Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The construction of Taiwan’s educational indicator systems: experiences and implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to illuminate the state of education in Taiwan by constructing Educational Indicator Systems. The study, sponsored by the National Science Council between 1998 and 2000, was the first comprehensive indicator project to cover all educational levels in Taiwan. Various research methods were used, including panel discussion, conference, setting up website, Delphi technique, questionnaires and visits to 14 international organizations and government agencies. In the process, two educational indicator systems based upon the “Context-Input-Process-Progress” (CIPP) model were formulated: “Taiwan’s Educational Indicator System by educational level” (TEIS by el) with 99 indicators, and “Significant Indicators of Taiwan’s Education” (SITE) with 34 indicators. Finally, some limitations and suggestions were offered for the future development of Educational Indicator Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

References in Chinese

  • Cheng Y.J., Lin J.T. (1994). The development of indicators of science education: Learning progress in science. National Science Council Monthly 22(5): 480–493 (Taiwan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien M.F., Lee C.M. (1998). First-year research paper – Integrated research of education indicator system. Taipei, National Science Council of Taiwan

  • Chien, M. F., Lee, C. M. (1999). Second-year research paper – Integrated research of education indicator system. Taipei: National Science Council of Taiwan.

  • Chien, M. F., Lee, C. M. (2000). Third-year research paper – Integrated research of education indicator system. Taipei: National Science Council of Taiwan.

  • Chien, M. F., Lee, C. M. (Eds.) (2001). Modern educational indicators—the internationally comparative perspectives. Taipei: Pro-Ed.

  • Wang, B. J. (1993). Research on performance indicators in the higher education level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Cheng-chi University, Taiwan.

  • Wang, W. K. (1994). Research on performance indicator of special education in the elementary and middle school levels. Taipei: Ministry of Education in Taiwan.

References in English

  • De Neufville, J. I. (1975). Social Indicators and public policy: Interactive processes of design and application. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

  • Herpen, M. V. (1992). Conceptual models in use for education indicators. In OECD (Ed.), The OECD International Education Indicators: A framework for analysis. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Kaagan S., Smith M.S. (1985). Indicators of educational quality. Educational Leadership 43(2): 21–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education in France (1998). Education in France—30 indicators on the education system.Paris: Ministry of Education in France.

  • Murnane R.J. (1987). Improving education indicators. Phi Delta Kappan 69(7): 509–513

    Google Scholar 

  • NCES (Ed.) (1991). Education counts: An indicator system to monitor the Nation’s educational health. Washington, DC.: Commissioner of Education Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics.

  • NCES (Ed.) (1998, 2000, 2001, 2002). The condition of education. Washington D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.

  • OECD (1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Ogawa, R., & Collom, E. (1998). Educational indicators: What are they? How can schools and school distracts use them? California Educational Research Cooperative, Riverside (ED 432 811).

  • Richard P. P. (1992). Education states nations: Indicators comparing U.S. States with other industrialized countries in 1991. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Process indicators of school functioning. In OECD (Ed.), The OECD international education indicators: A framework for analysis Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1991) What are educational indicators and indicator systems? Office of Educational Research and improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (ED338701). Retrieved Sep. 20, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed338701.html

  • Stufflebeam D.L., Shinkfield A.J. (1985). Syst ematic evaluation. Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2000, 2001, 2002). World education indicators. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to (Angela) Chi-Ming Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chien, MF., Lee, (.CM. & Cheng, YP. The construction of Taiwan’s educational indicator systems: experiences and implications. Educ Res Policy Prac 6, 249–259 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9026-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9026-x

Keywords

Navigation