Anderson, J. L. (1958). Reduction of primary constraints in generally covariant field theories. Physical Review, 111, 965–966.
Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L. (1967). Principles of relativity physics. New York: Academic.
Google Scholar
Anonymous. (2019). Streetlight effect. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect.
Asprem, E. (2010). A nice arrangement of heterodoxies: William McDougall and the professionalization of psychical research. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 46, 123–143.
Google Scholar
Atmanspacher, H. (2015). Quantum approaches to consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/qt-consciousness/.
Averill, E., & Keating, B. F. (1981). Does interactionism violate a law of classical physics? Mind: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy, 90, 102–107.
Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1873). Mind and body: The theories of their relation. London: Henry S. King & Co.
Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. (1995). Need a Christian be a mind/body dualist? Faith and Philosophy, 12, 489–504.
Google Scholar
Bastianelli, F., & van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (2006). Path integrals and anomalies in curved space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bauer, H. (1918). Über die Energiekomponenten des Gravitationsfeldes. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 163–165.
Google Scholar
Beloff, J. (1962). The existence of mind. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Google Scholar
Belot, G. (2006). Conservation principle. In D. M. Borchert (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 461–464). Farmington Hills: Thomson Gale. Cabanis–Destutt de Tracy.
Google Scholar
Bender, C. M., Dunne, G. V., & Mead, L. R. (2000). Underdetermined systems of partial differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 41, 6388–6398.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. G. (1958). Conservation laws in general relativity as the generators of coordinate transformations. Physical Review, 112, 287–289.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. G. (1962). The general theory of relativity. In S. Flügge (Ed.), Prinzipien der Elektrodynamik und Relativitätstheorie, Handbuch der Physik (Vol. 4, pp. 203–272). Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. G. (1992). General relativity, a cornerstone of twentieth century physics. In N. Sanchez & A. Zichichi (Eds.), International school of astrophysics “D Chalonge”: 1st course: Current topics in astrofundamental physics, Erice, Italy 1–8 September 1991 (pp. 579–601). Singapore: World Scientific.
Google Scholar
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982). Quantum fields in curved space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. (2006). John Beloff obituary. The Times. https://www.susanblackmore.uk/journalism/john-beloff-obituary/.
Bona, C., Carot, J., & Palenzuela-Luque, C. (2005). Almost-stationary motions and gauge conditions in general relativity. Physical Review D, 72(124010). arXiv:gr-qc/0509015v2.
Bondi, H. (1957). Plane gravitational waves in general relativity. Nature, 179, 1072–1073.
Google Scholar
Born, M. (1914). Der Impuls-Energie-Satz in der Elektrodynamik von Gustav Mie. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pp. 23–36 (Translated as “The Momentum-Energy Law in the Electrodynamics of Gustav Mie” in Jürgen Renn and Matthias Schemmel, editors, The Genesis of General Relativity, Volume 4: Gravitation in the Twilight of Classical Physics: The Promise of Mathematics, Springer, Dordrecht (2007), pp. 745–756).
Brading, K. (2001). Symmetries, conservation laws, and Noether’s variational problem. PhD thesis, University of Oxford. Supervisor Harvey Brown.
Brading, K. (2005). A note on general relativity, energy conservation, and Noether’s theorems. In A. J. Kox & J. Eisenstaedt (Eds.), The universe of general relativity, Einstein studies (Vol. 11, pp. 125–135). Boston: Birkhäuser.
Google Scholar
Braude, S. (2006). John Beloff: Scientist who put parapsychology on the academic map. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/jul/04/obituaries.guardianobituaries.
Braude, S. E. (1986). The limits of influence: Psychokinesis and the philosophy of science. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1937). The mind and its place in nature. Tarner lectures, Trinity College, Cambridge, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., London.
Broad, C. D. (1953). Religion, philosophy and psychical research: Selected essays. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.
Google Scholar
Brown, D. K. (2012). Locke’s solid souls. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2(4), 228–234.
Google Scholar
Brown, H., & Holland, P. (2004). Dynamical versus variational symmetries: Understanding Noether’s first theorem. Molecular Physics, 102, 1133–1139.
Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1980). The mind-body problem: A psychobiological approach. Oxford: Pergamon.
Google Scholar
Burge, T. (2007). Mind-body causation and explanatory practice. In Foundations of mind: Philosophical essays (Vol. 2, pp. 344–382). Clarendon Press, Oxford (Reprinted with new postscript from John Heil and Alfred R. Mele, editors, Mental Causation, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993), pp. 77–120).
Butterfield, J. (1989). The hole truth. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40, 1–28.
Google Scholar
Butterfield, J. (1997). Quantum curiosities of psychophysics. In J. Cornwell (Ed.), Consciousness and human identity (pp. 122–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/193/.
Cardeña, E., Palmer, J., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (Eds.). (2015). Parapsychology: A handbook for the 21st century. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.
Carroll, S. (2004). Spacetime and geometry: An introduction to general relativity. San Francisco: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2010). Energy is not conserved. Discover: The magazine of science, technology and the future. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/#.WaAUO2d3FyA.
Carroll, S. (2016). The big picture: On the origins of life, meaning, and the universe itself. New York: Dutton.
Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2018). Poetic naturalism. Retrieved November 9, 2018 from https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/poetic-naturalism/.
Carroll, S. M. (2011). Physics and the immortality of the soul. Scientific American Guest Blog. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/physics-and-the-immortality-of-the-soul/.
Cattani, C., & De Maria, M. (1993). Conservation laws and gravitational waves in general relativity (1915–1918). In J. Earman, M. Janssen, & J. D. Norton (Eds.), The attraction of gravitation: New studies in the history of general relativity, Einstein studies (Vol. 1, pp. 63–87). Boston: Birkhä.
Cerullo, J. J. (1982). The secularization of the Soul: Psychical research in modern Britain. Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia.
Chang, C.-C., Nester, J. M., & Chen, C.-M. (1999). Pseudotensors and quasilocal energy-momentum. Physical Review Letters, 83, 1897–1901. arXiv:gr-qc/9809040.
Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (2011). Consciousness and the introspection of ‘qualitative simples’. Eidos, 15, 12–47.
Google Scholar
Clarke, P. G. H. (2014). Neuroscience, quantum indeterminism and the Cartesian soul. Brain and Cognition, 84, 109–117.
Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1874). Body and mind. Fortnightly Review, 16(96), 714–736.
Google Scholar
Collins, R. (2008). Modern physics and the energy-conservation objection to mind-body dualism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 31–42.
Google Scholar
Collins, R. (2011). The energy of the soul. In M. C. Baker & S. Goetz (Eds.), The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul (pp. 123–133). New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Cooperstock, F. I. (2000). The role of energy and a new approach to gravitational waves in general relativity. Annals of Physics, 282, 115–137. arXiv:gr-qc/9904046.
Google Scholar
Corcoran, K. J. (2006). Rethinking human nature: A Christian materialist alternative to the soul. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. (1986). The problem of miracles: A historical and philosophical perspective. In D. Wenham & C. Blomberg (Eds.), The miracles of Jesus, Gospel perspectives (Vol. 6, pp. 9–40). Sheffield: JSOT Press. http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html.
Crane, T. (2001). Elements of mind: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Cucu, A. C., & Pitts, J. B. (2019). How dualists should (not) respond to the objection from energy conservation. Mind and Matter, 17, 95–121.
Google Scholar
Curiel, E. (2000). The constraints general relativity places on physicalist accounts of causality. Theoria, 15, 33–58.
Google Scholar
Dain, S. (2004). A new geometric invariant on initial data for the Einstein equations. Physical Review Letters, 93, 231101. arXiv:gr-qc/0406099v2.
Google Scholar
Denisov, V. I., & Logunov, A. A. (1982). The inertial mass defined in the general theory of relativity has no physical meaning. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 51, 421–426.
Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Google Scholar
Dewar, N., & Weatherall, J. O. (2018). On gravitational energy in Newtonian theories. Foundations of Physics, 48, 558–578.
Google Scholar
DeWitt, B. (2003). The global approach to quantum field theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Two Volumes.
Google Scholar
Dowe, P. (2000a). The conserved quantity theory defended. Theoria, 15, 11–31.
Google Scholar
Dowe, P. (2000b). Physical causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Ducasse, C. (1960). In defense of dualism. In S. Hook (Ed.), Dimensions of mind: A symposium (pp. 85–90). New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar
Duerr, P. M. (2019a). Fantastic beasts and where (not) to find them: Local gravitational energy and energy conservation in general relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 65, 1–14.
Google Scholar
Duerr, P. M. (2019b). It ain’t necessarily so: Gravitational waves and energy transport. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 65, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.08.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Duff, M. J. (1981). Inconsistency of quantum field theory in curved space-time. In C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, & D. W. Sciama (Eds.), Quantum gravity 2: A second Oxford symposium (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Clarendon.
Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2000). Hume’s abject failure: The argument against miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://pitt.edu/~jearman/Earman2000HumeAbjectFailure.pdf.
Eccles, J. (1987). Brain and mind: Two or one? In C. Blakemore & S. Greenfield (Eds.), Mindwaves: Thoughts on intelligence, identity and consciousness (pp. 293–304). Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Eccles, J. C. (1994). How the self controls its brain. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1939). The philosophy of physical science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Elkin, V. I. (2009). Reduction of underdetermined systems of ordinary differential equations: I. Differential Equations, 45, 1721–1731. Russian original in Differentsial’nye Uravneniya, pp. 1687-1697.
Google Scholar
Fair, D. (1979). Causation and the flow of energy. Erkenntnis, 14, 219–250.
Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1958). The “mental” and the “physical”. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. II, pp. 370–497). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P. (1971). Lectures on gravitation, california institute of technology, Pasadena, California, 1962–63, Lecture notes by Fernando B. Morinigo and William G. Wagner. California Institute of Technology.
Feynman, R. P., Morinigo, F. B., Wagner, W. G., Hatfield, B., Preskill, J., & Thorne, K. S. (1995). Feynman lectures on gravitation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (Original by California Institute of Technology, 1963).
Fock, V. A. (1959). The theory of space, time and gravitation. New York: Pergamon. Translated by N. Kemmer.
Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1998). The mind-body problem. In N. S. Arnold, T. M. Benditt, & G. Graham (Eds.), Philosophy then and now (pp. 63–77). Malden, MA: Blackwell (Reprinted from Scientific American, January 1981, pp. 114–123).
Foster, J. (2001). A brief defense of the Cartesian view. In K. Corcoran (Ed.), Soul, body, and survival: Essays on the metaphysics of human persons (pp. 15–29). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
François, J. (2019). Artificial vs substantial gauge symmetries: A criterion and an application to the electroweak model. Philosophy of Science, 86, 472–496. arXiv:1801.00678v3 [physics.hist-ph].
Google Scholar
Fulling, S. A. (1989). Aspects of quantum field thery in curved space-time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2017). I am not a brain. Cambridge: Polity Press. Translation of Ich ist nicht Gehirn. Philosophie des Geistes für das 21. Jahrhundert, Ullstein Verlag, Berlin (2015).
Google Scholar
Garber, D. (1983). Mind, body, and the laws of nature in Descartes and Leibniz. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8, 105–134.
Google Scholar
Gates, S. J, Jr., Grisaru, M. T., Roček, M., & Siegel, W. (1983). Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry. Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA. arXiv:hep-th/0108200.
Gibb, S. (2010). Closure principles and the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Dialectica, 64, 363–384.
Google Scholar
Gibbs, P. E. (1997). Covariant energy-momentum conservation in general relativity. arXiv:gr-qc/9701028v3.
Gibbs, P. E. (2010). Energy is conserved in the classical theory of general relativity. Prespacetime Journal, 1(6), 1072–1084. http://vixra.org/pdf/1305.0034v1.pdf.
Goldstein, H. (1980). Classical mechanics (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Gorelik, G. (2002). The problem of conservation laws and the Poincaré quasigroup in General Relativity. In Y. Balashov & V. Vizgin (Eds.), Einstein studies in Russia, Einstein Studies, editors Don Howard and John Stachel, pp. 17–43, Boston: Birkhäuser.
Graves, J. C. (1971). The conceptual foundations of contemporary relativity theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1997). Parapsychology, philosophy, and spirituality: A postmodern exploration. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Grosso, M. (2016). The man who could fly: St. Joseph of Copertino and the mystery of levitation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Hack, T.-P. (2016). Cosmological applications of algebraic quantum field theory in curved spacetimes. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar
Halvorson, H. (2011). The measure of all things: Quantum mechanics and the soul. In M. C. Baker & S. Goetz (Eds.), The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul (pp. 138–163). New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. R. (1834). On a general method in dynamics; by which the study of the motions of all free systems of attracting or repelling points is reduced to the search and differentiation of one central relation, or characteristic function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 124, 247–308.
Google Scholar
Hardy, L. (2016). Operational general relativity: Possibilistic, probabilistic, and quantum. arxiv:1608.06940.
Hasker, W. (2001). Persons as emergent substances. In K. Corcoran (Ed.), Soul, body, and survival: Essays on the metaphysics of human persons (pp. 107–119). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J., & Uzquiano, G. (2011). How many angels can dance on the point of a needle? Transcendental theology meets modal metaphysics. Mind, 120(477), 53–81.
Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (2003). The mind-body problem in the origin of logical empiricism: Herbert Feigl and psychophysical parallelism. In P. Parrini, W. Salmon, & M. H. Salmon (Eds.), Logical empiricism: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 233–262). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (2004). Nature from within: Gustav theodor fechner and his psychophysical worldview. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar
Hoefer, C. (2000). Energy conservation in GTR. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31, 187–199.
Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, S. (2016). Dear Dr B: Where does dark energy come from and what’s it made of? BackReAction. http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2016/10/dear-dr-b-where-does-dark-energy-come.html.
Jacobi, C. G. J. (1996). Vorlesungen über analytische Mechanik, Berlin 1847/8. Vieweg: Deutsche Mathematiker-Vereinigung. Edited by Helmut Pulte.
Google Scholar
Josephson, B. (2004). Key bent by Matthew Manning.jpg. Toronto, 1974. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Key_bent_by_Matthew_Manning.jpg.
Kaku, M. (1993). Quantum field theory: A modern introduction. New York: Oxford University.
Google Scholar
Kastrup, H. A. (1987). The contributions of Emmy Noether, Felix Klein and Sophus Lie to the modern concept of symmetries in physical systems. In M. G. Doncel, A. Hermann, L. Michel, & A. Pais (Eds.), Symmetries in physics (1600–1980): Proceedings of 1st international meeting on the history of scientific ideas, Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain, September 20–26, 1983 (pp. 113–163). Seminari d’Història de les Ciéncies, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona. http://www.desy.de/~hkastrup/reprints/.
Katz, J. (1985). Note on Komar’s anomalous factor. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2, 423–425.
Google Scholar
Kennefick, D. (2007). Traveling at the speed of thought: Einstein and the quest for gravitational waves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Kent, A. (2018). Quanta and qualia. Foundations of physics (contribution to panel discussion at FQXi 2016 international conference), 48, 1021–1037. arXiv:1608.04804v4 [quant-ph].
Kijowski, J. (1978). On a new variational principie in general relativity and the energy of the gravitational field. General Relativity and Gravitation, 9, 857–877.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2003). Lonely souls: Causality and substance dualism. In T. O’Connor & D. Robb (Eds), Philosophy of mind: Contemporary readings, Routledge, London (Slightly modified from Kevin Corcoran, editor, Soul, Body and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2001, pp. 30–43).
Klein, O. (1971). Arguments concerning relativity and cosmology. Science, 171, 339–345.
Google Scholar
Komar, A. (1959). Covariant conservation laws in general relativity. Physical Review, 113, 934–936.
Google Scholar
Komar, A. (1962). Asymptotic covariant conservation laws for gravitational radiation. Physical Review, 127, 1411–1418.
Google Scholar
Komar, A. (1963). Positive-definite energy density and global consequences for General Relativity. Physical Review, 129, 1873–1876.
Google Scholar
Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y. (2011). The Noether theorems: Invariance and conservation laws in the twentieth century. New York: Springer. Translated by Bertram E. Schwarzbach.
Google Scholar
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., & Collier, J. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Lagrange, J.-L. (1811). Mécanique Analytique (revised ed., Vol. 1). Paris: Courcier. Google Books.
Lagrange, J. L. (1997). Analytical mechanics: Translated from the Mécanique analytique, nouvelle édition of 1811. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 191. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. Translated and edited by Auguste Boissonnade and Victor N. Vagliente.
Lakatos, I. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstruction. In Buck, R. C. & Cohen, R. S., (Eds), PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 91–136, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Lam, V. (2010). Metaphysics of causation and physics of general relativity. Humana Mente, 13, 61–80.
Google Scholar
Lam, V. (2011). Gravitational and non-gravitational energy: The need for background structures. Philosophy of Science, 78, 1012–1023.
Google Scholar
Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1975). The classical theory of fields (4 revised English ed.). Oxford: Pergamon. Translated by Morton Hamermesh.
Google Scholar
Lange, M. (2002). An introduction to the philosophy of physics: Locality, fields, energy, and mass. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1981). New essays on human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated and edited by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett.
Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1985). Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God and the freedom of man and the origin of evil. La Salle, IL: Open Court. Translator E. M. Huggard.
Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1997). [First] explanation of the new system of the communication between substances, in reply to what was said of it in the Journal for 12 September 1695. In R. S. Woolhouse & R. Francks (Eds.), Leibniz’s ‘new system’ and associated contemporary texts (pp. 47–52). Oxford: Clarendon Press (Original April 1696).
Lord, E. A. (1976). Tensors, relativity and cosmology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (1992). The problem of psychophysical causation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 263–276.
Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (1996). Subjects of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2003). Physical causal closure and the invisibility of mental causation. In S. Walter & H.-D. Heckmann (Eds.), Physicalism and mental causation: The metaphysics of mind and action (pp. 137–154). Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Google Scholar
Lycan, W. G. (2009). Giving dualism its due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87, 551–563.
Google Scholar
Manton, N., & Sutcliffe, P. (2004). Topological solitons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Matzner, R. A. (1968a). 3-sphere “backgrounds” for the space sections of the Taub cosmological solution. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 9, 1063–1067.
Google Scholar
Matzner, R. A. (1968b). Almost symmetric spaces and gravitational radiation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 9, 1657–1668.
Google Scholar
Maudlin, T., Okon, E., & Sudarsky, D. (2019). On the status of conservation laws in physics: Implications for semiclassical gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (forthcoming). arXiv:1910.06473v1 [gr-qc].
McGinn, C. (1999). The mysterious flame: Conscious minds in a material world. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Merricks, T. (1999). The resurrection of the body and the life everlasting. In M. Murray (Ed.), Reason for the hope within (pp. 261–286). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Google Scholar
Misner, C., Thorne, K., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: Freeman.
Google Scholar
Mohrhoff, U. (1997). Interactionism, energy conservation, and the violation of physical laws. Physics Essays, 10, 651–665.
Google Scholar
Mohrhoff, U. (1999). The physics of interactionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 165–184.
Google Scholar
Montero, B. (2006). What does the conservation of energy have to do with physicalism? Dialectica, 60, 383–396.
Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P., & Craig, W. L. (2003). Philosophical foundations for a Christian worldview. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P., & Rae, S. B. (2000). Body and soul: Human nature and the crisis in ethics. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
Google Scholar
Motl, L. (August 11, 2010). Why and how energy is not conserved in cosmology. The Reference Frame. https://motls.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-and-how-energy-is-not-conserved-in.html?m=1.
Murphy, N. (1998). Human nature: Historical, scientific, and religious issues. In W. S. Brown, N. Murphy, & H. N. Maloney (Eds.), Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature (pp. 1–30). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Google Scholar
Nathan, N. M. L. (1991). McTaggart’s immaterialism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 41, 442–456.
Google Scholar
Nester, J. M. (2004). General pseudotensors and quasilocal quantities. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21, S261–S280.
Google Scholar
Nijenhuis, A. (1952). Theory of the geometric object. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam. Supervisor Jan A. Schouten.
Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pp. 235–257 (Translated as “Invariant Variation Problems” by M. A. Tavel, Transport Theory and Statistical Physics1 pp. 183-207 (1971), LaTeXed by Frank Y. Wang) arXiv:physics/0503066 [physics.hist-ph].
Ogievetskiĭ, V. I., & Polubarinov, I. V. (1965a). Spinors in gravitation theory. Soviet Physics JETP, 21, 1093–1100.
Google Scholar
Ogievetsky, V. I., & Polubarinov, I. V. (1965b). Interacting field of spin 2 and the Einstein equations. Annals of Physics, 35, 167–208.
Google Scholar
Owen, A. R. G. (1964). Can we explain the poltergeist?. New York: Helix Press.
Google Scholar
Owen, A. R. G. (1975). Psychic mysteries of the north: Discoveries from the maritime provinces and beyond. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Owen, A. R. G., Whitton, J. L., Manning, M., et al. (1975). Proceedings of the first Canadian conference on psychokinesis and related phenomena, June 1974. New horizons: Journal of the new horizons research foundation incorporating transactions of the Toronto Society for psychical research, 1(5). https://survivalresearch.ca/NHRF/NHJ/New_Horizons_Journal_vol_1_no_5_January_1975.pdf.
Parker, L. E., & Toms, D. J. (2009). Quantum field theory in curved spacetime: Quantized fields and gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2011). Metaphysical themes 1274–1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Pasricha, S. (1990). Claims of reincarnation: An empirical study of cases in India. New Delhi: Harman Publishing House.
Google Scholar
Pasricha, S. K. (2008). Can the mind survive beyond death? In Pursuit of scientific evidence. Reincarnation research (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Harman Publishing House.
Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An introduction to quantum field theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Petrov, A. N., & Katz, J. (2002). Conserved currents, superpotentials and cosmological perturbations. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) A, 458, 319–337.
Google Scholar
Physics Stack Exchange. (2017). https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/333489/conservation-of-energy-in-general-relativity.
Pitts, J. B. (2008). Why the big bang singularity does not help the kalām cosmological argument for theism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,59:675–708 (Reprinted in Paul Copan with William Lane Craig, editors, The Kalām Cosmological Argument. Volume 2: Scientific Evidence for the Beginning of the Universe. Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 2018, 80–109).
Pitts, J. B. (2009a). Empirical equivalence, artificial gauge freedom and a generalized Kretschmann objection. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004995/; arXiv:0911.5400.
Pitts, J. B. (2009b). Gauge-invariant localization of infinitely many gravitational energies from all possible auxiliary structures, or, why pseudotensors are okay. In Proceedings of the DPF-2009 conference, division of particles and fields, American Physical Society, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; arXiv:0910.3320 [hep-th].
Pitts, J. B. (2010). Gauge-invariant localization of infinitely many gravitational energies from all possible auxiliary structures. General Relativity and Gravitation, 42, 601–622. arXiv:0902.1288 [gr-qc].
Google Scholar
Pitts, J. B. (2012). The nontriviality of trivial general covariance: How electrons restrict ‘time’ coordinates, spinors (almost) fit into tensor calculus, and \(7/16\) of a tetrad is surplus structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43, 1–24. arXiv:1111.4586.
Google Scholar
Pitts, J. B. (2013). Time and fermions: General covariance vs. Ockham’s razor for spinors. In M. O’Loughlin, S. Stanič, & D. Veberič (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on time and matter (pp. 185–198). Nova Gorica, Slovenia: University of Nova Gorica Press.
Pitts, J. B. (2016a). Einstein’s equations for spin \(2\) mass \(0\) from Noether’s converse Hilbertian assertion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56, 60–69. PhilSci; arxiv:1611.02673 [physics.hist-ph].
Google Scholar
Pitts, J. B. (2016b). Einstein’s physical strategy, energy conservation, symmetries, and stability: “but Grossmann & I believed that the conservation laws were not satisfied”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 54, 52–72. PhilSci; arxiv.org/1604.03038 [physics.hist-ph].
Google Scholar
Pitts, J. B. (2016c). Universally coupled massive gravity, III: dRGT-Maheshwari pure spin-\(2\), Ogievetsky-Polubarinov and arbitrary mass terms. Annals of Physics, 365, 73–90. arXiv:1505.03492 [gr-qc].
Google Scholar
Pitts, J. B. (2019). Conservation laws and the philosophy of mind: Opening the black box, finding a mirror. Philosophia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00102-7.
Pitts, J. B. (2020). The mind-body problem and conservation laws: The growth of physical understanding? Under review at HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science.
Plantinga, A. (2007). Materialism and Christian belief. In P. van Inwagen & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Persons: Human and divine (pp. 99–141). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. (February 22, 2017). Has the large Hadron Collider disproved the existence of ghosts? LiveScience. https://www.livescience.com/57973-has-large-hadron-collider-disproved-existence-of-ghosts.html.
Pons, J. M. (2010). Substituting fields within the action: Consistency issues and some applications. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 51, 122903. arXiv:0909.4151.
Google Scholar
Pons, J. M. (2011). Noether symmetries, energy-momentum tensors and conformal invariance in classical field theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 52(1), 012904. arXiv:0902.4871.
Google Scholar
Popper, K., & Eccles, J. C. (1983). The self and its brain: An argument for interactionism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Read, J. (2018). Functional gravitational energy. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx048.
Reid, J. W. (2008). The spatial presence of spirits among the Cartesians. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46, 91–118.
Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (Ed.). (1991). G. W. Leibniz’s monadology: An edition for students. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Romero-Maltrana, D. (2015). Symmetries as by-products of conserved quantities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 358–368.
Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Rueger, A. (1998). Local theories of causation and the a posteriori identification of the causal relation. Erkenntnis, 48, 25–38.
Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2018). I’m an Atheist. But thank God I’m not a New Atheist. Premier Christianity. 25 September; https://www.premierchristianity.com/Blog/I-m-an-atheist.-But-thank-God-I-m-not-a-New-Atheist.
Russell, B. (1927). The analysis of matter. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.
Google Scholar
Sagan, C. (1979). Broca’s brain: The romance of science. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. M. (2008). Descartes on causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Schouten, J. A. (1954). Ricci-calculus: An introduction to tensor analysis and its geometrical applications, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007.
Schrödinger, E. (1918). Die Energiekomponenten des Gravitationsfeldes. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 4–7.
Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2004). Mind: A brief introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Seligman, C. B. (1949). I. The theory of gravitational interactions. II. The interaction of gravitation with light. PhD thesis, Harvard University. Supervisor Julian Schwinger. This is Bryce Seligman DeWitt’s thesis.
Siegel, E. (2018). Ask Ethan: Where is the line between mathematics and physics? Forbes: Starts with a Bang.
Smith, C. U. M. (2001). Renatus renatus: The Cartesian tradition in British neuroscience and the neurophilosophy of John Carew Eccles. Brain and Cognition, 46, 364–372.
Google Scholar
Smoller, J., & Temple, B. (2003). Shock-wave cosmology inside a black hole. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 11216–11218.
Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., & Beloff, J. (Eds.). (1989). The case for Dualism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Google Scholar
Sorkin, R. (1977). On stress-energy tensors. General Relativity and Gravitation, 8, 437–449.
Google Scholar
Steinkamp, F. (Ed.). (2002). Parapsychology, philosophy and the mind: Essays honoring John Beloff. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Stephani, H. (1990). General relativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Stevenson, I. (1975–1983). Cases of the reincarnation type, volume v. 1. Ten cases in India (1975).–v. 2. Ten cases in Sri Lanka (1977).–v. 3. Twelve cases in Lebanon and Turkey (1980).–v. 4. Twelve cases in Thailand and Burma (1983). University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Stevenson, I. (1997). Reincarnation and biology: A contribution to the etiology of birthmarks and birth defects. volume 1: birthmarks, volume 2: birth defects and other anomalies. Westport: Praeger.
Google Scholar
Szabados, L. B. (1991). Canonical pseudotensors, sparling’s form and noether currents. http://www.rmki.kfki.hu/~lbszab/doc/sparl11.pdf.
Szabados, L. B. (2009). Quasi-local energy-momentum and angular momentum in general relativity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 12, 4.
Google Scholar
Taliaferro, C. (1994). Consciousness and the mind of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Taubes, C. H. (1978). Solution of the almost Killing eqution and conformal almost-Killing equation in the Kerr space-time. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 19, 1515.
Google Scholar
Thompson, I. J. (2008). Discrete degrees within and between nature and mind. In A. Antonietti, A. Corradini, & J. Lowe (Eds.), Psycho-physical dualism today: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 99–123). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar
Trautman, A. (1966). The general theory of relativity. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 9, 319–339. Appendix by L. P. Grishchuk.
Google Scholar
Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–460.
Google Scholar
Vailati, E. (1993). Clarke’s extended soul. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31, 387–403.
Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1995). Dualism and materialism: Athens and Jerusalem? Faith and Philosophy, 12, 475–488.
Google Scholar
van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (1981). Classical gauge fixing in quantum field theory. Physical Review D, 24, 3315–3318.
Google Scholar
Vassallo, A. (2020). Dependence relations in general relativity. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(2). arXiv:1910.04496.
von Wachter, D. (2006). Why the argument from causal closure against the existence of immaterial things is bad. In H. J. Koskinen, R. Vilkko, & S. Philström (Eds.), Science: A challenge to philosophy? (pp. 113–124). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1952/.
Wald, R. M. (1984). General relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Wald, R. M. (1994). Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1905). My life: A record of events and opinions (Vol. 2). London: Chapman & Hall.
Google Scholar
Watkins, E. (1995). The development of physical influx in early eighteenth-century Germany: Gottsched, Knutzen, and Crusius. Review of Metaphysics, 49, 295–339.
Google Scholar
Watkins, E. (1998). From pre-established harmony to physical influx: Leibniz’s reception in eighteenth century Germany. Perspectives on Science, 6, 136–203.
Google Scholar
Wegener, F. D. A. (2009). A true Proteus: A history of energy conservation in German science and culture, 1847–1914. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/36626.
Westphal, J. (2016). The mind-body problem. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1922). Space-time-matter. London: Methuen & Company (Translated by Henry L. Brose from 4th edition of Raum-Zeit-Materie; reprinted by Dover, New York (1952)).
Wiebe, P. H. (2004). God and other spirits: Intimations of transcendence in Christian experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wigner, E. P. (1962). Remarks on the mind-body problem. In I. J. Good, A. J. Mayne, & J. Maynard Smith (Eds.), The scientist speculates: An anthology of partly-baked ideas (pp. 284–302). London: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Wong, H. Y. (2007). Cartesian psychophysics. In P. van Inwagen & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Persons: Human and divine (pp. 169–195). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Woodard, R. P. (1984). The vierbein is irrelevant in perturbation theory. Physics Letters B, 148, 440–444.
Google Scholar
York, J. W, Jr. (1974). Covariant decompositions of symmetric tensors in the theory of gravitation. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A: Physique Thorique, 21, 319–332.
Google Scholar
Young, D. E., & Goulet, J.-G. (Eds.). (1994). Being changed by cross-cultural encounters: The anthropology of extraordinary experience. Broadview Press, Peterborough, ON (Reprinted by University of Toronto Press, Higher Education Division, North York, 2012).
Zajtz, A. (1988). Geometric objects with finitely determined germs. Annales Polonici Mathematici, 49, 157–168.
Google Scholar
Zalaletdinov, R. (1999). Approximate symmetries in general relativity. arXiv:gr-qc/9912021.
Zimmerman, D. (2007). Dualism in the philosophy of mind. In D. M. Borchert (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn. (pp. 113–122). New York: Macmillan. http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/zimmerman/Dualism.in.Mind.pdf.