Abstract
How should females choose their mates if choice is not completely free, but at least partly dictated by outcomes of male–male competition, or sexual coercion? This question is of central importance when evaluating the relationship between sexually antagonistic ‘chase-away’ scenarios and models of more traditional female choice. Currently, there is a mismatch between theories: indirect benefits are seen to play a role in conventional mate choice, whereas they are not predicted to have an influence on the outcome if matings impose direct costs on females. This is at odds with the idea that resistance and preference are two sides of the same coin: either leads to a subset of males enjoying enhanced mating success. In the same way as choosy females benefit from mating with sexy males if this yields sexy sons, females could benefit from being manipulated or ‘seduced’, if the manipulative or seductive ability of males is heritable. Here I build a model where male dominance (or coerciveness) improves his mating success, and this relationship can be modified by female behaviour. This clarifies the definitions of resistance and preference: resisting females diminish the benefit a male gains from being dominant, while preferences enhance this pre-existing benefit enjoyed by dominant males. In keeping with earlier theory, females may evolve to resist costly mating attempts as a counterstrategy to male traits, particularly if male dominance is environmentally rather than genetically determined. Contrary to earlier results, however, indirect benefits are also predicted to influence female mating behaviour, and if sufficiently strong, they may produce female preferences for males that harm them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Arnqvist L. Rowe (2002) ArticleTitleAntagonistic co-evolution between the sexes in a group of insects Nature 415 787–789
A. Berglund G. Rosenqvist (2003) ArticleTitleSex role reversal in pipefish Adv. Study Behav 32 131–167 Occurrence Handlefull_text||10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01003-9
A Berglund A. Bisazza A. Pilastro (1996) ArticleTitleArmaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility Biol. J. Linn. Soc 58 385–399 Occurrence Handle10.1006/bijl.1996.0043
G. Bernasconi L. Keller (2001) ArticleTitleFemale polyandry affects their sons’ reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum J. Evol. Biol 14 186–193 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00247.x
A Bisazza G. Vaccari A. Pilastro (2001) ArticleTitleFemale mate choice in a mating system dominated by male sexual coercion Behav. Ecol 12 59–64
E Cameron T. Day L. Rowe (2003) ArticleTitleSexual conflict and indirect benefits J. Evol. Biol 16 1055–1060 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00584.x Occurrence Handle14635921
U. Candolin (1999) ArticleTitleMale-male competition facilitates female choice in sticklebacks Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266 785–789 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.1999.0706
T Chapman G Arnqvist J. Bangham L. Rowe (2003) ArticleTitleSexual conflict Trends Ecol. Evol 18 41–47 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
T Chapman L.F. Liddle J.M. Kalb M.F. Wolfner L. Partridge (1995) ArticleTitleCost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products Nature 373 241–244 Occurrence Handle10.1038/373241a0 Occurrence Handle7816137
T.H. Clutton-Brock G.A. Parker (1995) ArticleTitleSexual coercion in animal societies Anim. Behav 49 1345–1365 Occurrence Handle10.1006/anbe.1995.0166
C. Cordero W.G. Eberhard (2003) ArticleTitleFemale choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research J. Evol. Biol 16 1–6 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00506.x Occurrence Handle14635875
C.R. Cox B.J. Le Boeuf (1977) ArticleTitleFemale incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection Am. Nat 111 317–335 Occurrence Handle10.1086/283163
H.S. Crudgington M.T. Siva-Jothy (2000) ArticleTitleGenital damage, kicking and early death: the battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil Nature 407 855–856 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35038154 Occurrence Handle11057654
E.J.A. Cunningham T.R. Birkhead (1998) ArticleTitleSex roles and sexual selection Anim. Behav 56 1311–1321 Occurrence Handle10.1006/anbe.1998.0953 Occurrence Handle9933527
M.C. Double A. Cockburn (2003) ArticleTitleSubordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270 379–384 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2002.2261
W.G. Eberhard C. Cordero (2003) ArticleTitleSexual conflict and female choice Trends Ecol. Evol 18 438–439 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00180-0
E. Forsgren (1997) ArticleTitleFemale sand gobies prefer good fathers over dominant males Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 264 1283–1286 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.1997.0177
U. Friberg G. Arnqvist (2003) ArticleTitleFitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females J. Evol. Biol 16 797–811 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00597.x Occurrence Handle14635895
S Gavrilets G. Arnquist U. Friberg (2001) ArticleTitleThe evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268 531–539 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2000.1382
T. Getty (1999) ArticleTitleChase-away sexual selection as noisy reliable signalling Evolution 53 299–302
M.P. Haley (1994) ArticleTitleResource-holding power asymmetries, the prior residence effect, and reproductive payoffs in male northern elephant seal fights Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 34 427–434
D.W. Hall M. Kirkpatrick B. West (2000) ArticleTitleRunaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected Evolution 54 1862–1869 Occurrence Handle11209766
B. Holland W.R. Rice (1998) ArticleTitleChase-away selection: antagonistic seduction vs. resistance Evolution 52 1–7
D. Houle A.S. Kondrashov (2002) ArticleTitleCo-evolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269 97–104 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2001.1823
Y Iwasa A. Pomiankowski S. Nee (1991) ArticleTitleThe evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The “handicap” principle Evolution 45 1431–1442
M.D. Jennions M. Petrie (2000) ArticleTitleWhy do females mate multiply?. A review of the genetic benefits Biol. Rev 75 21–64 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0006323199005423 Occurrence Handle10740892
M.D. Jennions A.P. Møller M. Petrie (2001) ArticleTitleSexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis Q. Rev. Biol 76 3–36 Occurrence Handle10.1086/393743 Occurrence Handle11291569
R.A. Johnstone L. Keller (2000) ArticleTitleHow males gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating Am. Nat 156 368–377 Occurrence Handle10.1086/303392
V. Jormalainen (1998) ArticleTitlePrecopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict Q. Rev. Biol 73 275–304 Occurrence Handle10.1086/420306
H Kokko R Brooks M. Jennions J. Morley (2003) ArticleTitleThe evolution of mate choice and mating biases Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270 653–664 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2002.2235
H Kokko R Brooks J.M. McNamara A.I. Houston (2002) ArticleTitleThe sexual selection continuum Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269 1331–1340 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2002.2020
H. Kokko P. Monaghan (2001) ArticleTitlePredicting the direction of sexual selection Ecol. Lett 4 159–165 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00212.x
R. Lande (1981) ArticleTitleModels of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic characters Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 3721–3725
P.L.M. Lee G.C. Hays (2004) ArticleTitlePolyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 6530–6535 Occurrence Handle10.1073/pnas.0307982101 Occurrence Handle15096623
T.A. Markow (2000) ArticleTitleForced matings in natural populations of Drosophila Am. Nat 156 100–103 Occurrence Handle10.1086/303368 Occurrence Handle10824025
O.Y. Martin D.J. Hosken P.I. Ward (2004) ArticleTitlePost-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 271 353–359 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2003.2588
F. McKinney S. Evarts (1998) Sexual coercion in waterfowl and other birds P.G. Parker N.T. Burley (Eds) Avian Reproductive Tactics: Female and Male Perspectives. Allen Lawrence 163–195
A.J. Moore P.J. Moore (1999) ArticleTitleBalancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266 711–716 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.1999.0694
A.J. Moore P.A. Gowaty W.G. Wallin P.J. Moore (2001) ArticleTitleSexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268 517–523 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2000.1399
E.H. Morrow G. Arnqvist S. Pitnick (2003) ArticleTitleAdaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol 14 802–806 Occurrence Handle10.1093/beheco/arg073
A.P. Møller R.V. Alatalo (1999) ArticleTitleGood-genes effects in sexual selection Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266 85–91 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.1999.0607
A.G. Ophir B.G. Galef SuffixJr. (2003) ArticleTitleFemale Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners Anim. Behav 66 399–407 Occurrence Handle10.1006/anbe.2003.2230
A. Pai G. Yan (2002) ArticleTitlePolyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269 361–368 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2001.1893
G.A. Parker (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict M.S. Blum N.A. Blum (Eds) Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic Press New York 123–166
L. Partridge L.D. Hurst (1998) ArticleTitleSex and conflict Science 281 2003–2008 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.281.5385.2003 Occurrence Handle9748155
R.J.H. Payne M. Pagel (2001) ArticleTitleInferring the origins of state-dependent courtship traits Am. Nat 157 42–50 Occurrence Handle10.1086/317007
T. Pizzari (2003) ArticleTitleFood, vigilance, and sperm: the role of male direct benefits in the evolution of female preference in a polygamous bird Behav. Ecol 47 593–601 Occurrence Handle10.1093/beheco/arg048
T. Pizzari T.R. Birkhead (2000) ArticleTitleFemale feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males Nature 405 787–789 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35015558 Occurrence Handle10866198
T. Pizzari R.R. Snook (2003) ArticleTitleSexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts Evolution 57 1223–1236 Occurrence Handle12894931
A Pomiankowski Y. Iwasa S. Nee (1991) ArticleTitleThe evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation Evolution 45 1422–1430
A. Qvarnström E. Forsgren (1998) ArticleTitleShould females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol. Evol 13 498–501 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01513-4
K Reinhardt R. Naylor M.T. Siva-Jothy (2003) ArticleTitleReducing a cost of traumatic insemination: female bedbugs evolve a unique organ Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270 2371–2375 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2003.2515
L. Rowe (1992) ArticleTitleConvenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration Anim. Behav 44 189–202 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0003-3472(92)90025-5
A.D. Stutt M.T. Siva-Jothy (2001) ArticleTitleTraumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 5683–5687 Occurrence Handle10.1073/pnas.101440698 Occurrence Handle11331783
R. Thornhill J. Alcock (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
P.J. Watson G. Armqvist R.R. Stallmann (1998) ArticleTitleSexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders Am. Nat 151 46–58 Occurrence Handle10.1086/286101
N. Wedell T. Tregenza (1999) ArticleTitleSuccessful fathers sire successful sons Evolution 53 620–625
B.B.M. Wong (2004) ArticleTitleSuperior fighters make mediocre fathers in the Pacific blue-eye fish Anim. Behav 67 583–590 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.015
Wong B.B.M., Candolin, U. (in press) How is female choice affected by male competition? Biol. Rev.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kokko, H. Treat ’em Mean, Keep ’em (sometimes) Keen: Evolution of Female Preferences for Dominant and Coercive Males. Evol Ecol 19, 123–135 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-004-7919-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-004-7919-1