Abstract
In this note, we cast doubt on the requirement of spacetime inextendibility; it is not at all clear that our universe is “as large as it can be.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: Singularities and acausalities in relativistic spacetimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geroch, R. (1970). Singularities. In M. Carmeli, S. I. Fickler, & L. Witten (Eds.), Relativity (pp. 259–291). New York: Plenum Press.
Geroch, R., & Horowitz, G. (1979). Global structure of spacetimes. In S. W. Hawking & W. Israel (Eds.), General relativity: An Einstein centenary survey (pp. 212–293). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manchak, J. (2011). What is a physically reasonable spacetime? Philosophy of Science, 78, 410–420.
Manchak, J. (2016). Epistemic “Holes” in spacetime. Philosophy of Science (forthcoming).
Wald, R. (1984). General relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks go to Jeff Barrett, Thomas Barrett, Bob Geroch, David Malament, Jim Weatherall, and two anonymous referees for helping to improve an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manchak, J.B. Is the Universe As Large As It Can Be?. Erkenn 81, 1341–1344 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9799-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9799-x