Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contribution of Pressure to the Energy–Momentum Density in a Moving Perfect Fluid: A Physical Perspective

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 03 March 2022

Abstract

In the energy–momentum density expressions for a relativistic perfect fluid with a bulk motion, one comes across a couple of pressure-dependent terms, which though well known, are to an extent, lacking in their conceptual basis and the ensuing physical interpretation. In the expression for the energy density, the rest mass density along with the kinetic energy density of the fluid constituents due to their random motion, which contributes to the pressure as well, are already included. However, in a fluid with a bulk motion, there are, in addition, a couple of explicit, pressure-dependent terms in the energy–momentum density, whose presence to an extent, is shrouded in mystery, especially from a physical perspective. We show here that one such pressure-dependent term appearing in the energy density, represents the work done by the fluid pressure against the Lorentz contraction during transition from the rest frame of the fluid to another frame in which the fluid has a bulk motion. This applies equally to the electromagnetic energy density of electrically charged systems in motion and explains in a natural manner an apparently paradoxical result that the field energy of a charged capacitor system decreases with an increase in the system velocity. The momentum density includes another pressure-dependent term, that represents an energy flow across the system, due to the opposite signs of work being done by pressure on two opposite sides of the moving fluid. From Maxwell’s stress tensor we demonstrate that in the expression for electromagnetic momentum of an electric charged particle, it is the presence of a similar pressure term, arising from electrical self-repulsion forces in the charged sphere, that yields a natural solution for the notorious, more than a century old but thought by many as still unresolved, 4/3 problem in the electromagnetic mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singal, A.K.: Energy–momentum density and pressure relations for a relativistic ideal gas with a bulk motion. Eur. J. Phys. 41, 065602 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1964)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, J.D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Panofsky, W.K.H., Phillips, M.: Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Singal, A.K.: Energy–momentum of the self-fields of a moving charge in classical electromagnetism. J. Phys. A 25, 1605–1620 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singal, A.K.: Do the standard expressions for the electromagnetic field momentum need any modifications? Am. J. Phys. 84, 780–785 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rohrlich, F.: Self-energy and stability of the classical electron. Am. J. Phys. 28, 639–643 (1960)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation. Freeman, San Fransisco (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schutz, B.F.: A First Course in General Relativity. Cambridge University, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Datta, S.: Introduction to Special Theory of Relativity. Allied, Mumbai (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kittel, C., Knight, W.D., Ruderman, M.A.: Mechanics: Berkeley Physics Course, vol. 1, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singal, A.K.: Lorentz contraction during acceleration from one inertial frame to another. Am. J. Phys. 88, 551–557 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rindler, W.: Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Purcell, E.M.: Electricity and Magnetism: Berkeley Physics Course, vol. 2, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rindler, W., Denur, J.: A simple relativistic paradox about electrostatic energy. Am. J. Phys. 56, 795 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz, H.M.: Poincaré’s Rendiconti paper on relativity part II. Am. J. Phys. 40, 862–872 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singal, A.K.: On the “explanation” of the null results of Trouton–Noble experiment. Am. J. Phys. 61, 428–433 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trouton, F.T., Noble, H.R.: The mechanical forces acting on a charged electric condenser moving through space. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 202, 165–181 (1903)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Teukolsky, S.A.: The explanation of the Trouton–Noble experiment revisited. Am. J. Phys. 64, 1104–1109 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok K. Singal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Energy Momentum in the Electromagnetic Fields of a Charged Particle in Motion

We assume the charged particle to be a thin spherical shell of radius \(\epsilon\) of a uniform surface charge density, with total charge e, stationary in a frame \(\mathcal{S}_0\), called the rest frame (Fig. 5). The electric field is zero inside the shell, and is radial outside the shell, with magnitude \(E_0=e/r^2\).

Fig. 5
figure 5

A uniformly charged, thin spherical shell, has only a radial electric field outside the shell, but no fields inside the shell, as seen in the rest frame \(\mathcal{S}_0\). The charged shell moves with velocity \(\mathbf{v}\) along the x-axis with respect to the lab frame \(\mathcal{S}\), where both electric and magnetic fields exist outside the spheroid-shaped shell, but nil fields on the inside

The volume integral of the energy density in rest frame \(\mathcal{S}_0\) is easily calculated to be

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}_{0}=\int _\epsilon ^\infty \frac{E_0^{2}}{8\pi }\,\mathrm{d}V_0 = \frac{e^2}{2\epsilon }. \end{aligned}$$
(66)

The momentum is zero as the magnetic field is zero throughout

The volume integrals of the energy and momentum densities of the electromagnetic fields of the charge in frame \(\mathcal{S}\), where it is moving with a velocity \(\mathbf{v}\),  say, along x-axis, are then computed, making use of Eqs. (50) and (51), as

$$\begin{aligned}&\mathcal{E}=\int \frac{E^{2}+B^{2}}{8\pi }\,\mathrm{d}V, \end{aligned}$$
(67)
$$\begin{aligned}&\mathbf{P}=\int \frac{\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B}}{4\pi c}\,\mathrm{d}V, \end{aligned}$$
(68)

where \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) are the electric and magnetic fields of the uniformly moving charge.

These integrals can be evaluated in a simple way by noting that \(\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{E}/c\), and using the transformation relations between \(\mathcal{S}\) and \(\mathcal{S}_0\), for the electromagnetic fields as well as for the volume element as

$$\begin{aligned} E_{\Vert }= \,\,& E_{0\Vert }\,, \end{aligned}$$
(69)
$$\begin{aligned} E_{\bot }=\, & {} \gamma E_{0\bot }\,,\end{aligned}$$
(70)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{d}V= \,& {} \mathrm{d}V_{0}/\gamma . \end{aligned}$$
(71)

From that we get

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}=\int \frac{E^{2}_{0\Vert }+(\gamma ^{2}+\gamma ^{2}v^2/c^{2}) E^{2}_{0\bot }}{8\pi \gamma }\,\mathrm{d}V_0. \end{aligned}$$
(72)

Now because of the circular-cylindrical symmetry of the system about the x-axis, the direction of motion, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \int E^{2}_{0\bot }dV_0=\frac{2}{3}\int E_0^{2}\,\mathrm{d}V_0. \end{aligned}$$
(73)

Then, after integration, we get for the field energy in \(\mathcal{S}\)

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}=\gamma \mathcal{E}_{0}\left( 1+\frac{v^{2}}{3c^2}\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(74)

In the same way, we have an expression for the field momentum

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{P}=\int \frac{\gamma ^{2}{} \mathbf{v} E^{2}_{0\bot }}{4\pi c^2 \gamma }\,\mathrm{d}V_0, \end{aligned}$$
(75)

which, after integration, yields

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{P}=\frac{4}{3}\,\mathcal{E}_{0} \frac{\gamma \mathbf{v}}{c^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
(76)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singal, A.K. Contribution of Pressure to the Energy–Momentum Density in a Moving Perfect Fluid: A Physical Perspective. Found Phys 51, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00403-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00403-6

Keywords

Navigation