Abstract
Struggling with complex environmental decision making often makes us feel that only the wizard in the movie, “The Wizard of Oz” (Fleming in Wizard of Oz, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, California, 1939) can produce agreeable solutions. However, this need not be the case if we distinguish between the technical information used in decision making versus the process of decision making. Making environmental decisions is a wicked problem, meaning that values are imposed, whether or not we explicitly acknowledge or understand what those values are. Classic wicked problems are those such as how to choose among potential ozone control policies, climate change policies or developing a sustainability plan. In contrast, tame problems are those where there is a knowable truth. Classic tame problems are those such as estimating the ground level ozone level given source emissions and meteorology within a chosen spatial and temporal scale such as that stipulated by assessing compliance with the federal ozone standard. Lack of understanding that environmental decision making utilizes tame problem information while remaining a wicked problem is a barrier to finding policy solutions. Hence, we challenge environmental professionals to rethink their processes of decision making with the tame/wicked insight offered here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.A. §§ 501 et.seq
Böhringer C, Jochem PEP (2007) Measuring the immeasurable—a survey of sustainability indices. Ecol Econ 63:1–8
Brunk CG, Haworth L, Lee B (1991) Value assumptions in risk assessment: a case study of the alachlor controversy. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo
Clark J, Burgess J, Harrison CM (2000) “I struggled with this money business”: respondents’ perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecol Econ 33:45–62
Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241
Fleming V (1939) Wizard of Oz. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, California
Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M (2008) A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28:286–311
Hisschemoller M, Hoppe R, Dunn WN, Ravetz JR (2001) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. In: Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 47–72
Linkov I et al (2012) Using our brains to develop better policy. Risk Anal 32:374–380
Linkov I et al (2014) Risk-based standards: integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches. Environ Syst Decis 34:134–137
Mengerink KJ et al (2014) A call for deep-ocean stewardship. Science 344:696–698
Norton BG (ed) (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013). Better Life Index. Available at http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. http://www.uctc.net/mwebber/Rittel+Webber+Dilemmas+General_Theory_of_Planning.pdf
Seager T, Selinger E, Wiek A (2012) Sustainable engineering science for solving wicked problems. J Agric Environ Ethics 25:467–484
Stahl CH, Cimorelli AJ (2005) How much uncertainty is too much and how do we know? A case example of the assessment of ozone monitoring network options. Risk Anal 25:1109–1120
Stahl C, Cimorelli A (2013) A demonstration of the necessity and feasibility of using a clumsy decision analytic approach on wicked environmental problems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:17–30
Tacnet J-M et al (2014) How to manage natural risks in mountain areas in a context of imperfect information? New frameworks and paradigms for expert assessments and decision-making. Environ Syst Decis 34:288–311
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Climate change indicators in the United States, 2014. EPA 430-R-14-004. Available at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/pdfs/climateindicators-full-2014.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990) Hazardous Site Evaluation Division, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule; 40 CFR Part 300. Fed Regist 55:51532–51667
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. Probabilistic Risk Assessment White Paper. Washington, DC. EPA/100R-14/004
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board Ecological Processes Effects Committee (2002) Planning for ecological risk assessment: developing management objectives: an SAB report—a review by the Ecological Processes Effects Committee (EPEC) of the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB). EPA-SAB-EPEC-02-005. Available at http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P1009Q81.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2000+Thru+2005&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C00thru05%5CTxt%5C00000026%5CP1009Q81.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=p%7Cf&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL
Vermeij M et al (2006a) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Adm 84:817–843
Vermeij M, Thompson M, Engel C (2006b) Clumsy conclusions: how to do policy and research in a complex world. In: Vermeij M, Thompson M (eds) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: governance, politics and plural perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan, NYC, pp 241–249
Williams BK (2001) Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife. Environ Ecol Stat 8:269–288
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Al Cimorelli, USEPA (retired), and Justin Babendreier, USEPA ORD, for review and comments on drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. government has the right to retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stahl, C.H. Out of the Land of Oz: the importance of tackling wicked environmental problems without taming them. Environ Syst Decis 34, 473–477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9522-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9522-5