Skip to main content
Log in

Principles and methods of model validation for model risk reduction

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models, being incomplete and simplified representations of complex, real-world systems, contain simplifications and abstractions. However, models with errors or incorrect assumptions can suggest misleading results from the perspective of the decision-maker. Model risk arises from errors within models, or the incorrect use of models, and if undetected, can have significant impacts on businesses and organizations whose decisions and business processes depend on the model outputs. Thus, there is a need for model validation to reduce model risk. Validation is a process of comparing the correspondence between model outputs and system behavior. Systems engineering, given its primary focus on the theory and methodology of systems modeling, is a valuable source for principles and best practices in model validation, even for applications outside of systems engineering. In this paper, we discuss how model validation principles and methods developed in systems engineering research are applicable across a variety of modeling methodologies and domain areas for the reduction of model risk. Specific open challenges are discussed, including dealing with the subjectivity in models, the validation of decision models, and determining what level of validation is sufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in systems dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns P, Ody C (2014) Forum on validation of consumer credit risk models. Payment Cards Center, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman C, Ward S (2000) Estimation and evaluation of uncertainty: a minimalist first pass approach. Int J Project Manag 18:369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo I, Kumar P, Noteboom P, Taymans M (2017). The evolution of model risk management. McKinsey and Company, New York. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/the-evolution-of-model-risk-management

  • Dubberly H (2009) Models of models. ACM Interact 16(3):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM, Hollingsworth W, Caro JJ, Tsevat J, McDonald KM, Wong JB (2012) Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-7. Value Health 15:843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elele JN (2008) Assessing risk levels of verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations. ITEA J 29(2):190–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein JM (2008) Why model? J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(4):12

    Google Scholar 

  • French S, Rios Insua D (2000) Statistical decision theory. Arnold Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R (2009) A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language. OMG Press, Needham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass SI (1983) Decision-aiding models: validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis. Oper Res 31(4):603–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion AM (1976) The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers. Interfaces 7(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerlandt F, Khakzad N, Reniers G (2017) Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis: a review. Saf Sci 99:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg HJ (1988) Validation of decision support systems. In: Mitra G (ed) Mathematical models for decision support. Springer, Berlin, pp 641–657

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon SY, Youngblood SM (2005) A proposed model for simulation validation process maturity. J Def Mod Simul 2(4):179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RA (2007) The foundations of decision analysis revisited. In: Edwards W, Miles RF, Von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Boston, pp 32–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2015) ISO 9000:2015 quality management systems—fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en

  • Keeney RL (1994) Using values in operations research. Oper Res 42(5):793–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer GB, Ganeshan R (1993) The philosophy of science and validation in simulation. In: Evans GW, Mollaghasemi M, Russell EC, Biles WE (eds) Proceedings of the 1993 winter simulation conference, pp. 50–57

  • Landry M, Malouin JL, Oral M (1983) Model validation in operations research. Eur J Oper Res 14(3):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop J, Ezell B (2016) Validation in the absence of observed events. Risk Anal 36(4):653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Quantitative model validation techniques: new insights. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MITRE (2014) Verification and validation. Systems engineering guide. The MITRE Corporation. https://www.mitre.org/publications/systems-engineering-guide/se-lifecycle-building-blocks/test-and-evaluation/verification-and-validation

  • Molinari D, De Bruijn KM, Castillo-Rodríguez JT, Aronica GT, Bouwer LM (2019) Validation of flood risk models: current practice and possible improvements. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 33:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American CRO Council (2012) Model validation principles applied to risk and capital models in the insurance industry. North American CRO Council Incorporated. http://www.crocouncil.org/images/CRO_Council_-_Model_Validation_Principles.pdf

  • Panko RR (2008) What we know about spreadsheet errors. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. http://panko.shidler.hawaii.edu/SSR/Mypapers/whatknow.htm

  • Phillips LD (1984) A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychol 56:29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piel G (1986) The social process of science. Science 231(4735):201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1:54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmill F (2002) Risk analysis—a subjective process. Eng Manag J 12(2):91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RG (2014) Verifying and validating simulation models. In: Tolk A, Diallo SY, Ryzhov IO, Yilmaz L, Buckley S, Miller JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2014 winter simulation conference, pp. 118–131

  • Sculpher M, Fenwick E, Claxton K (2000) Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models: a suggested framework and example of application. Pharmacoeconomics 17(5):461–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SEBoK (2017). Model validation (glossary). Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge. SEBoK v. 1.9 released 17 November 2017. http://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Model_Validation_(glossary)

  • Sobehart J, Keenan S, Stein R (2000) Validation methodologies for default risk models. Credit 1(4):51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker M, Wang S, Strommen SJ (2014) Model validation for insurance enterprise risk and capital models. Casualty Actuarial Society, Canadian Institute of Actuaries, Society of Actuaries, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • US Federal Reserve (2011) Supervisory guidance on model risk management. OCC 2011-12. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.occ.treas.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2011/bulletin-2011-12a.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the participants of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research, which convened at the University of Virginia, USA, in May 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary A. Collier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collier, Z.A., Lambert, J.H. Principles and methods of model validation for model risk reduction. Environ Syst Decis 39, 146–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09723-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09723-5

Keywords

Navigation