Skip to main content
Log in

Reinforcement with Geosynthetics of Walls of the Saltpans of the Aveiro Lagoon

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate the solution for the reinforcement of the walls of the saltpans of the Aveiro lagoon by using geosynthetics. For that purpose literature research has been done to collect both the properties and the geometry of the walls and of the soils. Simultaneously, methods for the design of reinforced soils using geosynthetics were collected, particularly to allow the consideration of two types of backfill soil: granular and fine. So, two solutions for such walls were studied using granular and fine soils, respectively. The design methods used were the ones proposed by: Jewell (1996) and Rogbeck et al. (2002) for granular soils and Naughton et al. (2001) for fine soils. Finally, the verification of the external stability of the profiles of a selected wall has been made using the methodology described in Eurocode 7: EN1997-1: 2004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ATM:

Atmospheric effects

BIO+CHE:

Biological and chemical degradation

c′:

Cohesion in terms of effective stress

cu :

Undrained strength

cv :

Coefficient of vertical consolidation

C:

Constant

CAL:

Complex Alluvium Sludges

CR:

Creep

C1:

Combination of fine soil parameters number 1

C2:

Combination of fine soil parameters number 2

DDI:

Damage during installation

ev :

Vertical spacing between reinforcement layers

Epwp :

Interstitial pressure generated by the construction of an embankment layer on a pre-existing layer

EQU:

Loss of equilibrium of the structure or the ground

ES:

Effective stresses

FcJ :

Design tensile strength obtained by the method of Jewell (1996)

FcNH :

Ddesign tensile strength obtained by the method of the Nordic Handbook

Fk :

Characteristic tensile strength of reinforcements

Fult :

Ultimate tensile strength

FDiss :

Safety factor applied to the time of dissipation

GCR1:

Geocomposite number 1

GCR2:

Geocomposite number 2

GGR1:

Uniaxial Geogrid number 1

GGR2:

Uniaxial Geogrid number 2

GEO:

Collapse or excessive deformation of the ground

h:

Height of each layer

H:

Height of the wall

LR :

Length of the reinforcement

mv :

Coefficient of volume compressibility

n:

Number of layers constructed

qQ :

Surcharge caused by the construction process

ru :

Interstitial pressure parameter

RFtotal :

Total reduction factor

RF:

Reduction factor

RFATM :

Reduction factor for atmospheric effects

RFDDI :

Reduction factor for damage during installation in situ

RFFLU :

Reduction factor for the effects of creep in the reinforcement

STR:

Internal collapse or excessive deformation of the structure or structural elements

T:

Time required to dissipate the excesses of interstitial pressure generated

TS:

Total stresses

u:

Interstitial pressure

V:

Volume of water dissipated

z:

Depth measured from the top of the wall to a point in study

β:

Tilt the face of the structure from the horizontal

δv :

Settlement

ϕ′:

Soil friction angle in terms of effective stresses

γ:

Unit weight of soil

γΜ :

Partial safety factor for the parameters of soil

η:

Conversion factor

η1 :

Conversion factor of creep

η2 :

Conversion factor for the installation damage

η3 :

Conversion factor for the biological and chemical degradation

θ:

Τransmissivity

References

  • Allen TM, Bathurst RJ (2003) Prediction of reinforcement loads in reinforced soil walls. Washington State Department of Transportation and US Department of Transportation, Washington, USA, p 363

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasopoulos GA (1996) Experimental investigation of shearing behavior at cohesive soil-geotextile interfaces. Earth Reinf 1:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg RR, Christopher BR, Samtani NC (2009) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC, FHWA NHI-09-083 and FHWA GEC 011, p 668

  • Bergado DT, Macatol KC, Amin NU, Chai JC, Alfaro MC (1993) Interaction of lateritic soil and steel grid reinforcement. Can Geot J 30(2):376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonito FAB (2008) Rheology of sludge and other recent sediments of Aveiro lagoon. Ph.D. thesis in Civil Engineering. University of Aveiro, Aveiro, p 422 (In Portuguese)

  • Carlos DM (2009) Reinforcement with geosynthetics of walls of the saltpans of the Aveiro lagoon. Master’s thesis in Civil Engineering. University of Aveiro, Aveiro, p 171 (In Portuguese)

  • Christopher BR (2010) USA design guidelines for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls, slopes and embankments. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on geosynthetics, Guarujá, Brazil, pp 237–241

  • Clancy J, Naughton PJ (2008) Design of steep slopes using fine grained fills and novel multifunctional geocompósitos. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference of geosynthetics, Edinburgh, Scotland, CD-ROM, Paper number 131

  • Corbet SP, Horgan G (2010) Introduction to international codes for reinforced soil design. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on geosynthetics, Guarujá, Brazil, pp 225–231

  • Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg RR (2001) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, design and construction guidelines. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC, FHWA-NHI-00-043, p 418

  • Fleming IR, Sharma JS, Jogi MB (2006) Shear strength of geomembrane-soil interface under unsaturated conditions. Geotext Geomembr 24(5):274–284 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes LMF (1992) Geotechnical zoning from urban and suburban area of Aveiro. Ph.D. thesis in Engineering Geology. University of Aveiro, vol 1. p 531 (In Portuguese)

  • Jewell RA (1996) Soil reinforcement with geotextiles. Special publication 123 CIRIA. p 332

  • Kempton GT, Jones CJFP, Jewell RA, Naughton PJ (2000) Construction of slopes using cohesive fills and a new innovative geosynthetic material. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on geosynthetics, Bologna, Italy, Vol. 2, pp 825–828

  • Khedkar, Mandal JN (2009) Pullout behavior of cellular reinforcements. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):262–271 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CN, Ho YH, Huang JW (2009) Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):19–30 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton PJ (2009) Personal communication (e-mail 19/05/2009)

  • Naughton PJ, Jewell RA, Kempton GT (2001) The design of steep slopes constructed from cohesive fills and a geogrid. Landmarks in Earth reinforcement, IS Kyushu, Japan

  • O’Kelly BC, Naughton PJ (2008) On the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability. Geotext Geomembr 26(4):357–362 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira C, Coelho C (2007) Walls of the saltpan marines of Aveiro. In: Earth in Seminar 2007, proceedings of the V seminar on earth architecture in Portugal, Aveiro, pp 108–111, ISBN: 978-972-8479-49-7 (in Portuguese)

  • Pitanga HN, Gourc JP, Vilar OM (2009) Interface shear strength of geosynthetics: evaluation and analysis of inclined plane tests. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):435–446 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogbeck Y, Alén C, Franzén G, Kjeld A, Odén K, Rathmayer H, Want A, Oiseth E (2002) Nordic handbook—reinforced soils and fills. Nordic Geosynthetic Group (NGG), p 203 (draft version de 20/12/2002)

  • Sieira AC, Gerscovich D, Sayão A (2009) Displacement and load transfer mechanisms of geogrids under pullout condition. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):241–253 Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SLOPE/W (2007) Stability modeling with SLOPE/W 2007—an engineering methodology, 2nd edn. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, p 344

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin G, Wei Z, Wang JG, Wan L, Shean L (2008) Interaction characteristics of geosynthetics with fine tailings in pullout test. Geosynth Int 15(6):428–436 Thomas Telford

    Article  Google Scholar 

Standards

  • AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th edn, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  • AASHTO (2007) LRFD bridge design specifications. 4th Edition with 2008 and 2009 interim revisions. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  • BS 8006:-1: 2009 Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and fills, Public Draft for Comment, BSi London 2009

  • DIN 1054:2005-01 Baugrund; Sicherheitsnachweise im Erdund Grundbau; Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin

  • EN 1997-1: 2004 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design—Part 1: General rules

  • ISO/TR 20432:2007 Guidelines for the determination of the long-term strength of geosynthetics for soil reinforcement

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia), Research Project PTDC/ECM/65589/2006, Research Project PTDC/ECM/099087/2008—FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009724 and Research Project PTDC/ECM/100975/2008—FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009750.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Carlos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlos, D.M., Pinho-Lopes, M. Reinforcement with Geosynthetics of Walls of the Saltpans of the Aveiro Lagoon. Geotech Geol Eng 29, 519–536 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9400-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9400-6

Keywords

Navigation