Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perception of Occupational Risk of Firefighters in Quito (Ecuador)

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study contributes to research on how firefighters manage the question of safety by analyzing their perception of risk. This work therefore serves to promote safety management, safer behavior and a safer work environment. Specifically, this work sheds light on the implications of firefighters’ perception of their occupational risk. The study applies the paradigmatic psychometric model to describe perceived risk. The sample population comprised 205 firefighters from Quito, Ecuador. The results reveal that likelihood of occurrence (β = 0.222), risk controllability (β = 0.156), catastrophe potential (β = 0.168), and delay in consequences (β = 0.332) are the four factors that best illustrate firefighter’s conception of risk perception (R2 = 32%). Furthermore, this study has identified two groups with different perceptions of risk. The findings show that more than 60% of the sampled firefighters consider that their occupation entails a high level of risk (127 subjects). Finally, the finding that a high level of education enhances a higher perception of risk is discussed. This paper also explores the implications of this research on management, academia and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipshitz R, Omodei M, McLennan J, Wearing A (2007) What’s burning? the RAWFS heuristic on the fire ground. Expert Context 97–112

  3. Hermansson H (2012) Defending the conception of “Objective risk”. Risk Anal 32(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aven T (2007) A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(6):745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kunreuther H, Slovic P (1996) Science, values, and risk. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 545:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallowell M (2010) Safety risk perception in construction companies in the pacific northwest of the USA. Constr Manag Econ 28(4):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rundmo T (2000) Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in norsk hydro. Saf Sci 34(1–3):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sjöberg L (1998) Risk perception of alcohol consumption. Alcoholism 22(S7):277s–284s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9(2):127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Starr C (2003) The precautionary principle versus risk analysis. Risk Anal 23(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourque LB, Regan R, Kelley MM, Wood MM, Kano M, Mileti DS (2013) An examination of the effect of perceived risk on preparedness behavior. Environ Behav 45(5):615–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boix P, García AM, Llorens C, Torada R (2001) Percepciones y experiencia. Instituto Sindical de Trabajo, Ambiente y Salud (ISTAS), Valencia

  13. Kinateder MT, Kuligowski E, Reneke PA, Peacock RD (2014) A review of risk perception in building fire evacuation. NIST Technical Note

  14. Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Leiter MP, Zanaletti W, Argentero P (2009) Occupational risk perception, safety training, and injury prevention: Testing a model in the italian printing industry. J Occup Health Psychol 14(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimolong B, Trimpop R (1998) Risk perception. In: Stellman JM (ed) Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Mapping social psychology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimbardo PG, Leippe MR (1991) The psychology of attitude change and social influence. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lund J, Aarø LE (2004) Accident prevention. Presentation of a model placing emphasis on human, structural and cultural factors Saf Sci 42(4):271–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart-Taylor A, Cherrie J (1998) Does risk perception affect behaviour and exposure? A pilot study amongst asbestos workers. Ann Occup Hyg 42(8):565–569

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington Jr JE, Ph D M (2004) Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Ann Behav Med 27(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arezes PM, Bizarro M (2011) Alcohol consumption and risk perception in the portuguese construction industry. Open Occup Health Saf J 3:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mullen J (2004) Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. J Saf Res 35(3):275–285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Choudhry RM, Fang D (2008) Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. Saf Sci 46(4):566–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gucer PW, Oliver M, McDiarmid M (2003) Workplace threats to health and job turnover among women workers. J Occup Environ Med 45(7):683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gierlach E, Belsher BE, Beutler LE (2010) Cross‐cultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters. Risk Anal 30(10):1539–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellrose CA, Pilisuk M (1991) Vocational risk tolerance and perceptions of occupational hazards. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 12(3):303–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Crawford BA (2007) To die for: to discover why firefighters feel a duty to die, look beyond the obvious. Fire Chief 51:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gomez AG (2008) A descriptive analysis of antecedents of risk based decision making in firefighting. ProQuest, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stehman P (2011) Risk taking behaviors and attitudes in the U.S. fire service

  31. Flin RH (1996) Sitting in the hot seat: leaders and teams for critical incident management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad Manag J 44(6):1281–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Klaene B, Sanders R (2007) Structural firefighting: strategy and tactics. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Sudbury

    Google Scholar 

  34. Duncan MD, Littau SR, Kurzius-Spencer M, Burgess JL (2014) Development of best practice standard operating procedures for prevention of fireground injuries. Fire Technol 50(5):1061–1076. doi:10.1007/s10694-013-0342-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xin J, Huang CF (2014) Fire risk assessment of residential buildings based on fire statistics from china. Fire Technol 50(5):1147–1161. doi:10.1007/s10694-013-0327-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodríguez-Garzón I, Lucas-Ruiz V, Martínez-Fiestas M, Delgado-Padial A (2014) Association between perceived risk and training in the construction industry. J Constr Eng Manag 141(5):04014095. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000960

  37. Slovic P (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, New York, pp 117–152

  38. Portell M, Solé MD (2001) Riesgo percibido: Un procedimiento de evaluación. (NTP 578). Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid

  39. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982) Why study risk perception? Risk Anal 2(2):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aven T (2010) On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(6):623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rivers L, Arvai J, Slovic P (2010) Beyond a simple case of black and white: searching for the white male effect in the African‐American community. Risk Anal 30(1):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Saccinto E, Kehl D, Knuth D, Schmidt S (2013) Risk perception of different emergencies in a sample of european firefighters. Work 45(1):87–96

    Google Scholar 

  43. Caponecchia C, Sheils I (2011) Perceptions of personal vulnerability to workplace hazards in the australian construction industry. J Saf Res 42(4):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. DeJoy DM (1996) Theoretical models of health behavior and workplace self-protective behavior. J Saf Res 27(2):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Myers L, Reynolds D (1997) Repressive defensiveness, controllability and optimism for health-related events. In: Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, p 15

  46. Holmes N, Lingard H, Yesilyurt Z, De Munk F (1999) An exploratory study of meanings of risk control for long term and acute effect occupational health and safety risks in small business construction firms. J Saf Res 30(4):251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harrell WA (1990) Perceived risk of occupational injury: control over pace of work and blue-collar versus white-collar work. Percept Mot Skills 70(3c):1351–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mullet E, Duquesnoy C, Raiff P, Fahrasmane R, Namur E (1993) The evaluative factor of risk perception. J Appl Soc Psychol 23(19):1594–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Knowles DJ (2002) Risk perception leading to risk taking behaviour amongst farmers in england and wales. HSE Contract Research Report

  50. Zohar D (2000) A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol 85(4):587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Aven T, Kristensen V (2005) Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. O’Connor T, Loomis D, Runyan C, dal Santo JA, Schulman M (2005) Adequacy of health and safety training among young latino construction workers. J Occup Environ Med 47(3):272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Arquitecture, Southern Scientific University, South Panamericana, Km-19, Lima, Peru

    Ignacio Rodríguez-Garzón

  2. Marketing Area, ESAN University, Jr Alonso de Molina 1652, Surco, Lima 100, Peru

    Myriam Martínez-Fiestas

  3. Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behavioural Science, University of Granada, c/Rector López Argüeta s/n, CP 18007, Granada, Spain

    Antonio Delgado-Padial

  4. Departament of Architectural Constructions II, University of Seville, Avd. Reina Mercedes, 4, CP 41012, Seville, Spain

    Valeriano Lucas-Ruiz

Authors
  1. Ignacio Rodríguez-Garzón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myriam Martínez-Fiestas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Delgado-Padial
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valeriano Lucas-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Rodríguez-Garzón.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 8.

Table 8 Risk Dimensions in this Study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Martínez-Fiestas, M., Delgado-Padial, A. et al. Perception of Occupational Risk of Firefighters in Quito (Ecuador). Fire Technol 52, 753–773 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0494-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0494-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation