analysis of cohesive slopes reinforced with geotextiles. Comput Geotech 7:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann GR, Chouery-Curtis VE, Johnson RD, Bonaparte R (1987) Design charts for geogrid-reinforced soil slopes. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’ 87, New Orleans, pp. 108–120

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS (2008) Geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls and slopes. Seismic behaviour and design methodologies, PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Porto, p 575 (in Portuguese)

  • Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2008) Influence of facing panel rigidity on performance of reinforced soil retaining walls: a numerical study. In: Proceedings of the 4th European geosynthetics conference, Edimburg, 7–10 Sept 2008, Theme 7—Paper 244

  • Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2011a) Earth pressure coefficients for design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. Geotext Geomembr 29(5):491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2011b) Numerical modelling of a geosynthetic reinforced steep slope subjected to seismic loading. In: Proc. of 3rd computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering—COMPDYN 2011, Corfu, Greece

  • Wright SG, Duncan JM (1991) Limit equilibrium stability analyses for reinforced slopes. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (1991) The finite element method, vol 2. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zornberg JG, Sitar N, Mitchell JK (1998) Performance of geosynthetic reinforced slopes at failure. J Geotech Eng ASCE 124(8):670–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial support of Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) and FEDER, Research Project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009750 - PTDC/ECM/100975/2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Castorina Silva Vieira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vieira, C.S., Lopes, M.L. & Caldeira, L.M. Limit Equilibrium Analyses for Internal Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes: Influence of Potential Failure Surface and Strength Distribution. Geotech Geol Eng 31, 1123–1135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9639-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9639-1

Keywords

Navigation