Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 445–455 | Cite as

Private Solidarity

  • Nicolas Bommarito


It’s natural to think of acts of solidarity as being public acts that aim at good outcomes, particularly at social change. I argue that not all acts of solidarity fit this mold - acts of what I call ‘private solidarity’ are not public and do not aim at producing social change. After describing paradigmatic cases of private solidarity, I defend an account of why such acts are themselves morally virtuous and what role they can have in moral development.


Solidarity Virtue Virtuous Private Moral development Simone Weil 



This paper was written while under the support of a Bersoff Fellowship at New York University. A draft of it was presented as a lunchtime talk at the NYU Philosophy Department and benefitted from many helpful comments there. Special thanks to Julia Driver, Chelsea Rosenthal, Neil Williams, and Alex King for discussing these ideas with me. Thanks also to Anna Bialek for introducing me to the life and work of Simone Weil. Finally, I also received very helpful comments from two anonymous referees for Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.


  1. Cureton A (2012) Solidarity and social moral rules. Ethical Theory and Moral Pract 15(5):691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davie W (1999) Hume on monkish virtues. Hume Studies 25(1/2):139–153Google Scholar
  3. Derpmann S (2009) Solidarity and cosmopolitanism. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 12(3):303–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Driver J (2001) Uneasy virtue. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray FDP (2001) Simone Weil. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Harvey J (2007) “Moral solidarity and empathetic understanding”. J Soc Philos 38(1):22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill T (1979) “Symbolic protest and calculated silence”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 9(1):83–102Google Scholar
  8. Hume, David (1751/2003). An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurka T (2006) “Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions”. Analysis 66(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perrin J-M, Thibon G (2003) Simone weil as we knew her. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Rippe KP (1998) “Diminishing solidarity”. Ethical Theory and Moral Pract 1:355–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. von der Ruhr M (2006) Simone Weil: an apprenticeship in attention. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams B (1981) “Utilitarianism and moral self-indulgence” in moral luck. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Yourgrau P (2011) Simone Weil. Reaktion, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations