Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2018). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. British Medical Journal Open, 8, e018815.
Ackerman, E. (2015). Care-O-bot 4 Is the robot servant we all want but probably can't afford. Spectrum IEEEE 29 Jan 2015. Retrieved from https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/care-o-bot-4-mobile-manipulator.
Baer, M., Tilliette, M. A., Jeleff, A., Ozguler, A., & Loeb, T. (2014). Assisting older people: from robots to drones. Gerontechnology, 13(1), 57–58.
Ballermann, M. A., Shaw, N. T., Mayers, D. C., Gibney, N., & Westbrook, J. (2011). Validation of the work observation method by activity timing (WOMBAT) method 116 of conducting time-motion observations in critical care settings: An observational study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 11(32), 1–12.
Beck, S. (2016). The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics. AI & Society, 31, 473–481.
Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2010). Robot caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 277–288.
Chen, T. L., Bhattacharjee, T., Beer, J. M., Ting, L. H., Hackney, M. E., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2017). Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0182736.
Coco, K., Kangasniemi, M., & Rantanen, T. (2018). Care personnel's attitudes and fears toward care robots in elderly care: A comparison of data from the care personnel in Finland and Japan. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(6), 634–644.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(2), 181–190.
Decker, M., Dillmann, R., Dreier, T., Fischer, M., Gutmann, M., Ott, I., et al. (2011). Service robotics: Do you know your new companion? Framing and interdisciplinary technology assessment. PoiesisPrax, 8, 25–44.
D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Oscar, J., Ricciardi, F., Casey, D., Murphy, K., & Greco, A. (2018). A multicenter survey about companion robot acceptability in caregivers of patients with dementia. In Sensors and microsystems: Proceedings of the 19th AISEM 2017 national conference (Vol. 457, pp. 161–178). Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer.
Dorrestijn, S., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2013). Technology, wellbeing and freedom: the legacy of utopian design. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 45–56.
Emmanouila, M.-C., Stiakakisa, E., Vlachopouloua, M., & Manthou, V. (2013). An analysis of waste and information flows in an ICT waste management system. Procedia Technology, 8, 157–164.
Engelberger, J. (1997). A gauntlet thrown down for elder care. Industrial Robot, 24(3), 202–206.
Engelberger, J. (2000). A day in the life of Isaac. Industrial Robot, 27(3), 176–180.
Eurostat. (2017). People in the EU - population projections. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=People_in_the_EU_-_population_projections#Population_projections.
Executive Summary World Robotics. (2018). Service robots. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2018.pdf.
Goeldner, M., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2015). The emergence of care robotics: A patent and publication analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 115–131.
Hall, A. K., Backonja, U., Painter, I., Cakmak, M., Sung, M., Lau, T., et al. (2017). Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks. Assistive Technology, 31(3),133–140.
Hellström, Y., & Hallberg, I. (2004). Determinants and characteristics of help provision for elderly people living at home and in relation to quality of life. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 18(4), 387–395.
Hobbit (2011) The mutual care robot. Retrieved from http://hobbit.acin.tuwien.ac.at/.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237.
International federation of Robotics (IFR). (2018). Executive Summary World Robotics 2018 Service Robots. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2018.pdf.
Jylhä, M., Enroth, L., & Luukkala, T. (2018). Trends of functioning and health in nonagenarians: the Vitality 90+ Study. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 33(1), 313–332.
Khosla, R., Nguyen, K., & Chu, M.-T. (2017). Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33(6), 510–522.
Kröger, T., Puthenparambil, J. M., & Van Aerschot, L. (2019). Care poverty: unmet care needs in a Nordic welfare state. International Journal of Care and Caring, 3(4), 485–500.
Lawton, P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.
Levin, M. (2014). Designing multi-device experiences: An ecosystem approach to user experiences across devices. Sebastopal: O’Reilly Media.
Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence, 175(5–6), 942–949.
Meagher, G., & Cortis, N. (2009). The political economy of for-profit care: Theory and evidence. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practice. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Merrilees, J. J., Bernstein, A., Dulaney, S., Heunis, J., Walker, R., Rah, E., et al. (2018). The care ecosystem: Promoting self-efficacy among dementia family caregivers. Dementia (London). Retrieved November 29, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497302.
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care, health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.
Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, K., & Thompson, G. (2013). Use of social commitment robots in the care of older people with dementia: a literature review. Maturitas, 74, 12–20.
Parviainen, J., & Pirhonen, J. (2017). Vulnerable bodies in human-robot interaction: Embodiment as ethical issue in robot care for the elderly. Transformations, 29 (special issue: ‘Social robots: Human-machine configurations’), 104–115.
Parviainen, J. & Särkikoski, T. (2018). Kinetic values, assistive robotics and smart urban environments. In M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, J. Seibt, M. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning robots in society – power, politics, and public space (pp. 199–207). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Parviainen, J., Van Aerschot, L., Särkikoski, T., Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., & Hennala, L. (2019). Motions with emotions? Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(3), 318–341.
Pedersen, I., Reid, S., & Aspevig, K. (2018). Developing social robots for aging populations: A literature review of recent academic sources. Sociology Compass, 12, e12585.
Pew Research Center. (October 2017). Automation in everyday life. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/10/04/americans-attitudes-toward-robot-caregivers/.
Picard, R. (2015). The promise of affective computing. In R. A. Calvo, S. D’Mello, J. Gratch, & A. Kappas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of affective computing (pp. 111–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pino, M., Boulay, M., Jouen, F., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2015). “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 141.
Pransky, J. (2018). The essential interview: Martin Haegele, head of Robot and Assistive Systems, Fraunhofer Institute. Robotics Business Review. Retrieved from https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/robo-dev/martin-haegele-robot-fraunhofer-essential-interview/.
Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2018). The adoption of care robots in home care-A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(9–10), 1846–1859.
Robertson, J. (2007). Robo sapiens japanicus: Humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Critical Asian Studies, 39(3), 369–398.
Santoni de Sio, F., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2016). When should we use care robots? The nature-of-activities approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1745–1760.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care. Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. London: Routledge.
Share, P., & Pender, J. (2018). Preparing for a robot future? Social professions, social Robotics and the challenges ahead. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 18(1), 4.
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics of Information Technology, 16(1), 63–75.
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40.
Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., & Blake, J. (2018). A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health, 7–8, 1–18.
Smarr, C. A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., et al. (2014). Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 229–247.
Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2014). Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16, 183.
Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161.
Sullins, J. P. (2009). Friends by design. A design philosophy for personal robotics technology. In P. E. Vermaas, et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and design from engineering to architecture (pp. 143–157). Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.
Sullins, J. P. (2011). Introduction: Open questions in roboethics. Philosophy and Technology, 24, 233.
Ten Bruggencate, T., Luijkx, K., & Sturm, J. (2017). Social needs of older people: A systematic literature review. Ageing and Society, 38(9), 1745–1770.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for and the ethics of care. New York: Routledge.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Twigg, J. (2000). Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing and Society, 20(4), 389–411.
Vallor, S. (2013). Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philosophy & Technology, 24(3), 251–268.
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407–433.
Waerness, K. (1984). The rationality of caring. In M. Söder (Ed.), Economic and industrial democracy (pp. 185–212). London: Sage.
Waerness, K. (2005). Social research, political theory, and the ethics of care in a global perspective. In H. M. Dahl & T. Rask Eriksen (Eds.), Dilemmas of care in the Nordic welfare state: Continuity and change (15–30). Aldershot: Ashgate.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). Dementia: A public health priority. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75263/9789241564458_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D6B851EEC0307CCF79D01A80D940C853?sequence=1.
World Health Organization WHO. (2018). Fact sheets, ageing and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
Wolbring, G., & Yumakulov, S. (2014). Social robots: views of staff of a disability service organisation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0229-z.