Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality assurance in the Singapore education system in an era of diversity and innovation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes how Singapore attempts to balance the need for quality assurance and the need for educational diversity and innovation. The Singapore experience shows that this is a delicate balance. On the one hand, to promote diversity and innovation, the government attempts to decentralise its power to the schools. On the other hand, for quality assurance, the government sets up quality structures that reassert the centrality of government control. This paper examines the implications of such a strategy and the challenges that schools face in navigating a new paradigm of diversity and innovation while satisfying the requirements of quality assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bharwani V. (2006). Does new banding system really ease pressure on kids - or make it worse? The New Paper, 26 September Issue.

  • Bray, M. (1999). Control of education: issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. In: Arnove R.F., Torres C.A. (eds), Comparative education: the dialectic of the global and the local. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, S. (2004). School awards: Pragmatism wins over idealism. The Straits Times, 2 October Issue.

  • Drucker P.F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York, Harper Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh C.T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore Government Press Release. Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the Opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking, 2 June.

  • Goh C.T. (2005). Investment in people pays off for the country (speech by Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong at the Jeddah Economic Forum, Saudi Arabia). The Straits Times, 22 February Issue.

  • Ho A.L., & Almenoar, M. (2004). No football team, so they started their own. The Straits Times, 8 November issue.

  • Lee H.L. (2004). Our future of opportunity and promise. Singapore Government Press Release. Address by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the 2004 National Day Rally at the University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore, 22 August.

  • Ministry of Education (1997). Learning, creating and communicating: A curriculum review (a report by the External Review Team for the Ministry of Education). Singapore: Ministry of Education.

  • Ministry of Education (2000). The school excellence model: A guide. Singapore: The School Appraisal Branch, Schools Division, Ministry of Education.

  • Ng P.T. (2003). The Singapore school and the School Excellence Model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2(1): 27– 39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng P.T. (2005). Students’ perception of change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 3(1): 77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng P.T. (2005b). Innovation and enterprise in Singapore schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 3(3): 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng J., & Davie, S. (2004). Ministry steps away from focus on grades. The Straits Times, 28 February Issue.

  • Ohmae K. (1990). The borderless world. New York, Harper Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan E.T.J. (2005). The marketisation of education in Singapore: What does this mean for thinking schools, learning nation?. In: Tan E.T.J., Ng P.T. (eds) Shaping Singapore’s future: thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan E.T.J., Ng P.T. (eds) (2005). Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo C.H. (1999). Towards ability-driven education: Making every Singaporean matter. Singapore Government Press Release. Speech by RAdm Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence, at the Ministry of Education Work Plan Seminar, 4 September.

  • Teo C.H. (2002). Closing Speech by Rear Admiral Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education, on the Junior College/Upper Secondary Recommendations at Parliament, Singapore, 27 November.

  • Tharman, S. (2003). The next phase in education: Innovation and enterprise. Singapore Government Press Release. Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Acting Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education Work Plan Seminar, 2 October.

  • Tharman, S. (2004). To light a fire: Enabling teachers, nurturing students. Singapore Government Press Release. Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education Work Plan Seminar, 29 September.

  • Watkins P. (1993). Centralized decentralization: sloanism, marketing quality and higher education. Australian Universities Review 36(2): 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee H.T. (1998). The desired outcomes of education. Singapore, Ministry of Education

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pak Tee Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, P.T. Quality assurance in the Singapore education system in an era of diversity and innovation. Educ Res Policy Prac 6, 235–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9018-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9018-x

Keywords

Navigation