Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary correlation of heterodichogamy and floral longevity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterodichogamy, the coexistence of morphs differing in the time when the shift between male and female phases occurs, is a rare sexual dimorphism derived from synchronous dichogamy. In dichogamous populations, plants need to adjust the temporal sex role to deal with the negative frequency dependent selection imposed by population sex ratios. However, such temporal adjustment may be constrained in dichogamous species with bisexual flowers and short floral longevities (<2 days) and therefore the reciprocal floral strategy can easily invade the population, ultimately leading to heterodichogamy. We predict that heterodichogamy has evolved in species with short floral longevities. To test this prediction, we compiled data on floral longevity for 377 dichogamous and heterodichogamous species with bisexual flowers and ran a phylogenetic logistic regression between floral strategy (dichogamy/heterodichogamy) and floral longevity. The results showed that heterodichogamous species had significantly shorter floral longevities than dichogamous species. This result together with the fact that evolutionary transitions always occurred from dichogamy to heterodichogamy supports the conclusion of the existence of a significant and negative evolutionary correlation between the floral longevity and the probability to evolve heterodichogamy from dichogamy in bisexual species. We discuss that the rarity of heterodichogamy in nature may be the result of other selective pressures towards long floral longevity in dichogamous species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashman T-L, Schoen DJ (1994) How long should flowers live? Nature 371:788–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI, Newman CM (1993) Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot Rev 59:112–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J, Charlesworth D (1995) Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaw SM (1992) Pollination, breeding syndromes, and systematics of Trochodendron aralioides Sieb. & Zucc. (Trochodendraceae), a relictual species in Eastern Asia. In: Peng CI (ed) Phytogeography and Botanical Inventory of Taiwan. Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica Monograph Series No 12. Taipei, pp 63–77

  • Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuhara T, Tokumaru S (2014) Inflorescence dimorphism, heterodichogamy and thrips pollination in Platycarya strobilacea (Juglandaceae). Ann Bot 113:467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Xiong YZ, Huang SQ (2015) Effects of floral sexual investment and dichogamy on floral longevity. J Plant Ecol 8:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, HX (2006) Pollination biology and breeding system of the Endangered Chinese Endemic Kingdonia uniflora (Ranunculales). Master’s Thesis, Shaanxi Normal University

  • Ho LST, Ane C (2014) A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst Biol 63:397–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii HS, Harder LD (2012) Phenological associations of gender with floral morphology and integration in protandrous Delphinium glaucum. J Ecol 100:1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Garland T Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst Biol 59:9–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Garland T (2014) Phylogenetic regression for binary dependent variables. In: Garamszegi LZ (ed) Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology. Springer, New York, pp 231–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS, Mooers AØ, Thomas GH (2011) A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies. Methods Ecol Evol 2:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. N Z J Bot 24:135–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2015) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.04. http://mesquiteproject.org

  • Pannell JR, Verdú M (2006) The evolution of gender specialisation from dimorphic hermaphroditism: paths from heterodichogamy to gynodioecy and androdioecy. Evolution 60:660–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renner SS (2001) How common is heterodichogamy? Trends Ecol Evol 16:595–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner SS (2014) The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am J Bot 101:1588–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RD, Mandegar M, Otto SP (2006) A model of the evolution of dichogamy incorporating sex ration selection, anther-stigma interference and inbreeding depression. Evolution 60:934–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Ashman TL (1995) The evolution of floral longevity: a resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated structures in modular organisms. Evolution 49:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P.F (2012) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ Accessed 5 Jan 2016

  • Teichert H, Dötterl S, Gottsberger G (2011) Heterodichogamy and nitidulid beetle pollination in Anaxagorea prinoides, an early divergent Annonaceae. Plant Syst Evol 291:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhang P, Du Q, He H, Zhao L, Ren Y, Endress PK (2012) Heterodichogamy in Kingdonia (Circaeasteraceae, Ranunculales). Ann Bot 109:1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution. Bioinformatics 24:2098–2100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2211–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. R. Bertin for kindly providing the database of dichogamous species and S. Renner and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. S.S gratefully acknowledges funding support from Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2015-89).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Sun.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix is the data on floral longevity for 377 species with bisexual flowers (xls 81 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, S., Verdú, M. Evolutionary correlation of heterodichogamy and floral longevity. Evol Ecol 30, 1023–1030 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9865-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9865-0

Keywords

Navigation