Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hitting the nail on the head instead of beating the bush: Does corporate social responsibility actually address corporate environmental sustainability?

  • S.I. : Greenwashing
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study assesses the impact of CSR on corporate environment sustainability taking energy intensity as the measure of the latter. We consider the Indian manufacturing firms as our sample for analysis for the period 2015 through 2022. We employ fixed effect regression, Driscoll–Kraay standard errors and the feasible GLS method for our empirical analysis. Interestingly, we find CSR does not depict firms’ sustainable practices in true sense. While the Indian manufacturing firms keep spending on CSR, they apparently fail to heed their energy intensity level, which is suspected as greenwashing. Among other variables, we underline that firms investing in R&D can effectively optimize their energy intensity. Similarly, larger firms and firms with better profitability are found to be less energy intensive. Oppositely, firms with higher asset tangibility and higher financial leverage are more energy intensive. The findings of the study can further guide Indian firms to evaluate their CSR practices. It can also guide social activists, researchers and policymakers to understand the importance of the environmental concerns of CSR. The findings of our empirical analysis endorse regular assessment of environmental legislation and regulatory mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source authors’ creation

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on demand.

Notes

  1. We use the term, environmental corporate social responsibilities, corporate environment sustainability, and corporate sustainability interchangeably throughout the manuscript to reduce ambiguity.

  2. As per energy statistics India report—Energy Statistics India 2023 | Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation | Government Of India (https://mospi.gov.in/).

  3. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1847812

  4. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/un-desa-policy-brief-no-153-india-overtakes-china-as-the-worlds-most-populous-country/

  5. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/india-uk-fifth-largest-economy-world

  6. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1885731

  7. Results of the checks are provided under appendix.

  8. In the sense that activities undertaken in the normal course of business do not form part of CSR as per the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014: getdocument (https://mca.gov.in/).

  9. The ESG rating framework is still at the incipient stage in India. CRISIL has recently started providing ESG scores to Indian companies in 2021. For further details please check: CRISIL launches ESG scores of 225 companies.

References

  • Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well.

  • Asemah, E. S., Okpanachi, R. A., & Olumuji, E. O. (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility performance of organisations: A key to winning stakeholders’ goodwill. AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2(4), 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(3), 419–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., Choi, S. H., & Liao, Y. (2021). Feasible generalized least squares for panel data with cross-sectional and serial correlations. Empirical Economics, 60, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balluchi, F., Lazzini, A., & Torelli, R. (2020). CSR and Greenwashing: A Matter of Perception in the Search of Legitimacy. Accounting, Accountability and Society: Trends and Perspectives in Reporting, Management and Governance for Sustainability, 151–166.

  • Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1), 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, B., & Breitung, J. (2016). Testing for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 35(7), 1290–1316.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bothello, J., Ioannou, I., Porumb, V. A., & Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, Y. (2023). CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing. Strategic Management Journal.

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1287–1294.

  • Bux, H., Zhang, Z., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Promoting sustainability through corporate social responsibility implementation in the manufacturing industry: An empirical analysis of barriers using the ISM-MICMAC approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1729–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalvatzis, K. J., Malekpoor, H., Mishra, N., Lettice, F., & Choudhary, S. (2019). Sustainable resource allocation for power generation: The role of big data in enabling interindustry architectural innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheit, E. F. (Ed.). (1964). The business establishment. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. K., & Le, N. T. M. (2022). Environmental quality and the role of economic policy uncertainty, economic complexity, renewable energy, and energy intensity: The case of G7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 2866–2882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Companies Act, 2013. (n.d.). Available at https://www.mca.gov.in/content/mca/global/en/acts-rules/companies-act/companies-act-2013.html

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, D. M., Dopart, P., Ferracini, T., Sahmel, J., Merryman, K., Gaffney, S., & Paustenbach, D. J. (2010). A cross-sectional analysis of reported corporate environmental sustainability practices. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 58(3), 524–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. D. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organizations’ legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees’ reactions through organizational identification theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. R. (2007). Business, ethics, and the environment: Imagining a sustainable future. Pearson/Prentice Hall.

  • Donald, S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ec act | bureau of energy efficiency, government of India, ministry of power. (n.d.). Available at https://beeindia.gov.in/en/about-us/ec-act

  • Fan, L. W., Pan, S. J., Liu, G. Q., & Zhou, P. (2017). Does energy efficiency affect financial performance? Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A., Pinheiro, M. D., de Brito, J., & Mateus, R. (2019). Decarbonizing strategies of the retail sector following the Paris Agreement. Energy Policy, 135, 110999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, H., & Clouse, M. (2021). Renewable energy commitments versus greenwashing: Board responsibilities. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(3), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R., Tao, L., Yan, L., & Gao, P. (2014). The effect path of greenwashing brand trust in Chinese microbiological industry from decoupling view. Indian J, 10(7), 1827–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2022). Environmental effects of information and communication technology-exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hille, E., & Lambernd, B. (2020). The role of innovation in reducing South Korea’s energy intensity: Regional-data evidence on various energy carriers. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hongli, J., Ajorsu, E. S., & Bakpa, E. K. (2019). The effect of liquidity and financial leverage on firm performance: evidence from listed manufacturing firms on the ghana stock exchange. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 10(8), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, M., & Kaur, S. (2021). Determinants of energy intensity trends in indian metallic industry: A firm-level analysis. Vision, 09722629211004293.

  • Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backman, J. (Ed.). (1975). Social responsibility and companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 10(2), 130–accountability. New York University Press.

  • Kautish, P., Sharma, R., Mangla, S. K., Jabeen, F., & Awan, U. (2021). Understanding choice behavior towards plastic consumption: An emerging market investigation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, 105828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I., Hou, F., Zakari, A., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Links among energy intensity, non-linear financial development, and environmental sustainability: New evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. (2015). Tests based on skewness and kurtosis for multivariate normality. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2003). Energy intensity: a quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing.

  • Kumar, A., Mittal, A., & Pradhan, A. K. (2022). Magnitude and determinants of energy intensity: evidence from Indian firms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–12.

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective.

  • Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization and Environment, 28(2), 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. S., & Mason, E. S. (Eds.). (1959). The corporation in modern society (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Startz, R. (2018). Feasible generalized least squares using machine learning. Available at SSRN 2966194.

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassani, A. A., Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Hussain, H., & Haffar, M. (2023). Green innovation through green and blue infrastructure development: Investigation of pollution reduction and green technology in emerging economy. Energies, 16(4), 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njenga, R., & Jagongo, A. (2019). Board characteristics, firm size and financial leverage of manufacturing firms listed at Nairobi Security Exchange, Kenya: Theoretical review. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(3), 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurunnabi, M., Esquer, J., Munguia, N., Zepeda, D., Perez, R., & Velazquez, L. (2020). Reaching the sustainable development goals 2030: Energy efficiency as an approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR). GeoJournal, 85(2), 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak, H., & Bansal, S. (2017). Perform-achieve-trade policy: A case study of cement industry for energy efficiency (No. 17–05). Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University.

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6–10), 1089–1117.

  • Pogutz, S. (2008). Sustainable development, corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility: The missing link. In Corporate accountability and sustainable development (pp. 34–60). Oxford University Press.

  • Pradhan, A. K., & Nibedita, B. (2021). The determinants of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Indian Firms. Global Business Review, 22(3), 753–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, A. K., Sachan, A., Sahu, U. K., & Mohindra, V. (2022). Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 690–701.

  • Prasad, M., & Mishra, T. (2017). Low-carbon growth for Indian iron and steel sector: Exploring the role of voluntary environmental compliance. Energy Policy, 100, 41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, M., Mishra, T., & Bapat, V. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Evidence from India using energy intensity as an indicator of environmental sustainability. IIMB Management Review, 31(4), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachan, A., Sahu, U. K., Pradhan, A. K., & Thomas, R. (2023). Examining the drivers of renewable energy consumption: Evidence from BRICS nations. Renewable Energy, 202, 1402–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, S., & Narayanan, K. (2009). Determinants of Energy Intensity: A preliminary investigation of Indian manufacturing.

  • Sahu, S. K., Bagchi, P., Kumar, A., & Tan, K. H. (2022). Technology, price instruments and energy intensity: a study of firms in the manufacturing sector of the Indian economy. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21.

  • Sahu, S. K., & Mehta, D. (2018). Determinants of energy and Co2 emission intensities: A study of manufacturing firms in India. The Singapore Economic Review, 63(02), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samargandi, N. (2019). Energy intensity and its determinants in OPEC countries. Energy, 186, 115803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, M., & Bhattacharjee, T. (2021). Does CSR disclosure enhance corporate brand performance in emerging economy? Evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(2), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sdg indicators. (n.d.). Available at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/

  • Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Roy, H., & Dalei, N. N. (2019). Estimation of energy intensity in indian iron and steel sector: A panel data analysis. Statistics, 20, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., & Choubey, A. (2022). Green banking initiatives: A qualitative study on Indian banking sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 293–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soni, A., Mittal, A., & Kapshe, M. (2017). Energy Intensity analysis of Indian manufacturing industries. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(3), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The economics of climate change.

  • Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2021). Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 719–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollero, A., Palazzo, M., Siano, A., & Elving, W. J. (2016). Avoiding the greenwashing trap: Between CSR communication and stakeholder engagement. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 120–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Dong, K., Hochman, G., & Timilsina, G. R. (2023). Factors driving aggregate service sector energy intensities in Asia and Eastern Europe: A LMDI analysis. Energy Policy, 172, 113315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. I., & Wang, W. H. (2014). Impact of CSR perception on brand image, brand attitude and buying willingness: A study of a global café. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(6), 43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, H. N., Nguyen, T. T. N., & Cao, T. T. (2020). Greenwashing behaviours: Causes, taxonomy and consequences based on a systematic literature review. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1486–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, E. P. Y., Van Luu, B., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Su, B., Zhou, K., & Sun, Y. (2020). A multi-dimensional analysis on microeconomic factors of China’s industrial energy intensity (2000–2017). Energy Policy, 147, 111836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoogah, D. B. (2014). Ingenuity spirals and corporate environmental sustainability. In Handbook of organizational and entrepreneurial ingenuity (pp. 57–83). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Download references

Funding

No funding details available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India

    Udit Kumar Sahu & Ashis Kumar Pradhan

Authors
  1. Udit Kumar Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashis Kumar Pradhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udit Kumar Sahu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6 Tests for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation
Full size table
Table 7 Test for cross-sectional dependence
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahu, U.K., Pradhan, A.K. Hitting the nail on the head instead of beating the bush: Does corporate social responsibility actually address corporate environmental sustainability?. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04506-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation