Abstract
It is the aim of this study to analyse how different crop growth model routines affect the simulation of water flow and nitrogen transport of a crop rotation in agricultural fields. The model system Expert-N is briefly described and used to test the crop growth sub-models against data of a six-year field experiment on sandy soils. Expert-N is a modular soil–plant–atmosphere model system, which comprises different sub-models to simulate one-dimensional vertical transport of water, solute and heat in the unsaturated zone. It includes several sub-models to describe organic matter turnover and has three generic crop growth sub-models. The latter are derived from the crop models CERES, SPASS and SUCROS. Simulations were performed using the different sub-models for each of the cereal crops in the sugar beet, winter wheat, winter barley, winter rye crop rotation. Results show the impact of crop model choice on simulated water balances and turnover of C and N. It is concluded that the simulation of root growth and plant residue mineralisation needs some improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addiscott T.M. and Wagenet R.J. (1985). Concepts of solute leaching in soils: a review of modelling approaches J. Soil Sci. 36: 411–424
Asseng S., van Keulen H. and Stol W. (2000). Performance and application of the APSIM NWHEAT model in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Agron. 12: 37–54
Bellochi G., Silvestri N., Mazzoncini M. and Menini S. (2002). Using the CROPSYST model in continuous rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) using alternative management options. Ital. J. Agron. 6: 43–56
Berkenkamp A., Priesack E. and Munch J.C. (2002). Modelling the mineralisation of plant residues on the soil surface. Agronomie 22: 711–722
Beven K. (2002). Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system. Hydrol. Process. 16: 189–206
Booltink H.W.G., van Alphen B.J., Batchelor W. D., Paz J.O., Stoorvogel J.J. and Vargas R. (2001). Tools for optimizing management of spatially-variable fields. Agric. Syst. 70: 445–476
De Willigen P. (1991). Nitrogen turnover in the soil crop system: comparison of fourteen simulation models. Fert. Res. 27: 141–149
Diekkrüger B., Söndgerath D., Kersebaum K.C. and McVoy C.W. (1995). Validity of agroecosystem models. A comparison of results of different models applied to the same data set. Ecol. Model. 81: 3–29
DVWK. 1996. Ermittlung der Verdunstung von Land- und Wasserflächen. Merkblätter zur Wasserwirtschaft 238, Wirtschafts- und Verlagsgesellschaft Gas und Wasser, Bonn, Germany
Engel T., Klöcking B., Priesack E. and Schaaf T. 1993. Simulationsmodelle zur Stickstoffdynamik. Agrarinformatik 25, Verlag Eugen Ullmer, Stuttgart, Germany
Engel Th. and Priesack E. (1993). Expert-N, a building block system of nitrogen models as resource for advice, research, water management and policy. In: Eijsackers H.J.P. and Hamers T. (eds), Integrated Soil and Sediment Research: A Basis for Proper Protection. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 503–507
Gayler S., Wang E., Priesack E., Schaaf T. and Maidl F.-X. (2002). Modeling biomass growth, N-uptake and phenological development of potato crop. Geoderma 105: 367–383
Grant R.F. (1995). Dynamics of energy, water, carbon and nitrogen in agricultural ecosystems: simulation and experimental validation. Ecol. Model. 81: 169–181
Hansen S., Jensen H.E., Nielsen N.E. and Svendsen H. (1991). Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model DAISY. Fert. Res. 27: 245–259
Hutson J.L. and Wagenet R.J. 1992. LEACHM: Leaching Estimation And Chemistry Model: A process-based model of water and solute movement, transformations, plant uptake and chemical reactions in the unsaturated zone. Version 3.0. Department of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, Research Series No. 93-3, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Huwe B. 1992. Deterministische und stochastische Ansätze zur Modellierung des Stickstoffhaushalts landwirtschaftlich genutzter Flächen auf unterschiedlichem Skalenniveau. Mitteilungen 11, Institut für Wasserbau, Stuttgart, Germany
Johnsson H., Bergström L., Jansson P.E. and Paustian K. (1987). Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 18: 333–356
Jones C.A. and Kiniry J.R. (eds) (1986). CERES-Maize. A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. Texas A&M University Press, Temple, TX, USA
Kersebaum K.C. , Lorenz K., Reuter H.I. and Wendroth O. (2002). Modeling crop growth and nitrogen dynamics for advisory purposes regarding spatial variability. In: Ahuja L.R., Ma L. and Howell T.A. (eds), Agricultural System Models in Field Research and Technology Transfer. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 229–252
McIsaac G., Martin D.L. and Watts D.G. (1985). Users Guide to NITWAT – A Nitrogen and Water Management Model. Agr. Eng. Dpt., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NA, USA
Munch J.C., Berkenkamp A. and Sehy U. (2001). The effect of site specific fertilisation on N 2 O emissions and N-leaching – measurements and simulations. In: Horst W.J. et al. (eds), Plant Nutrition – Food Security and Sustainability of Agro-ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 902–903
Nicolardot B. and Molina J.A.E. (1994). C and N fluxes between pools of soil organic matter: model calibration with long-term field experimental data. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 245–251
Priesack E., Achatz S. and Stenger R. (2001). Parameterisation of Soil Nitrogen Transport Models by Use of Laboratory and Field Data. In: Shaffer M.J., Ma L. and Hansen S. (eds), Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 461–484
Priesack E. and Bauer C. (2003). Expert-N Datenmanagement. FAM-Bericht 59, Hieronymus, München, Germany
Ritchie J.T. (1991). Wheat phasic development. In: Hanks J. and Ritchie J.T. (eds), Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, Agronomy Monograph 31. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 31–54
Schaaf T., Priesack E. and Engel T. (1995). Comparing field data from north Germany with simulations of the nitrogen model N-SIM. Ecol. Model. 81: 223–212
Schröder P., Huber B., Olazábal U., Kämmerer A. and Munch J.C. (2002). Land use and sustainability: FAM research network on agro ecosystems. Geoderma 105: 155–166
Shaffer M.J., Ma L. and Hansen S. (2001). Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Šimunek J., Huang, K. and van Genuchten, M.T. 1998. The HYDRUS code for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Version 6.0. Research Report No. 144, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA, USA
Smith P., Smith J.U., Powlson D.S., McGill W.B., Arah J.R.M., Chertov O.G., Coleman K., Franko U., Frolking S., Jenkinson D.S., Jensen L.S., Kelly R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek H., Komarov A.S., Li C., Molina J.A.E., Mueller T., Parton W.J., Thornley J.H.M. and Whitmore A.P. (1997). A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81: 153–225
Sperr C., Priesack E. and Engel T. (1993). Expert-N: Aufbau, Bedienung und Nutztungsmöglichkeiten des Prototyps. In: Engel T. and Baldioli M. (eds), Expert-N und Wachstumsmodelle. Referate des Anwenderseminars im März 1993 in Weihenstephan. Agrarinformatik 24, Verlag Eugen Ullmer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 41–57
Stenger R., Priesack E., Barkle G., Sperr C. (1999). Expert-N A tool for simulating nitrogen and carbon dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. In: Tomer M., Robinson M., Gielen G. (eds), NZ Land Treatment Collective Proceedings Technical Session 20: Modelling of Land Treatment Systems. New Plymouth, New Zealand, pp. 19–28
Stoeckle C.O., Donatelli M. and Nelson R. (2003). CROPSYST, a cropping system simulation model. Eur. J. Agron. 18: 289–307
Svendsen H., Hansen S. and Jensen H.E. (1995). Simulation of crop production, water and nitrogen balances in two German agro-ecosystems using the DAISY model. Ecol. Model. 81: 197–212
Vanclooster M., Viaene P., Diels J. and Christiaens K. (1994). WAVE a Mathematical Model for Simulating Water and Agrochemicals in the Soil and Vadose Environment. Reference and User’s Manual (release 2.0). Institute for Land and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
van Ittersum M.K. and Donatelli M. (2003). Modelling cropping systems–highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues. Eur. J. Agron. 18: 187–197
van Laar H.H., Goudriaan J. and van Keulen H. (eds) 1992. Simulation of Crop Growth for Potential and Water-limited Production Situations, as Applied to Spring Wheat. Simulation Reports 27, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Wallach D. and Goffinet B. (1989). Mean squared error of prediction as a criterion for evaluating and comparing system models. Ecol. Model. 44: 299–306
Wang E. (1997). Development of a Generic Process-oriented Model for Simulation of Crop Growth. Dissertation, Herbert Utz Verlag, München, Germany
Wang E. and Engel T. (2000). SPASS: a generic process-oriented crop model with versatile windows interfaces. Environ. Model. Software 15: 179–188
Wegehenkel M. (2005). Validation of a soil water balance model using soil water content and pressure head data. Hydrol. Process. 19: 1139–1164
Wegehenkel M. and Mirschel W. 2006. Crop growth, soil water and nitrogen balance simulation on three experimental field plots using the Opus model – a case study. Ecol. Model. 190: 116–132
Wegehenkel M., Mirschel W. and Wenkel K.-O. (2004). Prediction of soil water and crop growth dynamics using the agroecosystem models THESEUS and OPUS. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 167: 736–744
Willmott C.J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 64: 1309–1313
Zadoks J.C., Chang T.T. and Konzak C.F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the framework of the Collaborative Research Centre 607 “Growth and Parasite Defense: Competition for Resources in Economic Plants from Agronomy and Forestry”. The experimental dataset provided by the Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape and Land Use Research is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the anonymous reviewer for his comments that helped to considerably improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Priesack, E., Gayler, S. & Hartmann, H.P. The impact of crop growth sub-model choice on simulated water and nitrogen balances. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 75, 1–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9006-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9006-1