Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tourism growth and environmental sustainability: trade-off or convergence?

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides its socioeconomic benefits, tourism has been documented as one of the leading sectors with deleterious effects on the environment. This study investigates the relationship between tourism dynamics and environmental sustainability using biennial data for 148 countries over the period from 2006 to 2016. The first step develops a tourism growth index that encompasses various dimensions of tourism development and various panel cointegration techniques are then employed to characterize the dynamic association between environment sustainability and tourism growth. Empirical results reveal that tourism growth and environmental sustainability are indeed convergent not only for the full sample countries but also across geographical regions and socioeconomic clusters. In addition, a negative impact of tourism growth on the environmental welfare is evidenced in the long term; suggesting a trade-off between tourism activities and environment performance for the full sample over the past decade. At the regional level, similar finding is reported for Asia and Europe against a positive environmental impact for America and an inconclusive output for Africa. The observed difference might be attributed to the heterogeneity in the unsustainability level of regional tourism development with limited exposure for Africa and America. Interestingly, the convergence of tourism growth and environment well-being tends to exhibit varied speeds of adjustment across sample panels. The observed differences could be attributed to the country-level switching propensity from environment-harmful tourism practices as well as their socioeconomic characteristics. Consequently, policies geared towards minimizing the adverse environmental effects should be integrated with countries tourism management policies to enable the transition to sustainable tourism sector development. Thus, targeting nature tourism becomes a critical approach to tourism development rather than setting traditional goals such as number of visitors, income stream and employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An extensive literature exists on the determinants of environment quality, most of which advocating the detrimental effect of energy consumption, urbanization, industrialization, globalization, economic growth and financial development (Brahmasrene and Lee, 2017; Ehigiamusoe & Lean, 2019; Akadiri et al., 2019; Ehigiamusoe et al., 2020a among others).

  2. A stationary process denoted I(0) is characterized by time-invariant mean and variance. Otherwise, it is non-stationary and can be I(1) or I(2) depending on whether the stationarity is achieved after the first or the second difference, respectively.

  3. This is implemented in Stata using the command xtdcce2 proposed by Ditzen (2018).

  4. http://www.ssfindex.com/data-all-countries/.

  5. Phillips and Sul (2007) club convergence test is built on the intuition that N cross sections are likely to follow a common path to the steady state at some point in time, regardless of whether they are near the steady state or in transition. Thus convergence pattern of a group of countries is framed as a nonlinear time varying factor model allowing for various time paths as well as individual heterogeneity. Its particularity lies in the possibility to ensure endogenous determination of convergence clubs rather than exogenous a priori grouping as implemented in alternative approaches. Technical details on this test can be found in Apergis et al. (2018).

References

  • Adhikari, Y. P., & Fischer, A. (2008). Tourism: Boon for forest conservation, livelihood, and community development in Ghandruk VDC, Western Nepal. SUFFREC (p. 11).

  • Akadiri, S. S., Alola, A. A., & Akadiri, A. C. (2019). The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey. Science of the Total Environment, 687, 423–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, B., Student, J., Nicholls, S., Lamers, M., Baggio, R., Boavida-Portugal, I., Johnson, P., de Jong, E., Hofstede, G. J., Pons, M., Steiger, R., & Balbi, S. (2016). The value of agent-based modelling for assessing tourism-environment interactions in the Anthropocene. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 23, 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anup, K. C., & Parajuli, R. B. T. (2014). Tourism and its impact on livelihood in Manaslu conservation area Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16, 1053–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis, N., Christou, C., Gupta, R., & Miller, S. M. (2018). Convergence in income inequality: Further evidence from the club clustering methodology across states in the US. International Advances in Economic Research, 24, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beladia, H., Chaob, C.-C., Hazaric, B. R., & Laffargued, J. P. (2009). Tourism and the environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 31, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., & Crabtree, A. (2007). Quality assurance and certification in ecotourism. CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blersch, D. M., & Kangas, P. C. (2013). A modeling analysis of the sustainability of ecotourism in Belize. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahmasrene, T., & Lee, J. W. (2017). Assessing the dynamic impact of tourism, industrialization, urbanization, and globalization on growth and environment in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 24(4), 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J., & Pesaran, M. H. (2008). Unit Roots and Cointegration in Panels. In Mátyás L., Sevestre P. (eds) The econometrics of panel data. Advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics, vol 46. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  • Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditzen, J. (2018). Estimating dynamic common-correlated effects in Stata. The Stata Journal, 18(3), 585–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X. B., Yu, B. H., & Brown, M.T.b, Zhang, Y.S., Kang, M.Y., Jin, Y., Zhang, X.S. and Ulgiati, S. . (2014). Environmental and economic consequences of the overexploitation of natural capital and ecosystem services in Xilinguole League, China. Energy Policy, 67, 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehigiamusoe, K. U., & Lean, H. H. (2019). Effects of energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development on carbon emissions: Evidence from heterogeneous income groups. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 22611–22624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehigiamusoe, K. U., Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2020). The moderating role of energy consumption in the carbon emissions-income nexus in middle-income countries. Applied Energy, 261, 114215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehigiamusoe, K. U. (2020a). The drivers of environmental degradation in ASEAN+China: Do financial development and urbanization have any moderating effect? Singapore Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820500241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehigiamusoe, K. U. (2020b). Tourism, growth and environment: Analysis of non-linear and moderating effects. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(8), 1174–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, I., and Ghosh, S. 2007. Does tourism contribute to local livelihoods? A case study of tourism, poverty and conservation in the Indian Sundarbans. ISSN 1893-1891; 2007—WP 26) ISBN: 978-9937-8015-2-2, vol. 26-07. SANDEE (Ed.).

  • Gunn, C. (1973). Report of Tourism - Environment Study Panel. In Destination U.S.A. 5:25–34 Washington, D.C.: Report of the National Tourism Resources Review Commission.

  • Haulot, A. (1978). Cultural Protection Policy in the Field of Tourism. Parks 3:6–8.

  • Holden, B. (2009). The environment-tourism nexus: influence of market ethics. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(3), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçak, E., Ulucak, R., Ulucak, Z. S. (2019). The impact of tourism developments on CO2 emissions: An advanced panel data estimation. Tourism Management Perspectives 33, 100611.

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Zhang, C., Shen, Y., Jia, W., & Li, J. (2016). Quantitative assessment of the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification processes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on net primary productivity. CATENA, 147, 789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, S. H., & Gan, T. Y. (2018). Impact of anthropogenic climate change and human activities on environment and ecosystem services in arid regions. Science of the Total Environment, 633, 1329–1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mona, M. H., El-Naggar, H. A., El-Gayar, E. E., Masood, M. F., & Mohamed, E. N. E. (2019). Effect of human activities on biodiversity in Nabq Protected Area, South Sinai Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 45, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2019). Panel Cointegration techniques and open challenges. In: Tsionas, M. (eds) The panel data econometrics: Theory, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  • Persyn, D., & Westerlund, J. (2008). Error correction based cointegration tests for panel data. Stata Journal, 8(2), 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. P. (1997). Estimating long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels. DAE Working Papers Amalgamated Series 9721.

  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. P. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 79–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, IZA discussion paper No. 1240.

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75, 1771–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigram, J. (1977). Access to Countryside for Recreation. Paper presented at 48th ANZAAS Congress, Melbourne.

  • Pigram, J. J. (1980). Environmental implications of tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 7(4), 554–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido-Fernandez, J. I., Cardenas-García, P. J., & Espinosa-Pulido, J. A. (2019). Does environmental sustainability contribute to tourism growth? An analysis at the country level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajéa, F., Tightb, M., & Popea, F. D. (2018). Traffic pollution: A search for solutions for a city like Nairobi. Cities, 82, 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, R., & Swamy, A. (2012). Global warming, climate change and tourism: A review of literature. Culture Special Issue: Sustainability, Tourism and Environment in the Shift of A Millennium: A Peripheral View, 6(3), 72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, L., & Thapa, B. (2010). Visitor perspectives on sustainable tourism development in the pitons management area world heritage site St. Lucia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12, 839–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, T., Can, M., Paramati, S. R., Fang, J., & Wu, W. (2019). The impact of tourism quality on economic development and environment: Evidence from Mediterranean Countries. Sustainability, 11(8), 2296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, K. H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., Aloisi de Larderel, J., Basile, G., Jansen, J. L., Kuehr, R., & Wackernagel, M. (2002). Strategic sustainable development-selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. A., Relvasa, H., Gama, C., Lopes, M., Borrego, C., Rodrigues, V., Robainab, M., Madaleno, M., Carneirob, M. J., Eusebio, C., & Monteiroa, A. (2020). Estimating emissions from tourism activities. Atmospheric Environment, 220, 117048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, K., Zaman, K., Batool, R., Khurshid, M. A., Aamir, A., Shoukry, A. M., Sharkawy, M. A., Aldeek, F., Khader, J., & Gani, S. (2019). Dynamic linkages between tourism, energy, environment, and economic growth: Evidence from top 10 tourism-induced countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(30), 31273–31283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunlu, U. (2003). Environmental impacts of tourism. In: Camarda, D., Grassini, L. (ed.), Local resources and global trades: Environments and agriculture in the Mediterranean region. Bari: CIHEAM, 2003. p. 263–270 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 57)

  • Tian, S., Xu, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Human infrastructure development drives decline in suitable habitat for Reeves’s pheasant in the Dabie Mountains in the last 20 years. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., Ytterhus, B., & Eligh, J. (1999). Tourism and sustainable development: An analysis of policy and guidelines for managing provision and consumption. Sustainable Development, 7(4), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J. (2005). New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Liu, X. (2019). The roles of international tourism and renewable energy in environment: New evidence from Asian countries. Renewable Energy, 139, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatrice D. Simo-Kengne.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Regional tourism growth

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Appendix 2: Sustainability indices across regions

figure e

Appendix 3: Technical details on PCA

The PCA as introduced by Jolliffe (2002) consists of decomposing each observation from a sample into principal components.

Let X be a vector of p variables on a sample of n observations:

$$X = \left( {x_{1} ,x_{2} ,...,x_{p} } \right)$$

The first principal component of the sample is defined by the linear transformation:

$$z_{1} \equiv a_{1}^{T} X = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{p} {a_{i1} x_{i} }$$

where the vector \(a_{1} = \left( {a_{11} ,a_{21} ,...,a_{p1} } \right)\) is such that \(Var\left( {z_{1} } \right)\,\,\,is\,\,\max imum\).

Similarly, the kth principal component of the sample is defined by the linear transformation:

$$z_{k} \equiv a_{k}^{T} X = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{p} {a_{ik} x_{i} } \,\,\,\,\,\,k = 1,...,p$$

where the vector \(a_{k} = \left( {a_{1k} ,a_{2k} ,...,a_{pk} } \right)\) is such that \(Var\left( {z_{k} } \right)\,\,\,is\,\,\max imum\). subject to \(\left\{ \begin{gathered} {\text{cov}} \left[ {z_{k} ,z_{l} } \right] = 0\,\,\,\,for\,\,\,k > l \ge 1 \hfill \\ and \hfill \\ a_{k}^{T} a_{k} = 1 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.\)

It is shown that \({\text{cov}} \left[ {z_{1} ,z_{2} } \right] = a_{1}^{T} Sa_{2} = \lambda_{1} a_{1}^{T} a_{2}\). where S is the covariance matrix and \(\lambda_{1}\) the largest eigenvalue of S.

In general, the kth eigenvalue of S is the variance of the kth principal component; that is:\(Var\left[ {z_{k} } \right] = a_{k}^{T} Sa_{k} = \lambda_{k}\).

Therefore, the kth principal component retains the kth greatest fraction of the variation in the sample.

For data compression, PCA reduces the dimensionality of the data from p to m by approximating \(X \cong X^{m} = Z^{m} A^{mT}\).

Where.

  • \(Z^{m}\) is the \(n \times m\) portion of \(Z\) and \(A^{m}\) is the \(p \times m\) portion of \(A\)

  • \(Z = A^{T} X\) and A being an orthogonal \(p \times p\) matrix.

  • \(Z = \left( {z_{1} ,z_{2} ,...,z_{p} } \right)\) and X as defined previously

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simo-Kengne, B.D. Tourism growth and environmental sustainability: trade-off or convergence?. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 8115–8144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01775-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01775-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation