Skip to main content

Overarching Process for Systems Engineering and Design

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents three key processes central to systems engineering: requirements discovery, tradeoff studies, and risk analysis. It compares and contrasts these three processes and then combines them into a single Overarching Process. The three original processes can then be viewed as specific tailorings of the Overarching (superset) Process. Similarly, the Overarching Process can be viewed as a top-level process (a superset) for model-based system engineering (MBSE) implementations. The Overarching Process itself is not an example of model-based systems engineering, except at a high level. This chapter also identifies the activities in the Overarching Process that contribute to uncertainty. All of these activities involve human decision-making. Therefore, most mistakes caused by uncertainty are found in the system models and documentation. These mistakes often arise from confirmation bias, severity amplifiers, and framing. The two key examples used in this chapter are the Cookie Acquisition System and the BaConLaws model for baseball-bat collisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bahill AT (2012) Diogenes, a process for finding unintended consequences, Systems Engineering, 15(3):287–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20208

  2. Bahill AT (2016) Model for absorption of perfluoropropane intraocular gas after retinal surgeries, International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Research, PAK Publishing Group, 3(5):50–76, 2016. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.9/2016.3.5/9.5.50.76. http://www.pakinsight.com/journal/9/abstract/4546

  3. Bahill AT (2019) The Science of Baseball: Batting, Bats, Bat-Ball Collisions and the Flight of the Ball, Springer Nature, NY, NY, second edition, 2019, ISBN 978-3-030-03032-2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bahill AT, Baldwin DG (2004) The rising fastball and other perceptual illusions of batters. In: Hung G, Pallis J (eds) Biomedical engineering principles in sports. Kluwer Academic, pp 257–287

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bahill AT, Baldwin DG (2008) Mechanics of baseball pitching and batting, Chapter 16. In: Ghista D (ed) Applied biomedical engineering mechanics. CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Asia Pacific, pp 445–488

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bahill AT, Dean F (2009) Discovering system requirements, Chapter 4 In Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management, second edition, (eds.) AP Sage, WB Rouse, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 205–266

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bahill AT, Gissing B (1998) Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern C. 28(4):516–27

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bahill AT, Madni AM (2017) Tradeoff Decisions in System Design, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bahill AT, Szidarovszky F (2009) Comparison of dynamic system modeling methods, Systems Engineering, 12(3):183-200

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bahill AT, Baldwin DG, Venkateswaran J (2005) Predicting a baseball’s path. Am Sci 93(3):218–225

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bahill AT, Szidarovszky F, Botta R, Smith ED (2008) Valid models require defined levels, International Journal of General Systems, 37(5):533–571

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beach LR, Connolly T (2005) The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations. second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boehm B, Lane J, Koolmanojwong S, Turner, R (2014) The Incremental Commitment Spiral Model, Addison-Wesley, Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bohlman J, Bahill AT (2014) Examples of Mental Mistakes Made by Systems Engineers While Creating Tradeoff Studies, Studies in Engineering and Technology, 1(1): 22–43, https://doi.org/10.11114/set.v1i1.239

  15. Botta R, Bahill AT (2007) A Prioritization Process. Engineering Management Journal, 9(4):20–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) Rule-based Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buede DM (2009) The engineering design of systems: Models and methods. Second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen RB (2003) Teaching Note on A-Rod: Signing the best player in baseball, Harvard Business School Case Study 5-203-091, April 16, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen RB, Wallace J (2003) A-Rod: Signing the best player in baseball, Harvard Business School Case Study 9-203-047, January 27, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daniels J, Bahill AT (2004) The hybrid process that combines traditional requirements and use cases, Systems Engineering 7(4) pp. 303-319.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daniels J, Werner PW, Bahill AT (2001) Quantitative methods for tradeoff analyses, Systems Engineering, 4(3):190-212, 2001, with a correction published in 8(1):93, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards W (1977) How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision making. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern. 7(5):326-40

    Google Scholar 

  23. Estefan JA (2021) Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies, to be published in the Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering, edited by Azad M. Madni and Norman Augustine

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fagan M (2020) Improved Fagan Inspections and Continuous Process Improvement http://www.mfagan.com/index.html

  25. Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R (2012) A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language, Elsevier, Morgan Kaufman, OMG

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hilgartner S, Hurlbut JB, Jasonoff S (2021) Was ‘science’ on the ballot? Science, 371, 6532, 893–894.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hooks IF, Farry KA (2001) Customer-centered products: Creating successful products through smart requirements management, AMACOM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. ISBN: 978-0-374-27563-1

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 46(2):171–85

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karnavas WJ, Sanchez PJ, Bahill AT (1993) Sensitivity analyses of continuous and discrete systems in the time and frequency domains. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(2):488–501

    Google Scholar 

  31. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  32. Madni AM (2000) Thriving on Change through Process Support: The Evolution of the Process Edge Enterprise Suite and Team Edge. Information Knowledge Systems Management 2.1 7–32

    Google Scholar 

  33. Madni AM (2014) Generating novel options during systems architecting: psychological principles, systems thinking, and computer-based aiding. Syst Eng 17(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Madni AM (2020) Models in Systems Engineering: From Engineering Artifacts to Source of Competitive Advantage, Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2020), Redondo Beach, October 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  35. Madni AM (2020) Minimum Viable Model to Demonstrate the Value Proposition of Ontologies for Model Based Systems Engineering, 2020 Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Redondo Beach, CA, October 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  36. Madni AM (2020) Exploiting augmented intelligence in systems engineering and engineered systems. INSIGHT Special Issue, Systems Engineering and AI, March 2020

    Google Scholar 

  37. Madni AM, Allen K (2011) Systems thinking-enabled real options reasoning for complex socio-technical systems programs. In: Conference on systems engineering research

    Google Scholar 

  38. Madni AM, Bahill AT (2021) Handling Uncertainty in Engineered Systems, Handbook of Systems Sciences, Gary S. Metcalf et al. (eds), (Chapter 22-1), Springer

    Google Scholar 

  39. Madni AM, Jackson S (2009) Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. Syst J IEEE 3.2:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  40. Madni A, Sievers M (2014) Systems integration: key perspectives, experiences, and challenges. Syst Eng 17(1):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  41. Madni AM, Sievers M (2018) Model-based systems engineering: motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21: 172–190

    Google Scholar 

  42. McBeath MK, Nathan AM, Bahill AT, Baldwin DG (2008) Paradoxical pop-ups: why are they difficult to catch? Am J Phys 76(8):723–729

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mohanani R, Salman I, Turhan B, Rodriguez P, Ralph P (2020) Cognitive biases in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 46(2):1318–1339. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2018.2877759

  44. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology. Vol. 2, No. 2, 175-220

    Google Scholar 

  45. Neches R, Madni AM (2013) Towards Affordably Adaptable and Effective Systems, Systems Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 224–234

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oakes J, Botta R, Bahill AT (2006) Technical Performance Measures. This paper was presented at the National Defense Industrial Association, NDIA Systems Engineering Conference, October 2005. It was also presented at the INCOSE Symposium and was published in the Proceedings of the INCOSE Symposium, July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  47. Overgaard G, Palmkvist K (2005) Use Cases: Patterns and Blueprints, Addison-Wesley, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pignatiello JJ, Ramberg JS (1985) Off-line quality-control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method-discussion. J Qual Technol 17(4):198–206

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rechtin E, Maier MW (1997) The Art of System Architecting, CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rosenblit JW (1985) A conceptual basis for model-based system design, Ph.D. dissertation in Computer Science at Wayne State University (published by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Smith E, Bahill AT (2010) Attribute substitution in systems engineering. Syst Eng 13(2):130–148

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smith ED, Son YJ, Piattelli-Palmarini M, Bahill AT (2007) Ameliorating mental mistakes in tradeoff studies. Syst Eng 10(3):222–240

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smith ED, Szidarovszky F, Karnavas WJ, Bahill AT (2008) Sensitivity analysis, a powerful system validation technique. Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 2:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wymore AW (1993) Model-based systems engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Terry Bahill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bahill, A.T., Madni, A.M. (2022). Overarching Process for Systems Engineering and Design. In: Madni, A.M., Augustine, N., Sievers, M. (eds) Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_16-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_16-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics