Correction to: Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-023-09517-7

In this article Fig. 18 was incorrectly given; the figure should have appeared as shown below. Also, for Appendix 4, there are some information for specific instances (mk11, mk13, mk14, mk15) (Figs. 28, 30, 31, 32).

Fig. 18
figure 18

Pareto front of mk01

Fig. 28
figure 28

Pareto front of mk11. The computations of the instance mk11 with the epsilons of 693 and 769 time steps were aborted early due to insufficient memory

Fig. 30
figure 30

Pareto front of mk13. The computations of the instance mk13 with the epsilons of 438 and 608 time steps were aborted early due to insufficient memory

Fig. 31
figure 31

Pareto front of mk14. The computations of the instance mk14 with the epsilon of 2128 time steps was aborted early due to insufficient memory

Fig. 32
figure 32

Pareto front of mk15. The computations of the instance mk15 with the epsilons of 389, 471, and 2036 time steps were aborted early due to insufficient memory


The original article has been corrected.