Abstract
This study investigates the sub-dimension of perceived value, environmental value, and employee service quality, influencing tourist satisfaction. This study also examines how tourist satisfaction impacts loyalty, environmentally responsible behavior, and environmental commitment. Data were collected from respondents who had visited the Sundarbans, a UNESCO World Heritage mangrove forest in Bangladesh, resulting in 732 valid responses. The proposed model was investigated using PLS-SEM. Findings reveal that tourists are dissatisfied with the functional, social, and emotional values, while environmental value and employee service quality significantly influence tourist satisfaction. Tourist satisfaction demonstrates a positive relationship with tourist loyalty, environmentally responsible behavior, and environmental commitment to the destination. To our knowledge, this study is the first empirical examination that integrates environmental value and employee service quality with perceived value in the tourism industry of Bangladesh. Grounded in the consumption value theory, this study comprehensively assesses tourists’ satisfaction, loyalty, and environmental awareness within a single model. Theoretical, managerial, and policy implications are discussed to promote a better environment and sustainable tourism destination in the mangrove forest.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Tourism industry provides travelers with immersive experiences at travel destinations, crafting indelible memories, stirring emotions, engaging the senses, and inspiring minds (Song et al., 2015a, b). In the past decade, tourism research has highlighted individual and contextual factors that foster travelers’ environmental consciousness (Liu et al., 2016). Environmental awareness is highly associated with sustainable tourism development, contributing significantly to regions’ economic development (Zhang & Lei, 2012; Gunter et al., 2017). Further, eco-tourism is also part of sustainable tourism development, which conserves resources and sustains environment by reducing the negative impacts (Snyman, 2017). The crucial role of eco-tourism is to promote sustainable resource utilization and the development of diverse communities (Jeong et al., 2021).
Eco-tourism is often viewed as the economic validation of resource conservation and provides a straightforward concept for the community and stakeholders to grasp sustainable tourism (Sultan et al., 2021). Sustainable tourism encompasses all activities aimed at minimizing the environmental impact, promoting environmental awareness, and enhancing the authenticity of the tourism experience (Santos-Roldán et al., 2020). Furthermore, environmental awareness in tourism activities increases with the satisfaction of tourist destinations. Also, emotional excitement leads to higher satisfaction with the tourist destination (Liu et al., 2016). Therefore, as a multidimensional variables (place dependence, place identity, place affect, and place social bonding) of tourism destination attachment significantly influence tourist satisfaction and quality of life (Ramkissoon et al., 2013).
However, the natural heritages of developing and underdeveloped nations face significant threats from various hazards stemming from unplanned tourism development, including environmental, sociocultural, and fragile ecosystem challenges. Other reasons include coastal environment destruction, waste disposal, declining traditional agricultural values, and shifting from fisheries to tourism. These hazards profoundly affect residents’ cultural heritage and identity (Hsu et al., 2020). Han et al. (2016) found that climate change significantly impacts adverse environmental pressure on nature-based tourism. Cheng and Wu (2015) pointed out that environmental knowledge plays an essential role in fostering environmentally responsible behavior (ERB), helping tourists understand the environment, and encouraging them to protect the environment (Lee et al., 2019). Moreover, nature-based tourism activities enhance tourists’ awareness of ERB and contribute to eco-tourism (Lee et al., 2015). Han et al. (2016) specified that climate change perceptions and tourist experiences influence tourists’ ERB intentions for Korean tourists. Many researchers (Cheng et al., 2018; Mohammed et al., 2020; Ramseook-Munhurrun et al., 2015; Ngurah et al., 2017) have discussed the relationship between tourist satisfaction (TS) and environmentally responsible behavior (ERB). The relationships among satisfaction, loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment have yet to be studied using the same conceptual model. However, there is still a research gap on tourist satisfaction, tourist destination loyalty, tourist environmental commitment, and tourist environmentally responsible behavior using a single model. Further, Bangladesh has yet to explore the relationship between tourist satisfaction, loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment. Consequently, it is important to do further research on improving tourist satisfaction and increasing tourist environmental awareness.
Additionally, we examine how perceived value, environmental value, and employee service quality (ESQ) impact tourist satisfaction, loyalty, and environmental awareness.
In our study, we will identify the key factors affecting tourist satisfaction and tourist environmental awareness in Sundarbans. Therefore, our study contributes to the existing literature by filling this research gap. To achieve these objectives, we attempt to answer the following questions: (1) What are the main factors of perceived value influencing tourist satisfaction (TS)? (2) How do environmental value and ESQ impact TS? (3) How does TS impact loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment?
This study significantly contributes to theoretical, practical, and policy insights, supporting the cultivation of a sustainable tourist environment and enhancing the overall experience for visitors within the mangrove forest. This research provides opportunities for tourism practitioners, marketers, and policymakers to improve environmental conditions at tourist destinations in Bangladesh.
This study represents a pioneering effort to assess tourists’ satisfaction, loyalty, and environmental awareness in the Sundarbans mangrove forest, a UNESCO World Heritage site. We extend the theory of consumption value (TCV) model by integrating environmental value and ESQ, while measuring the environmental awareness of tourists’ ERB and environmental commitment. This paper comprises seven sections, sequentially covering a literature review, methods, results, discussion, implications, and conclusion.
2 Literature review
2.1 Theoretical background
Theory of consumption value (TCV), developed by (Sheth et al., 1991), has been extensively explored in marketing, tourism, and consumer behavior. TCV emphasizes consumption values that explain ‘why consumers choose to buy/use or not to buy/ use a specific product, and why they prefer one product type over another’ (Sheth et al., 1991; Gonçalves et al., 2016). Consumers choose services based on perceived benefits (Khan & Mohsin, 2017). TCV suggests that consumers emphasize various values of products or services, which influence their purchasing motives. Consumption values denote significance consumers attribute to products or services (Sin & Yau, 2001). Earlier research has employed this concept to explain a wide range of consumer decision behavior across various fields, including sociology, economics, marketing, psychology, and so on (Awuni & Du, 2016). It also applies to a variety of tangible and intangible services (Chakraborty et al., 2022; Abbasi et al., 2023), e.g., tourism services, hotel services (Park & Rabolt, 2009; Nekmahmud et al., 2022), and healthcare services (Chakraborty & Paul, 2023). Sheth et al. (1991) classified five consumption values- functional, social, emotional, epistemic, and conditional value- that substantially influence consumer preference and purchase decisions. For instance, tourists may visit a new destination because they feel they will gain social value by impressing others after the tour. In contrast, other tourists may choose services like quality food and service at tourist spots because of their functional values, e.g., economics, convenience, value of money, and quality (Nekmahmud et al., 2022). Additionally, consumer purchase decisions are influenced by various dimensions, including enjoyment, social factors, service quality, financial value, and trade-offs (Awuni & Du, 2016).
In the tourism sector, TCV is applied to understand consumer purchase behavior regarding hotels and restaurants (Zaitouni & Murphy, 2023), green products (Nekmahmud et al., 2022), and visiting tourist places (Abdullah et al., 2019). In this research, we extend the TCV by incorporating new variables, e.g., environmental value, employee service quality, and ERB, to measure tourists’ environmental awareness when visiting the UNESCO WHS Mangrove Forest. We also investigate the quality dimensions of the conceptual model, which including tourist satisfaction, environmental commitment, and loyalty. We consider the TCV model as suitable for tourist destinations due to its multidimensional structure, evaluates consumer value in the hospitality and tourism field. On the other hand, the TCV model has yet to be applied to the context of tourism destinations in Bangladesh. Therefore, we examine how perceived values (functional, social, emotional, and conditional), environmental values, and ESQ influence tourist satisfaction, consequently affecting tourist loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment.
2.2 Hypotheses and research model development
2.2.1 Perceived value and satisfaction
In consumer behavior, perceived value is a well-known concept representing the overall evaluation of a product’s utility (Kumar & Pansari, 2015; Song et al., 2015a, b; Ngurah et al., 2017). Perceived value is often seen as a function of a product’s price, where the concept of ‘value for money’ is regarded as the key determinant (Gallarza & Saura, 2006). Williams and Soutar (2009) identified functional value, emotional value, financial value, social value, and the value of novelty as essential dimensions of perceived value in tourism, significantly impacting tourist satisfaction. Also, Jamal et al. (2011) specified some dimensions of perceived value in tourism, such as functional value (price & establishment), experiential value (host-guest interaction, culture, activity, and knowledge), and emotional value. Scholars have extensively examined how perceived values impact on various contexts of tourist’s post-purchase behavior, behavioral intention, satisfaction, and loyalty (e.g., Jamal et al., 2011; Kim & Thapa, 2018). Moreover, several research studies have employed multidimensional metrics to evaluate the perceived value of different tourism products and services (Rasoolimanesh et al., 2016; Kim & Park, 2017). Tourist satisfaction is a favorable perception or sensation from participating in a particular tourism activity (Che et al., 2021). Tourist satisfaction is a crucial metric for evaluating the on-site experience during their tours (Lee et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2021). Factors like time, effort expended, and initial expectations can significantly impact overall satisfaction (Kim & Park, 2017). In the tourism industry, customer happiness is the most crucial factor shaping the success or failure of a company. Tourist expectations, primarily based on destination impressions and perceived value for tourists, are closely linked to satisfaction (Campón-Cerro et al., 2017). For example, a study in Malaysia’s Lenggong Valley WHS found that perceived value strongly affects homestay guest satisfaction (Rasoolimanesh et al., 2016). Similarly, in China’s Kaiping Diaolou and Villages, UNESCO research indicated that perceived value and the Diaolou village experience positively influence tourists’ satisfaction and intention to revisit (Zhang et al., 2022). Perceived value significantly influences tourist satisfaction and loyalty at the WHS Mahabalipuram, India (Verma & Rajendran, 2017). Therefore, we propose that perceived value (functional, social, and emotional) significantly influences tourist satisfaction:
H1
Functional value at a destination positively affects tourist satisfaction.
H2
Social value at a destination positively affects tourist satisfaction.
H3
Emotional value at a destination positively affects tourist satisfaction.
2.2.2 Environmental value and satisfaction
Previous research focused on environmental values in a broad area such as social psychology, marketing, and political science (Burningham & O’Brien, 1994; Dietz et al., 2005). Prior studies have also explored environmental values within sustainable and eco-tourism contexts (e.g., Miller et al., 2010; Vermeersch et al., 2016). However, more research must be done on environmental values within the tourism context, especially in developing countries. Thus, we consider environmental values within sustainable tourist destinations and investigate how these environmental values influence tourist satisfaction. Uriely et al. (2007) stated that effectively integrating ecological values at tourism destinations involves aligning with consumer wants and a dedicated ideological commitment to environmental preservation. When tourists perceive a destination to offer high environmental value such as natural beauty, ecological conservation, and sustainable practices, it is anticipated that these environmental values will positively influence tourists’ overall satisfaction at the destination (Vermeersch et al., 2016). Several factors contribute to this expected positive relationship. For example, a destination’s commitment to environmental conservation may enhance its appeal, attracting environmentally conscious tourists who derive satisfaction from supporting sustainable practices (Poudel & Nyaupane, 2017; Sahabuddin et al., 2021). Moreover, a destination’s aesthetic and recreational aspects, shaped by its environmental features, can positively impact tourists’ overall satisfaction (Demir et al., 2021). Understanding environmental value is essential in studying sustainable lifestyles, quality of life, and consumption patterns (Chen, 2014; Biswas, 2017). Therefore, we propose that environmental values significantly influence tourist satisfaction at the destination:
H4
Environmental value at a destination positively affects tourist satisfaction.
2.2.3 Employee service quality and satisfaction
Scholars and policymakers stated that employee service quality (ESQ) explores its relationship with satisfaction (Spreng & Mackoy, 1996; He et al., 2018; Hasan et al., 2020). ESQ is commonly regarded as a precursor of consumer satisfaction (Chiu et al., 2014), and it has also been linked to overall service quality. In service marketing, ESQ is emphasized as institutions must create a conducive service environment and maintain excellent service quality to ensure better tourist satisfaction (Song et al., 2015). He et al. (2011) demonstrated that better service quality significantly contributes to environmental commitment. Similarly, in their study, He et al. (2018) revealed that service quality affects value perceptions, positively influencing tourists’ ERB and commitment. Wan & Cheng (2011) showed high visitor satisfaction with Macao’s WHS but suggested improvements in empathy and consumables. Also, Sahabuddin et al. (2021) found a positive and strong association between ESQ and tourist satisfaction at Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, the world’s longest natural sea beach. Thus, we postulate the following hypothesis:
H5
Employee service quality at a destination positively affects on tourist satisfaction.
2.2.4 Satisfaction, loyalty, and environmentally responsible behavior and environment commitment
Tourist satisfaction (TS) is one of the most potent stimuli for visitors to return to the destination. The connection between tourist satisfaction and loyalty has been firmly established and is substantiated by several empirical and theoretical studies (Yusliza et al., 2020; Hernandez-Rojas et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021). Recently, Wang and Kang (2019) specified that tourist satisfaction influences their inclination to engage in pro-environmental behavior. Thus, individual tourists’ environmental concerns significantly affect life satisfaction (Chiu et al., 2014; Han et al., 2016).
Tourist satisfaction positively influences loyalty to the destination (Tsoukatos & Rand, 2006; Hussain et al., 2023). In the context of WHS, tourist satisfaction significantly influences loyalty to the destination, as evidenced by studies on WHS in Córdoba, Spain (del Río et al., 2020) and China (Su et al., 2017). Satisfaction impacts tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) differently (Cheng et al., 2018). Satisfaction leads to positive ERB (Mohammed et al., 2020) and commitment (Sahabuddin et al., 2021). Satisfaction impacts tourist loyalty and significantly affects the selection of alternative tourist destinations (Hutchinson et al., 2009). Dissatisfaction often prompts tourists to opt for alternative tourist destinations. Understanding tourist environmental behavior is critical for maintaining the eco-tourism system.
Tourist satisfaction significantly impacts environmental commitment (Pan & Liu, 2018; Su et al., 2020). Tourists’ highly satisfying experiences at a destination positively influence their commitment to environmental conservation. The enjoyment and satisfaction of the travel experience may enhance tourists’ willingness to engage in ERB, which promotes environmental sustainability at the destination. A positive and satisfying travel experience can cultivate a stronger sense of responsibility, commitment, and concern for the environment among tourists (Su et al., 2020). Hence, we postulate the following hypotheses:
H6
Tourists’ satisfaction at a destination positively impacts on loyalty.
H7
Tourists’ satisfaction at a destination positively impacts ERB.
H8
Tourists’ satisfaction at a destination positively impacts environmental commitment.
2.2.5 Environmental commitment and environmentally responsible behavior
Tourism industry’s contribution to the economy has been steadily expanding, yet its adverse effects also impact the natural environment. As a result, ERB toward nature is essential for safeguarding the environment. The influence of ERB on eco-tourism and the preservation of the natural environment is immensely significant (Handriana & Ambara, 2016; Nekmahmud & Fekete-Farkas, 2020; Poudel & Nyaupane, 2017). ERB encompasses conserving the natural environment, minimizing local environmental interference, voluntarily reducing or abstaining from visiting a destination during its environmental recovery, and undertaking measures to alleviate damage to specific destinations. Recycling, energy conservation, green consumption, and political engagement on environmental issues are all environmentally responsible actions (Han et al., 2016; Manisha et al., 2023). Thus, ERB reflects a positive attitude toward tourism’s environmental commitment, ultimately leading to sustainable tourism (Cheng & Wu, 2015). Also, ERB is interconnected with other crucial factors of sustainable tourism, including environmental commitment, perceived value, and service quality (Sahabuddin et al., 2021). A study (Lee, 2011) concluded that environmental commitment significantly influences ERB. Hence, we postulate the following hypotheses:
H9
Environmental commitment has a significant relationship with ERB.
From the discussion, we have synthesized that the sub-dimensions of perceived value (functional, social, emotional, and conditional), environmental value, and ESQ significantly influence tourist satisfaction. In contrast, tourist satisfaction will also strongly influence tourists to increase loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment. Further, environmental commitment influences the improvement of ERB, as underpinnings are discussed in Fig. 1.
3 Methodology
3.1 Research area and data collection
This study has been conducted on the world’s largest mangrove forest, Sundarbans, in the southwestern region of Bangladesh, specifically the Khulna Division. Sundarbans is one of the most extensive forests, and it was recognized by UNESCO as the most famous World Natural Heritage Site in 1997. Figure 2 presents the map of Bangladesh and the mangrove forest, Sundarbans.
We developed a survey questionnaire to collect data from targeted respondents with specific criteria, e.g., respondents’ age being more than 18 years and respondents having experience traveling to Sundarbans. The data collection process went through social media platforms, specifically direct communication through Facebook. Recent research has highlighted Facebook as a strong platform for online data collection, demonstrating an average response rate of 54% in prior studies (Ali et al., 2021). Judgmental sampling was utilized because of its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and direct access to our specific target population of interest. A structured questionnaire was made based on Google Forms to collect the data from the primary source in 2022.
We distributed our questionnaire to over 1,000 respondents, leveraging social media timelines to request valid responses. Additionally, we contracted well-known individuals to ensure a diverse pool of participants. Usually, well-known persons prefer responding to a questionnaire to an unknown person. At the beginning of the questionnaire, whether they have ever visited Sundarbans or not (Yes/No). If yes, then please go to the next section. We have also found that many respondents answered our questionnaire and have not visited Sundarbans. Thus, we dropped those responses to show the real impact and implications. Following three months of survey collection, we garnered responses from 755 individuals who had visited the Sundarbans. However, finally, we identified 732 questionnaires as valid, while 23 were deemed invalid due to inaccuracies. Some respondents answered all questions with moderate responses without considering reality.
3.2 Questionnaire design and measurement scale
The questionnaire included five demographic questions pertaining to respondents’ age, gender, education level, monthly income, and occupation. Respondents’ age and education were assessed using open-ended questions to ensure accuracy in their answers. Nevertheless, 31 items of 9 variables are adopted from well-established literature. For example, nine items of functional, social, and emotional value are adopted from previous literature (Sweeney & Soutar, 2001; Williams & Soutar, 2009). Four items of environmental value are taken from (Handriana & Ambara, 2016; Abdullah et al., 2019). Three items of employee service quality are taken from (He et al., 2018; Hutchinson et al., 2009), four items of tourist satisfaction are borrowed from (Lee et al., 2007; Su & Hsu, 2013), environmental commitment are adopted from (Davis et al., 2009; He et al., 2018), six items of environmentally responsible behavior are taken from (Cheng et al., 2013; Chiu et al., 2014) and four items of loyalty are browed from (Chen & Hu, 2010; Kim & Park, 2017). The specifics of the variable scale are outlined in Appendix A. The scales of the variables were constructed using a five-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). Following a pilot test, all items exhibited a Cronbach’s alpha value exceeding 0.700. As a result, no items were removed from the questionnaire.
3.3 Statistical techniques
In our proposed model, we used the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) to analyze and evaluate the data. PLS-SEM is suitable to analyze complicated models which include non-normal data, structural indicators, and more flexible foundations (Hair et al., 2014). In our study, we implemented the SmartPLS 3.2.3 version because of its extensive use and suitability for SEM analysis in marketing and tourism (Hair et al., 2019; Ringle et al., 2024). Many researchers in their previous research used SEM to analyze tourist satisfaction and loyalty (e.g., Ali et al., 2018; Nunkoo et al., 2020; Jaafar et al., 2015; Muntean et al., 2023). The reason to choose SmartPLS in our study is its user-friendly interface and capability to examine complex SEM-reflective and formative models (Hair et al., 2019; Sarstedt et al., 2021). We used 5000 subsamples on bootstrapping for our analysis with no sign changes and a bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrapping confidence interval for analysis. Two-tailed testing was conducted with 95% confidence (Cheah et al., 2019).
4 Results
4.1 Demographic result
Table 1 presents the demographic variables, whereas the majority, 89.33% of respondents are male. Regarding age, the highest proportion of respondents falls, with 36.94% being between 26 and 30 years old, and 20.52% being between 31 and 35 years. 43.37% of respondents are from postgraduate and 41.04% are from undergraduate levels. This study presents remarkable information that, in most cases, private service holders and self-employed respondents are highly fascinated by tourism. Nearly 35.98% of tourists are private service holders, and 31.19% are engaged in business or self-employed. Since tourism costs money, the income range of tourists is also a significant aspect to consider. Most tourists’ monthly income ranges from 241 USD to 360 USD.
4.2 Measurement model
The PLS-SEM for latent indicators was analyzed to ensure convergent and discriminant validity by evaluating the composite reliability of individual and blocks of indicators. Table 2 presents the convergent validity’s internal consistency, reliability, and measurement.
According to Fornell and Larcker (1981), factor loadings are considered substantial if it surpass a cut-off value of 0.50. Thus, two items from the construct of ERB (ERB2, ERB3) and one item from tourist satisfaction (TS4) were eliminated due to falling below the threshold value of 0.50. Additionally, each latent construct demonstrated satisfactory reliability, surpassing the threshold level of 0.70 for composite reliability (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
Results of Cronbach alpha show that constructs’ values surpass the ideal threshold of 0.700 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) without emotional value (0.543) construct. The constructs’ composite reliabilities range from 0.766 to 0.882, with all values exceeding the minimum value of 0.7 (Hair et al., 2014) and indicating high process reliability and error-free. Moreover, all latent variables demonstrated an average variance extracted (AVE) surpassing 0.50, suggesting satisfactory convergent validity (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988).
VIF (variance inflation factor) results show values ranging from 1.088 to 1.943, all below the threshold of 5. This indicates the absence of negative effects or multicollinearity across items or predictor constructs, suggesting a structurally sound model.
Table 3 presents the diagonal entries (in bold), signifying the square root of the AVE for each construct (Hair et al., 2013). This indicates that discriminant validity is sufficient.
All HTMT ratios are below 0.85 (Henseler et al., 2015), indicating that each construct is sufficiently distinct. Thus, the measurement model confirms acceptable discriminant validity.
4.3 Structural model and hypotheses test
The structural model was measured by evaluating (i) statistical coefficients, (ii) path coefficients, (iii) indirect effects through estimation of f2, and (iv) the Stone - Geisser test (Q2), which measures the predictive relevance of the dependent reflexive constructs (Avkiran & Ringle, 2018; Hair et al., 2019).
To fit the model, we applied the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR ¼ 0.089), which is considered satisfactory. A value less than 0.10 or, in a more conservative approach, 0.08 indicates a good model fit with the data, as suggested by Hu and Bentler (1999).
Besides, we calculate the coefficient (R2), which determines the degree of adjustment of the model and evaluate its in-sample consistency fit. The model clarifies that the R2 values of tourist loyalty (R2 Adjusted 0.306), environmental commitment (R2 Adjusted 0.290), and environmental responsibility (R2 Adjusted 0.297) of mangrove forest Sundarbans prediction contribute the most to 30% which are considered satisfactory in the behavioral science. Rasoolimanesh et al. (2016) suggest that R2 values exceeding 20% are deemed significant for tourism research.
f2 results imply that ESQ (0.087) has a medium effect on tourist satisfaction. Emotional value (0.001), environmental value (0.034), functional value (0.001), and social value (0.000) have minimal effects on tourist satisfaction. Nevertheless, tourist satisfaction significantly impacts ERB (0.429) and loyalty (0.441). ERB has a medium-sized impact on environmental commitment (0.071).
PLS utilizes the blindfolding approach for forecasting test aptitude, while Q2 accurately predicted endogenous construct values exceeding zero and deemed satisfactory (Hair et al., 2019).
Table 4 presents endogenous construct values that surpassed the ideal value of zero, such as 0.147 for tourist satisfaction, 0.05 for loyalty, 0.007 for ERB, and 0.08 for environmental commitment. Therefore, it is considered a prediction test. Therefore, the Stone-Geiger test (Q2) was determined to be methodologically valid (Chin, 1998), demonstrating a medium to large scale and exhibiting accuracy in (pseudo) out-of-sample predictions (Hair et al., 2019).
Table 4 shows that the PLS-RMSE values reached higher and smaller predictive errors than the PLS-MAE values. Therefore, the model demonstrates a moderate predictive capability for the target constructs.
Table 5 shows the hypotheses testing for tourists’ pro-environmental behavior in Sundarbans. Results reveal six hypotheses are accepted, while three hypotheses are not supported. Path coefficients and t-values indicate that functional value (β = -0.019, p > 0.05), social value (β = 0.016, p > 0.05), and emotional value (β = 0.039, p > 0.05) do not exert a significant influence on tourist satisfaction on world largest mangrove forest Sundarbans. Thus, H1, H2, and H3 are not supported. Nevertheless, environmental value (β = 0.185, p < 0.001) and employee service quality (β = 0.299, p < 0.001) have shown positive impacts on tourist satisfaction. Therefore, H4 and H5 are accepted. Tourist satisfaction exhibits positive and significant effects on tourist loyalty (β = 0.554, p < 0.001), environmentally responsible behavior (β = 0.548, p < 0.001), and environmental commitment (β = 0.113, p < 0.001). So, hypotheses H6, H7, and H8 are accepted. Finally, the standardized beta coefficients reveal that environmental commitment positively relates to environmentally responsible behaviors (β = 0.266, p < 0.001). So, H9 is also supported.
5 Discussion
We investigate factors influencing tourist satisfaction and environmental awareness of the WHS mangrove forest Sundarbans. Drawing on the TCV, we introduced a model to assess tourist satisfaction, ERB, and tourist loyalty towards the destination. Three perceived values (functional, social, emotional) and environmental values are identified to measure tourist satisfaction in the Sundarbans mangrove forest. The results of SEM suggest that Bangladeshi tourists are not satisfied with the functional, social, and emotional value. Functional is insignificantly negatively associated with tourist satisfaction. The results contradicts the earlier literature (Lee et al., 2007; Song et al., 2015a, b; Kim & Park, 2017). For example, functional, emotional, and social values significantly influence China’s WHS (Zhang et al., 2022).
Similarly, perceived value strongly enhances the satisfaction of homestay guests at Lenggong Valley, WHS in Malaysia (Rasoolimanesh et al., 2016) and WHS, Córdoba, Spain (del Río et al., 2020). However, visitors to Sundarbans are not satisfied with the price, value for money, and quality. Travelers tend to prioritize functional values like convenience and consistent service quality. Williams and Soutar (2009) found that factors such as reasonable prices, service, and perceived value for money significantly impact tourist satisfaction.
Further, findings indicate that social value has yet to be associated with tourist satisfaction in Bangladesh. This result contradicts previous findings by (Kim & Park, 2017; Williams & Soutar, 2009). A prior study by Kim and Park (2017) demonstrated that visitors in Korea prioritize social values. They are inclined to value aspects such as feeling special, social acceptance, and making a favorable impression on others.
Emotional value also has no positive relation with tourist satisfaction. According to earlier studies (Kim & Park, 2017; Lee et al., 2007), emotional values play a vital role in shaping tourist satisfaction. Positive emotions, e.g., enjoyment and happiness, play a significant role in influencing tourist satisfaction. Therefore, ecological programs should incorporate engaging elements to attract and maintain visitors’ interest. The path result shows that environmental value significantly influences tourist satisfaction because travelers are delighted with several environmental values such as cleanliness of the tourist places, good environment, safe places, and so on.
ESQ has a notable direct impact on tourist satisfaction in Sundarbans. These results with earlier research (He et al., 2018; Hutchinson et al., 2009). In Sundarbans, ESQ positively impacts tourist satisfaction. A study in Bangladesh has shown that ESQ has a significant relationship with Bangladeshi tourist satisfaction (Sahabuddin et al., 2021). Moreover, He et al. (2018) found that perceived employee quality does not positively influence tourist satisfaction in China.
Finally, our research establishes a link between tourist satisfaction, environmental commitment, ERB, and tourist loyalty. He et al. (2018) demonstrated that tourist satisfaction significantly and directly affected ERB in China. Similarly, tourist satisfaction is significantly association with ERB at Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, and leads to revisits of the destination. (Sahabuddin et al., 2021). Tourists are more inclined to participate in ERB if they are pleased with their experience. Tourist satisfaction positively influences destination loyalty (Chen & Chen, 2010; Kim & Park, 2017; Lee et al., 2007; Lee, 2009). For example, there is a significant correlation between tourist satisfaction and loyalty toward the world heritage site (WHS) in Córdoba, Spain (del Río et al., 2020), and China (Su et al., 2017). Kim and Park (2017) revealed that tourist satisfaction serves as a mediator in the relationship between travelers’ perceived overall value and destination loyalty.
The results also demonstrate a significant positive correlation between tourist satisfaction and environmental commitment, consistent with the earlier findings (Moliner et al., 2007). Their research finds that satisfaction with the travel agency influences the impact of satisfaction on commitment, particularly the affective dimension of commitment. On the other hand, satisfaction with the tourism package does not significantly influence commitment.
Finally, result shows that environmental commitment positively correlates with environmental responsibility (He et al., 2018). Environmental commitment exerts the most substantial overall influence on ERB. Tourists are more likely to participate in activities that contribute to preserving the natural environment at their destination (Sahabuddin et al., 2021).
6 Implications
Although this study focuses on a particular region, it has theoretical, practical, and policy implications to ensure sustainable tourism.
6.1 Theoretical implication
We applied the consumption value theory by integrating satisfaction, loyalty, and environmental awareness. Previously, most studies applied some dimensions of perceived value, e.g., functional, social, emotional, conditional, and epistemic value, where environmental value was ignored. Therefore, this study extends perceived value by adding environmental values and employee service quality, which helps to understand tourists’ environmental satisfaction and employee service quality at tourist destinations. Our proposed model connected how tourist satisfaction influences loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment, significantly contributing to theories. Concerning theoretical implications, our study’s proposed model proves that tourist satisfaction is essential to loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment. Our research model shows that different consumption values, e.g., functional, social, emotional, and environmental, are connected with satisfaction. Perceived and environmental values significantly influence tourists’ decision-making when choosing which destination to travel to.
Nevertheless, a significant academic implication arises from these findings, which is that ESQ positively correlates with tourist satisfaction. Finally, tourist satisfaction also dramatically influences the loyalty of tourist destinations and services. Our study findings will fill the literature gap and offer a sound theoretical framework for measuring the tourists’ overall satisfaction and environmental awareness at the destination.
6.2 Practical implication
Marketing campaigns should concentrate on perceived value aspects. Our findings confirm that functional and social value has a negative impact on tourist destinations in Sundarbans. Therefore, marketers should focus on enhancing functional value through various ways, including improving facilities, accommodation, economic services, and the value of money for visitors to experience and provide a superior guest experience. This experience includes offering polite, courteous, proactive, ready-to-help, competent, and knowledgeable employees to the tourists. The tourist will be happier if s/he is appropriately treated and gets a larger net value. Tourists visiting Sundarbans place less importance on social values, e.g., seeking social approval, feeling special, or making a favorable impression on others. Therefore, marketers should consider implementing social promotion strategies to enhance the perception of social value. Furthermore, marketers have the opportunity to offer tourists emotional value by facilitating natural and ecological experiences, as positive emotions such as enjoyment and happiness are crucial in shaping tourist satisfaction. To ensure tourist satisfaction, marketing people of tourism must continually strive to deliver good tourism experiences. Marketing managers should emphasize creating values, e.g., improving tourist guides and maintaining tangible tourist amenities (Sahabuddin et al., 2021).
It is critical to incorporate environmental values into tourism management in order to promote sustainable practices. Engaging with local communities and developing educational programmes can help to promote responsible tourism. Eco-tourism activities, as well as collaboration with NGOs and government organisations, help to conserve the environment. Monitoring systems, improvements in green infrastructure, and increased environmental awareness are critical for reducing ecological effects.
Incorporating environmental values into tourism management is critical to promoting sustainable practices. Engaging with local communities and developing educational programs can promote responsible tourism. Eco-tourism activities, as well as collaboration with NGOs and government organizations, help conserve the environment. Additionally, the tourism industry can be boosted and contribute enormously to the economy if the authorities implement the climate change mitigation strategy appropriately, adopting environmental values and improving tourist destinations’ appeal. Marketers must be concerned about captivating features to capture and maintain tourists’ interest while designing the environmental awareness program. For instance, storytelling may enrich the environmental experience and stimulate attractions (Kim & Park, 2017).
When designing tourist products and services, managers must realize the relevance of these multidimensional perceived and environmental values. Managers should enhance tourist satisfaction to foster destination loyalty and maintain a destination’s competitiveness.
6.3 Policy implication
Policymakers need to endorse the advancement of eco-tourism in alignment with fostering an eco-friendly environment for travelers. Tourists of Bangladesh need to be made aware and learn about sustainability and eco-tourism. Therefore, when they travel, they contribute to over-tourism and devastate the place (Nekmahmud & Hassan, 2021). The government should continue educating tourists about green alternatives to encourage eco-friendly behavior. The government should establish guidelines, regulations, and policies prioritizing eco-friendly practices in the tourism sector. Bangladeshi policymakers can ensure environmentally responsible tourism by implementing stringent rules tailored to the industry, including waste management and emissions controls. They should encourage businesses to obtain eco-certifications, involve local communities in decision-making, and launch environmental awareness campaigns, and contribute to rural sustainable development (Hasan, 2022; Saini et al., 2022; Hasan et al., 2023). Providing incentives for sustainable practices, monitoring compliance, and investing in green infrastructure are essential. Policies should prioritize biodiversity conservation and include capacity-building programs for industry professionals. Collaborative efforts between government, NGOs, and the private sector can create a unified approach to promote sustainable tourism, preserving natural resources and cultural heritage for long-term success.
7 Conclusions, limitations, and future direction
Moreover, our study examined how perceived value, environmental value, and ESQ impact tourist satisfaction and environmental awareness of the Sundarbans World Heritage mangrove forest. This study identified three perceived values (functional, social, and emotional value), environmental values, and employee service quality as the main factors in measuring tourist satisfaction in the Sundarbans mangrove forest based on TCV. Furthermore, this study identifies tourist satisfaction as a key factor influencing loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment.
The results indicate that environmental value significantly influences tourist satisfaction. In addition, tourist satisfaction positively correlates with tourist loyalty, ERB, and environmental commitment to the destination, which are novel results in sustainable tourism research. Results also revealed that environmental commitment has a significant relationship with ERB. Those who firmly commit to environmental concerns are more inclined to engage in behaviors that align with environmental responsibility. It explains that individuals actively adopt sustainable practices, reduce their ecological footprint, participate in environmental conservation initiatives, and engage in responsible behaviors contributing to environmental conservation and sustainability.
This research provides opportunities for tourism practitioners and policymakers to enhance environmental conditions at tourist destinations, promoting sustainable tourism practices in Bangladesh. It underscores the need for improved environmental initiatives and collaboration between practitioners and policymakers to ensure sustainable and eco-friendly approach to tourism in the country.
There are several limitations in this study that future research should take into account. Firstly, data are gathered from Bangladeshi tourists who had already traveled to the Sundarbans. Thus, the results of other study areas can be contrasted with our current study. Further study should be conducted to compare this model to various destinations in Bangladesh. Secondly, the study’s sample size is small compared to Bangladesh’s population. Thus, future researchers need to consider large-scale data size. Future research may incorporate a specific TPB and TCV model to examine outcomes in various destination settings. Finally, we used the value consumption model in this analysis and ignored the mediator and moderator variables. So, future researchers should look into the mediator and moderator variables in our suggested model.
Data availability
Data are available on request.
References
Abbasi, A. Z., Asif, M., Shamim, A., Ting, D. H., & Rather, R. A. (2023). Engagement and consumption behavior of eSports gamers. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 27(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-07-2022-0161
Abdullah, S. I. N. W., Samdin, Z., Teng, P. K., & Heng, B. L. J. (2019). The impact of knowledge, attitude, consumption values and destination image on tourists’ responsible environmental behaviour intention. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.005
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568
Ali, F., Ciftci, O., Nanu, L., Cobanoglu, C., & Ryu, K. (2021). Response rates in hospitality research: An overview of current practice and suggestions for future research. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(1), 105–120.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Avkiran, N. K., & Ringle, C. M. (Eds.). (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Recent advances in banking and finance (Vol. 239). Springer.
Awuni, J. A., & Du, J. (2016). Sustainable consumption in Chinese cities: Green Purchasing intentions of young adults based on the theory of consumption values. Sustainable Development, 24(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1613
Aziz, A., & Paul, A. R. (2015). Bangladesh Sundarbans: Present status of the environment and biota. Diversity, 7(3), 242–269. https://doi.org/10.3390/d7030242
Banglapedia, (2021). https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Sundarbans,_The
Biswas, A. (2017). A consumption value-gap analysis for sustainable consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(8), 7714–7725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8355-9
Burningham, K., & O’Brien, M. (1994). Global environmental values and local contexts of action. Sociology, 28(4), 913–932.
Campón-Cerro, A. M., Hernández-Mogollón, J. M., & Alves, H. (2017). Sustainable improvement of competitiveness in rural tourism destinations: The quest for tourist loyalty in Spain. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 6(3), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.04.005
Chakraborty, D., & Paul, J. (2023). Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective. Technovation, 120, 102481.
Chakraborty, D., Kayal, G., Mehta, P., Nunkoo, R., & Rana, N. P. (2022). Consumers’ usage of food delivery app: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(5), 601–619.
Che, C., Koo, B., Wang, J., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Han, H. (2021). Promoting rural tourism in inner mongolia: Attributes, satisfaction, and behaviors among sustainable tourists. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073788
Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019). External oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: The dominant mediating role of formal business planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117693
Chen, K. K. (2014). Assessing the effects of customer innovativeness, environmental value and ecological lifestyles on residential solar power systems install intention. Energy Policy, 67, 951–961.
Chen, C. F., & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
Chen, P. T., & Hu, H. H. (2010). The effect of relational benefits on perceived value in relation to customer loyalty: An empirical study in the Australian coffee outlets industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.09.006
Cheng, T. M., & Wu, H. C. (2015). How do environmental knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and place attachment affect environmentally responsible behavior? An integrated approach for sustainable island tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.965177
Cheng, T. M., Wu, C., H., & Huang, L. M. (2013). The influence of place attachment on the relationship between destination attractiveness and environmentally responsible behavior for island tourism in Penghu, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(8), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.750329
Cheng, T. E., Wang, J., Cao, M. M., Zhang, D. J., & Bai, H. X. (2018). The relationships among interpretive service quality, satisfaction, place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior at the cultural heritage sites in Xi’an, China. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 16(5), 6317–6339. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1605_63176339
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In Marcoulides G. A. (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
Chiu, Y. T. H., Lee, W. I., & Chen, T. H. (2014). Environmentally responsible behavior in eco-tourism: Antecedents and implications. Tourism Management, 40, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.013
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001
del Río, J. A. J., Hernández-Rojas, R. D., Vergara-Romero, A., & Millán, M. G. D. D. (2020). Loyalty in heritage tourism: The case of Córdoba and its four world heritage sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238950
Demir, M., Rjoub, H., & Yesiltas, M. (2021). Environmental awareness and guests’ intention to visit green hotels: The mediation role of consumption values. Plos One, 16(5), e0248815.
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 335–372.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F., Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and.pdf. Journal of Marketing Research, XVIII(February), 39–50.
Gallarza, M. G., & Saura, I. G. (2006). Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism Management, 27(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.12.002
Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M. (2016). Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129
Gunter, U., Ceddia, M. G., & Tröster, B. (2017). International eco-tourism and economic development in Central America and the Caribbean. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1173043
Guo, R., Liu, X., & Song, H. (2021). Structural relationships among strategic experiential modules, motivation, serious leisure, satisfaction and quality of life in bicycle tourism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312731
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better results and higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Han, J. H., Lee, M. J., & Hwang, Y. S. (2016). Tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior in response to climate change and tourist experiences in nature-based tourism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070644
Handriana, T., & Ambara, R. (2016). Responsible environmental behavior intention of travelers on ecotourism sites. Tourism and hospitality management, 22(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.22.2.4
Hasan, M. (2022). Energy economic expansion with production and consumption in BRICS countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101005
Hasan, M. M., Yajuan, L., & Khan, S. (2020). Promoting China’s Inclusive Finance through Digital Financial services. Global Business Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091989534
Hasan, M., Noor, T., Gao, J., Usman, M., & Abedin, M. Z. (2023). Rural consumers’ financial literacy and access to FinTech services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 780–804.
He, Y., Li, W., & Lai, K. K. (2011). Service climate, employee commitment and customer satisfaction: Evidence from the hospitality industry in China. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(5), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111143359
He, X., Hu, D., Swanson, S. R., Su, L., & Chen, X. (2018). Destination perceptions, relationship quality, and tourist environmentally responsible behavior. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28(April), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.08.001
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hernandez-Rojas, R. D., Folgado-Fernandez, J. A., & Palos-Sanchez, P. R. (2021). Influence of the restaurant brand and gastronomy on tourist loyalty. A study in Córdoba (Spain). International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 23(October 2020), 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100305
Hsu, C. Y., Chen, M. Y., Nyaupane, G. P., & Lin, S. H. (2020). Measuring sustainable tourism attitude scale (SUS-TAS) in an eastern island context. Tourism Management Perspectives, 33, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100617
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hussain, A., Li, M., Kanwel, S., Asif, M., Jameel, A., & Hwang, J. (2023). Impact of tourism satisfaction and service quality on destination loyalty: A structural equation modeling Approach concerning China Resort hotels. Sustainability, 15(9), 7713.
Hutchinson, J., Lai, F., & Wang, Y. (2009). Understanding the relationships of quality, value, equity, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions among golf travelers. Tourism Management, 30(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.07.010
Jaafar, M., Noor, S. M., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2015). Perception of young local residents toward sustainable conservation programmes: A case study of the Lenggong World Cultural Heritage Site. Tourism Management, 48, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.018
Jamal, S. A., Othman, N., & Muhammad, N. M. N. (2011). Tourist perceived value in a community-based homestay visit: An investigation into the functional and experiential aspect of value. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 17(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766710391130
Jeong, E., Lee, T., Brown, A. D., Choi, S., & Son, M. (2021). Does a national park enhance the environment-friendliness of tourists as an eco-tourism destination? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168321
Khan, S. N., & Mohsin, M. (2017). The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.187
Kim, K. H., & Park, D. B. (2017). Relationships among Perceived Value, satisfaction, and loyalty: Community-based eco-tourism in Korea. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 34(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1156609
Kim, M., & Thapa, B. (2018). Perceived value and flow experience: Application in a nature-based tourism context. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 8(March), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.08.002
Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2015). Competitive advantage thourgh engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 0–51.
Lee, K. H. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 47(7), 1101–1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978322
Lee, T. H. (2011). How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570345
Lee, C. K., Yoon, Y. S., & Lee, S. K. (2007). Investigating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and recommendations: The case of the Korean DMZ. Tourism Management, 28(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.017
Lee, T. H., Jan, F. H., & Huang, G. W. (2015). The influence of recreation experiences on environmentally responsible behavior: The case of Liuqiu Island, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(6), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1024257
Lee, H. M., Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., & Reisinger, Y. (2019). Formation of festival visitors’ environmentally friendly attitudes: Cognitive, affective, and conative components. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(2), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1381668
Li, S., Liu, M., & Wei, M. (2021). Host sincerity and tourist environmentally responsible behavior: The mediating role of tourists’ emotional solidarity with hosts. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 19(December 2019), 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100548
Liu, C. H., Horng, J. S., Chou, S. F., Chen, Y. C., Lin, Y. C., & Zhu, Y. Q. (2016). An empirical examination of the form of Relationship between sustainable tourism experiences and satisfaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(7), 717–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2015.1068196
Manisha, K., Singh, I., & Chettry, V. (2023). Investigating and analyzing the causality amid tourism, environment, economy, energy consumption, and carbon emissions using Toda–Yamamoto approach for Himachal Pradesh, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04252-3
Miller, G., Rathouse, K., Scarles, C., Holmes, K., & Tribe, J. (2010). Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 627–645.
Mohammed, N., Aziz, Y. A., Awang, K. W., & Samdin, Z. (2020). Influence of destination attractiveness on place satisfaction and environmentally responsible behaviour in marine parks. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 15(1), 52–67.
Moliner, M. A., Sánchez, J., Rodríguez, R. M., & Callarisa, L. (2007). Relationship quality with a Travel Agency: The influence of the Postpurchase Perceived Value of a Tourism Package. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(4), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.thr.6050052
Muntean, M. C., Sorcaru, I. A., & Manea, L. D. (2023). Empirical evidence of tourist satisfaction and loyalty in the case of Bucharest—A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(4), 985–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2136
Nekmahmud, M., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2020). Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197880
Nekmahmud, M., & Hassan, A. (2021). Tourism products and services in Bangladesh: In search of policy and development frameworks. In A. Hassan (Ed.), Tourism Products and Services in Bangladesh: Concept Analysis and Development suggestions (pp. 3–24). Springer.
Nekmahmud, M., Ramkissoon, H., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Green purchase and sustainable consumption: A comparative study between European and non-european tourists. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100980
Ngurah, G., Adinegara, J., Wayan, N., Suprapti, S., Nyoman, N., Yasa, K., Putu, I., & Sukaatmadja, G. (2017). Factors that influences Tourist’s satisfaction and its consequences. European Journal of Business and Management Www Iiste Org ISSN, 9(8), 39–50.
Nunkoo, R., Teeroovengadum, V., Ringle, C. M., & Sunnassee, V. (2020). Service quality and customer satisfaction: The moderating effects of hotel star rating. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102414
Pan, Y., & Liu, J. G. (2018). Antecedents for College Students’ environmentally responsible behavior: Implications for collective impact and sustainable tourism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062024
Park, H. J., & Rabolt, N. J. (2009). Cultural Value, Consumption Value, and global brand image: A cross-national study. Psychology & Marketing, 30(6), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20296
Poudel, S., & Nyaupane, G. P. (2017). Understanding environmentally responsible Behaviour of ecotourists: The reasoned Action Approach. Tourism Planning and Development, 14(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2016.1221851
Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013). Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.708042
Ramseook-Munhurrun, P., Seebaluck, V. N., & Naidoo, P. (2015). Examining the Structural relationships of Destination Image, Perceived Value, Tourist satisfaction and loyalty: Case of Mauritius. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175(230), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1198
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Dahalan, N., & Jaafar, M. (2016). Tourists’ perceived value and satisfaction in a community-based homestay in the Lenggong Valley World Heritage Site. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 26, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.01.005
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
Sahabuddin, M., Tan, Q., Hossain, I., Alam, M. S., & Nekmahmud, M. (2021). Tourist environmentally responsible behavior and satisfaction; study on the world’s longest natural sea beach, cox’s bazar, Bangladesh. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169383
Saini, N., Singhania, M., Hasan, M., Yadav, M. P., & Abedin, M. Z. (2022). Non-financial disclosures and sustainable development: A scientometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381, 135173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135173
Santos-Roldán, L., Canalejo, A. M. C., Berbel-Pineda, J. M., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2020). Sustainable tourism as a source of healthy tourism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155353
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer International Publishing.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
Sin, L. Y., & Yau, O. H. (2001). Female role orientation and consumption values. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 13(2), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/j046v13n02_04
Snyman, S. (2017). The role of private sector eco-tourism in local socio-economic development in southern Africa. Journal of Ecotourism, 16(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2016.1226318
Song, H. J., Ahn, Y. J., & Lee, C. K. (2015a). Examining relationships among Expo experiences, Service Quality, satisfaction, and the Effect of the Expo: The case of the Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(11), 1266–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.965719
Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Park, J. A., Hwang, Y. H., & Reisinger, Y. (2015b). The influence of Tourist Experience on Perceived Value and satisfaction with Temple stays: The Experience Economy Theory. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 32(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.898606
Spreng, R. A., & Mackoy, R. D. (1996). An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(96)90014-7
Su, L. J., & Hsu, M. K. (2013). Service Fairness, Consumption emotions, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: The experience of Chinese Heritage tourists. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 30(8), 786–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.835228
Su, L. J., Hsu, M. K., & Swanson, S. (2017). The Effect of Tourist Relationship perception on destination loyalty at a World Heritage Site in China: The mediating role of overall destination satisfaction and trust. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 41(2), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348014525630
Su, L., Hsu, M. K., & Boostrom, R. E. (2020). From recreation to responsibility: Increasing environmentally responsible behavior in tourism. Journal of Business Research, 109(December 2018), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.055
Sultan, M. T., Sharmin, F., Badulescu, A., Stiubea, E., & Xue, K. (2021). Travelers’ responsible environmental behavior towards sustainable coastal tourism: An empirical investigation on social media user-generated content. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010056
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Tsoukatos, E., & Rand, G. K. (2006). Path analysis of perceived service quality, satisfaction and loyalty in Greek insurance. Managing Service Quality, 16(5), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520610686746
Uriely, N., Reichel, A., & Shani, A. (2007). Ecological orientation of tourists: An empirical investi- gation. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(4), 161–175.
Verma, A., & Rajendran, G. (2017). The effect of historical nostalgia on tourists’ destination loyalty intention: An empirical study of the world cultural heritage site–Mahabalipuram, India. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(9), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1357639
Vermeersch, L., Sanders, D., & Willson, G. (2016). Generation Y: Indigenous tourism interests and environmental values. Journal of Ecotourism, 15(2), 184–198.
Wan, Y. K., P., & Man Cheng, E. I. (2011). Service quality of Macao’s world heritage site. International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506181111111762
Wang, E., & Kang, N. (2019). Does life satisfaction matter for pro-environmental behavior? Empirical evidence from China General Social Survey. Quality and Quantity, 53(1), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0763-0
Williams, P., & Soutar, G. N. (2009). Value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in an adventure tourism context. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.02.002
Yusliza, M. Y., Amirudin, A., Rahadi, R. A., Athirah, N. A. N. S., Ramayah, T., Muhammad, Z., Dal Mas, F., Massaro, M., Saputra, J., & Mokhlis, S. (2020). An investigation of pro-environmental behaviour and sustainable development in Malaysia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177083
Zaitouni, M., & Murphy, K. S. (2023). Self-Service technologies (SST) in the US Restaurant industry: An evaluation of consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and continuance intentions. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 1–32.
Zhang, H., & Lei, S. L. (2012). A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in eco-tourism: The case of a wetland community. Tourism Management, 33(4), 916–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.012
Zhang, L., Yang, S., Wang, D., & Ma, E. (2022). The perceived value of, and experience with, a World Heritage Site in China—the case of Kaiping Diaolou and villages in China. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1820014
Funding
“This research received no external funding”.
Open access funding provided by Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Sahabuddin: Collected data, Resources, Validation, Project Administration, Review & Editing. Shariful Alam: Collected data, Validation. Nekmahmud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis results, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Editing, Visualization, Supervision the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Institutional review board statement
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest.”
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sahabuddin, M., Alam, M.S. & Nekmahmud, M. How do perceived and environmental values influence tourist satisfaction, loyalty, and environmental awareness?. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05094-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05094-3