Erkenntnis

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 423–430

Philosophy of Science: What are the Key Journals in the Field?

Original Article

Abstract

By means of a citation analysis I aim to determine which scholarly journals are most important in the sub-field of philosophy of science. My analysis shows that the six most important journals in the sub-field are Philosophy of Science, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Journal of Philosophy, Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, and Erkenntnis. Given the data presented in this study, there is little evidence that there is such a field as the history and philosophy of science (HPS). Rather, philosophy of science is most properly conceived of as a sub-field of philosophy.

References

  1. European Science Foundation. (2007). “ERIH initial list: History and philosophy of science (2007)”.Google Scholar
  2. French, S. (2008). Genuine possibilities in the scientific past and how to spot them. Isis, 99(3), 568–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. (2008). History and philosophy of science in a new key. Isis, 99, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giere, R. (1973). History and philosophy of science: Intimate relationship or marriage of convenience? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24(3), 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hempel, C. G. (1975). The old and new “Erkenntnis”. Erkenntnis, 9, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Institute for Scientific Information. (2003). “Arts and humanities citation index—history and philosophy of science journal list.” [http://www.isinet.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jresults.cgi; accessed 09/01/03 2:12 PM].
  7. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The relation between the history and the philosophy of science. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 3–30). University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The road since structure: Philosophical essays, 1970–1993, with an autobiographical interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Newton-Smith, W. H. (Ed.). (2000). Companion to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Papineau, D. (Ed.). (1996). Philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Psillos, S., & Curd, M. (Eds.). (2008). The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Reisch, G. (2005). How the cold war transformed philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richardson, A. (2008). Scientific philosophy as a topic for history of science. Isis, 99, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyState University of New YorkOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations