Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of land grabbing on food security: evidence from Ghana

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the 2007–08 multiple crises, land-rich nations witnessed an unprecedented rise in land grabbing by different actors. However, there is a lack of evidence for the impact of land grabbing by actors even though such information could be very useful for development, theoretical and empirical studies. This study investigates the food security (i.e., household income food consumption score, household food insecurity access score, and self-reported food security) impacts of land grabbing by domestic (LGDE) and foreign entities (LGFE) in Ghana, using a farm household-level data from a survey conducted during the 2017/2018 cropping season. Specifically, we test two main hypotheses on food security impacts of LGDE and LGFE: (i) given that land grabbing leads to farmland loss and fewer job opportunities, food security will decrease under both LGDE and LGFE; and (ii) the decrease in food security will be higher under LGFE as compared to LGDE since foreign actors dominate in land grabbing, and control more land than domestic actors. The multinomial endogenous switching regression and multinomial endogenous treatment effect models were applied to control for potential selection bias and to test these hypotheses. The results revealed that a decrease in food security ranged between 15 and 61% for LGDE, and 11% and 49% for LGFE. These suggest that both LGDE and LGFE decrease food security but the decrease is much associated with LGDE as compared to LGFE. Thus, concerns about the negative impacts of land grabbing should be directed to all actors in land grabbing. The findings also have implications for development, theoretical and empirical studies which are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Authors’ design, 2018

Fig. 3

Source: Field Survey, 2018

Fig. 4

Source: Field survey, 2018

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this study, land grabbing includes land acquisitions that are non-consultative and lead to displacement of households from their land (Lands Commission, 2016).

  2. LGDE includes all land grabs that are wholly perpetuated by local entities (Levien, 2011) whiles LGFE includes all land grabs that are carried out by foreign entities (Amanor, 2012).

  3. We have conducted a Small-Hsiao test for Independent and Irrelevant Alternative (IIA) assumption and Wald test of combining outcome categories. In all cases, the null hypotheses fail to be rejected, suggesting that land grabbing is appropriately categorized (see Tables 4 and 5 of appendix).

  4. Due to space limitation, the details for constructing each of these indicators are not presented here but can be provided upon request.

References

  • Alamirew, B., Harald Grethe, K. H. A. S., & Wossen, T. (2015). Do land transfers to international investors contribute to employment generation and local food security? Evidence from Oromia Region Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(12), 1121–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amanor, K. S. (2012). Global resource grabs, agribusiness concentration, and the smallholder: Two West African case studies. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 731–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arezki, R., Deininger, K., & Selod, H. (2013). What drives the global “land rush”? The World Bank Economic Review, 29(2), 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, P., Braun, J. V. O. N., Abebaw, D., & Mu, M. (2015). Impacts of Large-scale land investments on income, prices, and employment: Empirical analyses in Ethiopia. World Development, 72(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., Meinzen-dick, R., & Quisumbing, A. (2012). The gender implications of large-scale land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(1), 49–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. A., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). An Interpretation of large-scale land deals using boserup’s theories of agricultural intensification, gender and rural development. In M. Fischer-Kowalski, A. Reenberg, A. Schaffartzik, & A. Mayer (Eds.), Ester Boserup’s legacy on sustainability: Orientation for contemporary research (4th ed., pp. 189–202). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boamah, F. (2010). Competition between biofuel and food? The case of a jatropha biodiesel project and its effects on food security in the affected communities in Northern Ghana. In Masters in resources and human adaptations, department of geography, University of Bergen (Issue May). The University of Bergen.

  • Boamah, F., & Overa, R. (2015). Rethinking livelihood impacts of biofuel land deals in Ghana. Development and Change, 47(1), 98–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S. J., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 33(4), 402–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi, P., Crespo, D., Omar, L., & Rist, S. (2018). Evaluating the livelihood impacts of a large-scale agricultural investment: Lessons from the case of a biofuel production company in northern Sierra Leone. Land Use Policy, 73(4), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., & Gurgand, M. (2007). Selection bias corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo comparisons. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 174–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civic Response. (2017). Assessing community consent in large scale land investments in Ghana. https://loggingoff.info/library/assessing-community-consent-in-large-scale-land-investments-in-ghana/ (11/01/2020).

  • Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Keeley, J. (2009). Land Grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. IIED/FOA/IFAD.

  • Cotula, L. (2012). The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography, and drivers. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 649–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L., Oya, C., Codjoe, E. A., Eid, A., Kakraba-Ampeh, M., Keeley, J., Kidewa, A. L., Makwarimba, M., Seide, W. M., Nasha, W. O., Rizzo, R., & Asare, O. M. (2014). Testing claims about large land deals in Africa : Findings from a multi-country study. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(7), 903–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. F., Odorico, P. D., & Rulli, M. C. (2014). Land grabbing: A preliminary quantification of economic impacts on rural livelihoods. Population & Environment, 36(2), 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2009). Large-scale land acquisitions and leases : A set of core principles and measures to address the human rights challenge. UN.

  • Deb, P., & Trivedi, P. K. (2006). Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of a negative binomial regression model with multinomial endogenous treatment. The Stata Journal, 6(2), 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Byerlee, D., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H., & Stickler, M. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? In Rising Global Interest in Farmland. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8591-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. http://www.ennonline.net/resources/667 (Accessed: 20.06.2014).

  • Dubin, J. A., & Mcfadden, D. L. (1984). An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52(2), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Falco, S., Veronesi, M., & Yesuf, M. (2011). Does adaptation to climate change provide from Ethiopia? Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 93(3), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, FAD, UNCTAD, & World Bank. (2010). Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respects rights, livelihoods, and resources. In UNPRI report (Issue January).

  • FAOSTAT. (2020). Hunger and food insecurity. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/81.

  • Goldstein, M., & Udry, C. (2008). The profits of power: Land Rights and agricultural investment in Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), 981–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRAIN. (2008). Seized! The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. October, 1–11, http://www.grain.org/go/landgrab. http://www.grain.org/go/landgrab.

  • IFPRI. (2013). 2012 global food policy report. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896295537.

  • Jayne, T. S., Chapoto, A., Sitko, N., & Nkonde, C. (2014). Is the scramble for land in Africa foreclosing a smallholder agricultural expansion strategy? Journal of International Affairs, 67(2), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, X., Smith-Hall, C., & Theilade, I. (2015). Rural household incomes and land grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 48(1), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, Q., Ni, J., Ni, D., & Wu, Y. (2016). Land acquisition, labor allocation, and income growth of farm households. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(8), 1744–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, L., & Thiele, R. (2015). Rural welfare implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Africa: A theoretical framework. Economic Modelling, 51(1), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lands Commission. (2016). Guidelines for large scale land transactions in Ghana (Issue May). https://www.colandef.org/lands-commission-guidelines (Accessed on: 11/08/2017).

  • Lele, U., Masters, W. A., Kinabo, J., Meenakshi, J. V., Ramaswami, B., Tagwireyi, J., Bell, W. F. L., & Goswami, S. (2016). Measuring Food and Nutrition Security: An Independent Technical Assessment and User’s Guide for Existing Indicators (Issue June).

  • Levien, M. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867). Capital: a critique of political economy. Madison Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D., Vaitla, B., & Coates, J. (2014). How do indicators of household food insecurity measure up? An empirical comparison from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 47(4), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaya, S. (2015). Large scale land acquisitions in ethiopia: implications for biodiversity and communities (Issue January). http://www.abcg.org/document_details?document_id=719.

  • NEPAD. (2003). Comprehensive Africa agriculture development programme. CODESRIA. http://www.nepad.org; E-mail: sundayd@nepad.org; E-mail: mkandawirer@nepad.org

  • Nguyen, T. T., Hegedus, G., & Nguyen, T. L. (2019). Effect of Land acquisition and compensation on the livelihoods of people in Quang Ninh district, Quang Binh province: Labor and income. Land, 8(91), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., & Kerr, R. B. (2016). Land grabbing, social differentiation, intensified migration, and food security in northern Ghana. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafael, P. (2017). Food security and the 2015–2030 sustainable development goals: From human to planetary health. Current Developments in Nutrition, 1(7), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1453–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo, G. D. (2018). The impact of FDI in agriculture in developing countries on host country food security. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shete, M., & Rutten, M. (2015). Impacts of large-scale farming on local communities’ food security and income levels–empirical evidence from Oromia Region Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 47(1), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhardiman, D., Giordan, M., Keovilignavong, O., & Sotoukee, T. (2015). Revealing the hidden effect of land grabbing through a better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss. Land Use Policy, 49(9), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuyen, T. Q. (2014). The impact of farmland loss on income distribution of households in Hanoi’s Peri-Urban Areas Vietnam. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 55(2), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twene, S. K. (2016). Land grabbing and rural livelihood sustainability: Experiences from the Bui Dam construction in Ghana (Issue October). Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.

  • Yengoh, G. T., & Armah, F. A. (2015). Effects of large-scale acquisition on food insecurity in Sierra Leone. Sustainability, 7(7), 9505–9539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Hanan Abdallah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 37 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 4 Small-Hsiao tests of IIA assumption (N = 635)

4,

Table 5 Wald tests for combining alternatives (N = 635)

5 and

Table 6 Mixed multinomial logit model estimates of exposure to land grabbing (First stage of the MESR)

6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdallah, AH., Ayamga, M. & Awuni, J.A. Impact of land grabbing on food security: evidence from Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 6071–6094 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02294-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02294-7

Keywords

Navigation