Abstract
It is argued that, in probabilistic estimates of quasibrittle structure strength, the strength threshold should be considered to be zero and the distribution to be transitional between Gaussian and Weibullian. The strength histograms recently measured on tough ceramics and other quasibrittle materials, which have been thought to imply a Weibull distribution with nonzero threshold, are shown to be fitted equally well or better by a new weakest-link model with a zero strength threshold and with a finite, rather than infinite, number of links in the chain, each link corresponding to one representative volume element (RVE) of a non-negligible size. The new model agrees with the measured mean size effect curves. It is justified by energy release rate dependence of the activation energy barriers for random crack length jumps through the atomic lattice, which shows that the tail of the failure probability distribution should be a power law with zero threshold. The scales from nano to macro are bridged by a hierarchical model with parallel and series couplings. This scale bridging indicates that the power-law tail with zero threshold is indestructible while its exponent gets increased on each passage to a higher scales. On the structural scale, the strength distribution except for its far left power-law tail, varies from Gaussian to Weibullian as the structure size increases. For the mean structural strength, the theory predicts a size effect which approaches the Weibull power law asymptotically for large sizes but deviates from it at small sizes. This deviation is the easiest way to calibrate the theory experimentally. The structure size is measured in terms of the number of RVEs. This number must be convoluted by an integral over the dimensionless stress field, which depends on structure geometry. The theory applies to the broad class of structure geometries for which failure occurs at macro-crack initiation from one RVE, but not to structure geometries for which stability is lost only after large macro-crack growth. Based on tolerable structural failure probability of <10−6, the change from nonzero to zero threshold may often require a major correction in safety factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang AH-S, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. vol II. Decision, risk and reliability. Wiley, New York
Barenblatt GI (1996) Scaling, selfsimilarity and intermediate asymptotics. Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge, UK)
Barenblatt GI (2003) Scaling. Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge, UK)
Bažant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech, ASCE 110(4): 518–535
Bažant ZP (2001) Size effects in quasibrittle fracture: Aperçu of recent results. In: Borst R, Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Mier JGM (eds) Fracture mechanics of concrete structures (Proc., FraMCoS-4 Int. Conf., Paris), Swets & Zeitlinger, A.A.. Balkema Publishers, Lisse, pp 651–658
Bažant ZP (2004a) Probability distribution of energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle fracture. Probab Eng Mech 19(4): 307–319
Bažant ZP (2004b) Scaling theory for quasibrittle structural failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(37): 13397–13399
Bažant ZP (2005) Scaling of structural strength. 2nd edn. Elsevier, London
Bažant ZP, Chen E-P (1997) Scaling of structural failure. Appl Mech Rev ASME 50(10): 593–627
Bažant ZP, Kazemi MT (1990) Size effect in fracture of ceramics and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length. J Am Ceram Soc 73(7): 1841–1853
Bažant ZP, Novák D (2000a) Probabilistic nonlocal theory for quasibrittle fracture initiation and size effect. I. Theory. II. Application. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(2): 166–185
Bažant ZP, Novák D (2000b) Energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle failure at crack initiation. ACI Mater J 97(3): 381–392
Bažant ZP, Pang S-D (2005) Revision of reliability concepts for quasibrittle structures and size effect on probability distribution of structural strength. In: Augusti G, Schuëller GI, Ciampoli M (eds) Safety and reliability of engrg. systems and structures (Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR 2005, held in Rome). Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 377–386
Bažant ZP, Pang S-D (2006) Mechanics-based statistics of failure risk of quasibrittle structures and size effect on satety factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(25): 9434–9439
Bažant ZP, Pang S-D (2007) Activation energy based extereme value statistics and size effect in brittle and quasibrittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 32(55): 91–131
Bažant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton and London
Bažant ZP, Xi Y (1991) Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures: II. Nonlocal theory. J Eng Mech ASCE 117(17): 2623–2640
Bažant ZP, Vořechovský M, Novák D (2007) Asymptotic prediction of energetic-statistical size effect from deterministic finite element solutions. J Eng Mech ASCE 128: 153–162
Bažant ZP, Le J-L, Bazant MZ (2008) Size effect on strength and lifetime distributions of quasibrittle structures implied by interatomic bond break activation. Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. on Fracture. (held in Brno, Sept. 2008) (in press)
Bažant ZP, Le J-L, Bazant MZ (2009) Scaling of strength and lifetime distributions of quasibrittle structures based on atomistic fracture mechanics. Theoretical & Appl Mech Rep No 08-12/C6055, Northwestern Univ. Submitted to Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Bulmer MG (1979) Principles of statistics (chapter 12). Dover Publ., New York
Bouchaud J-P, Potters M (2000) Theory of financial risks: from statistical physics to risk management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Daniel HE (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles and threads. Proc R Soc Lond 183: 405–435
Duckett K (2005) Risk analysis and the acceptable probability of failure. Struct Eng 83(15): 25–26
Duffy SF, Powers LM, Starlinger A (1993) Reliability analysis of structural ceramic components using a three-parameter Weibull distribution. Trans ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 115: 109–116
Eyring H (1936) Viscosity, plasticity and diffusion as examples of absolute reaction rates. J Chem Phys 4: 283–291
Fisher RA, Tippett LHC (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest and smallest member of a sample. Proc Camb Philol Soc 24: 180–190
Freudenthal AM (1968) Statstical approach to brittle fracture. In: Lievowitz H. (ed) Fracture: an advanced treatise. Academic Press, New York, vol 2 pp 591–619
Gross B (1996) Least squares best fit method for the three parameter weibull distribution: analysis of tensile and bend specimens with volume or surface flaw failure. NASA TM-4721 pp 1–21
Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York
Harlow DG, Smith RL, Taylor HM (1983) Lower tail analysis of the distribution of the strength of load-sharing systems. J Appl Probab 20: 358–367
Ironside JG, Swain MV (1998) Ceramics in dental restorations—a review and critical issues. J Aust Ceram Soc 34(2): 78–91
Kaxiras E (2003) Atomic and electronic structure of solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lohbauer U, Petchelt A, Greil P (2002) Lifetime prediction of CAD/CAM dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 63(6): 780–785
Melchers RE (1987) Structural reliability, analysis & prediction. Wiley, New York
NKB (Nordic Committee for Building Structures) (1978) Recommendation for loading and safety regulations for structural design. NKB Report, No. 36
Okabe N, Hirata H (1995) High temperature fatigue properties for some types of SiC and Si 3 N 4 and the unified strength estimation method. In: Kishimoto H, Hoshide T, Okabe N (eds) Cyclic fatigue in ceramics. Elsevier Science B. V. and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp 245–276
Philips R (2001) Crystals, defects, and microstructures: modeling across scales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Phoenix SL, Ibnabdeljalil M, Hui C-Y (1997) Size effect in the distribution of strength of brittle matrix fibrous composites. Int J Solids Struct 34(5): 545–568
RILEM TC QFS (chaired by Z.P. Bažant) (2004) Quasibrittle fracture scaling and size effect—Final report. Mater Struct (Paris) 37(272):547–586
Risken H (1989) The Fokker–Planck equation. 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Salem JA, Nemeth NN, Powers LP, Choi SR (1996) Reliability analysis of uniaxially ground brittle materials. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 118: 863–871
Santos Cd, Strecker K, Piorino Neto F, de Macedo Silva OMM, Baldacum SA, de Silva CRM (2003) Evaluation of the reliability of Si 3 N 4−Al 2 O 3−CTR 2 O 3 ceramics through Weibull analysis. Mater Res 6(4): 463–467
Schwartz P (1987) A review of recent experimental resulst concerning the strength and time dependent behaviour of fibrous poly (Paraphenylene Terephthalamide). Polym Eng Sci 27(11): 842–847
Stanley P, Inanc EY (1985) Assessment of surface strength and bulk strength of a typical brittle material. In: Eggwertz S, Lind NC (eds) Probabilistic methods. I. The mechanics of solids and structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 231–251
Wagner HD (1989) Stochastic concepts in the study of size effects in the mechanical strength of highly oriented polymeric materials. J Polym Sci 27: 115–149
Weibull W (1939) The phenomenon of rupture in solids. Proceedings of Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research, Stockholm 151: 1–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pang, SD., Bažant, Z.P. & Le, JL. Statistics of strength of ceramics: finite weakest-link model and necessity of zero threshold. Int J Fract 154, 131–145 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9317-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9317-8