Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When is the Second One Coming? The Effect of Couple’s Subjective Well-Being Following the Onset of Parenthood

  • Published:
European Journal of Population Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parenthood has strong effects on people’s life. Some of these effects are positive and some negative and may influence the decision of having other children after the first. Demographic research has only marginally addressed the relationship between subjective well-being and fertility, and even less attention has been reserved to investigate how the subjective experience of the first parenthood may influence the decision to have a second child. Performing log-logistic hazard models using HILDA panel data (2001–2012), changes in couples’ objective life conditions and satisfaction within family and work domains after the first childbirth are related to the timing of the transition to the second parenthood. Results show that partners adopting traditional gender specialization in roles proceed quicker to the second child; however, experiencing dissatisfaction in reconciling, in the couple’s relationship and in the work domain negatively affects mothers’ probability of having a second child in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Measures on personality are available in HILDA wave 5 and 9. Variability of the predictors has been tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which tests the equality of matched pairs of observations, where the null hypothesis is that the distributions are the same. The results do not support a decision to reject the null hypothesis.

  2. The three models, Gompertz, Weibull and log logistic, were tested and compared based on their AIC. Log logistic was confirmed to fit the data better than the other models.

  3. During the year of the birth of their first child, more than 50 % of the women in the sample are inactive or unemployed, compared to 20 % of the previous and subsequent years. At the same time, the proportion of part-time working mothers is around 50 % during the first year of the child’s life, compared to 18 % during the year of the first pregnancy.

  4. The model has not been reported for parsimony. Here the time until the second child is modelled including the variables for the hours spent in doing housework for both partners, and a dummy variable taking value 1 if the couples are doing their fair share or 0 otherwise.

  5. The inclusion of satisfaction with the partner relationship does not change the magnitude and the significance of the other predictors and vice versa.

References

  • Aassve, A., Goisis, A., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Social Indicator Research, 108(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aassve, A., Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. (2015). Institutional change, happiness and fertility. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 749–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeles, L. (2010). Children and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balbo, N., & Arpino, B. (2016). The role of family orientations in shaping the effect of fertility on subjective well-being: A propensity score matching approach. Demography, 1–24.

  • Belsky, J. (1985). Exploring individual differences in marital change across the transition to parenthood: The role of violated expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(4), 1037–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1990). Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood: pregnancy to three years postpartum. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. (2009). The happiness commonality: fertility decisions in low-fertility settings. In UNECE (Ed.), How generations and gender shape demographic change (pp. 7–38). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C., & Kohler, H. P. (2009). Fertility and happiness in the XXI century: Institutions, preferences, and their interactions. In Annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Detroit.

  • Blossfeld, H. P., Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. (2007). Event history analysis with stata. New York: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, W. (2008). Employed women’s well-being: The global and daily impact of work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(3), 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: a test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Heming, G., Garrett, E., Coysh, W. S., Curtis-Boles, H., & Boles, A. J. (1985). Transitions to parenthood. Journal of Family Issues, 6(4), 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J., Paley, B., Burchinal, M., & Payne, C. C. (1999). Marital perceptions and interactions across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L., & Siminski, P. (2010). Men’s housework, women’s housework and second births in Australia. Social Politics, 17(2), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, K. (1997). Inequalities in marriage. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Martin, N. G., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., & Neale, M. C. (1990). Personality and reproductive fitness. Behavior Genetics, 20(5), 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., Johnston, P. W., & Shields, M. (2011). Life satisfaction dynamics with quarterly life event data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(1), 190–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., & Russel, H. (2008). Work family conflict and working conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Brandén, M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29(40), 1097–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., Oláh, L. S., & Puur, A. (2010). Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgins. Demographic Research, 22, 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela, M., Alvergne, A., Pollet, T. V., & Lummaa, V. (2011). Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela, M., Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2009). Personality and having children: A two-way relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmuss, D., Davidson, A., & Cushman, L. (1992). Parenting expectations, experiences, and adjustment to parenthood: A test of the violated expectations framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3), 516–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, H. P., Behrman, J. R., & Skytthe, A. (2005). Partner + children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population Development Review, 31(3), 407–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behaviour in our genes? Findings from a Danish twins study. Population and Development Review, 25, 253–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Nylen, K., & Cobb, R. (2007). Prenatal expectations and marital satisfaction over the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Moglie, M., Mencarini, L., & Rapallini, C. (2015). Is it just a matter of personality? On the role of subjective well-being in childbearing. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 117, 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losoncz, I. (2007). Personality Traits in HILDA. Paper presented to HILDA Survey Research Conference, University of Melbourne.

  • Luppi, F. (2014). Adjustment to parenthood and partners’ satisfaction with their relationship after the first child. Carlo Alberto Notebooks, working paper no. 389.

  • Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2015). Parental well-being surrounding first birth as a determinant of further parity progression. Demography, 52(4), 1147–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matysiak, A., Mencarini, L., & Vignoli, D. (2015). Work-family conflict moderates the impact of childbearing on subjective well-being. SWELL-FER working paper series, no. 8.

  • Myrskylä, M., & Margolis, R. (2014). Happiness: Before and after the kids. Demography, 51(5), 1843–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. A. (2008). How parenthood experiences influence desire for more children in Australia: A qualitative study. Journal of Population Research, 25(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, N. (2010). Satisfaction with life as an antecedent of fertility: Partner + happiness = children? Demographic research, 22(21), 635–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelli-Harris, B. (2006). The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in Post-Soviet Russia. Population Development Review, 32(4), 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollmann-Schult, M. (2014). Parenthood and life satisfaction: Why don’t children make people happy? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puur, A., Olah, L. S., Tazi-Preve, M. I., & Dorbritz, J. (2008). Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century. Demographic Research, 19, 1883–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., Fleming, A. S., Hackel, L. S., & Stangor, C. (1988). Changes in the marital relationship during the transition to first time motherhood: Effects of violated expectations concerning division of household labor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. E., & Ferligoj, A. (1995). Life-satisfaction and domain-satisfaction in 10 European countries: Correlation at the individual level. In W. E. Saris (Ed.), A comparative study of satisfaction with life in Europe (pp. 275–279). Budapest: Eötvös University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanturri, M. L., & Mencarini, L. (2008). Childless or childfree? Paths to voluntary childlessness in Italy. Population Development Review, 34(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, L. (2010). Who delays childbearing? The relationships between fertility, education and personality traits. ISER working paper series, no. 17.

  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Craig, A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 574–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., Ehrhardt, J., Ho, M. S. D., & de Vries, A. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 19461992. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council under the European ERC Grant Agreement no StG-313617 (SWELL-FER: Subjective Well-being and Fertility, P.I. Letizia Mencarini).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Luppi.

Additional information

This paper uses unit record data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the author and should not be attributed to either DSS or the Melbourne Institute.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7 and 8.

Table 6 Variables for adjustment to parenthood in family and work life spheres
Table 7 Distribution of the main covariates in the sample (Total sample N = 1498)
Table 8 Distribution of the control variables in the sample (total sample N = 1498)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luppi, F. When is the Second One Coming? The Effect of Couple’s Subjective Well-Being Following the Onset of Parenthood. Eur J Population 32, 421–444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9388-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9388-y

Keywords

Navigation