Abstract
The concept of probability seems to have been inexplicable since its invention in the seventeenth century. In its use in science, probability is closely related with relative frequency. So the task seems to be interpreting that relation. In this paper, we start with predicted relative frequency and show that its structure is the same as that of probability. I propose to call that the ‘prediction interpretation’ of probability. The consequences of that definition are discussed. The “ladder”-structure of the probability calculus is analyzed. The expectation of the relative frequency is shown to be equal to the predicted relative frequency. Probability is shown to be the most general empirically testable prediction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I am grateful for many suggestions from the work of and discussions with von Weizsäcker. He introduced the idea of the importance of the structure of time for philosophy in general and especially for the philosophy of physics, as well as the idea of probability being the quantification of possibility, and possibility in turn relating to the future. Cf. the collections of texts [5, 6]; cf. also [7].
von Weizsäcker calls that an ‘n-fold alternative’. This is actually a very general way of characterizing a (finite) observable as it is used in physics.
cf. Appendix.
References
Popper, K.: Logik der Forschung. Springer, Wien (1934/5). Quoted here from the English translation: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchison, London (1959), p. 148
Kolmogoroff, A.N.: Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer, Berlin (1933)
von Mises, R.: Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit. Springer, Wien (1928); English: Probability, statistics and truth, translated by Neyman, J.; Sholl, D. and Rabinowitsch, E.; The Macmillan Company, New York (1939); many reprints by Dover
Gillies, D.: Varieties of propensities. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 51, 809 (2000)
von Weizsäcker, C.F.: The Unity of Physics. Farrar/Straus/Giroux, New York (1971)
Drieschner M. (ed.): von Weizsäcker, C.F.: Major Works in Physics. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03668-7
Drieschner, M.: Voraussage - Wahrscheinlichkeit - Objekt. Über die begrifflichen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper deals with the philosophical question of how probability and relative frequency are related in empirical science. Its main point will be introducing and making plausible the “prediction interpretation” of probability. I will not ask any of the questions discussed today about objectivity or empirical sources or admissible distributions of probability, etc. The purpose of this paper is rather making clear the importance of predictions and showing how the rather intricate structure of probability—the “probability ladder”—is derivable from considering predictions of relative frequency. I conclude with two remarks on the probability of single results, and on the generality of probability statements.
Appendix: Derivation of the Predicted Variance
Appendix: Derivation of the Predicted Variance
The predicted variance \(\sigma ^{2}\) of the relative frequency is
since (cf. Eq. 7) \(E( {\frac{k}{N}})=p.\) Using Eq. (6) we get,
Replacing the factor k by the sum of k–1 and 1, we get the sum of two terms, \(T_{1 }\)and \(T_{2}\):
In \(T_1\) the summand with k = 1 is zero. Thus:
Substituting in the sum, l for k–2 and M for N–2 we get a binomial form:
Similarly we transform \(T_{2}\), substituting l for k–1 and M for N–1:
Thus
So we get the variance
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drieschner, M. Probability and Relative Frequency. Found Phys 46, 28–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9955-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9955-9