Skip to main content
Log in

Sex-biases in the hatching sequence of cooperatively breeding apostlebirds Struthidea cinerea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In the cooperatively breeding apostlebird (Struthidea cinerea, Corcoracidae) both sexes are philopatric and help to raise offspring. However, male helpers provision nestlings more often than females, an activity associated with reduced nestling starvation and enhanced fledgling production. Presuming that males are the more helpful sex, we examined the helper repayment hypothesis by testing the predictions that offspring sex ratio should be skewed toward the production of males (a) among breeding groups with relatively few helpers, and (b) in the population as a whole. The relationship between sex and hatching order was examined as a potential mechanism of biasing sex allocation. The sex ratio of all sexed offspring was male biased (57.9%; n = 171) as was the mean brood sex ratio (0.579; n = 70 broods). These biases were less pronounced in the subset of clutches/broods in which all offspring were sexed. This overall bias appeared to result from two distinct patterns of skew in the hatching order. First, mothers in small breeding groups produced significantly more males among the first-hatching pair. This is consistent with the helper repayment hypothesis given that later hatching chicks were less likely to survive, particularly in small groups. Second, almost all fourth-hatching chicks, usually the last in the brood, were male (91.7%, n = 12). This bias is difficult to interpret but demonstrates the value of examining hatching sequences when evaluating specific predictions of sex allocation theory in birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold KE, Griffith SC, Goldizen AW (2001) Sex-biased hatching sequences in the cooperatively breeding Noisy Miner. J Avian Biol 55:219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV, Hill GE, Beck ML, Dervan AA, Duckworth RA, McGraw KJ, Nolan PM, Whittingham LA (2002) Sex-biased hatching order and adaptive population divergence in a passerine bird. Science 295:316–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz JC, Hayden TJ (1991) Skewed brood sex ratio and sex-biased hatching in Harris’s hawks. Am Nat 137:116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland CRJ, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A (1997) Experimental manipulation of brood reduction and parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. J Anim Ecol 66:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1987) Helping and communal breeding in birds: ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burle T (1992) Single locus and multi-locus fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations–a molecular approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 227–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman G (1998) The social life of the Apostlebird Struthidea cinerea. Emu 98:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cichoń M, Dubiec A, Stoczko M (2003) Laying order and offspring sex in blue tits Parus caeruleus. J Avian Biol 34:355–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke MF, Jones DA, Ewen JG, Robertson RJ, Griffiths R, Painter J, Boag PT, Crozier R (2002) Male-biased sex ratios in broods of the cooperatively breeding bell miner Manorina melanophrys. J Avian Biol 33:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A (1998) Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:141–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, Covas R, Caizergues A, du Plessis M (2004) Unexpected sex ratio adjustment in a colonial cooperative bird: pairs with helpers produce more of the helping sex whereas pairs without helpers do not. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Dickinson JL, Hatchwell BJ, Griesser M (2004) Delayed dispersal. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Emlen JM, Levin SA (1986) Sex-ratio selection in species with helpers-at-the-nest. Am Nat 127:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1997) When mothers prefer daughters over sons. TREE 12:291–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen JG, Clarke RH, Moysey E, Boulton RL, Crozier RH, Clarke MF (2001) Primary sex ratio bias in an endangered cooperatively breeding bird, the black-eared miner, and its implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 101:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:13–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson A-K, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA, Lennartz MR (1985) Sex ratios of nestling and fledgling Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) favor males. Am Nat 126:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Sheldon BC, West SA (2005) Cooperative breeders adjust offspring sex ratios to produce helpful helpers. Am Nat 166:628–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn RG (1992) Cooperative enhancement of reproductive success in white-winged choughs. Evol Ecol 6:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn RG (1995) Hatching asynchrony and brood reduction in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs Corcorax melanorhamphos. Emu 95:252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner R (1998) Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav 56:155–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD, Walters JR (1999) Sex-ratio selection in species with helpers at the nest: the helper repayment model revisited. Am Nat 153:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD, Stanback MT, Haydock J, Kraaijeveld-Smit F (2001) Nestling sex ratio variation in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J (2004) Sex-ratio manipulation. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 102–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Daan S, Tinbergen J, Mateman C (1997) Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler’s eggs. Nature 385:522–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Magrath MJL, Krackow S (2002) Pre-ovulation control of hatchling sex ratio in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc London B 269:1067–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackow S, Tkadlec E (2001) Analysis of brood sex ratios: implications of offspring clustering. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs EA, Green DJ, Double MC, Griffiths R (2002) Laying date and laying sequence influence the sex ratio of crimson rosella broods. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge S, Heinsohn R, Double MC, Griffiths R, Cockburn A (2001) Complex sex allocation in the laughing kookaburra. Behav Ecol 12:524–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Avery MI (1987) Sex-ratio selection in species with helpers at the nest: some extensions of the repayment model. Am Nat 129:610–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD, Ligon SH (1990) Female-biased sex ratio at hatching in the green woodhoopoe. Auk 107:765–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Nager RG, Monaghan P, Griffiths R, Houston DC, Dawson R (1999) Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:570–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pen IR, Weissing FJ (2000) Sex ratio optimization with helpers at the nest. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pike TW, Petrie M (2003) Potential mechanisms of avian sex manipulation. Biol Rev 78:553–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yang M, Plewis I, Healy M, Woodhouse G, Draper D, Langford I, Lewis T (2000) A user’s guide to MlwiN. 2nd. Institute of Education, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1990) When should parents differentially provision sons and daughters? Am Nat 135:671–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoleson SH, Beissinger SR (1995) Hatching asynchrony and the onset of incubation in birds, revisited. When is the critical period? Curr Ornithol 12:191–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walters JR (1990) Red-cockaded Woodpeckers: a ‘primitive’ cooperative breeder. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69–101

    Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Sheldon BC (2002) Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295:1685–1688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Shuker DM, Sheldon BC (2005) Sex-ratio adjustment when relatives interact: a test of constraints on adaptation. Evolution 59:1211–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woxvold IA (2004) Breeding ecology and group dynamics of the apostlebird. Aus J Zool 52:561–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woxvold IA (2005) Social organisation, cooperative breeding and sex allocation in the Apostlebird Struthidea cinerea. Ph.D Thesis, University of Melbourne

  • Woxvold IA, Magrath MJL (2004) Predation events at an Apostlebird nest. Corella 28:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Woxvold IA, Magrath MJL (2005) Helping enhances multiple components of reproductive success in the cooperatively breeding apostlebird. J Anim Ecol 74:1039–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woxvold IA, Mulder RA, Maghrath MJL (2006) Contributions to care vary with age, sex, breeding status and group size in the cooperatively breeding apostlebird. Anim Behav 72:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Ryan family for accommodation and permission to work on their property. We would also like to thank Raoul Mulder and several anonymous referees for their valuable comments on the manuscript. The research was supported by grants from The Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, The Norman Wettenhall Foundation, Australian Geographic, The American Museum of Natural History, The Royal Zoological Society of NSW, and Birds Australia (VicGroup). IAW was supported by an Australian Research Council Large Grant awarded to Jan Komdeur, and a stipend from the Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne. Collection of field data was greatly assisted by Eron Chapman, Rebecca McIntosh, Emma and Helen Burdekin, Eric Woxvold, Bryony Anderson, Holly Dumble, Georgina Read, John Sandow, Mark Johnson, Andrew Barnes, Telford Scully, Sonia Orchard and Chris Jarvis. Capture, sampling and monitoring of apostlebirds was conducted under the authority of licences required by Australian law.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain Arne Woxvold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woxvold, I.A., Magrath, M.J.L. Sex-biases in the hatching sequence of cooperatively breeding apostlebirds Struthidea cinerea . Evol Ecol 22, 139–151 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9163-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9163-y

Keywords

Navigation