Skip to main content
Log in

Pollen viability and stigma receptivity in Lilium during anthesis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollen viability and stigma receptivity are prerequisites for successful pollination and seed set in flowering plants. In this study, the pollen viabilities and stigma receptivities of nine Lilium genotypes (six cultivars and three species native to China) were assayed by in vitro pollen germination and the benzidine-H2O2 method, respectively. Embryo sac development during anthesis was observed to further ensure the timing of controlled pollination. In addition, the relationship between stigma secretion and stigma receptivity was studied to estimate the pollination time based on phenotype. Anthers cracked on the day of flowering in all genotypes, but pollen germination during anthesis was not observed in Asiatic hybrids excepted for ‘Tiny pudhye’, which exhibited low pollen viability for a short period of time (from 0 to 1 day after anthesis). In the other genotypes, pollen germination rates were highest on anthesis (five of seven genotypes), 0–1 day after anthesis (L. sulphureum), or 0–2 days after anthesis (one Longiflorum hybrid), and then gradually decreased with days after anthesis. While, stigma receptivity first increased and then decreased during anthesis. For most genotypes, stigmas began to be receptive 1 day after anthesis, and all genotypes exhibited stigma receptivity at 2 days after anthesis. The durations of stigma receptivity and strongest stigma receptivity, were genotype dependent, and were 5–8 days and 1–4 days, respectively. Moreover, on the first flowering day, 6 of 7 genotypes had mature embryo sacs, and at the time at which stigmas began to be receptive, all tested genotypes had mature embryo sacs. Some Lilium genotypes showed stigma secretion, which can be a sign of stigma receptivity. Stigmas became receptive and reached highest receptivity within 1 day of the first appearance of secretion on the surface of the stigma and at peaking, respectively. The results of this study are valuable for the implementation of successful Lilium breeding programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaki W, Yamamoto Y (1988) Pollen tube growth in the pistils grafted with style of different cultivar or with cross or self pre-pollinated styles of Lilium longiflorum. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 57(2):269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaki W, Tezuka T, Yamamoto Y (1989) Effect of pistillary sap on the in vivo pollen tube growth and changes in components of stylar sap by pollination in Lilim longiflorum thumb. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 75(4):648–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano Y (1978) Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. III. New hybrids obtained through embryo culture. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 47(3):401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano Y (1982) Chromosome association and pollen fertility in some interspecific hybrids of Lilum. Euphytica 31:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano Y (1983) Random distribution of the number of chromosome pairings in interspecific hybrids of Llilum. Cytologia 48:803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano Y, Myodo H (1977) Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. I. For the intrastylar pollination technique. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 46(1):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD (1975) Special stylar property required for compatible pollen-tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. Int J Plant Sci 136(3):317–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Peloquin SJ (1966) Effect of floral aging on the growth of compatible and incompatible pollen tubes in Lilium longiflorum. Am J Bot 53(1):99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Peloquin SJ (1968) Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra- and interspecific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. Am J Bot 55(10):1230–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barba-Gonzalez R (2005) The use of 2n gametes for introgression breeding in Oriental × Asiatic lilies. PhD-thesis, University Wageningen

  • Barba-Gonzalez R, Ramanna MS, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM (2005) Intergenomic recombination in F1 lily hybrids (Lilium) and its significance for genetic variation in the BC1 progenies as revealed by GISH and FISH. Genome 48:884–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baskorowati L (2009) Stigma receptivity and pollen viability of Melaleuca alternifolia. J For Res Jpn 6(1):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2012) Plant DNA C-values database (release 6.0, December 2012). http://data.kew.org/cvalues/

  • Bhattacharya A (2011) Does canopy height determine the pollen viability and stigma receptivity? A cross-population observation on Shorea robusta Gaertn. f. Our Nat 9:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Mandal S (2004) Pollination, pollen germination and stigma receptivity in Moringa oleifera Lamk. Grana 43(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber HF (1949) A new classification of the Lilium. Lily Yearb R Hortic Soc 13:86–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A, Firmage D (2000) Pollen viability and longevity: practical, ecological and evolutionary implications. Plant Syst Evol 222:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A, Maués MM (1998) A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivity. Sex Plant Reprod 11:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AR, Ching KK, Johnson KW, Hand FC, Burgess IP (1982) Processing Eucalyptus pollen for use in controlled pollination. Silvae Genet 31:198–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR (1977) The receptive surface of the angiosperms stigma. Ann Bot 41:1233–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR (1984) The evaluation of pollen quality and a further appraisal of the fluorochromatic (FCR) test procedure. Theor Appl Genet 67:367–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu SY (2005) Reproductive biology of angiosperm. Higher Education Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson J (1992) Pollen tube - pistil interaction and fertilization in Lilium Iongiflorum. PhD-thesis, University Wageningen

  • Janson J, Willemse MTM (1995) Pollen tube penetration and fertilization in Lilium longiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 82(2):186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson J, Reinders MC, van Tuyl JM, Keijzer CJ (1993) Pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum following different pollination techniques and flower manipulations. Acta Bot Neerl 42(4):461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson J, Reinders MC, Valkering AGM, van Tuyl JM, Keijzer CJ (1994) Pistil exudate production and pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. Ann Bot 73:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinganire A, Harwood CE, Slee MU, Simons AJ (2000) Floral structure, stigma receptivity and pollen viability in relation to protandry and self-incompatibility in silky oak (Grevillea robusta A. Cunn). Ann Bot 86:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. Colorado University Press, Colorado, p 583

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MN (2009) A molecular cytogenetic study of intergenomic recombination and introgression of chromosomal segments in lilies (Lilium). PhD-thesis, University Wageningen

  • Khan MN, Zhou S, Ramanna MS, Arens P, Herrera J, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM (2009) Relevance of diploid BC progenies for intergenomic recombination and introgression breeding in Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids of lilies (Lilium L.). Euphytica 166:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Yuan S, Liu C, Tian M, Yu N (2012) Actors affecting viability and development of isolated microspore in Lilium. North Hortic 03:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang SY, Tamura M (2000) Lilium. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China, vol 24. Science Press, Beijing, pp 118–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim TK (2014) Lilium lancifolium. In: Lim TK (ed) Edible medicinal and non medicinal plants, vol 8. Flowers. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 215–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (2015) Lilium lancifolium (Baihe, Tiger Lily). In: Liu Y, Wang ZM, Zhang J (eds) Dietary Chinese herbs. Springer, Vienna, pp 147–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari P (1950) An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, London, pp 84–152

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae EA (1998) Lilies: a guide for growers and collectors. Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda S (1986) Cytogenetic behavior, chromosomal differentiations, and geographic distribution in Lilium lancifolium (Liliaceae). Plant Species Biol 1:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosevičius J, Strikulyte L (2004) Interspecific hybridization and embryo rescue in breeding of lilies. Acta Universitatis Latviensis Biology 676:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Razora OP, Zsuffa L (1986) Pollen viability of some Populus species as indicated by in vitro pollen germination and tetrazolium chloride staining. Can J Bot 64:1086–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RT, Dafni A (2000) A new procedure to asses pollen viability. Sex Plant Reprod 12:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanzol J, Herrero M (2001) Review: the effective pollination period in fruit trees. Sci Hortic 90:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgley M, Smith RM (1989) Pistil receptivity and pollen tube growth in relation to the breeding system of Eucalyptus woodwardii (Symphyomyrtus: Myrtaceae). Ann Bot 64:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivanna KR (2003) Pollen biology and technology. Science Publishers, Enfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivanna KR, Johri BM (1985) The angiosperm pollen: structure and function. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliva LAC, Pagliarini MS, Santos SA, Valle CB (2013) Stigma receptivity, mode of reproduction, and mating system in Mesosetum chaseae Luces (Poaceae), a native grass of the Brazilian Pantanal. Genet Mol Res 12(4):5038–5045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza EH, Carmello-Guerreiro SM, Souza FVD, Rossi ML, Martinelli AP (2016) Stigma structure and receptivity in Bromeliaceae. Sci Hortic 203:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Creij MGM, van Raamsdonk LWD, Van Tuyl JM (1990) Wide interspecific hybridization of Lilium: preliminary results of the application of pollination and embryo-rescue methods. Lily Yearb North Am Lily Soc 43:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM, Marcucci MC, Visser T (1982) Pollen and pollination experiments. VII. The effect of pollen treatment and application method on incompatibility and incongruity in Lilium. Euphytica 31:613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM, Van Diën MP, Van Creij MGM, Van Kleinwee TCM, Franken J, Bino RJ (1991) Application of in vitro pollination, ovary culture, ovule culture and embryo rescue for overcoming incongruity barriers in interspecific Lilium crosses. Plant Sci 74:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM, Arens P, Ramanna MS, Shahin A, Khan N, Xie S, Marasek-Ciolakowska A, Lim KB, Barba-Gonzalez R (2011) Lilium. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources, plantation and ornamental crops. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willemse MTM, Plyushch TA, Reinders MC (1995) In vitro micropylar penetration of the pollen tube in the ovule of Gasteria verrucosa (Mill.) H. Duval and Lilium longiflorum Thunb.: conditions, attraction and application. Plant Sci 108:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock HBD, Stearn WT (1950) Lilies of the world: their cultivation & classification. Country Life, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie S (2012) A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium hybrids. PhD-thesis, University Wageningen

  • Yuan S, Liu C, Ming J (2016) A new lily cultivar ‘Jinghe’. Acta Hortic Sin 43(9):1845–1846

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S (2007) Intergenomic recombination and introgression breeding in Longiflorum × Asiatic lilies, PhD-thesis, University Wageningen

  • Zhou S, Ramanna MS, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM (2008) Genome composition of triploid lily cultivars derived from sexual polyploidization of Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (Lilium). Euphytica 160:207–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Li K, Zhou G (2012) Analysis of endosperm development of allotriploid × diploid/tetraploid crosses in Lilium. Euphytica 184:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Yuan G, Xu P, Gong H (2014) Study on lily introgression breeding using allotriploids as maternal parents in interploid hybridizations. Breed Sci 64:97–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31301804), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201203071), the Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program (2012BAD01B0701), the National Center for Flower Improvement, and the Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China. We also acknowledge partial funding from the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2016-IVFCAAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suxia Yuan.

Additional information

Guoren He and Fengrong Hu have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, G., Hu, F., Ming, J. et al. Pollen viability and stigma receptivity in Lilium during anthesis. Euphytica 213, 231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-2019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-2019-9

Keywords

Navigation