Skip to main content
Log in

On Magnetic Forces and Work

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address a long-standing debate over whether classical magnetic forces can do work, ultimately answering the question in the affirmative. In detail, we couple a classical particle with intrinsic spin and elementary dipole moments to the electromagnetic field, derive the appropriate generalization of the Lorentz force law, show that the particle’s dipole moments must be collinear with its spin axis, and argue that the magnetic field does mechanical work on the particle’s elementary magnetic dipole moment. As consistency checks, we calculate the overall system’s energy-momentum and angular momentum, and show that their local conservation equations lead to the same force law and therefore the same conclusions about magnetic forces and work. We also compute the system’s Belinfante–Rosenfeld energy–momentum tensor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a more extensive treatment of the results in this paper, see [2].

  2. This group-theoretic definition of the particle’s phase space is the classical counterpart to Wigner’s classification [17] of quantum particle-types based on irreducible Hilbert-space representations of the Poincaré group.

  3. We thank David Griffiths for pointing out that a defining feature of Maxwell’s original theory is the inclusion of magnetic dipoles solely of the Ampère type, without magnetic monopoles, dyons, Gilbert dipoles, or elementary magnetic dipoles.

  4. For maximum generality and to avoid introducing any unnecessary constraints into the particle’s Lagrangian formulation, it is convenient to wait until after deriving the particle’s equations of motion before imposing the simplifying condition that \(\lambda\) is the particle’s proper time \(\tau\).

  5. The quantum-mechanical analogue of this classical collinearity condition follows from the Wigner-Eckart theorem.

  6. Explicitly, we have \(\dot{\theta }^{\mu \nu }=(i/2)\mathrm {Tr}[\sigma ^{\mu \nu }\dot{\Lambda }\Lambda ^{-1}]\), where \([\sigma ^{\mu \nu }]^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }=-i\eta ^{\mu \alpha }\delta _{\beta }^{\nu }+i\delta _{\beta }^{\mu }\eta ^{\nu \alpha }\) are the generators of the Lorentz group.

  7. We thank Sebastiano Covone for suggesting the relevance of these results to the Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem [6, 13]. The Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem assumes the original Lorentz force law without contributions from elementary dipole moments, and asserts that a non-rotating system of particles, when treated classically, always has a vanishing average magnetization at thermal equilibrium. The theorem’s implication is that phenomena like diamagnetism can only be understood in terms of quantum effects, a view challenged by our results, at least in principle.

  8. The authors of [10] decompose the overall energy-momentum tensor by including the interaction terms with the energy-momentum tensor for the particle, an approach that obscures the work being done by the electromagnetic field on the particle.

  9. For a review, see [8].

  10. This formula differs from the corresponding result in [7], whose energy-momentum tensor yields the correct equations of motion for the particle only after an unjustified four-dimensional integration by parts.

References

  1. Balachandran, A.P., Marmo, G., Skagerstam, B.S., Stern, A.: Gauge Symmetries and Fibre Bundles - Applications to Particle Dynamics, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barandes, J.A.: “Can Magnetic Forces Do Work?”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08890 (2019)

  3. Barandes, J.A.: “Manifestly Covariant Lagrangians, Classical Particles with Spin, and the Origins of Gauge Invariance”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08892 (2019)

  4. Barandes, J.A.: Gauge invariance for classical massless particles with spin. Found. Phys. 51(1), 7 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bargmann, V., Michel, L., Telegdi, V.L.: Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2(10), 435–436 (1959)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohr, N.: “II. The Doctor’s Dissertation (Text and Translation)”. In: L. Rosenfeld, J.R. Nielsen (eds.) Early Work (1905–1911), Niels Bohr Collected Works, vol. 1, pp. 163–393. Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187605030870015X (1972)

  7. van Dam, H., Ruijgrok, T.W.: Classical relativistic equations for particles with spin moving in external fields. Physica A 104(1–2), 281–297 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Francesco, P., Mathieu, P.: Sénéchal: Conformal Field Theory, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Geroch, R., Weatherall, J.O.: The motion of small bodies in space-time. Commun. Math. Phys. 364(2), 607–634 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gralla, S.E., Harte, A.I., Wald, R.M.: Rigorous derivation of electromagnetic self-force. Phys. Rev. D 80(2), 024031 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffiths, D.J.: Introduction to Electrodynamics, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanson, A.J., Regge, T.: The relativistic spherical top. Ann. Phys. 87(2), 498–566 (1974)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. van Leeuwen, H.J.: Problèmes de la théorie électronique du magnétisme (Problems of the electronic theory of magnetism). J. de Physique et le Rad. 2(12), 361–377 (1921)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rivas, M.: Kinematical Theory of Spinning Particles. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Skagerstam, B.S., Stern, A.: Lagrangian descriptions of classical charged particles with spin. Physica Scripta 24, 493–497 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Souriau, J.M.: Structure of Dynamical Systems, 1st edn. Birkhäuser, Basel (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Wigner, E.P.: On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Ann. Math. 40, 149–204 (1939)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J. A. B. has benefited from personal communications with Gary Feldman, Howard Georgi, Andrew Strominger, Bill Phillips, David Griffiths, David Kagan, David Morin, Logan McCarty, Monica Pate, Alex Lupsasca, and Sebastiano Covone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob A. Barandes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barandes, J.A. On Magnetic Forces and Work. Found Phys 51, 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00483-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00483-4

Keywords

Navigation