Erratum to: Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst (2010) DOI 10.1007/s10705-010-9399-8
Relationships between soil organic C and N fractions, and between crop residue C input and soil organic C or N fractions
Under above subheading, the first sentence in the second paragraph should read as “The cumulative crop residue C inputs for the ZTSRem0, ZTSRet0, ZTSRet50, ZTSRet100, CTSRem0, CTSRet0, CTSRet50 and CTSRet100, respectively, were 2.822, 10.491, 26.886, 27.899, 3.198, 11.674, 29.056 and 32.468 Mg C ha−1 for the growing seasons from 1980 to 1998 (19 years), and 4.379, 17.550, 42.361, 43.949, 5.221, 19.545, 44.960 and 51.891 Mg C ha−1 from 1980 to 2006 (27 years)”.
In Table 8, the correlation coefficients between crop residue C input and soil organic C or N fractions for the period 1980–1998 should read as 0.824*, 0.847**, 0.876**, 0.915**, 0.808*, 0.838*, 0.435ns, 0.778* and 0.590ns, respectively, for TOC, TON, LFOC, LFON, MOM-C, MOM-N, MB-C, Cmin and Nmin. The corresponding values for the period 1980–2006 should read as 0.845**, 0.864**, 0.772* and 0.741*, respectively, for TOC, TON, LFOC and LFON.
Table 9 should read as follows:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10705-010-9399-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malhi, S.S., Nyborg, M., Goddard, T. et al. Erratum to: Long-term tillage, straw and N rate effects on quantity and quality of organic C and N in a Gray Luvisol soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 90, 21–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9427-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9427-3