Skip to main content
Log in

Fish Diversity Associated with Environmental Parameters in Impacted Area of Ganga River, India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the fish diversity in relation to environmental parameters in the mining-impacted area of the Ganga River in India. Four zones, i.e. Zone A, Zone B, Zone C and Zone D, were selected for the targeted study, viz. Bairaagi camp, Shyampur Kangri, Bisanpur village and Bhogpur village. Zone A was a non-mining area and hence termed as reference zone, while the remaining zones were areas where river bed mining was carried out. Sampling was carried out twice a month for environmental parameters and once a month for fishes. Overall sixteen environmental parameters were studied and analysed using one-way ANOVA. A total of 5299 individuals associated with 13 families were collected and analysed using two indices, namely the Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′) and total number of individuals. In addition, canonical correspondence analysis revealed that selected environmental parameters such as water velocity, water temperature, water depth, boulders, sand, gravel, turbidity and dissolved oxygen had significant relationships with fish assemblage. The result showed that more fish were found in the non-mining-impacted zones than in the mining-impacted zones. However, it was found that mining of river bed materials disturbed the environmental parameters and this has affected the fish community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

WV:

Water velocity

D :

Depth

W :

Width

Bou:

Boulders

Cob:

Cobbles

Peb:

Pebbles

Gra:

Gravel

EC:

Electrical conductivity

WT:

Water temperature

T :

Turbidity

TDS:

Total dissolved solids

DO:

dissolved oxygen

BOD:

Biochemical oxygen demand

S :

Salinity

F1:

Barilius barna

F2:

Barilius bendelisis

F3:

Barilius tielo

F4:

Barilius vagra

F5:

Chagunius Chagunio

F6:

Cirrhinus mrigala

F7:

Crossocheilus latius latius

F8:

Cyprinus carpio

F9:

Garra gotyla gotyla

F10:

Labeo bata

F11:

Labeo rohita

F12:

Puntius phutunio

F13:

Puntius sophore

F14:

Puntius ticto

F15:

Raiamas bola

F16:

Tor tor

F17:

Botia almorhae

F18:

Botia Dario

F19:

Nemacheilus beavani

F20:

Nemacheilus montanus

F21:

Nemacheilus multifasciata

F22:

Nemacheilus rupicola

F23:

Nemacheilus zonata

F24:

Xenentodon cancila

F25:

Wallago attu

F26:

Bagarius bagarius

F27:

Glyptothorax cavia

F28:

Pseudecheneis sulcata

F29:

Mystus seenghala

F30:

Rita rita

F31:

Heteropneustes fossilis

F32:

Clupisoma garua

F33:

Clarias batrachus

F34:

Channa striata

F35:

Chanda nama

F36:

Amblyceps mangois

References

  1. Wu J, Wang J, He Y, Cao W (2011) Fish assemblage structure in the Chishui river, a protected tributary of the Yangtze river. Know Manage Aqua Eco 400:11p1-11p14

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koel TM, Peterka JJ (2003) Stream fish communities and environmental correlates in the Red river of the North Minnesota and North Dakota. Enviro Bio Fish 67:137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025699512619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li J, Huang L, Zou L, Kano Y, Sato T, Yahara T (2012) Spatial and temporal variation of fish assemblages and their associations to habitat variables in a mountain stream of north Tiaoxi river China. Enviro Bio Fish 93(3):403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9928-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira MT, Sousa L, Santos JM, Reino L, Oliveira J, Almeida PR, Cortes RV (2007) Regional and local environmental correlates of native Iberian fish fauna. Eco Fres Fish 16(4):504–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamboj N, Kamboj V (2019) Water quality assessment using overall index of pollution in riverbed-mining area of Ganga-River Haridwar India. Water Sci 33(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/11104929.2019.1626631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamboj V, Kamboj N, Sharma S (2017) Environmental impact of riverbed mining: a review. Inter J Sci Res Rev 7(1):504–520

    Google Scholar 

  7. Padmalal D, Maya K (2014) Sand mining. Environmental impacts and selected case studies. Environ Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9144-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lau JK, Lauer TE, Weinman ML (2006) Impacts of channelization on stream habitats and associated fish assemblages in east central Indiana. Ame Mid Natur 156(2):319–330. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2006)156[319:iocosh]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadye WT, Magadza CH, Moyo NA, Kativu S (2008) Stream fish assemblages in relation to environmental factors on a montane plateau (Nyika Plateau, Malawi). Enviro Bio Fish 83(4):417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Froese R, Pauly D (2021) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication.www.fishbase.org, version (08/2021)

  11. Pokharel KK, Basnet KB, Majupuria TC, Baniya CB (2018) Correlations between fish assemblage structure and environmental variables of the Seti Gandaki River Basin. Nepal J Fresh Eco 33(1):31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2017.1399170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen DJ, Molur S, Daniel BA (2010) The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the eastern Himalaya. IUCN, 23. ISBN 978-2-8317-1324-3

  13. Sharma AK, Malik DS, Bargali H (2018) Status of plankton diversity in relation to water quality of Bhagirathi riverine system in Garhwal Himalaya. Inter J Adv Sci Res 3(1):30–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aswal RS, Singh P, Kamboj N, Singh R (2016) Chemometric techniques: a comparative study of drinking water sources of Dehradun and Haridwar, Uttarakhand (India). Adv Hea Enviro Safe Sel Procee HSFEA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7122-5_33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamboj N, Kamboj V (2019) Morphometric and meristic study of four freshwater fish species of river Ganga. Indian J Ani Sci 89(4):470–473

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Public Health Association (APHA) (2012) The standard method for the examination of water and wastewater (22 editions) Washington D.C. ISBN 978-087553-013-0.

  17. Trivedy RK, Goel PK (1984) In: chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Environmental Publication, Carad, India

    Google Scholar 

  18. Day F (1875–1878). The fishes of India: being a natural history of fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh water of India, Burma and Ceylon. Text and atlas in 4 part, London, 778

  19. Jayaram KC (2010) The fresh water fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bruns DA (2005) Macroinvertibrate response to land cover, Habitat, and water chemistry in a mining-impacted river ecosystem: a GIS watershed analysis. Aqua Sci 67(4):403–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-005-0792-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamboj V, Kamboj N (2020) Spatial and temporal variation of zooplankton assemblage in the mining impacted stretch of Ganga River, Uttarakhand, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09089-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peck Yen T, Rohasliney H (2013) Status of water quality subject to sand mining in the Kelantan River Kelantan. Tro Lif Sci Res 24(1):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Sinha RK, Sivakumar K, Pandian AK, Pandey A et al (2011) Freshwater fish biodiversity in the River Ganga (India): changing pattern, threats and conservation perspectives. Rev Fish Bio Fish 22(1):251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9218-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vass KK, Mondal SK, Samanta S, Suresh VR, Katiha PK (2010) The environment and fishery status of the River Ganges. Aqua Eco Heal Manage 13(4):385–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2010.530139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jaramillo-Villa U, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Escobar F (2010) Altitudinal variation in fish assemblage diversity in streams of the central Andes of Colombia. J Fish Bio 76(10):2401–2417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02629.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Waidi OA, Ezekiel OA, Kehinde OA, Isaac TO, Dominic OO, Tomilola EA, Akinpelu EO (2016) The effects of environmental parameters on zooplankton assemblages in tropical coastal estuary, South-west, Nigeria. Egypt J Aqua Res 42:281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubey VK, Sarkar UK, Pandey A, Sani R, Lakra WS (2012) The influence of habitat on the spatial variation in fish assemblage composition in an un-impacted tropical river of Ganga Basin India. Aqua Eco 46(2):105–174

    Google Scholar 

  28. Malik DS, Sharma MK, Sharma AK, Kamboj V, Sharma AK (2021) Anthropogenic influence on water quality and phytoplankton diversity of upper Ganga basin: a case study of Ganga River and its major tributaries. World Water Policy 7(1):88–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pease AA, Gonzalez-Diaz AA, Rodiles-Hernandez R, Winemiller KO (2012) Functional diversity and trait-environment relationships of stream fish assemblages in a large tropical catchment. Fresh Biol 57:1060–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30(5):377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly grateful to the Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, India, for providing infrastructural facilities.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India, through INSPIRE programme grant number IF160805.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VK was involved in the study design, data collection, manuscript preparation and statistical analysis. NK contributed to the supervision and writing—review and editing. AKS helped in the identification of fish species, data collection and interpretation. AB contributed to the manuscript writing and investigation and reviewing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Kamboj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Signifiance Statement

During the last two decades, a tremendous increase in river bed mining has been observed in the River Ganga in the vicinity of district Haridwar, India. Hence, the current study focuses on the assessment of fish population structure in relation to environmental parameters in the mining-affected area of River Ganga. It provides basic data for the conservation of fish stocks in the affected area.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamboj, V., Kamboj, N., Sharma, A.K. et al. Fish Diversity Associated with Environmental Parameters in Impacted Area of Ganga River, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 93, 79–90 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01393-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01393-9

Keywords

Navigation