Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of habitat quality with relation to fish assemblages in an impacted river of the Ganges basin, northern India

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we examined water-quality assessment in relation to fish assemblage of Gomti River, a large tributary of the Ganges River basin in northern India. Principal component analysis was performed for 18 environmental variables which produced three axes that cumulatively explained 60.23% of the environmental variation in sites. Fifteen variables (fine substrate fine gravel, coarse gravel, cobble, sand substrate water flow, conductivity, TDS, total hardness, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and overhanging vegetation) had high loadings on at least one of the principal component axes interpreted. The canonical correspondence analysis was used to establish the relationship between important fish species and environmental variables. Species were distributed within four groups with respect to the significant habitat characteristics. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the water-quality parameters. We concluded that the level of species richness is mostly dependent on abiotic factors like temperature, dissolved oxygen, TDS, conductivity, depth, pH, and water current in the Gomti River, of the Ganges basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aadland LP (1993) Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. North Am J Fish Manag 13:790–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL, Schlosser IJ (1989) Species area relationship for stream fishes. Ecology 70:1450–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, p 959

  • Arunachalam M (2000) Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the Western Ghats (India). Hydrobiologia 430:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam M, Madhusoodanan NKC, Vijverberg J, Kortmulder K (1988) Food and habitat usage of cyprinid fish assemblage in stream pools of a south Indian River. Rep. 19, Limnological Institute of the Royal Academy of Sciences. The Netherlands, p 89

  • Bain MB (1995) Habitat at the local scale: multivariate patterns for stream fishes. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et la Pisciculture 337/338/339:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Knight JG (1996) Classifying stream habitat using fish community analysis. In: Leclerc M, Capra H, Valentin S, Boudreault A, Coˆte′ Y (eds) Proceedings of the second IAHR symposium on habitat hydraulics, Ecohydraulics 2000. Institute National de la Recherche Scientifique-Eau, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, pp 107–117

  • Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (1999) Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society Bethesda, MD, p 216

  • Baird IG, Flaherty MS (2005) Mekong River fish conservation zones in southern Laos: assessing effectiveness using local ecological knowledge. Environ Manage 36:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour MT, Stribling JB, Gerritsen J, Karr JR (1996) Biological criteria. Technical guidance for streams and small rivers. Revised edition. In: Gibson GR Jr (ed) Environmental Protection Agency, 822-B-96-001, pp 162

  • Batcha ASM (1998) Studies on hydrography and domestic pollution problems in the north bank of river Cauvery. J Environ Pollut 5:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari NS, Nayal K (2008) Correlation study on physico-chemical parameters and quality assessment of Kosi River Water, Uttarakhand. E-J Chem 5(2):342–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2000) Fish communities and their associations with environmental variability in the lower San Joaquin River drainage, California. Environ Biol Fish 57:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MG, Copp GH, Szomlai V (2004) Seasonal abundance and microhabitat use of bullhead Cottus gobio and accompanying fish species in the River Avon (Hampshire), and implications for conservation. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 14:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C, Collins AJ (1980) Introduction to multivariate analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, p 248

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhatawal GR (1998) Encyclopedia of environmental biology, vol 2. Anmol Pub. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 287–301

  • Copp GH, Guti G, Rovny J (1994) Hierarchical analysis of habitat use by 0+ juvenile fish in Hungarian/Slovak flood plain of the Danube River. Environ Biol Fish 40:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakayode SO (2005) Impact assessment of industrial effluent on water quality of the receiving Alaro River in Ibadan, Nigeria. Ajeam-Ragee 10:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner P (1996) Microhabitat use and diet of 0+ cyprinid fish in a lentic, regulated reach of the river Great Ouse. J Fish Biol 48:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman OT, Karr JR (1978) Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta LP, Subramanian V (1994) Environmental geochemistry of the River Gomti, a tributary of the Ganges River. Env Geol 24:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin DG (1984) Multistage sampling designs in fisheries research: applications in small streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1575–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DB, Ferreri CP, Taylor WW (2006) Linking fish habitat to their population dynamics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiware CJ, Jadhav BV (2001) Biological studies of Manjar River near Kallam, district Osmanabad, Maharastra, India. J Aquac Biol 16:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet M (1986) Text book of fish culture, 2nd edn. Fishing News Book Ltd., England

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram KC (1981) The freshwater fishes of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Sri Lanka. A Handbook Zoological of India, Calcutta, p 475

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhingran VG (1975) Fish and fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, p 954

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. III. Natural History Survey. Spec. Pub. 5. Champaign

  • Khan IA, Khan AA (1985) Physical and chemical condition in Seika Jheelat, Aligarh. Ecology 3:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosygin L, Dhamendra H (2009) Physicochemical and biological characteristics of Awang Khujairok river, Manipur, India. Environ Ecol 27(1):82–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kovach WL (1999) MVSP – a multivariate statistical package for windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales, Great Britain

  • Lakra WS, Sarkar UK, Gopalakrishnan A, Pandian AK (2010) Threatened freshwater fishes of India. NBFGR publication, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamouroux N, Souchon Y (2002) Simple predictions of in stream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams. Freshw Biol 47:1531–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamouroux N, Olivier JM, Persat H, Pouilly M, Souchon Y, Statzner B (1999) Predicting community characteristics from habitat conditions: fluvial fish and hydraulics. Freshw Biol 42:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazorchak JM, Klemm DL, Peck DV (1998) Environmental monitoring and assessment program surface waters: field operations and methods for measuring the ecological condition of wadeable streams. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/620/R-94/004F

  • Leonard LC (1971) Water and water pollution, vol 1. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 256–263

  • Lobb MD III, Orth DJ (1991) Habitat use by an assemblage of fish in a large warm water stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meitei NS, Bhargava V, Patil PM (2004) Water quality of Purna River in Purna town, Maharastra state. J Aquat Biol 19:77–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed SMA (1998) Nutrient balance pattern in African livestock system. Agric Ecol Environ 71:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath D, Srivastava NP (2001) Physico-chemical characteristics of Narmada for the stretch Sandia to Mola in M.P. state in the context of construction of reservoirs on the river or its tributaries. J Inland Fish Soc India 33:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson MD, Newson CL (2000) Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Prog Phys Geogr 24:195–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd edn. Toppan Company, Ltd., Japan, pp 278–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozaki M, Takahara T, Kawahara Y, Wada A, Seno K, Amakawa T, Yamaoka R, Nakamura T (2003) Perception of noxious compounds by contact chemoreceptor of the blowfly, Phormia regina: putative role of an odorant-binding protein. Chem Senses 28:349–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad NR, Patil JM (2008) A study of physico-chemical parameters of Krishna River water particularly in Western Maharashtra. Rasayan J Chem 1(4):943–958

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafeeq MA, Khan AM (2002) Impact of sugar mill effluents on the water quality of the river Godavari near Kandakurthi village, Nizamabad district, Andhra Pradesh. J Aquat Biol 17:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven JC, Styles I, Raven MA (1998) Raven’s progressive matrices: SPM plus test booklet. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Revenga C, Murray S, Abramovitz J, Hammond A (1998) Watersheds of the World: ecological value and vulnerability. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. http://earthtrends.wri.org/maps_spatial/maps_detail_static.cfm?map_select=350&theme=2

  • Saksena DN, Garg RK, Rao RJ (2008) Water quality and pollution status of Chambal River in National Chambal sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh. J Environ Biol 29(5):701–710

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Bain MB (2007) Priority habitats for the conservation of large river fishes in the Ganges river basin. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 17:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Gupta BK, Lakra WS (2010) Biodiversity, ecohydrology, threat status and conservation priority of the freshwater fishes of river Gomti, a tributary of river Ganga (India). Environ 30(1):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Sinha RK, Sivakumar K, Pandian AK, Pandey A, Dubey VK, Lakra WS (2011) Freshwater fish biodiversity in the River Ganga (India): changing pattern, threats and conservation perspectives. Rev Fish Biol Fish. doi:10.1007/s11160-011-9218-6

  • Sheldon AL (1968) Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 49:194–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava VS, Patil PR (2002) Tapti river water pollution by industrial wastes: a statistical approach. Nat Environ Pollut Tech 1:279–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN, Rai S (1999) Physico-chemical studies of Ganga river at Varanasi. J Environ Pollut 6:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HP, Mahaver LR, Mishra JP (1999) Limnochemical characteristics of river Ghaghara in U.P. J Inland Fish Soc India 31:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Malik A, Mohan D, Sinha S (2004) Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study. Water Res 38:3980–3992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VK, Singh KP, Mohan D (2005) Status of heavy metals in water and bed sediments of river Gomti—a tributary of the Ganga River, India. Environ Monit Assess 105:43–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar PK, Jhingran A (1991) Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM, Winston MR, Matthews WJ (1993) Fish species environment and abundance relationships in a Great Plains river system. Ecography 16:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TerBraak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination, version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi P, Bajpai A, Thareja S (2009) Evaluation of water quality: physico–chemical characteristics of Ganga River at Kanpur by using correlation study. Nat Sci 1(6):91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1993) World Health Organization, guidelines for drinking water quality-I, recommendations, 2nd edn. Geneva WHO, http://www.lenntech.com/drinking-water-standards.htm

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express sincere thanks to Dr W. S. Lakra, former Director, NBFGR and Dr J. K. Jena, Director, NBFGR, Lucknow for providing necessary facilities. This study was supported financially by the Council of Science and Technology, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (CSTUP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Kumar Sarkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, B.K., Sarkar, U.K. & Bhardwaj, S.K. Assessment of habitat quality with relation to fish assemblages in an impacted river of the Ganges basin, northern India. Environmentalist 32, 35–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9363-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9363-4

Keywords

Navigation