Abstract
Tolerance to low temperature is an important prerequisite for optimal performance of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a number of temperate peanut-growing environments. One hundred fifty-eight peanut accessions belonging to five botanical types, known to be tolerant to low temperature (12°C) at germination, were evaluated for phenotypic diversity for 15 morphological traits in the 2001 rainy season and for 15 agronomic and two seed quality traits in the 2001 rainy and 2001/2002 post-rainy seasons. Analysis of data, using the residual maximum-likelihood approach indicated that variance components due to genotypes were significant for all traits in the rainy and for all but two traits in the post-rainy season. Clustering based on scores of nine principle components delineated four clusters. The cold-tolerant genotypes and the standard control cultivars in the four clusters differed in mean, variance, and range both during rainy and post-rainy seasons for a range of agronomic traits, indicating the diversity among the clusters. The cold-tolerant accessions were superior to control cultivars for several agronomic traits compared with their respective controls in both the rainy and post-rainy seasons, so their use in breeding should result in genetically diverse cold-tolerant high-yielding peanut cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), also known as groundnut, is an important tropical legume grown for both oil production and human food, as it provides a good source of energy, protein, minerals, and vitamins. Peanut production environments are characterized by a warm, frost-free period of at least 90 days (Bunting et al. 1985), with mean temperatures between 24°C and 33°C, which is the optimum range for growth and dry-matter production (Ketring 1984). The peanut plant shows maximum growth at 28°C but experiences severe metabolic perturbations below 12°C (Bell et al. 1994a). Low temperature results in slow growth of both hypocotyl/radicle and epicotyl (Ketring et al. 1982). Night temperature determines both leaflet CO2 exchange rate, regardless of day temperature, and the efficiency of use of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (Sinclair et al. 1993; Bell et al. 1994b). Low soil temperature delays pod initiation, and reduces number of mature pods/seeds, and seed weight (Golombok and Johanson 1997).
The importance of cold tolerance in peanut is well recognized for specific production environments in North America (Benedict and Ketring 1972; Singleton and Pattee 1989; Bell et al. 1994a), Australia (Bell et al. 1991), India (Bhagat et al. 1992), and China (Fu et al. 1988). A few cold-tolerant early-maturing cultivars with ability to germinate in cooler soils have been released in Canada (Agriculture Canada 1984, 1989). The low temperatures (<18°C) at sowing in the winter peanut crop in India result in slow seedling emergence and poor plant stand. Delay in seedling emergence extends crop duration beyond 120 days, exposing the crop to high temperatures at reproductive phase and pod damage due to early onset of monsoon rains (Bhagat et al. 1988). Poor germination due to low temperatures in spring-sown peanut crop has also been reported in China, Nepal, and Vietnam (Fu et al. 1988; Koirala 1996; Dan and Hong 1996). Identification and incorporation of cold tolerance are therefore important peanut breeding objectives in these countries.
Upadhyaya et al. (2001) screened 1,704 peanut core collection accessions (Upadhyaya et al. 2003) and four control cultivars (Gangapuri, M13, ICGS 44, and ICGS 76), using rolled paper towel testing (Ellis et al. 1985) for ability to germinate in an incubator set at 12°C day-night temperature. Seeds of hypogaea and hirsuta were treated with ethrel (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) to break seed dormancy prior to cold-tolerant test. A sufficient quantity of distilled water was added to the tray so as to keep wet the 3–4 cm of paper rolls. The number of germinating seeds was recorded at 10 (fastigiata, vulgaris, aequatoriana, and peruviana types) and 15 (hypogaea and hirsuta types) days after incubation. The hypogaea types that showed less than 70% germination were retested, with the seed stored for at least 6 months, to avoid discrepancies that could arise due to seed dormancy. This experiment was repeated with the same number of entries during the 2000/2001 post-rainy season. In both seasons, accessions that showed 80% or higher germination for one seed source but not less than 70% from either seed source were considered tolerant to low temperature at germination. Based on two seasons’ evaluation, 158 peanut core collection accessions were identified as tolerant to low temperature (12°C), on the basis of 80% or higher germination for the best seed source and not less than 70% from the second source. Mean percentage seed germination in cold-tolerant entries ranged from 76% to 96%, compared with 36% to 55% in controls (M13, ICGS 44, and ICGS 76); the fourth control, Gangapuri, had 87% germination at 12°C (Table 1).
The present study was done to characterize phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic traits in the 158 cold-tolerant germplasm to identify genetically diverse accessions for use in peanut breeding to improve cold tolerance at germination.
Materials and methods
One hundred fifty-eight cold-tolerant peanut accessions, representing five botanical types (4 aequatoriana, 103 fastigiata, 11 peruviana, 5 vulgaris, and 35 hypogaea) and four released Indian control cultivars (Gangapuri, M13, ICGS 44, and ICGS 76) were evaluated for 15 morphological traits in field plantings in the 2001 rainy season and for 15 agronomic and two seed quality traits in the 2001/2002 post-rainy season at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Gangapuri (ICG 2738) belongs to subsp. fastigiata var. fastigiata (Valencia type) and matures in about 100 days. ICGS 44 (ICG 13941) belongs to subsp. fastigiata var. vulgaris (Spanish type), matures in about 120 days, and is adapted to the irrigated post-rainy season. Both M13 (ICG 156) and ICGS 76 (ICG 13942) belong to subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea (Virginia type), mature in 120–135 days, and are adapted to rainy season conditions.
The experiment was conducted in an alpha design (Paterson and Williams 1976) with two replications in the rainy season and three replications in post-rainy season. Each accession was sown in a one row plot of 4 m length, with 60 cm between rows and 10 cm between plants in both the seasons. Morphological descriptors used included growth habit, branching pattern, stem color, stem hair, leaflet color, leaflet shape, leaflet hair, flower color, streak color on flower, peg color, seeds per pod, pod beak, pod constriction, pod reticulation, and primary seed color (IBPGR and ICRISAT 1992). Ten mature pods were randomly selected to record data on pod beak, constriction, and reticulation. Days to emergence, days to 50% flowering, pod yield per plot, pod length and width, seed length and width, and shelling percentage were recorded on a plot basis; number of primary branches, plant height, leaflet length and width, pods per plant, and pod yield per plant were recorded on five competitive plants; seeds per pod, and pod length and width were recorded on ten randomly selected mature pods; seed length and width were based on ten mature seeds; shelling percentage was on 200 g pods; and seed weight was of 100 randomly selected mature seeds. Oven-dried (100°C, 16 h) bulked seed samples were used to determine oil and protein contents in both the seasons. Oil content was determined using a magnetic resonance spectrometer (Jambunathan et al. 1985), and data was corrected to uniform 50 g kg−1 seed moisture content. Nitrogen concentration was determined by Technicon Autoanalyser (Pulse Instrumentation Ltd., Saskatoon SK) and then multiplied by 5.46 to convert nitrogen into crude protein content (Singh and Jambunathan 1980).
Data were analyzed by the residual maximum-likelihood (REML) mixed model method with genotypes as random and environments (seasons) as fixed in GENSTAT 9.1 (Payne et al. 2006). The best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) were calculated for 15 agronomic and two quality traits. Homogeneity of variances in two seasons was tested by the Bartlett’s test of homogeneity (Bartlett 1937). Meta-analysis of two seasons’ data was performed when variances were heterogeneous. The components of variance due to the various botanical types as a group and individually and their interactions with season were also estimated for all traits to determine if the botanical types differed or interacted with environment. Also a comprehensive genotype-by-environment analysis, considering all genotypes as one group, was done, and the variance components due to genotype (σ 2g ), genotype-by-environment (σ 2ge ), and residual variance (σ 2e ) and their standard errors were calculated.
A phenotypic distance matrix was created by calculating the differences between all pair of accessions using all the descriptors. The diversity index was calculated by averaging all the differences in the phenotypic values for each trait divided by its respective range (Johns et al. 1997).
The mean observations of all traits for each environment were standardized by subtracting from each observation the mean value of the character and dividing by its respective standard deviation, providing standardized values for each trait with an average of 0 and standard deviation of 1. The standardized values were used for principal component analysis (PCA) using GENSTAT 9.1 (Payne et al. 2006). Cluster analysis was performed using scores of the first nine principal components (Ward 1963). Means and variances for quantitative traits in the different clusters were calculated. Differences for means among the clusters were tested using the Newman-Keuls procedure (Newman 1939; Keuls 1952) while the homogeneity of variances among the clusters was tested using Levene’s test (Levene 1960).
Results and discussion
Analysis based on botanical varieties
REML analysis indicated that the effect of season was highly significant for all agronomic traits (P ≤ 0.001–0.005), except for the number of primary branches. The effect of botanical variety was also highly significant (P ≤ 0.001–0.003) for all traits, except pod and seed width, and 100-seed weight. The season × botanical variety interaction was significant for nine traits (P ≤ 0.001–0.035), and nonsignificant for six traits (days to flowering, plant height, pod width, seed length, shelling percentage, and seed weight). In the 2001 rainy season, the effect of botanical variety was significant for five traits (leaf and pod length, seed width, plot yield, and shelling percentage) while in the 2001/2002 post-rainy season botanical variety was significant for all traits except for pod and seed width, shelling percentage, and seed weight (data not sown).
Estimates of components of variance for agronomic traits
Genotypic variance (σ 2g ) was significant for 15 traits in 2001 rainy season and for 13 traits in 2001/2002 post rainy-season (Table 2). In the combined analysis (meta analysis) genotypic variance was significant for primary branches, plant height, leaflet length, leaflet width, seed width, and 100-seed weight (Table 2). Genotype-by-environment (σ 2ge ) interaction was significant for all 15 traits.
Performance of cold-tolerant germplasm for agronomic traits
Accessions from fastigiata, aequatoriana, and peruviana (subsp. fastigiata) groups were compared with the control cultivar Gangapuri; accessions from vulgaris (subsp. fastigiata) were compared with control cultivar ICGS 44; and those belonging to hypogaea (subsp. hypogaea) were compared with with control cultivars ICGS 76 and M13. Table 3 lists the accessions with superior performance over their respective controls for various traits among different botanical varieties in the rainy and post-rainy seasons and across seasons. Of these, only 41 accessions from the five botanical varieties were significantly superior to their respective controls for 1–3 traits in the combined analysis. For example, 15 accessions were superior to the controls for pod yield (ICG#10915, 10567, 1710, 11088, 10945, 12625, 7898, 11130, 6148, 6022, 7013, 7905, 7884, 9515, and 4992), 5 for faster seed emergence (ICG#2422, 1364, 2344, 4749, and 1988), 1 for days to 50% flowering (ICG 14966), 9 for oil (ICG# 8833, 9695, 10575, 10036, 11203, 6340, 13513, 13430, and 14007) and 11 for protein (ICG# 9556, 8835, 9515, 10105, 4331, 1256, 1975, 7355, 398, 8485, and 1384) contents, 3 for pod yield and seed weight (ICG#1710, 6022, and 6148), and 1 each for pod yield and protein content (ICG 9515), seed weight and protein content (ICG 8485), and for seed weight and oil content (ICG 14007). However, only ICG# 12625, 10567, 1710, 10945, and 11088 were significantly superior for pod yield in both seasons. The variable performance of many accessions was mainly due to the significant genotype-by-environment interaction observed for most traits (Table 2).
Cluster composition and variation for morphological traits among clusters
PCAs based on the first nine principal components accounted for 79% of the total variation and resulted in four distinct clusters (Table 4). Cluster 1 comprised 23 accessions dominated by peruviana (47.8%) and fastigiata (30.4%) types. A majority of accessions in this cluster have erect growth habit, sequential branching, no stem pigmentation, leaflets almost glabrous on surfaces, peg pigmentation, pods with slight constriction and reticulation, and had 3-2-4-1/3-2-1-4/3-4-2-1 seeds per pod (more three-seeded than the other type of pods). Although there were five primary seed colors most of the accessions had tan-colored seeds. Of the 26 accessions included in cluster 2, 81% were hypogaea types, with most of the accessions having procumbent growth habit, alternate branching, no pigmentation on the stem (but pigmentation on pegs), subglabrous hairs in one or two rows along main axis, and green and glabrous leaflets. Most of the accessions have moderate pod beak and constriction, slight reticulation, and 2-1 seeds per pod (a high frequency of more two-seeded pods). The predominant seed color in this cluster was tan but the cluster included eight primary seed colors. In cluster 3, 54.3% of the accessions belonged to fastigiata and 34.3% to hypogaea. The cluster was characterized by erect growth with sequential branching, stem and peg pigmentation, subglabrous hairs on the main axis, light green glabrous leaflets, pods with slight beak, constriction and reticulation, and 3-2-4-1/3-2-1-4/3-4-2-1 seeds per pod. Red- and tan-colored seeds were predominant, although nine primary seed colors were recorded. Cluster 4 accessions were predominantly from fastigiata (95%), mostly with erect growth habit, sequential branching, stem and peg pigmentation, subglabrous hairs on the main axis, light-green glabrous leaflets, slight pod beak and constriction, and 3-2-4-1/3-2-1-4/3-4-2-1 seeds per pod. Red seed color was predominant, although eight primary seed colors were observed.
Variation for agronomic traits among clusters
In the rainy season the four clusters differed significantly for all traits except for pods per plant and pod width (Table 5). Cluster 2 and 4 accessions emerged faster and flowered earlier. Accessions in cluster 4 were taller, had large leaflets, and high seed protein content. Accessions in cluster 3 were shorter and had small leaflets, more primary branches, the highest seed yield, a high shelling percentage, and large seed size. Accessions in cluster 2 had the highest seed oil content. In the post-rainy season, differences were significant among four clusters for 17 traits. Cluster 1 and 4 accessions emerged faster and flowered earlier. Plants in cluster 1 accessions were taller, had larger leaflets, highest seed yield, large pod and seed size, and high seed oil content.
Heterogeneity of variances for various traits
Variance for 9 agronomic traits in the 2001 rainy and 8 traits in the 2001/2002 post-rainy seasons were heterogeneous (Table 6). In the rainy season, cluster 1 accessions had higher variances for plant height and leaflet length and cluster 3 accessions for pod yield per plot, 100-seed weight, and seed protein content. Higher variances for accessions in cluster 1 for pod length, in cluster 2 for pod yield and 100-seed weight, and in cluster 3 for pods per plant occurred in the post-rainy season.
Phenotypic diversity index among clusters
The clusters differed in terms of the biological status (whether landraces, breeding lines or cultivars) of the accessions involved in minimum and maximum phenotypic diversity indices (Table 7). Accessions with the least difference in phenotypic diversity index in the entire set were ICG 13288 (a landrace from Brazil) and ICG 10519 (an advanced cultivar from Australia). The accessions with the minimum diversity index in each cluster were two landraces from Peru (ICG 10945 and ICG 11088) in cluster 1, breeding lines (ICG 2506 and ICG 2925) from India in cluster 2, a landrace (ICG 6220) from Brazil and an advanced cultivar (ICG 9144) from Syria in cluster 3, and an accession with unknown origin (ICG 1298) and Indian cultivar Gangapuri (ICG 2738) in cluster 4.
The maximum phenotypic diversity index in the entire set was between ICG 12112 (landrace from Peru) and ICG 156 (cultivar from India) while accessions with maximum diversity in individual clusters were ICG 12112 (landrace from Peru) and ICG 7932 (advance line from South Africa) in cluster 1, ICG 10075 (landrace from Peru) and ICG 9037 (landrace from Côte d’Ivoire) in cluster 2, ICG 10595 (landrace from Brazil) and ICG 13942 (cultivar from India) in cluster 3, and ICG 1908 (breeding line from India) and ICG 7352 (land race from Peru) in cluster 4.
Botanical varieties and cold tolerance
Differences for chilling injury among botanical types of peanut have been reported. Sellschop and Salmon (1928) found Valencia and Spanish types highly sensitive while Virginia bunch type had exceptional hardiness. Bell et al. (1991) reported a positive association between rate of emergence and mean daily temperature (17.8–23.2°C) in 16 peanut cultivars, indicating that air temperatures were always lower than those required for good germination. They however reported no significant differences (P < 0.05) in coefficients of temperature sensitivity either between cultivars of the same botanical type or between different botanical types. All cultivars used in their study had similar base temperature (T b) values for emergence (13.2°C). However, we found differences between accessions (irrespective of botanical type) in terms of their cold tolerance at emergence under lower temperatures (12°C) under laboratory conditions (Upadhyaya et al. 2001), indicating that cold-tolerant accessions identified in this study captured greater diversity for base-temperature tolerance at germination.
The cold-tolerant accessions reported in this study had substantial diversity for most agronomic traits and thus should be good sources to use in breeding programs for developing peanut cultivar that germinate at lower temperatures. It will also be interesting to study the reaction of these cold-tolerant accessions at various growth stages at which peanut is vulnerable to cold injury. Some of the identified accessions have good agronomic potential, and hence their use in breeding programs will not adversely affect exploitation of additive genetic variance in a self-pollinated crop such as peanut.
References
Agriculture Canada (1984) Modified description of variety. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), variety OAC Garroy. Licensed no. 2439
Agriculture Canada (1989) Description of variety. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea, L.), variety OAC Ruby. Registration no. 1–82. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Bartlett MS (1937) Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. J R Stat Soc 4:137–170
Bell MJ, Shorter R, Mayer R (1991) Cultivar and environmental effects on growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L). 1. Emergence and flowering. Field Crops Res 27:17–33
Bell MJ, Roy RC, Tollenaar M, Michaels TE (1994a) Importance of variation in chilling tolerance for peanut genotypic adaptation to cool short-season environments. Crop Sci 34:1030–1039
Bell MJ, Gillespie TJ, Roy RC, Michaels TE, Tollenaar M (1994b) Peanut leaf photosynthetic activity in cool field environments. Crop Sci 34:1023–1029
Benedict CR, Ketring DL (1972) Nuclear gene affecting greening in virescent peanut leaves. Plant Physiol 49:974–976
Bhagat NR, Ahmad T, Lalwani HB, Patra GJ, Acharya D (1988) Screening of bunch peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. ssp. fastigiata) germplasm for cold tolerance in India. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 65:109–112
Bhagat NR, Dayal D, Acharya D (1992) Performance of Spanish peanuts during winter- summer season at two locations in India. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 69:93–95
Bunting AH, Gibbons RW, Wynne JC (1985) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (eds) Grain legume crops. Collins, London, pp 747–800
Dan NT, Hong NX (1996) Collaborative research in Vietnam: needs and opportunities. In Gowda CLL, Ramakrishna A (eds) Summary proceedings of CLAN country coordinators’ steering committee meeting, 4–6 Dec. 1995, ICRISAT Patancheru, India, pp 56–58
Ellis RS, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1985) The conduct of seed germination tests. Handbook of seed technology for genebanks. Vol. 1. Principles and methodology. IBPGR Rome, Italy, pp 94–198
Fu JR, Lu XH, Chen RZ, Zang BZ, Liu ZS, Lee ZS, Cai DY (1988) Osmoconditioning of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds with PEG to improve vigour and some biochemical activities. Seed Sci Technol (Switzerland) 16:197–212
Golombok SD, Johanson C (1997) Effect of soil temperature on vegetative and reproductive growth and development in three Spanish genotypes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci 24:67–72
IBPGR and ICRISAT (1992) Descriptors for groundnut. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India, 125 pp
Jambunathan R, Raju SM, Barde P (1985) Analysis of oil contents of groundnut by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry. J Sci Food Agric 36:162–166
Johns MA, Skroach PW, Nienhuis J, Hinrichsen P, Bascur G, Munoz-Schick C (1997) Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data. Crop Sci 37:605–613
Ketring DL (1984) Temperature effects on vegetative and reproductive development of peanut. Crop Sci 24:877–882
Ketring DL, Brown RH, Sullivan GA, Johnson BB (1982) Growth physiology. In: Pattee HE, Young CT (eds) Peanut science and technology. Yoakum, Texas, pp 411–457
Keuls M (1952) The use of the ‘Studentized range’ in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1:112–122
Koirala GP (1996) Collaborative research in Nepal: Needs and opportunities. In Gowda CLL, Ramakrishna A (eds) Summary proceedings of CLAN country coordinators’ Steering committee meeting, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp 39–43
Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honour of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 278–292
Newman D (1939) The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31:20–30
Paterson HD, Williams ER (1976) A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63:395–400
Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, Soutar DM, Baird DB, Welham SJ, Kane AF, Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Webster R, Wilson GT (2006) The guide to Genstat release 9, Part 2: statistics. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead
Sellschop JPF, Salmon SC (1928) The influence of chilling above the freezing point on certain crop plants. J Agric Res 37:315–338
Sinclair TR, Bennett JM, Boote KJ (1993) Leaf nitrogen content, photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency in peanut. Peanut Sci 20:40–43
Singh U, Jambunathan R (1980) Evaluation of rapid method for the estimation of protein content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Sci Food Agric 31:247–254
Singleton JA, Pattee HE (1989) Effect of chilling injury on windrowed peanuts. Peanut Sci 16:51–54
Upadhyaya HD, Nigam SN, Singh S (2001) Evaluation of groundnut core collections to identify sources of tolerance to low temperature at germination. Indian J Plant Genet Resour 14:165–167
Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R, Bramel PJ, Singh S (2003) Development of a core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Res Crop Evol 50:139–148
Ward J (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 38:236–244
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Upadhyaya, H.D., Reddy, L.J., Dwivedi, S.L. et al. Phenotypic diversity in cold-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm. Euphytica 165, 279–291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9786-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9786-2