Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal sampling strategies for evaluating fruit softening after harvest in apple breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental variance components associated with year, tree, and harvest date were estimated for fruit softening after harvest in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) to determine their relative importance and design optimum sampling strategies to discriminate genotypes in apple breeding. Fruit were stored after harvest under 20± 2 C and 80± 5%RH. Softening was evaluated by adapting the change in firmness during storage to a linear regression and defining the regression coefficient as the softening rate. Environmental variances associated with genotype × year interaction, among trees, year × tree interaction, and among harvest dates were all very small, namely, 2.7, 0.1, 5.2, and 5.7%, respectively, to the total variance obtained from the analysis of variance for the softening rate. The variance associated with genotype, at 57.3%, was very large. On the basis of the number of fruit necessary for firmness measurements, two times harvest is an efficient strategy to determine a genotype mean for the softening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, F.H., 1988. Breeding apples for long storage. Acta Hortic 224: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, S.M., M. Parker & C.R. Unrath, 1997. Use of maturity indices for predicting poststorage firmness of ‘Fuji’ apples. HortScience 32: 909–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durel, C.E., F. Laurens, A. Fouillet & Y. Lespinasse, 1998. Utilization of pedigree information to estimate genetic parameters from large unbalanced data sets in apple. Theor Appl Genet 96: 1077–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen, K., P. Hammer, R. Crassweller, G. Greene & L. Lehman-Salada, 1993. Predicting firmness of ‘York Imperial’ apples after long-term storage. HortTechnology 3: 318–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, C.R., H.A. Quamme, J.W. Hall, R.A. MacDonald, M.C. King & M.A. Cliff, 2000. Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding. Euphytica 111: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, M. & J.C. Morris, 1989. Predicting firmness changes of ‘Rome’ apples in refrigerated storage. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114: 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, M. & M.C. D'Souza, 1989. Fruit characteristics of ‘Red Delicious’ apple strains during maturation and storage. J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 114: 776–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, M., M.C. D'Souza & E.C. Townsend, 2000. Fruit characteristics of ‘York’ apples during development and after storage. HortScience 35: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwanami, H., M. Ishiguro, N. Kotoda, S. Takahashi & J. Soejima, 2004. Evaluation of differences in softening of apple genotypes by linear regression. HortScience 39: 1185–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.S. & M.S. Ridout, 1998. Prediction of storage quality of ‘Cox's Orange Pippin’ apples from nutritional and meteorological data using multiple regression models selected by cross validation. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 73: 622–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J.W., E.W. Hewett, M.L.A.T.M. Hertog & F.R. Harker, 2002. Harvest date and fruit size affect postharvest softening of apple fruit. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, C.M., 1992. Maturity indices for apple and pear. Hortic Rev 13: 407–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knee, M. & S.M. Smith, 1989. Variation in quality of apple fruits stored after harvest on different dates. J Hortic Sci 64: 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmo, C.A., W.J. Bramlage & S.A. Weis, 1985. Effects of fruit maturity, size, and mineral concentration on predicting the storage life of ‘McIntosh’ apples. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110: 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuno, T. (Ed.), 1978. Handbook of Applied Statistics (in Japanese), 1st edn. Yokendo, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1989. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, A., M. Yamada, H. Iwanami & N. Hirakawa, 2000. Optimal spatial and temporal measurement repetition for reducing environmental variation of berry traits in grape breeding. Sci Hortic 85: 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stow, J. & P. Genge, 2000. The effects of storage conditions on the keeping quality of ‘Gala’ apples. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 75: 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, M., H. Yamane, K. Yoshinaga & Y. Ukai, 1993. Optimal spatial and temporal measurement repetition for selection in Japanese persimmon breeding. HortScience 28: 838–841.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Iwanami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwanami, H., Ishiguro, M., Kotoda, N. et al. Optimal sampling strategies for evaluating fruit softening after harvest in apple breeding. Euphytica 144, 169–175 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5340-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5340-7

Key Words

Navigation