Abstract
It is widely hoped that quantum gravity will shed light on the question of the origin of time in physics. The currently dominant approaches to a candidate quantum theory of gravity have naturally evolved from general relativity, on the one hand, and from particle physics, on the other hand. A third important branch of twentieth century ‘fundamental’ physics, condensed-matter physics, also offers an interesting perspective on quantum gravity, and thereby on the problem of time. The bottomline might sound disappointing: to understand the origin of time, much more experimental input is needed than what is available today. Moreover it is far from obvious that we will ever find out the true origin of physical time, even if we become able to directly probe physics at the Planck scale. But we might learn some interesting lessons about time and the structure of our universe in the process. A first lesson is that there are probably several characteristic scales associated with “quantum gravity” effects, rather than the single Planck scale usually considered. These can differ by several orders of magnitude, and thereby conspire to hide certain effects expected from quantum gravity, rendering them undetectable even with Planck-scale experiments. A more tentative conclusion is that the hierarchy between general relativity, special relativity and Newtonian physics, usually taken for granted, might have to be interpreted with caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Weyl topologies include Fermi points in 3+1 dimensions, and Dirac points in 2+1 dimensions.
Mathematically, one could still define Lorentz transformations for such a system. However, the relativistic “corrections” compared to the Newtonian physics obtained from Galilean transformations would be irrelevant in practice. One may think, e.g., of a phase transition in a background system where all the velocities involved are necessarily much smaller than the relativistic speed characteristic of the background spacetime. This in fact is what happens in most laboratory systems which display effective acoustic gravity, and where \(c_\mathrm{sound}\ll c_\mathrm{light}\). For all practical purposes, the background system may therefore be described as Newtonian, even though the “internal” physics in the effective gravity is naturally Lorentzian and governed by \(c_\mathrm{sound}\). Note that it is not required for the emergence of an effective acoustic gravity that the background system be Newtonian. Analogue gravity also emerges, e.g., in relativistic Bose–Einstein condensates [18].
In fact, at this point, \(\tau _\mathrm{ch}\) can best be interpreted as a length scale, i.e. \(\tau _\mathrm{ch}=\xi _\mathrm{ch}/c\) with \(\xi _\mathrm{ch}\) some characteristic length scale of the system and \(c\) a dimensional conversion factor.
The fourth-order derivatives of the first part of Eq. (8) imply that the global behaviour will in general be determined by it, and not by the second part. The conditions for the second part to become dominant in the limit when \(a\rightarrow 0\) are actually mathematically quite subtle, but this is just meant as a simple pedagogical example to illustrate the point of obtaining a hyperbolic structure from an underlying non-hyperbolic one. More involved examples, including a discussion of the mathematical conditions for the obtention of a low-energy hyperbolic structure, can be found in [19].
General Relativity can be formulated as a gauge theory, and should therefore be invariant under the transformations of the relevant gauge group, namely the diffeomorphism group. For our discussion, the relevant issue is that physical states which differ only by a time reparametrization should be physically equivalent. One can take this as a fundamental point when attempting to quantize GR, which leads to the idea that time should be absent altogether in a fundamental (“quantum”) description of gravity. The problem then is how to recover time at the classical, “effective” level, and in particular how the evolution of the universe comes about. See e.g. [20, 21] for broad reviews on the problem of time in quantum gravity, including a dicussion of timeless models, and [22, 23] for introductions to two of the more popular approaches to timeless (quantum) gravity.
The bosonisation scale for the standard model interactions considered in [26] need not coincide with the gravitational bosonisation scale. In fact, [26] finds \({\sim }10^{13}-10^{15}\,\hbox {GeV}\) for the former, i.e. \(10^{-6}-10^{-4} E_{Pl}\). Note that, in a laboratory condensed matter system such as \(^3\)He-A, different types of collective bosons also need not necessarily appear at the same temperature, external magnetic field etc.
These analogue graviton masses are curiously related to the value of the analogue cosmological constant in \(^3\)He-A, see [14].
References
Volovik, G.E.: The Universe in a Helium Droplet. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2003)
Unruh, W.G.: Experimental black hole evaporation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1351 (1981)
Visser, M.: Acoustic black holes: horizons, ergospheres, and Hawking radiation. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 1767 (1998)
Barceló, C., Liberati, S., Visser, M.: Analogue gravity. Living Rev. Rel. 14, 3 (2011)
Lahav, O., Itah, A., Blumkin, A., Gordon, C., Steinhauer, J.: Realization of a sonic black hole analogue in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 240401 (2010)
Steinhauer, J.: Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser. Nat. Phys. 10, 864 (2014)
Sakharov, A.D.: Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of gravitation. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 12, 1040 (1968) [Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 177, 70 (1967)]
Girelli, F., Liberati, S., Sindoni, L.: Gravitational dynamics in Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. D 78, 084013 (2008)
Girelli, F., Liberati, S., Sindoni, L.: Emergence of Lorentzian signature and scalar gravity. Phys. Rev. D 79, 044019 (2009)
Barceló, C., Carballo-Rubio, R., Garay, L.J., Jannes, G.: Electromagnetism as an emergent phenomenon: a step-by-step guide. New J. Phys. 16(12), 123028 (2014)
Padmanabhan, T.: Dark energy and its implications for gravity. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 174 (2009)
Weinberg, S.: The cosmological constant problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989)
Volovik, G.E.: Vacuum energy: myths and reality. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1987 (2006)
Jannes, G., Volovik, G.E.: The cosmological constant: a lesson from the effective gravity of topological Weyl media. JETP Lett. 96, 215 (2012)
Barceló, C.: Cosmology as a search for overall equilibrium. JETP Lett. 84, 635 (2007)
Klinkhamer, F.R., Volovik, G.E.: Self-tuning vacuum variable and cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 77, 085015 (2008)
Klinkhamer, F.R., Volovik, G.E.: Dynamics of the quantum vacuum: cosmology as relaxation to the equilibrium state. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 314, 012004 (2011)
Fagnocchi, S., Finazzi, S., Liberati, S., Kormos, M., Trombettoni, A.: Relativistic Bose–Einstein condensates: a new system for analogue models of gravity. New J. Phys. 12, 095012 (2010)
Barceló, C.: Lorentzian space-times from parabolic and elliptic systems of PDEs. In: Petkov, V. (ed.) Relativity and the dimensionality of the world. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Kuchar, K.V.: Time and interpretations of quantum gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Proc. Suppl. D 20, 3 (2011)
Isham, C.J.: Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time. arXiv:gr-qc/9210011
Barbour, J.: The Nature of Time. arXiv:0903.3489[gr-qc]
Rovelli, C.: Forget time. Found. Phys. 41, 1475 (2011)
Jacobson, T., Liberati, S., Mattingly, D.: Lorentz violation at high energy: concepts, phenomena and astrophysical constraints. Ann. Phys. 321, 150 (2006)
Liberati, S.: Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 133001 (2013)
Klinkhamer, F.R., Volovik, G.E.: Merging gauge coupling constants without grand unification. Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 81, 683 (2005) [JETP Lett. 81, 551 (2005)]
Volovik, G.E.: Chiral anomaly and the law of conservation of momentum in \(^{3}\)He-A. JETP Lett. 43, 551 (1986) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 43, 428 (1986)]
Barceló, C., Garay, L.J., Jannes, G.: Quantum non-gravity and stellar collapse. Found. Phys. 41, 1532 (2011)
Barceló, C., Jannes, G.: A real Lorentz–FitzGerald contraction. Found. Phys. 38, 191 (2008)
Volovik, G.E.: Vacuum energy and universe in special relativity. JETP Lett. 77, 639 (2003) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 769 (2003)]
Zel’dovich, Y.B.: Interpretation of electrodynamics as a consequence of quantum theory. JETP Lett. 6, 345 (1967)
Visser, M.: Sakharov’s induced gravity: a modern perspective. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 977 (2002)
Belenchia, A., Liberati, S., Mohd, A.: Emergent gravitational dynamics in a relativistic Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. D 90, 104015 (2014)
Volovik, G.E.: The topology of the quantum vacuum. Lect. Notes Phys. 870, 343 (2013)
Feynman, R.P., Morinigo, F.B., Wagner, W.G., Hatfield, B.: Feynman Lectures on Gravitation. Addison-Wesley, New York (1995)
Weinberg, S., Witten, E.: Limits on massless particles. Phys. Lett. B 96, 59 (1980)
Jenkins, A.: Constraints on emergent gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 2249 (2009)
Boulware, D.G., Deser, S.: Can gravitation have a finite range? Phys. Rev. D 6, 3368 (1972)
de Rham, C., Gabadadze, G., Tolley, A.J.: Resummation of massive gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231101 (2011)
Baccetti, V., Martin-Moruno, P., Visser, M.: Massive gravity from bimetric gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 015004 (2013)
Volovik, G.E.: Singular behavior of the superfluid \(^3\)He-A at T = 0 and quantum field theory. J. Low Temp. Phys. 67, 301 (1987)
Volovik, G.E.: ”Peculiarities in the dynamics of superfluid \(^3\)He-A: analog of chiral anomaly and of zero-charge. Sov. Phys. JETP 65, 1193 (1987)
Halperin, W.P., Pitaevskii, L.P. (eds.): Helium Three. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)
Sindoni, L.: Emergent models for gravity: an overview of microscopic models. SIGMA 8, 027 (2012)
Carlip, S.: Challenges for emergent gravity. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 46, 200 (2014)
Acknowledgments
I thank F. Barbero, C. Barceló and G.E. Volovik for useful comments. Financial support was provided by the Spanish MICINN through the project FIS2011-30145-C03-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jannes, G. Condensed Matter Lessons About the Origin of Time. Found Phys 45, 279–294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-014-9864-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-014-9864-3