Abstract
An experiment by Proietti et al. purporting to instantiate the ‘Wigner’s Friend’ thought experiment is discussed. It is pointed out that the stated implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts attributed to different observers warrant critical review. In particular, violation of a Clauser–Horne–Shimony inequality by the experimental data actually shows that the attribution of measurement outcomes to the “Friends” (modeled by internal photons undergoing unitary interactions) is erroneous. An elementary but often overlooked result regarding improper mixtures is adduced in support of this assessment, and a basic logical error in the analysis leading to the authors’ ontological claims that different observers are subject to irreconcilable ‘facts’ is identified. A counterexample is provided which refutes the popular notion that quantum theory leads to ‘relative facts’ that never manifest as empirical inconsistencies. It is further noted that under an assumption of unbroken unitarity, no measurement correlation can ever yield an outcome, since all systems remain in improper mixtures, and attributing a definite but unknown outcome contradicts their composite pure state. It is pointed out that there already exists a solution to this conundrum in the form of an alternative formulation of quantum theory, which accounts for the data showing that no outcomes occurred at the interior entangled photon level and also predicts that outcomes can and do occur at the exterior “super-observer” level in this type of experiment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Kent [11] was concerned about the excessive freedom to “conclude anything we please” based on arbitrary theorizing about the relation between mind states and brain states. In the present case, refusing to falsify the antecedent for a falsified consequent of a deductively true conditional statement could similarly lead to being able to conclude anything we please.
Zukowski and Markiewicz [15] argue that there is no measurement outcome at the “Friend” level in this experiment using decoherence arguments. However, decoherence alone is not sufficient to establish a measurement outcome; this is implied by Hughes’ argument and is discussed in detail in Kastner [9] and references therein. See also Kastner [10].
References
Proietti, M., et al.: Experimental test of local observer independence. Sci. Adv. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw9832
Frauchiger, D., Renner, R.: Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018)
Bong, K.-W., et al.: A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox. Nat. Phys. 16, 1199–1205 (2020)
Kastner, R.E.: Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox. Found. Phys. 50, 441–456 (2020b)
Feyerabend, P.K.: On the quantum theory of measurement. In: Korner, S. (ed.) Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 121–130. Dover, New York (1962)
Hughes, R.I.G.: The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Baumann, V., Wolf, S.: On formalisms and interpretations. Quantum 2, 99 (2018)
Clauser, J., Horne, M., Shimony, A., Holt, R.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
Kastner, R.E.: Einselection of pointer observables: the new H-theorem? Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56–58 (2014)
Kastner, R.E.: Decoherence in the transactional interpretation. Int. J. Quantum Found. 6(2), 24–39 (2020a)
Kent, A.: One world versus many: the inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation. In: Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (eds.) Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Kastner, R.E.: On the status of the measurement problem: recalling the relativistic transactional interpretation. Int. J. Quantum Found. 4(1), 128–141 (2018)
Kastner, R. E.: “The Relativistic Transactional Interpretation and The Quantum Direct-Action Theory,” preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00712. (This material is excerpted from the forthcoming second edition of Kastner (2012) (2021)
Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)
Zukowski, M., Markiewicz, M.: Physics and metaphysics of Wigner’s Friends: even performed premeasurements have no results. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(13), 130402 (2021)
Kastner, R.E.: The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kastner, R.E. Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model “Wigner’s Friend”. Found Phys 51, 89 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00492-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00492-3