Abstract
The paper presents results from a computer code, based on limit equilibrium analyses, able to quantify earth pressure coefficients for the internal design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures and identify the potential failure surfaces. Failure mechanisms assuming bilinear or logarithmic spiral failure surfaces are considered. The influence of the potential failure surface and geosynthetic strength distribution on the earth pressure coefficient is analysed. Required reinforcement tensile strengths calculated by the developed program are compared with values published in the literature. To further evaluate the capabilities of limit equilibrium analyses, the numerical modelling of a geosynthetic reinforced steep slope, designed at ultimate limit state conditions (FS = 1), is also presented. Good agreement was achieved between the potential failure surfaces predicted by limit equilibrium analyses and those obtained with numerical modelling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FS:
-
Factor of safety (dimensionless)
- H:
-
Height of structure (m)
- H:
-
Horizontal component of inter-wedge force (Fig. 1 and Eq. (1)) (kN)
- Kreq :
-
Equivalent earth pressure coefficient (dimensionless)
- \( {\text{K}}_{\rm req}^{\rm uniform} \) :
-
Equivalent earth pressure coefficient for uniform distribution of reinforcement (dimensionless)
- N:
-
Resultant force of normal stresses over the failure surface (kN)
- Pa :
-
Required force for equilibrium (kPa)
- r:
-
Radius of log spiral surface (m)
- S:
-
Resultant force of shear stresses over the failure surface (kN)
- Sv,i :
-
Contributory height for the ith layer (m)
- Ti :
-
Required strength for reinforcement layer, i (kN/m)
- Tmax :
-
Maximum reinforcement tensile force (kN/m)
- V:
-
Vertical component of inter-wedge force (kN)
- W:
-
Weight of failure mass (kN)
- XC :
-
Horizontal coordinate of the centre of gravity (failure mass) (m)
- XP :
-
Horizontal coordinate of the pole (m)
- Ya :
-
Elevation of Pa application point (above the base) (m)
- YC :
-
Vertical coordinate of the centre of gravity (failure mass) (m)
- YP :
-
Vertical coordinate of the pole (m)
- β:
-
Slope angle (°)
- δ:
-
Friction angle between the soil and the wall facing (º)
- εsmax :
-
Maximum soil shear strain (dimensionless)
- ϕ:
-
Soil internal friction angle (°)
- ϕd :
-
Design value of internal friction angle of backfill (°)
- γ:
-
Backfill unit weight (kN/m3)
- λ:
-
Inter-wedge mobilized shear stress ratio (dimensionless)
- θ:
-
Angle between the radius, r, and a vertical line (Fig. 2 and Eq. (4)) (°)
- σav :
-
Available stress (kPa)
- σv,i :
-
Vertical stress at the depth of reinforcement layer, i (kPa)
- σreq :
-
Required stress (kPa)
References
Ausilio E, Conte E, Dente G (2000) Seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19:159–172
Bathurst RJ, Hatami K (2006) Parametric analysis of reinforced soil walls with different height and reinforcement stiffness. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics. Yokohama, Japan, pp. 953–956
Bathurst RJ, Miyata Y, Nernheim A, Allen AM (2008) Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geosynthetics Int 15(4):269–295
FHWA (2010) Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes. In: Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg RR, Samtani NC (eds) Geotechnical engineering circular No. 11 FHWA-NHI-10-024. Washington DC
Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2001) Modeling static response of a geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental retaining wall using FLAC. In: Proc. 2nd international FLAC and numerical modeling in geomechanics. Lyon, France, pp. 223–231
Itasca (2005) FLAC—fast lagrangian analysis of continua. Version 5.00. Itasca Consulting Group, USA
Jewell RA (1989) Revised design charts for steep reinforced slopes. In: Proc.symp. Reinforced embankments: theory and practice. Thomas Telford
Jewell RA, Paine N, Woods RI (1984) Design methods for steep reinforced embankments. Polym grid reinf, Thomas Telford, pp 70–81
Leshchinsky D, Boedeker RH (1989) Geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(10):1459–1478
Leshchinsky D, Ling HI, Hanks G (1995) Unified design approach to geosynthetic reinforced slopes and segmental walls. Geosynthetics Int 2(5):845–881
Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Perry EB (1997) Seismic design and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Géotechnique 47(5):933–952
Michalowski RL (1997) Stability of uniformly reinforced slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(6):546–556
Michalowski RL (1998) Soil reinforcement for seismic design of geotechnical structures. Comput Geotech 23:1–17
Sawicki A, Lesniewska D (1989) Limit analysis of cohesive slopes reinforced with geotextiles. Comput Geotech 7:53–66
Schmertmann GR, Chouery-Curtis VE, Johnson RD, Bonaparte R (1987) Design charts for geogrid-reinforced soil slopes. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’ 87, New Orleans, pp. 108–120
Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Vieira CS (2008) Geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls and slopes. Seismic behaviour and design methodologies, PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Porto, p 575 (in Portuguese)
Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2008) Influence of facing panel rigidity on performance of reinforced soil retaining walls: a numerical study. In: Proceedings of the 4th European geosynthetics conference, Edimburg, 7–10 Sept 2008, Theme 7—Paper 244
Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2011a) Earth pressure coefficients for design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. Geotext Geomembr 29(5):491–501
Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2011b) Numerical modelling of a geosynthetic reinforced steep slope subjected to seismic loading. In: Proc. of 3rd computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering—COMPDYN 2011, Corfu, Greece
Wright SG, Duncan JM (1991) Limit equilibrium stability analyses for reinforced slopes. Transportation Research Board, Washington
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (1991) The finite element method, vol 2. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York
Zornberg JG, Sitar N, Mitchell JK (1998) Performance of geosynthetic reinforced slopes at failure. J Geotech Eng ASCE 124(8):670–683
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the financial support of Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) and FEDER, Research Project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009750 - PTDC/ECM/100975/2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vieira, C.S., Lopes, M.L. & Caldeira, L.M. Limit Equilibrium Analyses for Internal Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes: Influence of Potential Failure Surface and Strength Distribution. Geotech Geol Eng 31, 1123–1135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9639-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9639-1