A fair amount of recent scholarship has been concerned with correcting a supposedly wrong, but wide-spread, assessment of the consequences of the empirical falsification of Bell-type inequalities. In particular, it has been claimed that Bell-type inequalities follow from “locality tout court” without additional assumptions such as “realism” or “hidden variables”. However, this line of reasoning conflates restrictions on the spatio-temporal relation between causes and their effects (“locality”) and the assumption of a cause for every event (“causality”). It thus fails to recognize a substantial restriction of the class of theories that is falsified through Bell-type inequalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Henceforth, I subsume also the similar constraints under the term “Bell’s Inequality”.
For an illuminating discussion and a proposal of how to untangle the argument, see [17, Chap. 3].
The complete passage reads: “The EPRB correlations are such that the result of the experiment on one side immediately foretells that on the other, whenever the analyzers happen to be parallel. If we do not accept the intervention on one side as a causal influence on the other, we seem obliged to admit that the results on both sides are determined in advance anyway, independently of the intervention on the other side, by signals from the source and by the local magnet setting.” [7, p. 149]
Albert, D.Z.: Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Albert, D.Z., Galchen, R.: A quantum threat to special relativity. Scientific American 3, 26–33 (2009)
Aspect, A.: Be or not to be local. Nature 446, 866–867 (2007)
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., Roger, G.: Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 49(25), 1804–1807 (1982)
Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964). Page references to reprint in Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 14–21. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Bell, J.S.: The theory of local beables. TH-2053-CERN (1975). Page references to reprint in Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 52–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Bell, J.S.: Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. Journal de Physique 42, C2 41–61 (1981). Page references to reprint in Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 139–158. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Bell, J.S.: “La nouvelle cuisine”. In: Sarlemijn, A., Kroes, P. (eds.) Between Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publishers (1990). Page references to reprint in Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 232–248. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of Hidden Variables I. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 166–179 (1952a)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of Hidden Variables II. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 180–193 (1952b)
Butterfield, J.: Bell’s theorem: what it takes. Br. J. Phil. Sci. 43(1), 41–83 (1992)
Butterfield, J.: A space-time approach to the Bell inequality. In: Cushing, J., McMullin, E. (eds.) Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem, pp. 114–144. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1989)
Cartwright, N. (ed.): What econometrics can teach quantum physics: causality and the Bell inequality. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement, pp. 231–250. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)
Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A.: Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys. Rev. D 10(2), 526–535 (1974)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(10), 777–780 (1935)
Fine, A. Correlations and physical locality. In: PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980, pp. 535–562 (1980)
Fine, A.: The Shaky Game: Einstein Realism and the Quantum Theory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1986)
Fine, A.: Do correlations need to be explained? In: Cushing, J., McMullin, E. (eds.) Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem, pp. 175–194. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1989)
Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys. Rev. D 34(2), 470–491 (1986)
Gisin, N.: Non-realism: deep thought or a soft option? Found. Phys. 42(1), 80–85 (2012)
Goldstein, S. et al. Bell’s theorem. In: Scholarpedia 6.10. revision #91049, p. 8378 (2011)
Goldstein, S.: Bohmian mechanics. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford (2013)
Graßhoff, G., Portmann, S., Wüthrich, A.: Minimal assumption derivation of a Bell-type inequality. Br. J. Phil. Sci. 56(4), 663–680 (2005)
Greenberger, D.M., et al.: Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58(12), 1131–1143 (1990)
Gyenis, B., Rédei, M.: When can statistical theories be causally closed? Found. Phys. 34(9), 1285–1303 (2004)
Jarrett, J.P.: On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments. Nous 18(4), 569–589 (1984)
Laudisa, F.: Non-local realistic theories and the scope of the Bell theorem. Found. Phys. 38(12), 1110–1132 (2008)
Maudlin, T.: Quantum Non-locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)
Mermin, N.D.: Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(3), 803–815 (1993)
Norsen, T.: Bell locality and the nonlocal character of nature. Found. Phys. Lett. 19, 633–655 (2006a)
Norsen, T.: EPR and Bell locality. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 844, pp. 281–293 (2006)
Norsen, T.: Against realism. Found. Phys. 37, 311–340 (2007)
Norsen, T.: Local causality and completeness: Bell vs. Jarrett. Found. Phys. 39(3), 273–294 (2009)
Norsen, T.: John S. Bell’s concept of local causality. Am. J. Phys. 79, 1261–1275 (2011)
Pan, J.-W., et al.: Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in threephoton Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Nature 403(6769), 515–519 (2000)
Reichenbach, H.: In: Reichenbach, M. (ed.) The Direction of Time. Dover Publications, Mineola (1956)
Shimony, A.: Events and processes in the quantum world. In: Penrose, R., Isham, C. (eds.) Concepts, Quantum, in Space and Time. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1986). Reprinted in Shimony, A.: The Search for a Naturalistic World View, vol. 2, pp. 140–162. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Suppes, P., Zanotti, M.: On the determinism of hidden variable theories with strict correlation and conditional statistical independence of observables. In: Suppes, P. (ed.) Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 445–455. Reidel, Dordrecht (1976)
Tittel, W., et al.: Experimental demonstration of quantum correlations over more than 10 km. Phys. Rev. A 57(5), 3229–3232 (1998)
Van Fraassen, B.C.: The Charybdis of realism: Epistemological implications of Bell’s inequality. Synthese 52(1), 25–38 (1982). Reprinted in revised form in Cushing, J., McMullin, E. (eds.) Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem, pp. 97–113. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1989)
Wüthrich, A.: Locality, causality, and realism in the derivation of Bell’s inequality. In: Sauer, T., Wüthrich, A. (eds.) New Vistas on Old Problems: Recent Approaches to the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 149–161. Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge. Edition Open Access, Berlin (2013)
Research for this article was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project No. 105211-129730). The project was hosted by the University of Bern’s Institute for Philosophy. I thank the principal investigator Gerd Graßhoff as well as Matthias Egg, Paul Näger, Samuel Portmann, Tilman Sauer, Andreas Verdun, Christian Wüthrich, and anonymous referees for detailed comments on the manuscript or other much valuable feedback.
About this article
Cite this article
Wüthrich, A. Local Acausality. Found Phys 44, 594–609 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-014-9796-y
- Bell’s inequality
- Hidden variables
- EPR argument
- Common causes