Abstract
Previous studies have shown that both student and school socioeconomic status (SES) are strongly associated with student outcomes, but less is known about how these relationships may vary for different students, schools and nations. In this study we use a large international dataset to examine how student SES, school SES and self-efficacy are associated with mathematics performance among 15-year-old students in Australia. We found that increases in school SES are consistently associated with substantial increases in achievement in mathematics and this phenomenon holds for all groups, regardless of their individual SES. Furthermore, our findings show that the association of school SES with maths achievement persists even when subject-specific self-efficacy is taken into account. However, our findings also suggest modest differences among student groups disaggregated by these factors. In particular, the association between maths achievement and school SES appears moderately stronger for students with higher levels of self-efficacy compared with their peers with lower self-efficacy. Furthermore, among students with similar levels of self-efficacy, the association between maths achievement and school SES tends to be stronger for lower SES students than for their more privileged peers. From these findings, we highlight the importance of the Australian case for comparable systems of education, and provide a discussion of policy implications and strategies for mitigating the influence of school socioeconomic composition on academic achievement more generally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artelt C., Baumert J., Julius-McElvaney N., Peschar J. (2003) Learners for life. OECD, Paris
Bandura A. (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84: 191–215
Caldas S. J., Bankston C. III. (1997) Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 90(5): 269–277
Chiu M. M., Xihua Z. (2008) Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction 18(4): 321–336
Coleman J., Campbell E., Hobson C., McPartland J., Mood A., Weinfeld F. et al (1966) Equality of educational opportunity. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Edwards, D. (2006). Competition, specialisation and stratification: Academic outcomes of the government school system in Melbourne, Australia. Paper presented at the Comparative Education Society in Europe, Granada, Spain.
Independent Schools Council of Australia. (2008). Funding of independent schools. Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.isca.edu.au/
Lent R.W., Brown S.D., Larkin K.C. (1984) Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistance. Journal of Counseling Psychology 31: 356–362
Lokan J., Greenwood L., Cresswell J. (2001) The PISA 2000 survey of students’ reading, mathematical and scientific literacy skills: How literate are Australia’s students?. Camberwell VIC, Australian Council for Educational Research
Lubienski S.T., Lubienski C. (2005) A new look at public and private schools: Student background and mathematics achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 86(9): 696–699
Marks G. N., Cresswell J., Ainley J. (2006) Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: The role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation 12(2): 105–128
Matear A. (2006) Equity in education in Chile: The tensions between policy and practice. International Journal of Educational Development 27(1): 101–113
McConney, A., & Perry, L. B. (2010). Science and mathematics achievement in Australia: the role of school socioeconomic composition in educational equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9197-4.
OECD: (2004a) Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. OECD, Paris
OECD: (2004b) PISA 2003 technical report. OECD, Paris
OECD: (2007) PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Author, Paris
Perry L.B., McConney A. (2010) Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record 112(4): 1137–1162
Rothman, S. (2003). The changing influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement: recent evidence from Australia. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Rumberger R. W., Palardy G. J. (2005) Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record 107(9): 1999–2045
Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2004). The drift to private schools in Australia: understanding its features (Discussion Paper No. 479). Canberra: Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.
Siegel R. G., Galassi J. P., Ware W. B. (1985) A comparison of two models for predicting mathematics performance: Social learning versus math aptitude-anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology 32: 531–538
Sirin S. R. (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417–453
Sui-Chu E. H., Willms J. D. (1996) Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education 69(2): 126–141
Tate W. F. (1997) Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(6): 652–679
Thrupp M. (1995) The school mix effect: The history of an enduring problem in educational research, policy and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education 16(2): 183–203
Thrupp M. (1997) How school mix shapes school processes: A comparative study of New Zealand schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 32(1): 58–82
Willms J. D. (1986) Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review 51(2): 224–241
Wu M. (2005) The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation 31(2–3): 114–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McConney, A., Perry, L.B. Socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement in Australia: a secondary analysis. Educ Res Policy Prac 9, 77–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9083-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9083-4