Skip to main content
Log in

On Entropy Production in the Madelung Fluid and the Role of Bohm’s Potential in Classical Diffusion

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Madelung equations map the non-relativistic time-dependent Schrödinger equation into hydrodynamic equations of a virtual fluid. While the von Neumann entropy remains constant, we demonstrate that an increase of the Shannon entropy, associated with this Madelung fluid, is proportional to the expectation value of its velocity divergence. Hence, the Shannon entropy may grow (or decrease) due to an expansion (or compression) of the Madelung fluid. These effects result from the interference between solutions of the Schrödinger equation. Growth of the Shannon entropy due to expansion is common in diffusive processes. However, in the latter the process is irreversible while the processes in the Madelung fluid are always reversible. The relations between interference, compressibility and variation of the Shannon entropy are then examined in several simple examples. Furthermore, we demonstrate that for classical diffusive processes, the “force” accelerating diffusion has the form of the positive gradient of the quantum Bohm potential. Expressing then the diffusion coefficient in terms of the Planck constant reveals the lower bound given by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in terms of the product between the gas mean free path and the Brownian momentum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madelung, E.: Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form. Z. Phys. A 40, 322–326 (1927)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Takabayasi, T.: On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures. Prog. Theor. Phys. 8, 143–182 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Schönberg, M.: On the hydrodynamical model of the quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cimento 12, 103–133 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonego, S.: Interpretation of the hydrodynamical formalism of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 21, 1135–1181 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Heifetz, E., Cohen, E.: Toward a thermo-hydrodynamic like description of Schrödinger equation via the Madelung formulation and Fisher information. Found. Phys. 45, 1514–1525 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’ I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsekov, R.: Bohmian mechanics versus Madelung quantum hydrodynamics. Ann. Univ. Sofia Fac. Phys. Special Edition, 112–119 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nauenberg, M.: Is Bohm’s interpretation consistent with quantum mechanics. Quanta 3, 43–46 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Polkovnikov, A.: Microscopic diagonal entropy and its connection to basic thermodynamic relations. Ann. Phys. 326, 486–499 (2011)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Vallis, G.K.: Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Wehrl, A.: General properties of entropy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 221–260 (1978)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsekov, R., Vayssilov, G.N.: Quantum Brownian motion and classical diffusion. Chem. Phys. Let. 195, 423–426 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Quantum Mechanics, Non-relativistic Theory, Course of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, London (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Caliari, M., Inverso, G., Morato, L.M.: Dissipation caused by a vorticity field and generation of singularities in Madelung fluid. New J. Phys. 6, 69 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kundu, P.K., Cohen, I.M.: Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press, Burlington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Esposito, S.: On the role of spin in quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 165–177 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Garbaczewski, P.: Differential entropy and dynamics of uncertainty. J. Stat. Phys. 123, 315–355 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Garbaczewski, P.: Indeterminacy relations in random dynamics. Rep. Math. Phys. 60, 289–297 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for helping to improve this manuscript. E.C. was supported by ERC AdG NLST. Z.N. acknowledges partial support by the NSF under Grant No. DMR 1411229.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliahu Cohen.

Appendix

Appendix

Assuming that the phase space density function, \(\rho _{ph}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{p},t)\), in equilibrium can be separated into coordinate and momentum parts, \(\rho _{ph}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{p},t) \equiv \rho (\mathbf{r},t)\chi (\mathbf{p},t)\), then the Boltzmann entropy becomes

$$\begin{aligned} Ent_B = -k_{B} \int \int \rho _{ph} \ln \rho _{ph} d\mathbf{r}d\mathbf{p} = Ent_S- k_{B}\int \chi \ln \chi d\mathbf{p}. \end{aligned}$$
(28)

Under the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation, the particle’s momentum is \(\mathbf{p} = \nabla S(\mathbf{r},t)\), so that \(\chi =\delta (\mathbf{p} -\nabla S)\). As seen from the two terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (28), the Boltzmann entropy is the sum of (i) the entropy \(Ent_S\) associated with the spatial probability distribution (\(\rho \)) and (ii) a (formally divergent) entropy associated with the momentum probability distribution \(\chi \),

$$\begin{aligned} Ent_B = Ent_S - k_{B} \ln \delta (0). \end{aligned}$$
(29)

The divergent contribution in the RHS of Eq. (29) results from the (unbounded) singular Dirac’s delta distribution for the momentum. In a discrete rendition of \(\chi \) (i.e., making it a Kronecker delta), this Dirac delta distribution will be replaced by a value of unity when the condition \(\mathbf{p} = \nabla S\) is satisfied, i.e., there is no entropic uncertainty associated with the momentum. Consequently, such a discrete probabilistic rendition will lead to no difference between \(Ent_B\) and \(Ent_S\). Thus, within the continuum framework that we work in, the singular term in Eq. (29) is an outgrowth of the fact that within the Bohmian interpretation (which indeed differs from the Madelung one [4, 7]) the variance of the continuum momentum distribution vanishes, equivalent to an assumption of zero temperature of the Madelung fluid. If, however, one interprets the de Broglie guiding equation (\(\mathbf{p} = \nabla S\)) only as a mean (hydrodynamic) motion, then the Madelung fluid has a non zero temperature that is proportional to the Fisher information [5], and the Boltzmann entropy in (28) will, generally, not be singular.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heifetz, E., Tsekov, R., Cohen, E. et al. On Entropy Production in the Madelung Fluid and the Role of Bohm’s Potential in Classical Diffusion. Found Phys 46, 815–824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0003-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0003-1

Keywords

Navigation