Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evidence on coverage choices and contract prices in the market for corporate insurance

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present experimental evidence on the effect adverse selection has on coverage choices and pricing in corporate insurance markets. Two sets of experimental data, each generated by experiments utilizing a specific parameterization of a corporate insurance decision, are presented to gauge these effects. In the first, subject behavior conforms to a unique equilibrium in which high risk firms choose higher coverage and contracts are priced accordingly. Insurers act competitively and convergence to equilibrium behavior is marked. In the second set, there is little evidence that subject behavior is consistent with either of the two equilibrium outcomes supported by the experimental setting—pooling by fully insuring losses and pooling by self insuring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, J., & Sobel, J. (1987). Equilibrium selection in signaling games. Econometrica, 55, 647–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., Camerer, C., & Porter, D. (1994). An experimental analysis of nash refinements in signaling games. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best’s Aggregates and Averages Property and Casualty (1995). Oldwick: NJ.

  • Bond, E., & Crocker, K. (1991). Smoking, skydiving, and knitting: The endogenous categorization of risks in insurance markets with asymmetric information. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandts, J., & Holt, C. (1992). An experimental test of equilibrium dominance in signaling games. American Economic Review, 82, 1350–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts, J., & Holt, C. (1993). Adjustment patterns and equilibrium selection in experimental signaling games. International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. (1993). Evidence on adverse selection in the individual health insurance market. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 60, 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadsby, C., Frank, M., & Maksimovic, V. (1998). Equilibrium dominance in experimental financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 189–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadsby, C., Frank, M., & Maksimovic, V. (1990). Pooling, separating, and semiseparating equilibria in financial markets: Some experimental evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 3, 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A., & Salanie, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 56–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, I. K., & Sobel, J. (1990). Strategic stability and uniqueness in signaling games. Journal of Economic Theory, 50, 381–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G., & Doherty, N. (1991). Adverse selection in insurance markets: A selective survey. In G. Dinne (ed.), Contributions to insurance economics. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  • Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  • Holt, C., & Sherman, R. (1994). The Loser’s curse and bidder bias. American Economic Review, 84, 642–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puelz, R., & Snow, A. (1994). Evidence on adverse selection: Equilibrium signaling and cross-subsidization in the insurance market. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 236–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebello, M. J., & Martin Grace (1993). Financing and demand for corporate insurance: A sequential signaling game. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 18, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1976). Equilibrium in insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teach, E. (1996). The rise of the alternate market, and a feeding frenzy in the conventional insurance market. CFO, 12(9), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, A. (1982). An exploration of competitive signaling equilibria with ‘third party’ information production: The case of debt insurance. Journal of Finance, 37, 717–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

JEL Classification C90, G14, G22

Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9152-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goswami, G., Grace, M.F. & Rebello, M.J. Experimental evidence on coverage choices and contract prices in the market for corporate insurance. Exp Econ 11, 67–95 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9152-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9152-y

Keywords

Navigation