Abstract
Leguminous cover crops used as green manures can reduce fertilizer inputs by supplying nitrogen (N) via mineralization of incorporated N-rich biomass derived from biological N2 fixation. In a multi-year trial at three locations in Germany, the effects of leguminous, non-leguminous and mixed green manure crops on the yield of the subsequent cash crop white cabbage (Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. alba) were investigated. The winter cover crop treatments were forage rye (Secale cereale L.), a mixture of forage rye with winter Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz), sole-cropped winter Hungarian vetch, winter pea (Pisum sativum L.), and winter faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with bare soil as a control. Sole-cropped legumes showed higher marketable cabbage head yields (head weight > 1.0 kg) compared to the other cover crop treatments, with 25.5, 25.9 and 28.1 Mg ha− 1 for vetch, pea and faba bean, respectively. The aboveground biomass of the legume winter cover crop treatments had higher N offtakes with 185, 177 and 159 kg N ha− 1 for vetch, pea and faba bean, respectively, with significantly lower carbon (C)/N ratios compared to rye and rye with vetch. The constant C/N ratio of the aboveground biomass of leguminous cover crops throughout the growing period indicates that the optimum incorporation date to achieve high N mineralization rates is less time dependent in leguminous compared to non-leguminous cover crops. The results of the present study show that leguminous winter cover crops do not reduce the soil N availability for a succeeding high N demanding cabbage crop resulting in yields comparable to agricultural practice without winter cover crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In organic horticulture, the source and amount of permitted commercial fertilizers and farm manures are limited by the restrictions of organic regulations, e.g. the Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council (European Parliament and European Council 2022) and additionally by private standards of organic associations (Bio Austria 2021; Bioland eV 2023; Demeter eV 2021). However, the demand for organically produced vegetables is constantly increasing at the national, EU-, and international level (European Commission 2019; Willer and Lernoud 2019; BLE 2020). Some vegetables, e.g. cabbage, zucchini or broccoli, have high nutrient requirements within a short growing period in comparison to arable crops (Feller and Fink 2005). Therefore, the supply of vegetables with a high nutrient demand, especially nitrogen (N), requires a well-functioning fertilisation management. Due to the specialization and intensification of intensive vegetable production, farms often have little to no animal husbandry to generate solid farmyard manure within the farming system. Consequently, large quantities of farmyard manures, as well as commercial fertilizers, are purchased from outside the farm. Farmyard manures are mainly multi-nutrient fertilizers with a nutrient stoichiometry that often does not match the nutrient offtake of the vegetable crops (Zikeli et al. 2017; Möller 2018). Therefore, fertilization with manure may lead to nutrient imbalances, particularly phosphorus (P) oversupply in the soil (Cooper et al. 2018; Möller 2018). Additionally, stockless organic horticultural farms commonly use N-dominant commercial fertilizers, which are often waste materials from conventional food production (Voogt et al. 2011; Möller and Schultheiß 2014). Keeping balanced N/P ratios in the overall fertilization scheme in mind, solid animal manures and composts can provide a maximum of 15–25% of the N demand of any cropping system (Möller 2018). Therefore, fertilisation of 100 kg N via composts means that approximately 400 kg N should be supplemented by sources nearly free of P, e.g. biological N2 fixation (BNF). Measures that enhance N inputs via BNF and improve internal N cycling in organic horticulture need to be optimized to reduce the need for external fertilizers and to adjust nutrient imbalances as a consequence of the use of external inputs (Möller 2018).
The overall approach to maintain soil fertility in organic farming is based on a crop rotation containing cover crops that provide ecosystem services and the incorporation of crop residues as green manure (Canali et al. 2015; Watson et al. 2002). Cover crops as green manure crops are particularly important when used as a sustainable fertilization management tool to close gaps in nutrient cycles and to decrease the dependency of external fertilizer purchases. Sown in autumn, they protect against leaching of nitrate (NO3−) and other nutrients, reduce wind and water erosion, improve biological, chemical and physical soil properties and store nutrients (Hartwig and Ammon 2002; Fageria et al. 2005; Larkin 2020). Vegetables planted in a previously cultivated leguminous green manure showed advantages over being planted in non-leguminous plants, e.g. velvet bean followed by cabbage (Cordeiro et al. 2018). Therefore, a more targeted approach in organic horticulture could be used to design crop rotations with a higher proportion of legumes to make use of their ability to supply N exclusively via BNF, as N is the nutrient that most often limits yield (Oelofse et al. 2013; Løes et al. 2017; Möller 2018). When cover crops or their residues are tilled and incorporated into the soil in spring, nutrients uptake during their cultivation are released by mineralization and serve as a nutrient source for the subsequent crops. The net N mineralization is mainly dependent on the interactions of soil water content and the C/N ratio of the residues as well as of the soil temperature (Coppens et al. 2007). Farmers can use a wide range of cover crops which are suitable for different purposes. Legumes, in particular, are cultivated for their contribution to the N input into the soil via BNF, thus offering the potential to reduce the need for N fertilizers for the succeeding crop. Nevertheless, some vegetables like cabbage, zucchini or broccoli have very high N demands. Early white cabbage produced for the fresh market has a N requirement of about 200 kg N ha− 1, while a slow-growing late white cabbage can take up about 300 kg N ha− 1 (Feller et al. 2011). By using legumes as cover crops the amount of N applied as farmyard manure or commercial fertilizer could be reduced and instead be generated internally on-farm.
The objective of this study was therefore to compare the N supply of cover crops by the cultivation of non-legumes, legumes, and the mixture of both crop types used as green manure followed by a late white cabbage as a high N demanding vegetable crop on its yield in the moderately continental climate of South-West Germany. We hypothesize that (1) legumes as green manures lead to higher cabbage yields compared to non-leguminous green manure or a mixture of both due to a higher N supply via the incorporation of their biomass, (2) a cereal as non-leguminous cover crop leads to a strong decrease of Nmin in the soil before the cabbage planting resulting in pre-emptive competition and a reduced cabbage yield, and (3) soil Nmin by the time of cabbage harvest and N content in cabbage biomass is increased by the incorporation of leguminous winter cover crops compared to bare soil during winter.
Materials and methods
Study areas and experimental setup
Seven field trials were conducted between 2019 and 2021 on three different locations in southern and western Germany, respectively: at the experimental station Kleinhohenheim (KH, 48°44′14.8′′N 9°12′05.6′′E) of the University of Hohenheim near Stuttgart; the research field Forchheim, Kaiserstuhl (FH, 48°10′10.3′′N 7°42′18.1′′E) of the Agricultural Technology Center Augustenberg, both in southwest Germany. The third location was the Experimental Center Horticulture Straelen/Köln-Auweiler (KA, 51°00′04.6′′N 6°50′54.0′′E) of the North Rhine-Westphalia Chamber of Agriculture in Western Germany. The fields have been organically managed since 1994, 2011 and 1991, the soil types were Haplic Luvisol, Calcaric Regosol and Haplic Luvisol (main soil characteristics are reported in Supplementary Table 1) and the altitudes were 444, 170 and 46 m a.s.l., respectively for KH, FH and KA. The long-term average of the mean annual temperature was 9.7, 11.8 and 11.0 °C and the long-term average of the mean annual precipitation was 740, 670 and 750 mm, for KH, FH and KA respectively. The monthly precipitations and air temperatures are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1. Trials were conducted in each year and location except for 2021 in FH and 2019 in KA. The trials were randomized as randomized complete block design (KA) or as row-column design (KH, FH) with four replicates per trial.
The winter cover crop treatments (I) forage rye (Secale cereale L. cv. ‘Protector’) as non-legume, (II) mixture of forage rye with 20% winter Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz cv. ‘Beta’) as a mixture of a non-legume with a legume, (III) sole cropped winter Hungarian vetch, (IV) winter pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. ‘Leguan’ and ‘EFB 33’), and (V) winter faba bean (Vicia faba L. cv. ‘Hiverna’ and ‘Augusta’) were compared with (VI) a control of bare soil during winter and until cabbage planting. In each location, five of the six treatments were tested. Thus, sole cropped winter Hungarian vetch was not tested in KH, winter faba bean was not tested in FH and the mixture of forage rye with 20% winter Hungarian vetch was not tested in KA. The design across locations is therefore similar to an incomplete block design, where each location serves as incomplete block. In total, 55% of all possible treatment-by-year-by-location combinations were available in the data. The imbalance of the dataset was based on two missing trials and one missing treatment per trial. In both cases, the missing data pattern is missing completely at random (Little and Rubin 2019; Hartung and Piepho 2021).
Agronomic measures
Trials were established on different fields at each location due to crop rotation at the location and the specification that the previous crop should be a cereal. The straw from the grain harvest of the preceding cereal was removed and only stubble remained on the fields. Field preparation and seeding of the cover crops included ploughing, disking and preparing the beds in autumn (October to November) depending on local weather conditions and following best agricultural practice at the location. The aim was for the control to be free of weeds. In order not to interfere too much with mineralization processes, weeds were flamed once in spring depending on their occurrence instead of using mechanical weed control. The quantity of weed biomass that grew up despite the control measures was recorded. The cover crops were mulched and incorporated by rototilling as green manure in mid-May. The cash crop was a late maturing cultivar of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea convar. capitata var. alba L. cv. ‘Rivera’). It was grown between the end of May or begin of June and mid of October. Exact dates of the management measures and trial metrics are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
To secure a sufficient N fertilization level in the cabbage crops, 150 kg N ha− 1 of horn shavings was used as a supplement underfoot fertilizer (KH, FH) or via wide spreading on the soil (KA) before planting. This amount was reduced compared to the N requirement of white cabbage (Feller et al. 2011). During the cabbage growing period, weed control was done with a rotary hoe between the rows and by hand within the rows. The trials were covered by a net to protect against pests. Nets were used for the first few weeks at KH, until a few weeks before the cabbage harvest at FH, and for the whole growing period of the cabbage at KA, depending on pest pressure and local practices. During the cabbage cultivation, the products XenTari® (active ingredient: Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai, Biofa AG, Germany) against Lepidoptera larvae and the product Spruzit Schädlingsfrei (active ingredients: pyrethrin and cinerin, W. Neudorff GmbH KG, Germany) against aphids and other insect larvae were applied if necessary.
Data collection
Soil samples for Nmin content were taken on six dates at each location and each year. For the assessment of the initial Nmin content (D1) the soils were sampled in October (0–0.9 m) before establishment of the trials. The number of samples varied depending on the location: In KA and KH, samples for the D1 Nmin content were taken once per replicate. In FH, only a single sample was taken for the whole trial. In KH in 2021, samples for the D1 Nmin content were taken from each plot. Subsequent sampling was carried out in all trials on each plot during the complete vegetation period: samples were taken at the beginning of the vegetation period in March (D2; 0–0.9 m), before planting the cabbage in May (D3; 0–0.6 m), at time of the onset of head formation in July (D4; 0–0.6 m), and shortly after the harvest of the cabbage in October (D5, 0–0.6 m). Final samples were taken approximately four weeks after the harvest at the end of the vegetation period in November (D6, 0–0.9 m). As leaching of NO3− due to precipitation is expected to be highest in Germany at dates D1, D2 and D6, soil sampling was carried out at 0.9 m depth on these dates. In each plot, six soil samples were taken with a hydraulic soil sampling device and each sample was separated into three sections of 0–0.3 m, 0.3–0.6 m, and 0.6–0.9 m, respectively. Afterwards, the six sub-samples of each section and plot were mixed prior to analysis. Mixed samples were frozen until analysis of the parameters nitrate-N (NO3−-N) and ammonium-N (NH4+–N) via continuous-flow analyzer. The minimum detectable quantification limit for the analysis was 4.5 kg ha− 1 for the analyzer used in the laboratory for KH and FH and 2.0 kg ha− 1 for the analyzer used in the laboratory for KA for each, NO3−–N and NH4+–N. Values below the detectable limit were arbitrarily set to 50% of the detectable limit, respectively. Finally, the Nmin content was defined as the sum of NO3−–N and NH4+–N.
During the growing period and before tilling of the winter cover crops, biomass growth was assessed at 0.5 m² per plot at four dates in intervals of approx. two weeks (end of March, mid of April, end of April and mid of May). At the last date, biomass growth of the spontaneous vegetation in the control plots was assessed in addition. The biomass was weighed, dried at 40 °C (KH, FH) resp. 70 °C (KA), weighed again, milled and analyzed for carbon (C) and N concentration by dry combustion. Cash crop yields were assessed as total cabbage yield, head yield (marketable > 1.0 kg, non-marketable < 1.0 kg), and cabbage residue biomass. The fresh and dry matter (DM) as well as the nutrient concentration of C and N of cabbage heads and residues were analyzed also by dry combustion.
The quantity of fixed N via BNF was estimated based on the method of Stuelpnagel (1982) and Karpenstein-Machan and Stuelpnagel (2000). This method requires a non-leguminous reference crop in the trial, and both, plant N and soil Nmin samples, must be taken in the reference plots. It is therefore a comparatively inexpensive method and easy to perform. In the extended difference method, the plant N and soil Nmin of the leguminous species are compared to that of a neighbouring non-leguminous species, with the difference between the two treatments assumed to be caused by the N2 fixation. Accordingly, the sum of the N content in the biomass DM and the soil Nmin content (total soil profile) of a legume crop was averaged over the trial for each legume containing treatment and subsequently subtracted by the quantity of N content in the biomass DM and the soil Nmin content (total soil profile) of the non-legume reference rye. The differences to the rye are interpreted as quantity of fixed N.
Statistical analysis
All traits were analyzed with a mixed model approach, as mixed models can handle unbalanced data structure with a missing at random or missing completely at random data pattern (Hartung and Piepho 2021). Winter cover crop was used as a fixed factor and year (Y) and location (L) were used as random factors. Our aim was to predict treatment effects in future farmers’ fields, therefore we assumed that year and location effects were random (Smith et al. 2005; Piepho et al. 2008). The trials were assumed to represent the population of all possible location-by-year combinations in which cover crops can be used. Additionally, in each location five out of six cover crops were treated. As treatments were not selected according the expected performance in these locations, this results in a missing completely random data pattern. For soil sample data, a separate analysis for each depth and date was performed. For other samples, a separate analysis was performed for each date. In all cases, the model can be described as (1):
where \({y}_{hijkl}\) is the observation of kth winter cover crop in column l, replicate j at year h and location i, \(\mu\) is the intercept, \({a}_{h}\), \({l}_{i}\), \({\left(al\right)}_{hi}\), and \({r}_{hij}\) are the fixed effects of the hth year, ith location, and hith year-by-location combination and the fixed effect of the jth replicate nested within a combination of year h and location i. The term \({c}_{hil}\) is the random column effect. As a randomized complete block design was used in KA, it is blocked and not considered in KA using a dummy variable being 0 for KA and being 1 elsewise (Piepho et al. 2004). The term \({\tau }_{k}\) is the fixed main effect of the kth winter cover crop, and \({\left(\tau a\right)}_{hk}\), \({\left(\tau l\right)}_{ik}\), and \({\left(\tau al\right)}_{hik}\) are the random interaction effects of the kth winter cover crop with year h, location i and hith year-by-location combination. The term \({e}_{hijkl}\) is the error of \({y}_{hijkl}\). The model was allowed to account for heterogeneous year-by-location-specific error variances if this increased model fit measured via AIC (Wolfinger 1993). Interaction effects of treatment with year, location and location-by-year were taken as random to allow a prediction of cover crop performance for other locations and future years (Smith et al. 2005) and to recover inter-location and inter-year information (Möhring et al. 2015). Residuals were graphically checked for normality and homogeneity of variance (despite the heterogeneity already accounted for by the model). These prerequisites were not fulfilled for the trait of soil Nmin content; therefore, logarithmic data transformation of the original values was carried out prior to analysis. For the transformed data, estimated means were back-transformed for presentation purpose only. Standard errors were back-transformed using the delta method. In case of finding significant differences via global F test, Fishers LSD test was performed and mean comparisons were presented via letter display (Piepho 2004), accepting a Type 1 error rate of 0.05. Within the letter display, treatment means with at least one identical letter were non-significant different from each other. All analyses were performed with SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems ver. 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Soil mineral N content
The initial soil mineral N (Nmin) levels for D1 were 90, 28 and 53 kg ha− 1 for KH in 2018, 2019 and 2020, 86 and 55 kg ha− 1 for FH in 2018 and 2019 and 147 and 161 kg ha− 1 for KA in 2019 and 2020.
The Nmin content at the beginning of the vegetation period in March (D2) showed significant differences in the depths 0–0.3 m and 0.3–0.6 m (Table 1). The rye treatment had the lowest content at both depths with 8.47 and 9.35 kg ha− 1, respectively, and was significantly lower compared to the control, vetch, pea and faba bean (0.3–0.6 m). At the time of the winter cover crop tilling and planting of cabbage (D3), differences were only detected at the depth of 0.3–0.6 m. Again, the treatments rye and rye with vetch showed the lowest Nmin contents, while the legume treatments showed no differences when compared to the control. At the time of the onset of head formation of cabbage (D4), the treatments of legumes vetch, pea and faba bean had the highest Nmin contents in the soil, at the depth of 0.3–0.6 m significantly with 14.9, 16.2, and 16.5 kg ha− 1, respectively, compared to the treatments of rye (9.94 kg ha− 1) and rye with vetch (8.86 kg ha− 1). As the growing period proceeded, the Nmin content continued to decrease across all treatments, so that by the time of the cabbage harvest (D5), the Nmin content was almost depleted, especially in the depth of 0.3–0.6 m and no differences between the treatments could be observed. Four weeks after the cabbage harvest and after the incorporation of the cabbage residues at the end of the vegetation period (D6), there were still no differences detected among the treatments.
Cover crop biomass
Biomass DM yield of the cover crops showed no significant differences among treatments at any dates (Table 2), however, rye and rye with vetch consistently showed the highest biomass yields. In comparison, the N concentration of the biomass showed a significant difference among the three legume treatments with more than 3.0% N in the DM and the treatments rye, rye with vetch or the spontaneous vegetation of the control with 2.0% N in the DM for the last sampling date mid of May. This resulted in rye and rye with vetch having the highest C/N ratios which were significantly higher than the C/N ratios of the three legumes vetch, pea and faba bean or the spontaneous vegetation of the control. The biomass DM yield and N concentration of the different treatments levelled out as N offtake in biomass, whereby no significant differences among the treatments were measured for the sampling dates. The factor year was significant for almost every biomass trait at all four sampling dates whereas the factor location shows less significant differences (Table 3). The estimated BNF of the legume treatments differ non-significantly for rye with vetch (25.9 kg ha− 1), vetch (126.1 kg ha− 1), pea (117.8 kg ha− 1), and faba bean (90.2 kg ha− 1).
Cabbage yield
Due to the high standard errors for the yields of marketable and non-marketable cabbage heads, no significant differences were found among the winter cover crop treatments (Table 4). Nonetheless, the head yield showed a pattern of higher marketable head yields for the legume treatments faba bean (28.0 Mg ha− 1), pea (27.3 Mg ha− 1) and vetch (25.4 Mg ha− 1) followed by the control (21.4 Mg ha− 1), rye with vetch (14.6 Mg ha− 1), and rye (11.3 Mg ha− 1). There were differences in the fresh mass yield of marketable heads among the trials (Table 3). For the residue DM, non-significant differences were found among the treatments, but were found among trials. The same was observed for the total above ground DM biomass (for treatments p = 0.1446) (Table 3).
Cabbage N content
The N concentrations in the cabbage heads were higher compared to the concentrations of the cabbage residues for all treatments (Fig. 1). The N concentration in total above ground biomass (heads and residues) was significantly lower in the treatment with rye compared to the control, vetch, pea and faba bean, and in vetch with rye compared to vetch and pea. No differences were detected between the control and the leguminous treatments.
Influence of winter cover crop on N concentration of cabbage heads and residues after harvest for all locations and years. The results are the means of four replicates and the error bars show the standard error. Values with at least one identical letter within the plant part (above ground biomass, heads, residues) indicate non-significant differences among winter cover crop treatments at α = 0.05
The N offtake by the cabbage heads was significantly lower in rye and rye with vetch compared to all other treatments (Fig. 2). The same pattern was observed in the offtake of the total above ground biomass. Nonetheless, the N offtake for the residues did not differ significantly among the treatments. Again, the traits above ground biomass, cabbage heads and cabbage residues showed differences in the factors of year and interaction of year and location (Table 3).
Influence of winter cover crop on N offtake by harvested cabbage heads and remaining residues after harvest for all locations and years. The results are the means of four replicates and the error bars show the standard error. Values with at least one identical letter indicate non-significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05 within each plant part
Discussion
N supply of leguminous and non-leguminous green manures to white cabbage
Although the cabbage yield did not differ significantly among the treatments (Table 4), the data on cabbage above ground biomass N concentration (Fig. 1) and cabbage above ground biomass N offtakes (Fig. 2) show that legumes used as winter cover crops and subsequently as green manures provide a higher N supply for the subsequent vegetable crop compared to sole cropped rye and the intercropping of rye with vetch. A high N accumulation in the winter cover crops depends on high biomass DM yield and/or high N concentration (Table 2). Therefore, leguminous green manures should be selected on criteria including consistent and strong biomass production potential. Since legumes generally are higher in biomass N concentration due to their ability to fix atmospheric N (Hartwig and Ammon 2002), higher N concentrations were found in vetch, pea and faba bean at the incorporation date in comparison to the non-legume rye and the mixture of non-legume and legume rye with vetch, in line with other studies (Campiglia et al. 2014a, b; Nyfeler et al. 2011).
C/N ratio of late tilled leguminous green manures
Besides the N quantity provided for the subsequent crop, the rate of N release after incorporation plays a crucial role for the farmer’s choice of green manure species: lower C/N ratios favour a faster decomposition of the green manure residues incorporated into the soil (Coppens et al. 2007). Generally, net N mineralization can be expected when the C/N ratio is < 20–25, while net immobilization can be expected when the C/N ratio is > 20–25 (Paul 2007). Legumes, therefore, show a higher potential of fast decomposition with C/N ratios between 10 and 15 (Rosecrance et al. 2000; Campiglia et al. 2014a) compared to non-legumes (Table 2).
Data in Table 2 indicates that the nutrient composition of the biomass of legumes changes during the cropping phase of the green manure to much lesser extent than that of non-legumes and the mixtures. Consequently, and assuming that the N concentration and the C/N ratio are the major drivers for the N mineralization pattern after green manure incorporation, it can be stated that the date of soil incorporation of the green manure biomass is much more relevant for non-legume green manure crops than for legumes. Furthermore, for legumes, there is another feature that should be addressed when determining the incorporation date: a later incorporation is connected to only a slight increase of the C/N ratio, however, combined with a strong increase of the total amount of N incorporated with the biomass, meaning a strong additional BNF. No studies were found addressing specifically the effects of the date of soil incorporation of legumes on BNF and the effects on the N supply of the subsequent crops. The legume cover crops in this study were able to fix an average of 90 kg N ha− 1 until mid-May, this corresponds to 37% of the N offtake of organic white cabbage above ground biomass. For less demanding crops than cabbage, the proportion of N offtake covered by BNF from legume winter cover crops can be up to 60% for carrots, or even 117% for lettuce (Wachendorf et al. 2022). However, the accuracy of the BNF estimation is rather low using Stuelpnagel’s (1982) difference method compared to the recommended and more accurate measurements of symbiotic N2 fixation using 15N labelled legumes (Unkovich et al. 2008).
For the parameters biomass DM yield of the cover crop, N concentration, C/N ratio, and N offtake of biomass, the mixture of rye with the legume vetch does not show significant advantages compared to sole cropped rye. The estimated amount of BNF for rye with vetch is about 26 kg N ha− 1. In comparison, the three leguminous treatments vetch, pea and faba bean showed higher values with 126, 118 and 90 kg ha− 1, respectively. Therefore, in order to achieve high N inputs by BNF a higher share in the mixture or pure legumes stands should be favoured. Frasier et al. (2017) used the same estimation formula for BNF by Karpenstein-Machan and Stuelpnagel (2000) but a 40/60 mixture of rye with vetch showing similar high values for BNF (100 kg ha− 1) compared to sole cropped vetch (110 kg ha− 1). Therefore, the treatment of rye with vetch could provide more advantages as a combination of catch crop and green manure instead of sole cropping of rye if the vetch proportion was higher than the 20/80 mixture in our study (Nyfeler et al. 2011).
Pre-emptive competition on soil Nmin by non-leguminous cover crops
Besides the N supply provided via green manure biomass, the soil Nmin content plays a major role in the development of vegetable plants at early growth stages. A pre-emptive competition for soil Nmin prior to planting can lead to yield loss in high demanding vegetable crops (Willumsen and Thorup-Kristensen 2001; Hefner et al. 2020). Especially cereal crops, mainly used as catch crop during winter, show high N uptake which is then initially unavailable to the following crop after incorporation of the winter cover crop due to the high C/N ratio of the biomass resulting in N immobilization. The pre-emptive competition can also be observed in our study (Table 1) for the sampling dates D2 (start of vegetation period) and D3 (prior to planting). After the rainy winter period the treatments of rye and rye with vetch had the lowest soil Nmin contents at the start of the vegetation period and at the time of cabbage planting. This could indicate that NO3− leaching was prevented during winter by the strong uptake of the cereals or it also could indicate that NO3− leaching occurred and could therefore not be measured in the lowest soil layer. The first case appears more likely due to the high dry matter already produced in March and the higher N concentrations in rye and rye with vetch compared to the end of the cropping period (Table 2). If the N was leached as NO3−, both dry matter and N concentration would likely be lower. The legumes, in contrast, did not significantly lower the Nmin content during these periods compared to the control. As catch crops for reduction of nitrate leaching the legumes are therefore less suitable. The soil Nmin content at the time of cabbage head formation onset (Table 1, D4), however, supports the assumption of rapid N release and thus green manuring with legumes resulting in the highest Nmin values among cover crop treatments in both depths, 0-0.3 and 0.3–0.6 m (Haas et al. 2007; Campiglia et al. 2014b).
At the end of the cabbage cultivation and the vegetation period itself (D5 and D6) no differences among the different cover crop treatments were observed. The high N demanding cabbage crop depleted the available soil Nmin in all treatments. However, there are some indications for N shortage in the cabbage for the treatments with non-leguminous crops as stated by lower cabbage N concentrations and N offtakes in the treatments with rye and rye with vetch as preceding crop (Figs. 1 and 2). The lower cabbage N offtake for the treatments rye and rye with vetch – in case of heads even significantly lower – compared to the other treatments (Fig. 2) seems primarily based on differences in N concentration rather than on the residue DM yields (Table 3).
Comparing leguminous green manuring with no preceding crop in the cabbage cultivation
Contrary to the initial hypothesis, the result of this study showed no significant increase in cabbage head yield with green manuring via leguminous cover crop species before planting compared to the bare soil during winter (Table 4). This lack of differences can be explained to some extend by the high standard errors for both, the marketable and the non-marketable head yield. Different initial Nmin contents at the time of the trial establishment may have had an impact on the cover crops development and therefore on the biomass and N offtake of the green manure or the amount of fixed N2. However, a correlation between initial soil Nmin content and cover crop development or amount of BNF could not be investigated in this work because soil samples were not taken per plot when the trials were established. Another explanation for the lack of significant differences between bare soil and leguminous winter cover crops could be the spontaneous vegetation, which was allowed to grow to a reasonable extent in order not to interfere too much with the mineralization processes of the soil by mechanical tillage. At the time of incorporation of the winter cover crops, weed biomass had grown on these plots, possibly resulting in a green manuring effect as well. In agricultural practice, such spontaneous vegetation would probably be mechanically removed earlier.
Overall, the cabbage head yield –either total head yield or marketable head yield– in our study is in line with results of similar studies including leguminous green manures followed by white cabbage like Haas et al. (2007) or Hefner et al. (2020) with between 20 and 50 Mg ha− 1. Considering the reduced amount of fertilizer with 150 kg N ha− 1 in this study compared to the N demand by cabbage of at least 200 kg N ha− 1, it can be assumed that the leguminous green manure was not capable of overcompensating the fertilizer reduction within the growing period of the cabbage and of leading to significantly increased cabbage yields. An effect of incorporated biomass of green manures - especially legumes and their BNF - compared to bare soil over winter, however, could be detected in the subsequent crop to cabbage. A systemic investigation of the crop rotation is therefore recommended.
Conclusion
As external N fertilizer inputs are often considered contentious when derived from conventional farming systems, the use of N2 fixing leguminous winter cover crops such as vetch, pea and faba bean as green manures is an option to substitute them. However, the amount of N supplied by leguminous cover crops does not fully substitute commercial keratin-based fertilizers for a vegetable cropping system with high N demanding crops like cabbage. Nevertheless, legumes are well suited as preceding green manure crops for vegetables, as they contain high levels of N in their biomass and do not pre-emptively compete with the following crop for the soil mineral nitrogen. The N in the biomass is readily available because of the narrow C/N ratio, resulting in rapid mineralization in the soil. By increasing the proportion of vetch in the mixture with rye, the combination of these two species could be useful for the reduction of NO3− leaching over winter while providing high amounts of N for the subsequent high N demanding vegetables in late spring. The main result of this study and benefit of pure legume stands as green manure crops is their low increase in the aboveground biomass C/N ratio over a period of several weeks in spring. To our knowledge, no data is available on how the change in N amount and biomass composition over the entire spring period influences the N mineralization pattern and the N release from winter cover crop residues after soil incorporation. Therefore, this should be investigated in the future, as well as the influence of leguminous winter cover crops on the succeeding crops in the crop rotation.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Allar J, Maltais-Landry G (2022) Limited benefits of summer cover crops on nitrogen cycling in organic vegetable production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 122:119–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10189-8
Alonso-Ayuso M, Gabriel JL, Quemada M (2014) The kill date as a management tool for cover cropping success. PLoS One 9:e109587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109587
Bergmann W (ed) (1993) Ernährungsstörungen bei Kulturpflanzen: Entstehung, visuelle und analytische Diagnose; 128 Tab, 3., erw. Aufl. Fischer, Jena Stuttgart
Bio Austria (2021) Bio Austria Produktionsrichtlinien. https://www.bio-austria.at/app/uploads/2022/02/richtlinien-2022-februar-klein-wasserzeichen.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2022
BLE (2020) Ökobarometer 2019 - Umfrage zum Konsum von Biolebensmitteln. Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Geschäftsstelle Bundesprogramm Ökologischer Landbau und andere Formen nachhaltiger Landwirtschaft (BÖLN). https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/oekobarometer-2019.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5. Accessed 22 Mar 2022
Bioland eV (2023) Amendments to the Standards. https://www.bioland.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Verband/Dokumente/Richtlinien_fuer_Erzeuger_und_Hersteller/Bioland-Richtlinien_englisch_2023-07.pdf
Campiglia E, Mancinelli R, Di Felice V, Radicetti E (2014a) Long-term residual effects of the management of cover crop biomass on soil nitrogen and yield of endive (Cichorium endivia L.) and savoy cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Sabauda). Soil Tillage Res 139:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.003
Campiglia E, Radicetti E, Brunetti P, Mancinelli R (2014b) Do cover crop species and residue management play a leading role in pepper productivity? Sci Hortic 166:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.12.018
Canali S, Diacono M, Campanelli G, Montemurro F (2015) Organic No-Till with roller crimpers: agro-ecosystem services and applications in organic mediterranean vegetable productions. Sustain Agric Res 4:70. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n3p70
Cooper J, Reed EY, Hörtenhuber S et al (2018) Phosphorus availability on many organically managed farms in Europe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 110:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9894-2
Coppens F, Garnier P, Findeling A, Merckx R, Recous S (2007) Decomposition of mulched versus incorporated crop residues: modelling with PASTIS clarifies interactions between residue quality and location. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2339–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.04.005
Cordeiro AAS, Rodrigues MB, Gonçalves Júnior M, Espíndola JAA, Araújo ES, Guerra JGM (2018) Organic cabbage growth using green manure in pre-cultivation and organic top dressing fertilization. Hortic Bras 36:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620180415
Demeter eV (2021) Demeter Richtlinien 2021 Erzeugung und Verarbeitung Richtlinien für die Zertifizierung »Demeter« und »Biodynamisch« Gültig ab 1. Januar 2021. https://www.demeter.de/sites/default/files/richtlinien/richtlinien_gesamt.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2022
European Parliament and European Council (2022) Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02018R0848-20220101&from=EN. Accessed 22 Mar 2022
European Commission (2019) Organic farming in the EU- A fast growing sector. European Union. https://www.ortocal.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/market-brief-organic-farming-in-the-eu_mar2019_en-1.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2022
Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Bailey BA (2005) Role of cover crops in improving soil and row crop Productivity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:2733–2757. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620500303939
Feller C, Fink M (2005) Growth and yield of Broccoli as affected by the nitrogen content of transplants and the timing of nitrogen fertilization. HortScience 40:1320–1323. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1320
Feller C, Fink M, Laber H et al (2011) Düngung im Freilandgemüsebau. Schriftenreihe des Leibniz-Instituts für Gemüse- und Zierpflanzenbau (IGZ), 3. Auflage, Heft 4, Grossbeeren
Frasier I, Noellemeyer E, Amiotti N, Quiroga A (2017) Vetch-rye biculture is a sustainable alternative for enhanced nitrogen availability and low leaching losses in a no-till cover crop system. Field Crops Res 214:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.016
Haas G, Brand H, de la Vega MP (2007) Nitrogen from Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) as winter green manure for white cabbage in organic horticulture. Biol Agric Hortic 25:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2007.10823207
Hartung, J, Piepho H-P (2021) Effect of missing values in multi-environmental trials on variance component estimates. Crop Science; 61:4087–4097. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20621
Hartwig NL, Ammon HU (2002) Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Sci 50:688–699. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0688:AIACCA]2.0.CO;2
Hefner M, Canali S, Willekens K et al (2020) Termination method and time of agro-ecological service crops influence soil mineral nitrogen, cabbage yield and root growth across five locations in Northern and Western Europe. Eur J Agron 120:126144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126144
Karpenstein-Machan M, Stuelpnagel R (2000) Biomass yield and nitrogen fixation of legumes monocropped and intercropped with rye and rotation effects on a subsequent maize crop. Plant Soil 218/2:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014932004926
Larkin RP (2020) Effects of cover crops, rotation, and biological control products on soil properties and productivity in organic vegetable production in the northeastern US. Org Agric 10:171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00257-3
Little RJ, Rubin DB (2019) Statistical analysis with missing data, vol. 793, Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482260
Løes A-K, Bünemann EK, Cooper J, Hörtenhuber S, Magid J, Oberson A, Möller K (2017) Nutrient supply to organic agriculture as governed by EU regulations and standards in six european countries. Org Agric 7:395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-016-0165-3
Möhring J, Williams E, Piepho HP (2015) Inter-block information: to recover or not to recover it? Theor Appl Genet 128:1541–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2530-0
Möller K (2018) Soil fertility status and nutrient input–output flows of specialised organic cropping systems: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 112:147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9946-2
Möller K, Schultheiß U (2014) Organische Handelsdüngemittel im ökologischen Landbau: charakterisierung und Empfehlungen für die Praxis. KTBL, Darmstadt
Nyfeler D, Huguenin-Elie O, Suter M, Frossard E, Lüscher A (2011) Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.022
Oelofse M, Jensen LS, Magid J (2013) The implications of phasing out conventional nutrient supply in organic agriculture: Denmark as a case. Org Agric 3:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0045-z
Paul EA (2007) Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press
Piepho H-P (2004) An algorithm for a letter-based representation of all-pairwise comparisons. J Comput Graph Stat 13:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1198/1061860043515
Piepho HP, Büchse A, Richter C (2004) A mixed modelling approach for randomized experiments with repeated measures. J Agron Crop Sci 190:230–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00097.x
Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8
Rosecrance RC, McCarty GW, Shelton DR, Teasdale JR (2000) Denitrification and N mineralization from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Plant Soil 227:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026582012290
Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005587
Stuelpnagel R (1982) Schätzung der von Ackerbohnen symbiontisch fixierten Stickstoffmenge im Feldversuch mit der erweiterten Differenzmethode. Z für Acker-und Pflanzenbau 446–458
Unkovich, Murray, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (2008) Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems/Murray Unkovich ... [et al.]. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra. http://www.aciar.gov.au/publication/MN136
Voogt W, de Visser PHE, van Winkel A, Cuijpers WJM, van de Burgt GJHM (2011) Nutrient management in organic greenhouse production: navigation between constraints. Acta Hortic. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.915.9
Wachendorf M, Buerkert A, Graß R (eds) (2022) Ökologische Landwirtschaft, 2., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart
Watson CA, Atkinson D, Gosling P, Jackson LR, Rayns FW (2002) Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use Manag 18:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00265.x
Willer EH, Lernoud J (2019) The world of organic agriculture statistics and emerging Trends 2019. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, and IFOAM – Organics International, Bonn
Willumsen J, Thorup-Kristensen K (2001) Effects of green manure crops on soil mineral nitrogen available for organic production of onion and white cabbage in two contrasting years. Biol Agric Hortic 18:365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2001.9754898
Wolfinger R (1993) Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 22:1079–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919308813143
Zikeli S, Deil L, Möller K (2017) The challenge of imbalanced nutrient flows in organic farming systems: a study of organic greenhouses in Southern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 244:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.01
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere thanks for the active support of the employees at all three institutions, namely: Björn Pieper, Andrea Heckenberger, Simon Schäfer, Hans Schubert, and Carolin Weiler.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The project is supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the Federal Scheme for Organic Farming (BÖL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, SS, UP, KM and SZ; Data curation, SS and UP; Formal analysis, SS and JH; Funding acquisition, SZ and KM; Investigation, SS; Methodology, SS, JH, UP, KM and SZ; Project administration, SS, UP, KM and SZ; Resources, SS, UP, KM and SZ; Supervision, SZ and KM; Validation, SS; Visualization, SS; Writing—original draft, SS; Writing—review and editing, SS, JH, UP, KM and SZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no financial and non-financial conflicts of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, S., Hartung, J., Perkons, U. et al. Plant and soil N of different winter cover crops as green manure for subsequent organic white cabbage. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 127, 285–298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10306-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10306-9