Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pink flower preference in sunbirds does not translate into plant fitness differences in a polymorphic Erica species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bird-pollinated plants typically have reddish flowers, but it is not clear whether this trait can be attributed to selection by birds. Here we experimentally test for the first time the foraging behaviour of sunbirds in relation to flower colour, using the Orange-breasted Sunbird Anthobaphes violacea (Nectariniidae) and the colour dimorphic Erica perspicua (Ericaceae). Pink and white flower morphotypes co-flower in intermixed populations and have similar nectar volumes and concentrations. Using floral arrays in a field aviary, we found that sunbirds preferred pink flowers; 95 % of their first choices were to pink inflorescences and they visited and probed more pink inflorescences and flowers, respectively. We also tested for flower constancy (the tendency to move between same colour rather than different colour morphotypes), but found no evidence for this in the sequence of their foraging choices, indicating that this mechanism did not maintain flower colour differences in sympatry. There was evidence for optimal foraging: 80 % of moves were to adjacent inflorescences. Unexpectedly, the preference for pink flowers observed in the aviary did not translate into a female fitness advantage for this morphotype in the field, since no difference is found in natural pollination rate, fruit or seed set. This may be because the minimization of flight distances between plants is the primary factor in sunbird foraging choices, overriding their colour preference. Antagonistic nectar robbers did not act as a selective force on the polymorphism, since nectar-robbing rates were equal between white and pink morphotypes in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge G, Campbell DR (2007) Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 61:99–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arista M, Talavera M, Berjano R, Ortiz PL (2013) Abiotic factors may explain the geographical distribution of flower colour morphs and the maintenance of colour polymorphism in the scarlet pimpernel. J Ecol 101:1613–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus W, Menzel R (1987) Color distance derived from a receptor model of color vision in the honeybee. Biol Cybern 55:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes K, Nicolson SW, Vanwyk BE (1995) Nectar sugar composition in Erica. Biochem Syst Ecol 23:419–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum KA, Grant WE (2001) Humming bird for aging behavior in different patch types: simulation of alternative strategies. Ecol Model 137:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bené F (1941) Experiments on the color preference of black-chinned hummingbirds. Condor 43:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekhuysen GJ (1963) The breeding biology of the orange-breasted Sunbird Anthobaphes violacea (Linnaeus). Ostrich 34:187–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MB, Forsyth AB (1974) Robust tests for equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 69:364–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Downs CT, Johnson SD (2010) Concentration-dependent sugar preferences of the Malachite Sunbird (Nectarinia famosa). Auk 127:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burd M, Stayton CT, Shrestha M, Dyer AG (2014) Distinctive convergence in Australian floral colors seen through the eyes of Australian birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. In Press

  • Burke D, Fulham BJ (2003) An evolved spatial memory bias in a nectar-feeding bird? Anim Behav 66:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JE, Holsinger KE (2010) Natural selection on inflorescence color polymorphisms in wild protea populations: the role of pollinators, seed predators, and intertrait correlations. Am J Bot 97:934–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JE, Holsinger KE (2013) Direct and indirect selection on floral pigmentation by pollinators and seed predators in a color polymorphic South African shrub. Oecologia 171:905–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Jager ML, Ellis AG, Dreyer LL (2009) The assembly of flower colour within communities of Oxalis (Oxalidaceae) through pollinator-mediated selection. South Afr J Bot 75:397–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Lively CM (1989) The evolution of floral color change: pollinator attraction versus physiological constraints in Fuchsia excorticata. Evolution 43:1252–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudash MR, Hassler C, Stevens PM, Fenster CB (2011) Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preference and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Am J Bot 98:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM, Rushing NS, Hart GM, Hansen JD (2006) Frequency-dependent pollinator foraging in polymorphic Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations: implications for flower colour evolution and pollinator interactions. Oikos 112:412–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, Van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Pauw A (2011) Easy technique for assessing pollination rates in the genus Erica reveals road impact on bird pollination in the Cape fynbos, South Africa. Austral Ecol 36:656–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2005) Flower constancy in bumblebees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis. Anim Behav 69:939–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigord LDB, Macnair MR, Smithson A (2001) Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L) Soò. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6253–6255

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Wolf LL (1977) Nonrandom foraging by sunbirds in a patchy environment. Ecology 58:1284–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant V (1994) Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3–10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC (1998) Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Bio 201:1433–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Hurly TA, Healy SD (2001) Rufous hummingbirds’ memory for flower location. Anim Behav 61:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heystek A, Pauw A (2013) Does competition for pollinators contribute to structuring Erica communities? J Veg Sci. doi:10.1111/jvs.12127

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Strauss SY (2005) Flower color microevolution in wild radish: evolutionary response to pollinator-mediated selection. Am Nat 165:225–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Strauss SY, Storz S, Emerson A, Guibert G (2003) The role of herbivores in the maintenance of a flower color polymorphism in wild radish. Ecology 84:1733–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KN, Reithel JS (2001) Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 88:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns C, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1985) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss SL, He T, Barrett LG, Lamont BB, Enright NJ, Miller BP, Hanley ME (2009) Contrasting impacts of pollen and seed dispersal on spatial genetic structure in the bird-pollinated Banksia hookeriana. Heredity 102:274–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Watkins L (1984) Assortative mating in Phlox. Heredity 53:595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz CN, Nicolson SW (1996) Sugar preferences of a nectarivorus passerine bird, the lesser double-collared Sunbird (Nectarinia chalybea). Funct Ecol 10:360–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunau K, Papiorek S, Eltz T, Sazima M (2011) Avoidance of achromatic colours by bees provides a private niche for hummingbirds. J Exp Biol 214:1607–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDade LA (1983) Long-tailed hermit hummingbird visits to inflorescence color morphs of Heliconia irrasa. Condor 85:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez-Ackerman E, Campbell DR, Waser NM (1997) Hummingbird behavior and mechanisms of selection on flower color in Ipomopsis. Ecology 78:2532–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Eadie JM, Harder LD (1984) What do foraging hummingbirds maximize? Oecologia 63:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ödeen A, Håstad O (2010) Pollinating birds differ in spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 196:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver EGH, Oliver IM (2005) The genus Erica (Ericaceae) in southern Africa: taxonomic notes 2. Bothalia 35:121–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press Inc, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds—rule of movement between inflorescences. Anim Behav 29:889–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (RDCT). 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  • Rebelo AG, Siegfried WR (1985) Colour and size of flowers in relation to pollination of Erica species. Oecologia 65:584–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Santamaría L (2004) Why are so many bird flowers red? PLoS Biol 2:1515–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Perspective: evolution of flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: Wright revisited. Evolution 55:1269–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2007) Spatial differentiation for flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: was Wright right? Evolution 61:2528–2543

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann D, Kirsten G, Oliver EGH (1992) Ericas of South Africa. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Skead CJ (1967) The sunbirds of southern Africa, also the sugarbirds, the white-eyes and the spotted creeper. Cape and Transvaal printers, Cape Town

  • Stiles FG (1976) Taste preferences, color preferences, and flower choice in hummingbirds. Condor 78:10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GD, Gass CL (1995) Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds. Anim Behav 50:1273–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Niet T, Pirie MD, Shuttleworth A, Johnson SD, Midgley JJ (2014) Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii? Ann Bot 113:301–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1982) A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species. Oecologia 55:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1986) Flower constancy: definition, cause and measurement. Am Nat 127:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. A. James for making his property available to us and several field assistants for their help. R. Maia and E. Newman are thanked for their statistical assistance. A.H. was funded by the Harry Crossley Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    Anina Heystek & Anton Pauw

  2. Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

    Sjirk Geerts

  3. Birds and Environmental Change Programme, Climate Change and BioAdaptation Division, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa

    Phoebe Barnard

  4. DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Phoebe Barnard

Authors
  1. Anina Heystek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sjirk Geerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Phoebe Barnard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anton Pauw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Pauw.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heystek, A., Geerts, S., Barnard, P. et al. Pink flower preference in sunbirds does not translate into plant fitness differences in a polymorphic Erica species. Evol Ecol 28, 457–470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9693-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9693-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation