Skip to main content
Log in

Semiconductor fault detection and classification for yield enhancement and manufacturing intelligence

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process monitoring and profile analysis are crucial in detecting various abnormal events in semiconductor manufacturing, which consists of highly complex, interrelated, and lengthy wafer fabrication processes for yield enhancement and quality control. To address real requirements, this study aims to develop a framework for semiconductor fault detection and classification (FDC) to monitor and analyze wafer fabrication profile data from a large number of correlated process variables to eliminate the cause of the faults and thus reduce abnormal yield loss. Multi-way principal component analysis and data mining are used to construct the model to detect faults and to derive the rules for fault classification. An empirical study was conducted in a leading semiconductor company in Taiwan to validate the model. Use of the proposed framework can effectively detect abnormal wafers based on a controlled limit and the derived simple rules. The extracted information can be used to aid fault diagnosis and process recovery. The proposed solution has been implemented in the semiconductor company. This has simplified the monitoring process in the FDC system through the fewer key variables. The results demonstrate the practical viability of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen L-F, Chien C-F (2011) Manufacturing intelligence for class prediction and rule generation to support human capital decisions for high-tech industries. Flex Serv Manuf J 23(3):263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien C-F, Hsu C (2011) UNISON analysis to model and reduce step-and-scan overlay errors for semiconductor manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 22(3):399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien C-F, Wang W, Cheng J (2007) Data mining for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing and an empirical study. Expert Syst Appl 33(1):192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien C-F, Chen Y-J, Peng J-T (2010) Manufacturing intelligence for semiconductor demand forecast based on technology diffusion and production life cycle. Int J Prod Econ 128(2):496–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien C-F, Hsu C, Hsiao C (2011) Manufacturing intelligence to forecast and reduce semiconductor cycle time. J Intell Manuf. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0572-y

    Google Scholar 

  • He QP, Wang J (2007) Fault detection using the k-nearest neighbor rule for semiconductor manufacturing process. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 20(4):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isermann R (1995) Model based fault detection and diagnosis methods. Proc Am Contr Conf 3:1605–1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE, Mudholkar GS (1979) Control procedures for residuals associated with principal component analysis. Technometrics 21(3):341–349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kass GV (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 29(2):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourti T, MacGregor JF (1996) Multivariate SPC methods for process and product monitoring. J Qual Technol 28(4):409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo C, Chien C-F, Chen C (2010) Manufacturing intelligence to exploit the value of production and tool data to reduce cycle time. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 8(1):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor JF, Jacckle C, Kiparissdes C, Kourti M (1994) Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods. AIChE J 40(5):826–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nomikos P (1996) Detection and diagnose of abnormal batch operations based on multi-way principal component analysis. ISA Trans 35(3):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomikos P, MacGregor JF (1994) Monitoring the processes using multiway principal component analysis. AIChE J 40(8):1361–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich A, Cinar A (1996) Statistical process monitoring and disturbance diagnosis in multivariable continuous processes. AIChE J 42(4):905–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralson P, DePuy G, Graham JH (2001) Computer-based monitoring and fault diagnosis: a chemical process case study. ISA Trans 40(1):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagerberg B, MacGregor JF, Kiparissides C (1992) Multivariate data analysis applied to low-density polyethylene reactors. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 14(1–3):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzlsperger G, Schmidt C, Ernst G, Strasser H, Speil M (2005) Fault detection for a via etch process using adaptive multivariate methods. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 18(4):528–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Yin K, Kavuri SN (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part I: quantitative model-based methods. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdier G, Ferreira A (2011) Adaptive Mahalanobis distance and k-nearest neighbor rule for fault defection in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 24(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikströma C, Albano C, Eriksson L, Fridén H, Johansson E, Nordahl A, Rännar S, Sandberg M, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S (1998) Multivariate process and quality monitoring applied to an electrolysis process part I. Process supervision with multivariate control charts. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 42(1–2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise BM, Gallagher NB (1996) The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection. J Process Contr 6(6):329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise BM, Gallagher NB, Bulter SW, White DD Jr, Barna GG (1999) A comparison of principal component analysis, multiway principal component analysis, trilinear decomposition and parallel factor analysis for fault detection in a semiconductor etch process. J Chemom 13(3–4):379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987a) Principal components analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2(1–3):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold S, Geladi P, Esbensen K, Ohman J (1987b) Multi-way principal components and PLS analysis. J Chemom 1(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue HH, Qin SJ, Markle RJ, Nauert C, Gatto M (2000) Fault detection of plasma etchers using optical emission spectra. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 13(3):374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 99-2221-E-007-047-MY3; NSC 100-2410-H-155-048), and the Ministry of Education (101N2073E1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Yu Hsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chien, CF., Hsu, CY. & Chen, PN. Semiconductor fault detection and classification for yield enhancement and manufacturing intelligence. Flex Serv Manuf J 25, 367–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9161-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9161-4

Keywords

Navigation