Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation method for maximum low-cycle fatigue loads using FRASTA reconstruction data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is proposed to calculate the load on a specimen during a fatigue failure using a post-mortem analysis of the fracture surfaces. This method uses the fracture-surface topography analysis to infer the plastic strains that have developed during the failure. That is, based on the previously proposed simple bar hypothesis, the fracture surfaces can be assumed to be composed of independent rectangular bars. After dividing the plastic deformation into single bars, the original lengths of these bars are calculated and then the global strains of these bars during the course of failure are calculated. According to the relationship between true stress and true strain for the material, the normal stress on the cross section of each bar is determined. Adding all loads on all bars together provides the total applied load of the specimen. As illustrations, the method is applied to fracture surfaces obtained from double-edge notched specimens made of two kinds of metallic alloy, broken under low-cycle fatigue. Results show that the calculated maximum fatigue load is almost equal to that recorded during testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertin ML (1978) Fractographic method of evaluation of the cyclic stress amplitude in fatigue failure analysis. American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM), Philadelphia, pp 73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao YG, Tanaka K (2006a) Determination of CTOA and J-integral by fracture surface topography analysis. Int J Fract 139(2):253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao YG, Tanaka K (2006b) Development of FRASTA simulation software. Acta Metall Sinica (English Letters) 19(3):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao YG, Xue SF, Tanaka K (2007a) Relationship between J-integral and fracture surface average profile. Acta Metall Sinica (English Letters) 20(1):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao YG, Sun XY, Tanaka K (2007b) Study on the relationship between J-integral and COD. Acta Metall Sinica (English Letters) 20(6):417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coster M, Chermant JL (1983) Recent development in quantitative fractography. Int Met Rev 28(4):228–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa K, Murakami Y, Nishida S (1998) A method for determining stress ratio of fatigue loading from the width and height of striation. Int J Fatigue 20(7):509–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hideaki K, Hiroshi I, Takashi K et al (2001) Study on estimation methods of applied stress using fractography analysis, Mitsubishi heavy industries, Ltd. Tech Rev 38(3):156–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Igata N (1983) Strength of materials. Baifukan Co., Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen MF, Popelar CH (1985) Advanced fracture mechanics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Shockey DA (1987) A fractographic investigation of thermal embrittlement in cast duplex stainless steel. Metall Trans A 18(11):1941–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Shockey DA (1991a) FRASTA: a new way to analyze fracture surfaces, part 1: reconstructing crack histories. Adv Mater Process 140(5):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Shockey DA (1991b) Fracture analysis via FRASTA, part 2: determining fracture mechanisms and parameters. Adv Mater Process 140(6):24–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd WR (2003) Microtopography for ductile fracture process characterization, part 1: theory and methodology. Eng Fract Mech 70:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto H, Kikuchi M, Kawazoe M (1990) A study on the ductile fracture of Al-alloys 7075 and 2017. Int J Fract 42:389–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan N, Benguediab M, Henaff G et al (1987) Quantitative fracture surface analysisof fatigue crack propagation under variable amplitude loading. American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM), Philadelphia, pp 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaniavski A (1996) Quantitative fractographic analysis of fatigue crack growth in longeron sofin service helicopter rotor blades. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater 19(9):1129–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sozanska M, Iacoviello F, Cwajna J et al (2002) Quantitative analysis of fatigue fracture surface in the duplex steel. Image Anal Stereol 21:55–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • William CC (1994) Fatigue striation spacing analysis. Mater Charact 33(3):245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong QP, Zhao ZH (2006) Fractography. Higher education press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Contract No. 11242004) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Contract No. 12CX04068A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-guang Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, Yg., Zhang, Sh. & Tanaka, K. Calculation method for maximum low-cycle fatigue loads using FRASTA reconstruction data. Int J Fract 182, 157–166 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9862-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9862-z

Keywords

Navigation