Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon information disclosure as a driving force for corporate digital transformation: a textual analysis from China

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decarbonization and digitalization are intrinsic requirements for business evolution within the global climate paradigm. This study delves into the impact of Carbon Information Disclosure (CID) quality on the digital transformation of corporations. Using text analysis techniques and OLS regression models, this research scrutinizes the annual and sustainable development reports, alongside financial data, of 4,045 companies listed on China's A-share market over the period 2013–2020. The results show that CID significantly promotes corporate digital transformation. Unabsorbed slack resources and negative coverage within a company have negative and positive, respectively, moderating effects on the relationship between CID and digital transformation. Additionally, the spillover effect of CID within the industry has a positive impact on corporate digital transformation, with this effect being more pronounced in private companies and highly competitive industries. These insights reveal a mutually reinforcing synergy between decarbonization and digitalization. The study offers profound insights into the equilibrium between digitalization and decarbonization for stakeholders in sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  • Adbi, A. (2023). Financial sustainability of for-profit versus non-profit microfinance organizations following a scandal. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarrak, M. S., Elnahass, M., & Salama, A. (2019). The effect of carbon dissemination on cost of equity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 1179–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amri, F., Zaied, Y. B., & Lahouel, B. B. (2019). ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barteková, E., & Börkey, P. (2022). Digitalisation for the transition to a resource efficient and circular economy. Working paper.

  • Bhattarai, B. P., Paudyal, S., Luo, Y., Mohanpurkar, M., Cheung, K., Tonkoski, R., Hovsapian, R., Myers, K. S., Zhang, R., & Zhao, P. (2019). Big data analytics in smart grids: State-of-the-art, challenges, opportunities, and future directions. IET Smart Grid, 2, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghei, Z., Leung, P., & Guthrie, J. (2018). Voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure impacts on accounting-based performance: Australian evidence. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 25, 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois III, L.J., & Singh, J.V. (1983). Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams. In Academy of management proceedings. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, 10510, pp. 43–47

  • Bui, B., Moses, O., & Houqe, M. N. (2020). Carbon disclosure, emission intensity and cost of equity capital: Multi-country evidence. Accounting & Finance, 60, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini, F., Cucinelli, D., Previtali, D., & Soana, M. G. (2020). Don’t talk too bad! stock market reactions to bank corporate governance news. Journal of Banking & Finance, 121, 105962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. (2023). Can low-carbon development force enterprises to make digital transformation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32, 1292–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-M., Yang, D.-H., & Lin, F.-J. (2013). Does technological diversification matter to firm performance? The moderating role of organizational slack. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1970–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review, 79, 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depoers, F., Jeanjean, T., & Jérôme, T. (2016). Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J., Lu, Z., & Yu, C.-H. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and firms’ green innovation: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 81, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, S. A., van Burg, E., Reymen, I. M., & Romme, A. G. L. (2014). Dynamics of resource slack and constraints: Resource positions in action. Organization Studies, 35, 511–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutil, P., & Williams, J. (2017). Regulation governance in the digital era: A new research agenda. Canadian Public Administration, 60, 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, Y., & Wicaksono, H. (2021). Advancing on the analysis of causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firk, S., Hanelt, A., Oehmichen, J., & Wolff, M. (2021). Chief digital officers: An analysis of the presence of a centralized digital transformation role. Journal of Management Studies, 58, 1800–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouquet, R., & Hippe, R. (2022). Twin transitions of decarbonisation and digitalisation: A historical perspective on energy and information in European economies. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannarakis, G., Zafeiriou, E., Arabatzis, G., & Partalidou, X. (2018). Determinants of corporate climate change disclosure for European firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q., Ban, M., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Blockchain, enterprise digitalization, and supply chain finance innovation. China Economic Transition= Dangdai Zhongguo Jingji Zhuanxing Yanjiu, 5, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34, 1265–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, E., Guenther, T., Schiemann, F., & Weber, G. (2016). Stakeholder relevance for reporting: Explanatory factors of carbon disclosure. Business & Society, 55, 361–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., & Xu, L. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13, 12844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, V., Ho, P., & Loualiche, E. (2022). Bubbles and the value of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 145, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, K., Chang, Y. B., & Hahn, J. (2011). Information technology spillover and productivity: The role of information technology intensity and competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Xu, L., Guo, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). The inducing factors of environmental emergencies: Do environmental decentralization and regional corruption matter? Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 114098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2022). Corporate carbon accounting: A literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62, 261–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrasky, S. (2011). Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: Symbolism or action? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25, 174–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggi, B., Allini, A., Macchioni, R., & Zagaria, C. (2018). The factors motivating voluntary disclosure of carbon information: Evidence based on Italian listed companies. Organization & Environment, 31, 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Q., Xia, T., Liu, F., & Xu, J.-H. (2019). The information spillover between carbon price and power sector returns: Evidence from the major European electricity companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1178–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, M., Tong, L., Viswanath, P., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Word power: The impact of negative media coverage on disciplining corporate pollution. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Q., & Ma, X. (2021). Spillovers of environmental regulation on carbon emissions network. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, A., Fehér, P., Kovacs, T., Mitev, A., & Szabó, Z. (2022). Influencing factors of digital transformation: Management or IT is the driving force? International Journal of Innovation Science, 14, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., Park, Y. S., & Klassen, R. D. (2015). Market responses to firms’ voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemma, T. T., Shabestari, M. A., Freedman, M., & Mlilo, M. (2020). Corporate carbon risk exposure, voluntary disclosure, and financial reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 2130–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X., & Ning, L. (2018). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1089–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Xue, Q., & Qin, J. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Liu, N., Kou, A., & Chen, W. (2023). Customer concentration and digital transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence city-level empirical data in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47, 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesen, A., Hoepner, A. G., Patten, D. M., & Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Chen, Y. (2019). Dynamic linkages and spillover effects between CET market, coal market and stock market of new energy companies: A case of Beijing CET market in China. Energy, 172, 1198–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., De Sisto, M., & Li, W. H. (2021a). How does the turnover of local officials make firms more charitable? A comprehensive analysis of corporate philanthropy in China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Xu, Y., Fan, D., Li, Y., Shao, X.-F., & Zheng, J. (2021b). Alleviating corporate environmental pollution threats toward public health and safety: The role of smart city and artificial intelligence. Safety Science, 143, 105433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., & Valero, F. (2021). Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Wang, C., Jamali, D., Gao, Y., Zhang, C., & Liang, M. (2022). A novel framework to unearth corporate hypocrisy: Connotation, formation mechanism, manifestation, and contagion effect. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31, 1136–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers, A., Yona, L., Field, C. B., Jackson, R. B., Mach, K. J., Cashore, B. W., Elliott, C., Gifford, L., Honigsberg, C., & Klaassen, L. (2022). Make greenhouse-gas accounting reliable—build interoperable systems. Nature, 607, 653–656.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 26, 6–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L. (2019). The influence of institutional contexts on the relationship between voluntary carbon disclosure and carbon emission performance. Accounting & Finance, 59, 1235–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xiong, G., & Mardani, A. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and corporate innovation: The “Inverted U-shaped” regulating effect of media attention. Journal of Business Research, 146, 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, M. (2021). Testing the theory of communication and uncertainty management in the context of digital transformation with transformational leadership as a moderator. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211023966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57, 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X., Chen, L., & Gou, D. (2023). The impact of corporate environmental disclosure quality on financing constraints: The moderating role of internal control. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 33455–33474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Romi, A. M. (2019). Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: Evidence from sustainability restatements. European Accounting Review, 28, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orens, R., Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2010). Web-based non-financial disclosure and cost of finance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 1057–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Lee, J., & Shin, J. (2023). Corporate governance, compensation mechanisms, and voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 19(3), 100361.

  • Pitrakkos, P., & Maroun, W. (2020). Evaluating the quality of carbon disclosures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11, 553–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1157–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business & Society, 43, 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J., & He, Z. (2022). How does social media drive corporate carbon disclosure? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 971077.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh, P., Vera, D., & Keller, R. T. (2019). Unabsorbed slack resource deployment and exploratory and exploitative innovation: How much does CEO expertise matter? Journal of Business Research, 94, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, X., Peng, M., Yin, J., & Xiu, Z. (2022). Does local governments’ environmental information disclosure promote corporate green innovations? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58, 3164–3176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Q., & Tang, L. M. (2021). Developing blockchain-based carbon accounting and decentralized climate change management system. In: Information for efficient decision making: big data, blockchain and relevance. World Scientific, pp. 431–450

  • Wang, D., Huang, Y., Guo, M., Lu, Z., Xue, S., & Xu, Y. (2023). Time dynamics in the effect of carbon information disclosure on corporate value. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 138858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and financial performance: the roles of social expectations and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1159–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Chen, L., & Li, Y. (2022). Digital economy and urban low-carbon sustainable development: The role of innovation factor mobility in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 48539–48557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Shao, J. (2023). Environmental information disclosure and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02910-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T.-C., & Lee, H.-D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8980–8985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., & Hu, S. (2020). The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Wu, C., Qin, Q., & Lin, X. (2022). Spillover effects and nonlinear correlations between carbon emissions and stock markets: An empirical analysis of China’s carbon-intensive industries. Energy Economics, 111, 106071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G., Nie, Y., Li, H., & Wang, H. (2023). Digital transformation and low-carbon technology innovation in manufacturing firms: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 263, 108969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, C., Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Sheng, Y. (2021). Digital transformation and division of labor between enterprises: Vertical specialization or vertical integration. China Industrial Economics, 9, 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, H., Yang, M., & Chan, K. C. (2022). Does digital transformation enhance a firm’s performance? Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 68, 101841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., & Geng, Y. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y.-J., & Liu, J.-Y. (2020). Overview of research on carbon information disclosure. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 7, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, M.-R., Cao, M.-Y., & Zou, H. (2022). The carbon reduction effect of ICT: A perspective of factor substitution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Qingdao University, No.93, Songling Road, Qingdao, 266071, China

    Zhengcheng Qu & Zhiwei He

Authors
  1. Zhengcheng Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiwei He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiwei He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Tables 

Table 5 Robustness check using alternative dependent variables
Full size table

5,

Table 6 Robustness check using alternative independent variables
Full size table

6 and

Table 7 Robustness check using alternative Tobit estimation
Full size table

7.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qu, Z., He, Z. Carbon information disclosure as a driving force for corporate digital transformation: a textual analysis from China. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04669-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04669-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation