Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Freedom, Ownership Structure, and SME Financial Fragility: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of economic freedom on the financial fragility of 1,496 non-financial SMEs in Vietnam over the period 2012–2020. We also evaluate the effect of ownership structure on the relationship between economic freedom and financial fragility. Our findings provide evidence that an increase in the degree of aggregated economic freedom and its categories – rule of law, regulatory efficiency, and market openness – help firms reduce the level of financial fragility. However, an increased government size tends to worsen their financial risk. Regarding the impact of ownership, our results reveal that greater rule of law, regulatory efficiency, and market openness have a positive influence on foreign-owned firms, enabling them to maintain lower levels of financial fragility compared to non-foreign-owned firms. However, foreign-owned firms experience a higher level of financial fragility relative to domestically private-owned firms due to increased government size. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that there is no difference in the effect of economic freedom on financial fragility between state-owned and non-state-owned firms in Vietnam. This finding has implications for recognizing the importance of foreign ownership and economic freedom in emerging markets. It also encourages foreign shareholders to design appropriate policies to mitigate financial risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This capsule of information is available at https://www.heritage.org/index/about.

  2. According to Heritage Foundation, the overall score of economic freedom is calculated as an average of 12 indicators taking values between 0 and 100, such that a higher value of any indicator implies a higher level of economic freedom. Rule of Law is assessed using three indices: property rights, judicial effectiveness, and government integrity. “Property rights encompass the acknowledgment of private property rights and the existence of an efficient rule of law to safeguard them. Judicial effectiveness necessitates a well-operating legal framework that safeguards the rights of all individuals against violations committed by others, including governments and influential entities. Government integrity relates to the systemic corruption within government institutions, characterized by practices such as bribery, nepotism, cronyism, patronage, embezzlement, and graft”. Government Size is represented by three indices corresponding to tax burden, government spending, and fiscal health. Regulatory efficiency comprises three components: business freedom, labor freedom, and monetary freedom. “Business freedom signifies an individual’s capacity to establish and operate an enterprise without excessive state intervention. Labor freedom entails the ability of individuals to access employment opportunities and the freedom of businesses to engage in flexible labor contracts and dismiss surplus workers when necessary. Monetary freedom necessitates a stable currency and market-determined prices. Indicators of monetary freedom include a commitment to combating inflation and the independence of the central bank.”

  3. We also use the 20% threshold in our robustness test; refer to Tran et al. (2021).

  4. To be more specific, the definitions of the variables used in this study are summarized in Table 1.

  5. The correlation matrix assists us in identifying potential issues of multicollinearity that could result in spurious estimation. Our untabulated test results indicate that the variance inflation factors (VIFs) of the explanatory variables have a mean value of 1.23, with a maximum of 1.76. These values suggest that multicollinearity is unlikely to be a problem.

    Table 3 Correlation coefficient matrix The presented table displays the correlation coefficient matrix encompassing all independent variables. It encompasses a total of 8,064 firm-year observations from 1,496 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam during the period of 2012 to 2020. Definitions for the variables are presented in Table 1

References

  • Agca, S., De Nicolò, G., & Detragiache, E. (2007). Financial reforms, financial openness, and corporate borrowing: International evidence. IMF Working Papers, 2007(186), https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451867503.001.

  • Aidt, T. S., & Hillman, A. L. (2008). Enduring rents. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shboul, M., Maghyereh, A., Hassan, A., & Molyneux, P. (2020). Political risk and bank stability in the Middle East and North Africa region. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 60, 101291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro, L., Asis, G., Chari, A., & Panizza, U. (2019). Corporate debt, firm size and financial fragility in emerging markets. Journal of International Economics, 118, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., & Ibrahim, P. (2018). Inflation and companies’ performance: A cross-sectional analysis. Advanced Science Letters, 24, 4750–4755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo-Guerrero, M. J., Pérez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I. M. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgary, A., Ozdemir, A. I., & Özyürek, H. (2020). Small and Medium Enterprises and global risks: Evidence from Manufacturing SMEs in Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11, 59–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, B. N. (2018). Do trade and financial openness matter for financial development? Bank-level evidence from emerging market economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 434–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteriou, D., Pilbeam, K., & Tomuleasa, I. (2021). The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone area. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 184, 150–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azman-Saini, W. N. W., Baharumshah, A. Z., & Law, S. H. (2010). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: International evidence. Economic Modelling, 27, 1079–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggs, J., & Brander, J. A. (2006). Trade liberalization, profitability, and financial leverage. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Nasr, H. (2016). State and foreign ownership and the value of working capital management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Schoar, A., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Banking deregulation and industry structure: Evidence from the French banking reforms of 1985. The Journal of Finance, 62, 597–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Lu, J. (2015). Size, leverage, and risk-taking of financial institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 520–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2016). Economic freedom and economic crises. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18, 541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 1258–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T. K. D., Doan, A. T., & Kang, H. G. (2020). Institutional environment, ownership structure and firm-specific information: Evidence from a transitional economy. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1774986.

  • Cebula, R. J., & Mixon, F. G. Jr. (2014). The roles of economic freedom and regulatory quality in creating a favorable environment for investment in energy R & D, infrastructure, and capacity. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 73, 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N., & Chang, M. (2013). Financial crisis and corporate liquidity: Implications for emerging markets. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 20, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. R., & Wu, M. H. (2013). How does monetary policy influence capital markets? Using a threshold regression model. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 20, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. K., Chen, X., Lin, B. X., & Zhong, R. (2005). The impact of government regulation and ownership on the performance of securities companies: Evidences from China. Global Finance Journal, 16, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. Y., Chen, P. F., & Jin, Q. (2015). Economic freedom, investment flexibility, and equity value: A cross-country study. The Accounting Review, 90, 1839–1870.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J., Elyasiani, E., & Jia, J. (2011). Institutional Ownership Stability and Risk taking: Evidence from the life–health insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78, 609–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., Daniel, N., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 431–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Morck, R., Wu, J., & Yeung, B. (2011). Monetary and fiscal stimuli, ownership structure, and China’s housing market. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Doan, A. T., Lin, K. L., & Doong, S. C. (2020a). State-controlled banks and income smoothing. Do politics Matter? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 101057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, A. T., Le, A. T., & Tran, Q. (2020b). Economic uncertainty, ownership structure and small and medium enterprises performance. Australian Economic Papers, 59, 102–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, A. T., Khan, A., Holmes, S., & Tran, T. (2021). SMEs’ efficiency in a transitional economy: Does innovation and public support schemes matter? Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1940693.

  • Doan, A. T., Truong, B. T., Nguyen, C. C., Nguyen, P. T. N., Truong, H. Y., & Le, A. T. (2023). Corruption and corporate leverage in an emerging economy: The role of economic freedom. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 94, 599–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., & Gehring, K. (2012). Does aid buy (economic) freedom. Economic freedom of the world: 2012 annual report, 219–246.

  • Dvorský, J., Kliestik, T., Cepel, M., & Strnad, Z. (2020). The influence of some factors of competitiveness on business risks. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21, 1451–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzhumashev, R. (2014). The two-way relationship between government spending and corruption and its effects on economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2009). The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 699–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2010). Large Shareholder Diversification And Corporate Risk- Taking. Purdue University, Department of Economics, Purdue University Economics Working Papers, 24.

  • Fu, X., Lin, Y., & Molyneux, P. (2014). Bank competition and financial stability in Asia Pacific. Journal of Banking & Finance, 38, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gande, A., & Kalpathy, S. (2017). CEO compensation and risk-taking at financial firms: Evidence from U.S. federal loan assistance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 47, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, K. (2013). Who benefits from economic freedom? Unraveling the effect of economic freedom on subjective well-being. World Development, 50, 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., & Luo, X. (2014). Risks and Opportunities of Participation in Global Value Chains. VoxEU.org.

  • Ghosh, S. (2016). Does economic freedom matter for risk-taking? Evidence from MENA banks. Review of Behavioral Finance, 8, 114–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13.

  • Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Shao, L. (2017). Political freedom and corporate payouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C., & Lawson, R. A. (2014). Economic freedom of the world: An accounting of the literature. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkati, R., Alhabshi, S. M., & Kassim, S. (2020). Influence of economic freedom and its subcomponents on risk-taking behavior. Review of Behavioral Finance, 12, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Echeverri, H., Haar, J., & Benavides, J. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment, Institutional Quality, Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1921–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodorogel, R. (2009). The Economic Crisis and its effects on SMEs. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 05(534), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. F., Lin, C., Lin, P., & Ma, Y. (2010). Creditor rights, information sharing, and bank risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 96, 485–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. S., & Wang, C. J. (2015). Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W., Jiang, F., Liu, Z., & Zhang, M. (2011). Agency cost, top executives’ overconfidence, and investment-cash flow sensitivity — evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, B., Marri, H., Nebhwani, M., Riaz, A., & Sohag, A. (2011). Study of government support system in SMEs: An empirical investigation. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 30.

  • Hussain, I., Hayat, U., Alam, M. S., & Khan, U. (2023). A dynamic analysis of the twin-deficit hypothesis: The case of a developing country. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 1–28.

  • Huynh, T. L. D., Walther, T., & Utz, S. (2022). Green and sustainable finance in the Asia-Pacific markets: An introduction to the special issue. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Finance Corporation. (2017). Women-owned enterprises in Vietnam: Perceptions and potential. World Bank.

  • Jadiyappa, N., Vanga, N. R., & Krishnankutty, R. (2016). Financial liberalisation and capital structuring decisions of corporate firms: Evidence from India. Economics Letters, 149, 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of Finance, 63, 1679–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. Journal of Finance, 67, 45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justesen, M. K. (2008). The effect of economic freedom on growth revisited: New evidence on causality from a panel of countries 1970–1999. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 642–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz, A., Berger, E., & Mpeqa, A. (2016). The more the merrier? Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1288–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999a). The quality of government. The Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999b). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002). Corruption and rent-seeking. Public Choice, 113, 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, A. T., & Doan, A. T. (2020). Corruption and financial fragility of small and medium enterprises: International evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 57-58, 100660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, A. H., & Kim, T. (2020). The effects of economic freedom on firm investment in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, A. T., Doan, A. T., & Phan, T. (2021). Institutional development and firm risk from a dynamic perspective: Does ownership structure matter? Economic Analysis and Policy, 72, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, W. S., Song, W., & Chen, J. (2019). Does bank stakeholder orientation enhance financial stability? Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 38–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Lins, K. V., & Warnock, F. E. (2008). Do foreigners Invest Less in Poorly Governed firms? The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 3245–3285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, M. Y. S. (2018). International Evidence on Economic Freedom, Governance, and firm performance. International Corporate Governance and Regulation, 20, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. L., Doan, A. T., & Doong, S. C. (2016). Changes in ownership structure and bank efficiency in Asian developing countries: The role of financial freedom. International Review of Economics & Finance, 43, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manwa, F., & Wijeweera, A. (2016). Trade liberalisation and economic growth link: The case of southern African Custom Union countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). The German ideology in Marx/Engels collected works, vol. 5.

  • Mateus, C., & Hoang, B. T. (2021). Frontier markets, liberalization and informational efficiency: Evidence from Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 1–28.

  • Merza, E. (2023). Government size and economic freedom as determinants of growth: Evidence based on the Heritage Foundation data. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 11, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micco, A., Panizza, U., & Yanez, M. (2007). Bank ownership and performance. Does politics matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., Kim, A. B., & Roberts, J. M. (2019). 2019 index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation.

  • Mishra, A. V. (2014). Foreign ownership and firm value: Evidence from Australian firms. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 21, 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd-Rashid, R., Mehmood, W., Ooi, C. A., Che Man, S. Z., & Ong, C. Z. (2022). Strengthened rule of law to reduce corruption: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of Money Laundering Control.

  • Nguyen, B. D. (2011a). Ownership structure and board characteristics as determinants of CEO turnover in french-listed companies. Finance, 32, 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, P. (2011b). Corporate governance and risk-taking: Evidence from Japanese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19, 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, K. S. (2020). Volatility and specific risk toward family’s performance in an emerging country. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 27, 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen Dang, H. A., Khan, A., Doan, A. T., & Ibbett, N. (2021). The Social Impact of Green Innovation: Towards a Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Public Administration, In Press, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1913747.

  • OECD. (2021). SME and Entrepreneurship Policy in Viet Nam, OECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.

  • Pan, H. I., Suriya, K., & Pastpipatkul, P. (2022). An Analysis of Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Banking Industry from Taiwan to ASEAN Countries with gravity model. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29, 631–649.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan, M., & Viaj, J. (2012). INFLUENCE OF FIRM SIZE ON ITS BUSINESS SUCCESS. Croatian Operational Research Review, 3, 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, M. H., & Archer, L. (2020). Corruption and SME financing structure: The case of Vietnamese manufacturing. Journal of Economics and Development, 22, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, T., Daly, K., & Doan, A. T. (2018). The effects of risks and environmental factors on bank cost efficiency: A study in East Asia and Pacific region. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1510719.

  • Phung, D. N., & Hoang, T. P. T. (2013). Corporate ownership and firm performance in emerging market. a study of Vietnamese listed firms.

  • Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2020). Micro, small, and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Oxford University Press.

  • Rodrı́guez-Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and Economic Development. The American Economic Review, 86, 852–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9, 86–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge university press.

  • Saha, S., Gounder, R., & Su, J. J. (2009). The interaction effect of economic freedom and Democracy on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Economics Letters, 105, 173–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeck, K., & Cihak, M. (2010). Competition, Efficiency, and Soundness in Banking: An Industrial Organization Perspective. Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, Discussion Paper.

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The quarterly journal of economics, 108, 599–617.

  • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and causes of the Wealth of nations. Modern Library.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). The anatomy of a Murder: Who killed America’s economy? Critical Review, 21, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2010). Does economic freedom fosters banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 6, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 29, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh, K., Saxena, A., & Srikanth, M. (2022). Comparing Financial Debt choices of existing and new SMEs in Indian Manufacturing Sector. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 1–12.

  • Taboada, A. G. (2011). The impact of changes in bank ownership structure on the allocation of capital: International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2528–2543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Heritage Foundation (2021). 2021 Index of Economic Freedom. https://www.heritage.org/index/about.

  • Tran, Q., Doan, A. T., & Tran, T. (2021). SMEs’ Credit Access, Ownership Structure, and Job Development. Australian Economic Papers, Forthcoming, Version of Record online: 09 March 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12227.

  • Tran, Q., Doan, A. T., & Tran, T. (2022). What are the drivers of SMEs’ financial performance? The interaction of intellectual capital and ownership. Australian Economic Papers, 61, 751–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassalou, M., & Xing, Y. (2004). Default risk in equity returns. Journal of Finance, 59, 831–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015a). The effect of firm size on the leverage–performance relationship during the financial crisis of 2007–2009. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 29, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015b). The effect of leverage on performance: Domestically-oriented versus internationally-oriented firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, X. V. (2016). Foreign investors and corporate risk taking behavior in an emerging market. Finance Research Letters, 18, 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. S. (2022). Shareholder disputes and commonality in liquidity: Evidence from the Equity markets in China. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29, 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Z., Xie, F., & Zhang, S. (2005). Ownership structure and firm value in China’s privatized firms: 1991–2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2011). Economic Freedom, Economic Growth, and China. Chinese Economy, 44, 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, I. S., Pahi, D., & Gangakhedkar, R. (2019). Financial markets development and financing choice of firms: New evidence from Asia. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 26, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. (2013). State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anh-Tuan Doan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doan, AT. Economic Freedom, Ownership Structure, and SME Financial Fragility: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Asia-Pac Financ Markets (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09438-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09438-3

Keywords

Navigation