Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 529–548 | Cite as

An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance

Article

Abstract

It is often claimed that surveillance should be proportionate, but it is rarely made clear exactly what proportionate surveillance would look like beyond an intuitive sense of an act being excessive. I argue that surveillance should indeed be proportionate and draw on Thomas Hurka’s work on proportionality in war to inform the debate on surveillance. After distinguishing between the proportionality of surveillance per se, and surveillance as a particular act, I deal with objections to using proportionality as a legitimate ethical measure. From there I argue that only certain benefits and harms should be counted in any determination of proportionality. Finally I look at how context can affect the proportionality of a particular method of surveillance. In conclusion, I hold that proportionality is not only a morally relevant criterion by which to assess surveillance, but that it is a necessary criterion. Furthermore, while granting that it is difficult to assess, that difficulty should not prevent our trying to do so.

Keywords

Surveillance Proportionality Thomas Hurka Just war Datong Oliver O’Donovan 

References

  1. Allen AL (2008) The virtuous spy: privacy as an ethical limit. Monist 91:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alleyne, By Richard. 2008. Poole council spies on family over school claim. Telegraph.co.uk, April 11Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, David. 2012. Phone and email records to be stored in new spy plan. Telegraph.co.uk, February 18Google Scholar
  4. Cavanaugh TA (2006) Double-effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil. Oxford studies in theological ethics. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coates AJ (1997) The ethics of war. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle T (2009) Privacy and perfect voyeurism. Ethics Inf Technol 11:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frowe H (2011) The ethics of war and peace: an introduction. Routledge, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallagher, Ryan, and Rajeev Syal. 2011. Met police using surveillance system to monitor mobile phones. the Guardian. October 30Google Scholar
  9. Graham G (1996) Ethics and international relation. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansson SO (1996) What is philosophy of risk? Theoria 62:169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1996.tb00536.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Home Office. 2010. Covert Surveillance and Property Interference Revised Code of Practice. The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurka T (2005) Proportionality in the morality of war. Philos Public Aff 33:34–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson JT (1999) Morality and Contemporary Warfare. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinig J (2009) The ethical perils of knowledge acquisition. Crim Justice Ethics 28:201–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kopstein, Joshua. 2013. Metadata matters: how phone records and obsolete laws harm privacy and the free press. The Verge. May 16Google Scholar
  16. Lackey DP (1988) The ethics of war and peace. Prentice-Hall, FacsimileGoogle Scholar
  17. Lever A (2008) Mrs. Aremac and the camera: a response to ryberg. Res Publica 14:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyon D (2001) Facing the future: seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics Inf Technol 3:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macnish K (2014) Just surveillance? Towards a normative theory of surveillance. Surveill Soc 12:142–153Google Scholar
  20. Marx GT (1998) Ethics for the new surveillance. Inf Soc 14:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMahan J (2009) Intention, permissibility, terrorism, and war. Philos Perspect 23:345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Donovan O (2003) The just war revisited. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orend B (2000) Michael Walzer on war and justice. University of Wales Press, WalesGoogle Scholar
  24. Orwell G (2004) 1984 nineteen eighty-four, Newth edn. Penguin Classics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pickles, Nick. 2011. Nine in Ten TFL CCTV cameras fail to solve a single crime | Big Brother Watch. December 21Google Scholar
  26. RIPA. 2000. Regulation of Investigatory Powers ActGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross, David. 2002. The Right and the Good. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake. New edition. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryberg J (2007) Privacy rights, crime prevention, CCTV, and the life of Mrs Aremac. Res Publica 13:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stoddart E (2014) Challenging “just surveillance theory”: a response to Kevin Macnish’s “just surveillance? towards a normative theory of surveillance.”. Surveill Soc 12:158–163Google Scholar
  30. Walzer, Michael. 2006. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Revised edition. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inter-Disciplinary Ethics AppliedUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations