Abstract
This commentary to Nescolarde-Selva and Usó-Doménech’s (Reality, systems and impure systems. Foundations of Science 2013) links ideas in their paper to radical constructivism and raises two questions. (1) Would it be helpful to substitute the constructivist notion of viability for the traditional notion of truth with its connotations of relating language and reality? (2) Is the link made to issues in ontological philosophy important since the implicit constructivist epistemology of the paper considers mathematical ideas are just as real as ideas about objects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gash, H., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1978). Vico (1668–1744): An early anticipator of radical constructivism. Irish Journal of Psychology, 4, 22–32.
Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J. L. (2013). Reality, systems and impure systems. Foundations of Science. Online First.
Overton, W. F. (2012). Evolving scientific paradigms: Retrospective and prospective. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), The role of paradigms in theory construction (pp. 31–65). New York: Springer.
Schmidt, S. (2011). From objects to processes: A proposal to rewrite radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations, 7(1), 1–9 and 37–47.
Vico, G. (1988). On the most ancient wisdom of the Italians (L. Palmer., Trans.) Cornell: Cornell University Press (Original work published 1710).
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gash, H. Constructivism, Truth and Reality. Found Sci 19, 307–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9351-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9351-5