Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent efforts in the private and public sectors to move toward enhanced sustainability in the built environment have prompted the need to quantify and assess trade-offs among relevant sustainability metrics. Within the US military, for instance, many technological improvements are available to facilitate the achievement of net-zero goals for installations. These technologies must be assessed based on numerous performance criteria, and these technology selection decisions are difficult to make unaided. This paper seeks to demonstrate the use of decision-analytical techniques in which sustainable roofing technology alternatives (reflective, vegetated, or solar roofs) can be properly framed and assessed while evaluating the trade-offs between multiple performance criteria. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods are used to assess the impact of technology alternatives on sustainability framed within the popular concept of the triple bottom line (economic, societal, and environmental concerns). The framework developed in this paper can be applied to other sustainability technologies (energy, water, waste) or portfolios of numerous technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akadiri PO, Olomolaiye PO, Chinyio EA (2013) Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Automat Constr 30:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Army (2012) Army Vision for Net Zero. http://army-energy.hqda.pentagon.mil/netzero/. Accessed 28 Nov 2012

  • Banaitiene N, Banaitis A, Kaklauskas A, Zavadskas EK (2008) Evaluating the life cycle of a building: a multivariant and multiple criteria approach. Omega 36:429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach, 1st edn. Springer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz S, Akbari H, Rosenfeld A (1998) Practical issues for using solar-reflective materials to mitigate Urban heat Islands. Atmos Environ 32(1):95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buck J (2012) Ecological Services Group. 13 June 2012. Personal Communication

  • Castro-Lacouture D, Safair JA, Florez L, Medaglia AL (2009) Optimization model for the selection of materials using a LEED-based green building rating system in Colombia. Build Environ 44:1162–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang N-B, Rivera BJ, Wanielista MP (2011) Optimal design for water conservation and energy savings using green roofs in a green building under mixed uncertainties. J Clean Product 19:1180–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji A, Levine D (2006) Breaking down the wall of codes: evaluating non-financial performance measurement. Calif Manage Rev 48(2):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C, Adriaens P, Talbot FB (2008) Green roof valuation: a probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits. Environ Sci Technol 42(6):2155–2161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Convertino M, Baker KM, Vogel JT, Lu C, Suedel B, Linkov I (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations. Ecol Ind 26:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cool Roof Rating Council (2012) Rated products directory. www.coolroofs.org/products/search.php. 8 June 2012. Accessed 11 June 2012

  • Crosbie T, Dawood N, Loh E, Dawood S (2010) Energy profiling: supporting performance based approaches in sustainable building design. In: Tizani W (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on computing in civil and building engineering. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Durmus-Pedini A, Ashuri B (2010) An overview of the benefits and risk factors of going green in existing buildings. Int J Facil Manage 1(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manage 8(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2012) Cool roofs. www.epa.gov/heatisland/mitigation/coolroofs.htm. Accessed 11 June 2012

  • Executive Order (2009) 13514. Federal leadership in environmental, energy, and economic performance 2009

  • Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2002) The sustainability balanced scorecard—linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus Strategy Environ 11:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant EJ, Jones JR (2005) A decision-making approach to green roof system design. Interfaces 12–20

  • Kaklauskas A, Zavadskas EK, Raslanas S (2005) Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishments. Energy Build 37:361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaklauskas A, Zavadskas EK, Raslanas S, Ginevicius R, Komka A, Malinauskas P (2006) Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: a Lithuanian case. Energy Build 38(5):454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liner B, deMonsabert S (2011) Balancing the triple bottom line in water supply planning for utilities. J Water Resour Plan Manage 137(4):335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Moberg E (2012) Multi- criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Ferguson E (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ Int 32:1072–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lippiatt BC, Boyles AS (2001) Using BEES to select cost-effective green products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(2):76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Løken E (2007) Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:1584–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merad M, Dechy N, Marcel F, Linkov I (2013) Multiple criteria decision aiding framework to analyze and assess the governance of sustainability. Environ Syst Decis 33(2)

  • Mihelcic JR, Crittenden JC, Small MJ, Shonnard DR, Hokanson DR, Zhang Q et al (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5314–5324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morton A, Airoldi M, Phillips LD (2009) Nuclear risk management on stage: a decision analysis perspective on the UK’s committee on radioactive waste management. Risk Anal 29(5):764–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2003) Get Your Power from the Sun. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/35297.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2012

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2010) Net zero energy military installations: a guide to assessment and planning. Tech Rep NREL/TP-7A2048876

  • National Research Council (2011) Sustainability and the U.S. EPA. Washington, National Academy of Sciences

  • Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Perera S, Odeyinka H, Bi Y(2009) A knowledge-based decision support system for roofing materials selection and cost estimating: a conceptual framework and data modelling. In: Dainty A, (ed). Procs 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7–9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management 2009; 1081–90

  • Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalo Solar (2011a) Scalo Solar Solutions Completes Comprehensive Solar, Vegetative Green Roofing, & Environmentally Friendly Demonstration Project. http://www.scalosolar.com/pdf/SunscapePressRelease07122011.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2012

  • Scalo Solar (2011b) Solar 101—The facts. http://www.scalosolar.com/facts-about-solar.html. Accessed 13 June 2012

  • Spetzler CS, Stäel von Holstein C-AS (1975) Probability encoding in decision analysis. Manage Sci 22(3):340–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell WG, Seaver DA, Edwards W (1981) A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multi-attribute utility decision making. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28(1):62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takebayashi H, Moriyama M (2007) Surface heat budget on green roof and high reflection roof for mitigation of Urban Heat island. Build Environ 42:2971–2979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsos T, Frantzeskaki N, Gekas V (2005) Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 33:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tupenaite L, Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Turskis Z, Seniut M (2010) Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation. J Civil Eng Manage 16(2):257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F (2009) Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Eng Econ 61(1):7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylock SM, Seager TP, Snell J, Bennett ER, Sweet D (2012) Energy management under policy and technology uncertainty. Energy Policy 47:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban B, Roth K (2012) Guidelines for selecting cool roofs. version 1.2. U.S. Department of energy, energy efficiency & renewable energy, building technologies program 2010; http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/coolroofguide.pdf, Accessed 23 May 2012

  • US Energy Information Administration (2012) http://www.eia.gov/emeu/consumptionbriefs/cbecs/pbawebsite/office/office_howuseelec.html. Accessed 13 June 2012

  • von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J (2007) Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives. Build Environ 42(1):436–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeffrey Keisler, Dr. Chris Hendrickson, Amy Nagengast, and Amy Bourne for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Permission was granted by the USACE Chief of Engineers to publish this material. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the individual authors and not those of the US Army, or other sponsor organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA

    Z. A. Collier

  2. Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    D. Wang

  3. Contractor to U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center, 696 Virginia Road, Concord, MA, 01742, USA

    J. T. Vogel & E. K. Tatham

  4. U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center, 696 Virginia Road, Concord, MA, 01742, USA

    I. Linkov

Authors
  1. Z. A. Collier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. T. Vogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. K. Tatham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Linkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Linkov.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collier, Z.A., Wang, D., Vogel, J.T. et al. Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach. Environ Syst Decis 33, 261–271 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9446-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9446-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation